One-Stage Factor VIII Assays

The Role of the von Willebrand Factor Collagen-Binding Assay (VWF:CB) in the Diagnosis and Treatment of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and Way Beyond: A Comprehensive 36-Year History

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay was first reported for use in von Willebrand diagnostics in 1986, by Brown and Bosak. Since then, the VWF:CB has continued to be used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease (VWD) (correctly) and also to help assign the correct subtype, as well as to assist in the monitoring of VWD therapy, especially desmopressin (DDAVP). However, it is important to recognize that the specific value of any VWF:CB is predicated on the use of an optimized VWF:CB, and that not all VWF:CB assays are so optimized. There are some good commercial assays available, but there are also some "not-so-good" commercial assays available, and these may continue to give the VWF:CB "a bad reputation." In addition to VWD diagnosis and management, the VWF:CB found purpose in a variety of other applications, from assessing ADAMTS13 activity, to investigation into acquired von Willebrand syndrome (especially as associated with use of mechanical circulatory support or cardiac assist devices), to assessment of VWF activity in disease states in where an excess of high-molecular-weight VWF may accumulate, and lead to increased (micro)thrombosis risk (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura). The VWF:CB turns 37 in 2023. This review is a celebration of the utility of the VWF:CB over this nearly 40-year history.

Performance characteristics of 5 numerical indexes in mixing test interpretation under coexistence of lupus anticoagulant and coagulation factor deficiency

Background

The mixing test is useful to investigate the cause of unexpectedly prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Several indexes are available for distinguishing correction from non-correction (ie, factor deficiency from inhibitors), but their performance characteristics may differ because of their different formulas. Furthermore, it is unclear how each index performs under the coexistence of factor deficiency and inhibitors.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to examine the differences in indexes, depending on factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) levels and lupus anticoagulant (LA) titers in test samples.

Methods

APTT was measured in spiked samples with various FVIII:C levels and LA titers, normal pooled plasma (NPP), and their 4:1, 1:1, and 1:4 mixtures. The following 5 indexes were calculated: index of circulating anticoagulant, mixing test normalized ratio, 4:1 and 1:1 percent corrections, and an APTT difference between the 1:1 mixture and NPP. The samples with LA, showing correction, were measured for FVIII:C in a one-stage assay to check parallelism.

Results

All indexes showed correction under FVIII deficiency and non-correction under higher LA titers. However, under lower LA titers, some indexes showed non-correction but others showed correction because of dilution effects and variations in formulas and/or sample mix ratios. The differences among the indexes were more pronounced under coexistent FVIII deficiency and LA, even though LA titers were equal in the tested samples; samples with lower FVIII:C showed correction, whereas those with normal FVIII:C showed non-correction. The samples tested for FVIII:C showed non-parallelism.

Conclusion

Each index had different performance characteristics to LA samples, which were pronounced under low FVIII:C levels in test samples.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Disease Using a Composite Rapid 3-Test Chemiluminescence-Based von Willebrand Factor Assay Panel

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most commonly reported inherited bleeding disorder and may alternatively occur as an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). VWD/AVWS develops from defects and/or deficiency in the adhesive plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD/AVWS diagnosis/exclusion remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of VWF defects and the technical limitations of many VWF tests, as well as the VWF test panels (number and type of tests) chosen by many laboratories. Laboratory testing for these disorders utilizes evaluation of VWF level and activity, with activity assessment needing several tests due to the many functions performed by VWF in order to help counteract bleeding. This report explains procedures for evaluating VWF level (antigen; VWF:Ag) and activity by means of a chemiluminescence-based panel. Activity assays comprise collagen binding (VWF:CB) and a ristocetin-based recombinant glycoprotein Ib-binding (VWF:GPIbR) assay that reflects a contemporary alternative to classical ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). This 3-test VWF panel (Ag, CB, GPIbR [RCo]) reflects the only such composite panel available on a single platform and is performed on an AcuStar instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory). Certain regional approvals may also allow this 3-test VWF panel to be performed on the BioFlash instrument (Werfen/Instrumentation Laboratory).

Anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies against emicizumab enable accurate procoagulant and anticoagulant assays, irrespective of the test base, in the presence of emicizumab

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab markedly shortens the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), resulting in inaccurate measurements of procoagulant and anticoagulant factor activities. We have recently reported that mixtures of two different anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies against emicizumab (anti-emicizumab-mAbs) allow measurement of factor (F)VIII activity (FVIII:C) and FVIII inhibitor in emicizumab-containing plasmas. It is unknown whether anti-emicizumab mAbs can work for other aPTT-based procoagulant and anticoagulant assays.

AIM

To investigate whether anti-emicizumab mAbs were measured by all of the aPTT-based assays tested.

METHODS

Two anti-emicizumab-mAbs (300 μg/mL each) were preincubated with emicizumab (200 μg/mL)-spiked FVIII-deficient plasma; we then measured FVIII:C, FIX:C, FXI:C, FXII:C, protein (P)C:C, PS:C, global PC-FV (aPTT-based), and prothrombin time (PT), diluted Russel's viper venom time (dRVVT), chromogenic-based FVIII:C, FIX:C and PC:C (non-aPTT-based). Emicizumab (100 μg/mL)-spiked haemophilia (H)A plasmas from patients (n = 23) were also measured.

RESULTS

Emicizumab shortened the clotting time in all aPTT-based assays, resulting in high levels of FVIII:C, FIX:C, FXI:C and FXII:C; low levels of PC:C and PS:C; and false-positive results for activated PC resistance. The addition of anti-emicizumab-mAbs to emicizumab-added plasma restored all factors to the initial levels without emicizumab. Chromogenic FVIII:C measurement by human FIXa/FX was affected by emicizumab, but anti-emicizumab mAbs cancelled this effect. PT-based assays and dRVVT, chromogenic FIX:C and PC:C assays showed no effect with emicizumab. Twenty-three plasma samples from HA patients also showed similar patterns.

CONCLUSION

Anti-emicizumab mAbs in vitro could cancel the effect of emicizumab, irrespective of the test base, resulting in accurate measurements of procoagulant and anticoagulant factor activity.

Hemostasis and Thrombosis: An Overview Focusing on Associated Laboratory Testing to Diagnose and Help Manage Related Disorders

Hemostasis is a complex but balanced process that permit normal blood flow, without adverse events. Disruption of the balance may lead to bleeding or thrombotic events, and clinical interventions may be required. Hemostasis laboratories typically offer an array of tests, including routine coagulation and specialized hemostasis assays used to guide clinicians for diagnosing and managing patients. Routine assays may be used to screen patients for hemostasis-related disturbances but may also be used for drug monitoring, measuring efficacy of replacement or adjunctive therapy, and other indications, which may then be used to guide further patient management. Similarly, "specialized" assays are used for diagnostic purposes or may be used to monitor or measure efficacy of a given therapy. This chapter provides an overview of hemostasis and thrombosis, with a focus on laboratory testing that may be used to diagnose and help manage patients suspected of hemostasis- and thrombosis-related disorders.

Harmonizing factor assay-related testing performed in a large laboratory network

Coagulation factor testing is commonly performed within haemostasis laboratories, either to assess for bleeding disorders, such as haemophilia, or to investigate unexplained prolongation in routine coagulation assays. The aim of this evaluation was to harmonize procedures and normal reference ranges (NRRs) for investigation of coagulation factors on the ACL TOP 50 family of instruments in a large laboratory network. We employed comparative evaluations using newly installed ACL TOPs 550 and 750 and HemosIL reagents vs. existing 'reference' instrumentation and reagents, predominantly Stago and Siemens, as well as assessment of factor sensitivity in routine coagulation assays, prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Also, establishment of coagulation factor NRRs using normal plasma samples. HemosIL factor assays showed good comparability with the existing reference methods (R > 0.9). Factor sensitivity for PT and APTT assays were acceptable at around 30 U/dl. NRRs were established and harmonized across the laboratory network. This evaluation of factor testing on ACL TOP 50 Family instruments identified overall acceptable performance using Werfen reagents and enabled harmonization of coagulation factor testing in our large network.

Emicizumab enhances thrombus formation in vitro under high shear flow conditions in whole blood from patients with type 1 and type 3 von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 and type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) are caused by partial and complete, quantitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF), respectively, and factor (F)VIII/VWF complex concentrates are used for haemostatic treatment. Emicizumab, mimics activated FVIII, reduces bleeding in haemophilia A patients. The effects of emicizumab on haemostasis in both types of VWD remain to be fully established, however.

AIM

To examine the effects of emicizumab on thrombogenesis in type 1 and type 3 VWD.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Perfusion chamber experiments under high shear conditions (2500 s^-1 ) combined with immunostaining were performed using whole blood samples from patients with type 1 (VWF:Ag 25 U/dl) and type 3 VWD (<1.0 U/dl).

RESULTS

The addition of FVIII (1 U/ml) to type 1 blood did not affect thrombus formation, whilst supplementation with VWF (1.6 U/ml) or FVIII/VWF (1 U/ml/1.6 U/ml) enhanced thrombogenesis to a similar extent. FVIII/VWF promoted thrombus formation significantly more than VWF alone, however, in type 3 blood. Emicizumab (100 μg/ml) augmented thrombus formation in type 3 blood compared to FVIII, and this potency seemed to be somewhat greater than that of VWF. Surface coverage of formed thrombus in type 3 VWD was less than that in type 1 VWD, but thrombus height was comparable in both. The addition of emicizumab to type 3 blood enhanced thrombin generation and fibrin formation compared to control IgG.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab promoted mechanisms of thrombus formation in vitro in type 3 and type 1 VWD, suggesting the possibility of alternative therapeutic protocols in these patients.

Should multiple factor dilutions be performed for all patient coagulation factor assays? Let the debate begin!

Laboratory assessment of blood coagulation factors may be undertaken for various reasons, including investigating the possibility of hemophilia or unexpected prolongation in routine coagulation assays (eg, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time). Several guidelines recommend performing multiple dilutions (usually 2‐3) on all patient test samples to evaluate “parallelism” as a guide to the presence of potential “inhibitors,” be they factor inhibitors, lupus anticoagulant, or related to the presence of anticoagulant therapy. The current Forum argues against mandating investigation of parallelism (or multiple dilutions) for all samples destined for testing, instead suggesting that a more targeted approach will likely provide better clinical utility and use of laboratory resources.

How can Secondary Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Pregnant Patients be Improved?

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is suggested for thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women with previous venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anyway, there is only limited amount of studies evaluating the effect of LMWH on hemostatic parameters during pregnancy of patients with previous VTE and the need of secondary thromboprophylaxis. We therefore provide results of prospective and longitudinal assessment of changes in hemostasis in high-risk pregnant women at four times during pregnancy (T1–T4) and one time after the postpartum period (T5) used for individualized modification of thromboprophylaxis. In this study, the results of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and protein S (PS) activity, ProC Global ratio and anti-Xa activity were evaluated. Despite the thromboprophylaxis, an increased predisposition to thromboembolic complications was detected (significant increase in FVIII activity and decrease in PS function, ProC Global ratio not normalized even after the postpartum period – p < .0001 between controls and T5 for PS and ProC Global). These results indicate that hemostasis may not be restored even 6 to 8 weeks after delivery and pose the question when is it safe to withdraw the anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients with prior VTE.

Pharmacokinetics of perioperative FVIII in adult patients with haemophilia A: An external validation and development of an alternative population pharmacokinetic model

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A patients require perioperative clotting factor replacement to limit excessive bleeding. Weight-based dosing of Factor VIII (FVIII) does not account for inter-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability, and may lead to suboptimal FVIII exposure.

AIM

To perform an external validation of a previously developed population PK (popPK) model of perioperative FVIII in haemophilia A patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified perioperative haemophilia A patients at the University of North Carolina (UNC) between April 2014 and November 2019. Patient data was used to externally validate a previously published popPK model proposed by Hazendonk. Based on these validation results, a modified popPK model was developed to characterize FVIII PK in our patients. Dosing simulations were performed using this model to compare FVIII target attainment between intermittent bolus (IB) and continuous infusion (CI) administration methods.

RESULTS

A total of 521 FVIII concentrations, drawn from 34 patients, were analysed. Validation analyses revealed that the Hazendonk model did not fully capture FVIII PK in the UNC cohort. Therefore, a modified one-compartment model, with weight and age as covariates on clearance (CL), was developed. Dosing simulations revealed that CI resulted in improved target attainment by 16%, with reduced overall FVIII usage by 58 IU/kg, compared to IB.

CONCLUSION

External validation revealed a previously published popPK model of FVIII did not adequately characterize UNC patients, likely due to differences in patient populations. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate our model prior to implementation into clinical practice.

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand Disease: Differences in Phenotypic Parameters According to the Affected Domain by Disease-Causing Variants and Assessment of Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) broadly show similar phenotypic parameters, but involve different pathophysiological mechanisms. This report presents the clinical and laboratory profiles of type 2A and type 2M patients genotypically diagnosed at one large center. Higher bleeding score values and a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes were observed in type 2A compared with type 2M, potentially reflective of the absence of large and intermediate von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers in 2A. In type 2A, most of disease-causing variants (DCVs) appeared to be responsible for increased VWF clearance and DCV clustered in the VWF-A1 domain resulted in more severe clinical profiles. In type 2M, DCV in the VWF-A1 domain showed different laboratory patterns, related to either reduced synthesis or shortened VWF survival, and DCV in the VWF-A2 domain showed patterns related mainly to shortened survival. VWF-type 1 collagen binding/Ag (C1B/Ag) showed different patterns according to DCV location: in type 2A VWD, C1B/Ag was much lower when DCVs were located in the VWF-A2 domain. In type 2M with DCV in the VWF-A1domain, C1B/Ag was normal, but with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain, C1B/Ag was low. The higher frequency of major bleeding in VWD 2M patients with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain than that with DCV in the VWF-A1 domain could be a summative effect of abnormal C1B/Ag, on top of the reduced VWF-GPIb binding. In silico modeling suggests that DCV impairing the VWF-A2 domain somehow modulates collagen binding to the VWF-A3 domain. Concomitant normal FVIII:C/Ag and VWFpp/Ag, mainly in type 2M VWD, suggest that other nonidentified pathophysiological mechanisms, neither related to synthesis/retention nor survival of VWF, would be responsible for the presenting phenotype.

2B or not 2B? A diagnosis of von Willebrand disease a lifetime of 86 years in the making

Type 2B von Willebrand disease (2B VWD) is a rare, autosomal dominant bleeding disorder characterized by a hyperadhesive form of von Willebrand factor (VWF). 2B VWD expresses phenotypically as an enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation and usually also a discordance in VWF activity versus protein level, with loss of high molecular weight VWF and (mild) thrombocytopenia. While all cases of 2B VWD supposedly share these characteristics, there is significant heterogeneity in laboratory findings within this group of patients, which are largely dictated by the underlying genetic defect. We present a case of such a patient, expressing a clearly atypical VWF phenotype, but as still associated with enhanced ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation, thrombocytopenia, and a previously undescribed VWF variant (c.4130C>G; p.Ala1377Gly). The patient was misdiagnosed over his lifetime as idiotypic thrombocytopenia - a (mis)diagnosis that took a lifetime of 86 years to redress.

Emicizumab improves thrombus formation of type 2A von willebrand disease under high shear condition

INTRODUCTION

Type 2A von Willebrand disease (VWD) is common in type-2 group caused by qualitative deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody that mimics activated factor VIII (FVIIIa) cofactor function, and emicizumab prophylaxis substantially reduces bleeding in patients with haemophilia A. It is unknown whether emicizumab affects thrombus formation in type 2A VWD characterized by not only low FVIII levels but also the impaired platelet adhesion and aggregation.

AIM

To examine the coagulant potential of emicizumab in type 2A VWD.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Perfusion chamber experiments combined with immunostaining were performed using whole blood from 5 patients with type 2A VWD under high shear condition (2500 s^-1 ).

RESULTS

The addition of FVIII to type 2A VWD whole blood did not augment thrombus formation, whilst supplementation with VWF or FVIII/VWF enhanced. FVIII appeared to contribute to thrombus height rather than surface coverage. The addition of emicizumab enhanced thrombus formation in type 2A VWD compared with FVIII, but this potency was less than the presence of VWF. The effect on thrombus formation mediated by emicizumab appeared to be more rapid than that by FVIII for non-requirement of activation step of FVIII, whilst that by FVIII showed more impact on thrombus formation at the late phase.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab-induced enhancing effects of thrombus formation, independent on VWF, may be useful as an alternative therapy for type 2A VWD patients. These results supported a critical role for the FVIII-VWF complex facilitating thrombus formation under high shear.

A microchip flow-chamber assay screens congenital primary hemostasis disorders

BACKGROUND

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) and platelet function disorders (PFDs) are congenital bleeding disorders caused by primary hemostasis defects. Platelet function tests are time-consuming and require considerable amounts of blood sample, and there have been no easy-to-use assays for assessing platelet function quickly and sensitively. We report the usefulness of a microchip flow-chamber system (T-TAS^® ) for detecting and/or predicting clinical severity in patients with VWD type 1 and type 2N and platelet storage pool disease. Here, we developed an application of a screening assay for primary hemostasis disorders.

METHODS

Microchips coated with collagen (PL-chip) and collagen/thromboplastin (AR-chip) were utilized to evaluate platelet thrombus formation (PTF) at high shear and fibrin-rich PTF at low shear, respectively, in whole blood samples from 22 patients with VWD (16 type 2A, four type 2B, two type 3) and four patients with PFDs (two BSS, two Glanzmann thrombasthenia). The time-to-increase by 10 kPa (T₁₀ ) was calculated from flow pressure curves. Also, whole blood-induced platelet aggregation was assessed using Multiplate^® analysis.

RESULTS

PL-chip T₁₀ values ≥10 min successfully distinguished patients with all types of VWD and PFDs from healthy controls, irrespective of age, bleeding scores, and von Willebrand factor levels. However, AR-chip assay incompletely distinguished between type 2A patients and healthy ones. Multiplate analysis permitted screening of PFDs and type 3 VWD, but values in type 2A partially overlapped with those in controls. PL-chip assay did not reflect the clinical severity in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

T-TAS with PL-chip could be a quick screening tool for congenital primary hemostasis disorder, VWD, and PFDs.

Navigating the Myriad of von Willebrand Factor Assays

von Willebrand factor (VWF) represents a large and complex adhesive plasma protein whose main function is to provide a bridge between blood platelets and damaged endothelium, and thus facilitate primary hemostasis. VWF also binds to FVIII, preventing early proteolysis, and delivers this cargo to sites of vascular injury, thereby promoting clot formation and secondary hemostasis. An absence, deficiency, or defect in VWF can lead to a bleeding diathesis called von Willebrand disease (VWD), considered the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Contemporary laboratory assays used in VWD diagnosis/exclusion comprise a myriad of assays that identify the quantity (level) of VWF, as well as the multitude of VWF activities. These may use the following test abbreviations: VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, VWF:CB, VWF:GPIbR, VWF:GPIbM, VWF:FVIIB, VWF:Ab. The current review explains what these assays are, as well as their place in VWD diagnostics.

Discrepant Hemophilia A: An Underdiagnosed Disease Entity

OBJECTIVES

The term discrepant hemophilia A (DHA) denotes the discrepancy between factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) measured by different assay methodologies in patients with nonsevere hemophilia A (HA). The objective was to review the characteristics and the current understanding of mechanisms contributing to assay discrepancy in DHA.

METHODS

Characteristics of the DHA patients treated were examined by retrospective chart review. In addition, a literature review was performed to determine the current understanding of DHA.

RESULTS

Three cases of DHA were diagnosed based on bleeding phenotype: 2 cases represented missed diagnoses of HA, and 1 represented misclassification of hemophilia severity. The revised diagnosis and classification of hemophilia directly affected clinical management. Review of the literature identified 18 articles with an estimated pooled prevalence of 36% (95% CI, 23%-56%; I2 = 85%; P < .01) among nonsevere HA. Furthermore, literature indicated that DHA is a feature of how different FVIII gene mutations affect FVIII:C activity within different assay methodologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience and literature review suggested that DHA is not only a laboratory phenomenon-it can affect clinical management in a subset of patients. A high index of suspicion for DHA is necessary while evaluating bleeding patients and/or classifying nonsevere HA.

Quantification of coagulation factor VIII in human plasma with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry using a selective sample purification with camelid nanobodies

Patients with hemophilia A are currently diagnosed and monitored by measuring the activity of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) in plasma mostly with the one-stage clotting assay (OSA). Although the OSA is routinely available in many clinical laboratories, it has in some circumstances relatively low sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, the FVIII activity as a biomarker does not always correlate with the bleeding phenotype. Therefore, we have developed a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method to quantify the concentration of coagulation FVIII in plasma which would allow us to investigate the relation between FVIII plasma concentration, FVIII activity and bleeding tendency in future studies. LC-MS/MS method was set up by firstly dissociation Von Willebrand factor (VWF) from coagulation factor VIII by triggering the coagulation cascade to occur thus generating active factor VIII (FVIIIa). FVIIIa was then selectively extracted by means of immunoaffinity interaction using anti-FVIII camelid nanobody, after which FVIIIa was eluted, heat denatured and trypsin digested. Finally, a FVIII specific peptide was used as a surrogate for quantification by mass spectrometry. Critical method parameters such as antibody amount, incubation time, sample volume and type of streptavidin 96 well plate were optimized. The method was validated according to European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines where an LLOQ of 1 ng/mL was obtained using 50 μL of citrate plasma sample. Within-run and between-run accuracy and precision for quality control (QC) samples, LLOQ (1 ng/mL), QC Low (5 ng/mL), QC Med (150 ng/mL), QC High (300 ng/mL) were within the threshold of 15% relative standard deviation (RSD) and Bias. The selective immunoaffinity method which was used in combination with a highly sensitive mass spectrometer allowed for an unpresented LLOQ of 1 ng/mL utilizing 50 μL plasma sample. This method will be used to investigate the beneficial value of FVIII plasma concentration which may be used in conjunction with FVIII activity for patient diagnosis and dosage optimization.

Emicizumab (ACE910): Clinical background and laboratory assessment of hemophilia A

Congenital hemophilia A, a relatively common and sometimes life-threatening bleeding disorder, is caused by inherited deficiency of clotting factor (F) VIII. The adoption of an appropriate medical and environmental prophylaxis is critical for long-term management of hemophilia because it will considerably reduce the number of both mild and severe bleeding episodes. Among the many therapeutic options that have become available over the past decades, ACE910 (also known as emicizumab) is a bispecific immunoglobulin G antibody characterized by its unique ability to bind FIX or FIXa on one arm and FX on the other, thus abrogating FVIII activity in vivo. Several phase I to III clinical trials have now been published, confirming the clinical efficacy and relative safety of this new agent for long-term prophylaxis of hemophilia A, especially those patients having FVIII inhibitors. The recent regulatory clearance of ACE910 in many countries will hence impose additional challenges to clinical laboratories because the panel of available tests will need to address the emerging issue of monitoring patients treated with this novel anti-hemophilic agent by using conventional as well as innovative approaches. Therefore, this article is aimed to provide an update on clinical background and challenges of laboratory assessment in hemophilia A patients undergoing ACE910 administration.

Postanalytical considerations that may improve the diagnosis or exclusion of haemophilia and von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) and haemophilia represent the most common inherited or acquired bleeding disorders. However, many laboratories and clinicians may be challenged by their accurate diagnosis or exclusion. Difficulties in diagnosis/exclusion may include analytical issues, where assays occasionally generate an incorrect result (ie representing an analytical error) or have limitations in their measurement range of and/or low analytical sensitivity. Also increasingly recognized is the influence of preanalytical issues on the diagnosis of VWD or haemophilia. Unfortunately, postanalytical considerations are often not well considered in the diagnostic process. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an overview of some important postanalytical considerations that may help improve the diagnosis of VWD and haemophilia. This review primarily discusses aspects around reporting of test results. However, we also discuss other less well-recognized postanalytical considerations, including the use of assay ratios to help identify differential diagnoses and then guide further investigation.