Circulating MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Humans

A Novel MicroRNA Signature for Cholestatic Drugs in Human Hepatocytes and Its Translation into Novel Circulating Biomarkers for Drug-Induced Liver Injury Patients

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) diagnosis and classification (hepatocellular, cholestatic, and mixed) relies on traditional clinical biomarkers (eg ALT and ALP), despite limitations such as extrahepatic interferences, narrow dynamic ranges, and low mechanistic value. microRNAs may be very useful for complementing traditional DILI biomarkers but most studies in this direction have considered only paracetamol poisoning. Thus the value of microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for idiosyncratic DILI has not yet been demonstrated. In this study, we first examined the effect of model cholestatic drugs on the human hepatocyte miRNome by RNAseq and RT-qPCR. Results demonstrated that chlorpromazine, cyclosporin A, and ANIT induced (miR-21-3p, -21-5p, -22-3p, -27a-5p, -1260b, -34a-5p, and -98-5p) and repressed (-122-5p, -192-5p, -30c-5p, -424-5p, and -16-5p) specific miRNAs in sandwich-cultured upcyte hepatocytes. However, no common signature was found for cholestatic drugs. Next we investigated the levels of these miRNA in human serum and found that most were also significantly altered in cholestatic/mixed DILI patients upon hospital/ambulatory admission. However, miR-122-5p, -192-5p, -34a-5p, and -22-3p demonstrated a much more significant induction in patients with hepatocellular DILI, thus revealing better specificity for hepatocellular damage. Time-course analyses demonstrated that -1260b and -146 had a very similar profile to ALP, but with wider dynamic ranges, while -16-5p and -451a showed a negative correlation. Conversely, -122-5p and -192-5p correlated with ALT but with wider dynamic ranges and faster recoveries. Finally, the 122/451a and 122/16 ratios showed excellent prediction performances in both the study [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) >0.93] and the validation cohort (AUROC > 0.82), and can, therefore, be postulated for the first time as circulating miRNA biomarkers for idiosyncratic DILI.

Diagnostic Biomarkers in Liver Injury by Drugs, Herbs, and Alcohol: Tricky Dilemma after EMA Correctly and Officially Retracted Letter of Support

Liver injuries caused by the use of exogenous compounds such as drugs, herbs, and alcohol are commonly well diagnosed using laboratory tests, toxin analyses, or eventually reactive intermediates generated during metabolic degradation of the respective chemical in the liver and subject to covalent binding by target proteins. Conditions are somewhat different for idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI), for which metabolic intermediates as diagnostic aids are rarely available. Although the diagnosis of idiosyncratic DILI can well be established using the validated, liver specific, structured, and quantitative RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method), there is an ongoing search for new diagnostic biomarkers that could assist in and also confirm RUCAM-based DILI diagnoses. With respect to idiosyncratic DILI and following previous regulatory letters of recommendations, selected biomarkers reached the clinical focus, including microRNA-122, microRNA-192, cytokeratin analogues, glutamate dehydrogenase, total HMGB-1 (High Mobility Group Box), and hyperacetylated HMGB-1 proteins. However, the new parameters total HMGB-1, and even more so the acetylated HMGB-1, came under critical scientific fire after misconduct at one of the collaborating partner centers, leading the EMA to recommend no longer the exploratory hyperacetylated HMGB1 isoform biomarkers in clinical studies. The overall promising nature of the recommended biomarkers was considered by EMA as highly dependent on the outstanding results of the now incriminated biomarker hyperacetylated HMGB-1. The EMA therefore correctly decided to officially retract its Letter of Support affecting all biomarkers listed above. New biomarkers are now under heavy scrutiny that will require re-evaluations prior to newly adapted recommendations. With Integrin beta 3 (ITGB3), however, a new diagnostic biomarker may emerge, possibly being drug specific but tested in only 16 patients; due to substantial remaining uncertainties, final recommendations would be premature. In conclusion, most of the currently recommended new biomarkers have lost regulatory support due to scientific misconduct, requiring now innovative approaches and re-evaluation before they can be assimilated into clinical practice.