Toxicogenomics and classic toxicology: how to improve prediction and mechanistic understanding of human toxicity

Joint Decision-Making Model Based on Consensus Modeling Technology for the Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the major cause of clinical trial failure and postmarketing withdrawals of approved drugs. It is very expensive and time-consuming to evaluate hepatotoxicity using animal or cell-based experiments in the early stage of drug development. In this study, an in silico model based on the joint decision-making strategy was developed for DILI assessment using a relatively large dataset of 2608 compounds. Five consensus models were developed with PaDEL descriptors and PubChem, Substructure, Estate, and Klekota–Roth fingerprints, respectively. Submodels for each consensus model were obtained through joint optimization. The parameters and features of each submodel were optimized jointly based on the hybrid quantum particle swarm optimization (HQPSO) algorithm. The application domain (AD) based on the frequency-weighted and distance (FWD)-based method and Tanimoto similarity index showed the wide AD of the qualified consensus models. A joint decision-making model was integrated by the qualified consensus models, and the overwhelming majority principle was used to improve the performance of consensus models. The application scope narrowing caused by the overwhelming majority principle was successfully solved by joint decision-making. The proposed model successfully predicted 99.2% of the compounds in the test set, with an accuracy of 80.0%, a sensitivity of 83.9, and a specificity of 73.3%. For an external validation set containing 390 compounds collected from DILIrank, 98.2% of the compounds were successfully predicted with an accuracy of 79.9%, a sensitivity of 97.1%, and a specificity of 66.0%. Furthermore, 25 privileged substructures responsible for DILI were identified from Substructure, PubChem, and Klekota–Roth fingerprints. These privileged substructures can be regarded as structural alerts in hepatotoxicity evaluation. Compared with the main published studies, our method exhibits certain advantage in data size, transparency, and standardization of the modeling process and accuracy and credibility of prediction results. It is a promising tool for virtual screening in the early stage of drug development.

Comparing Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one the most unpredictable adverse reactions to xenobiotics in humans and the leading cause of postmarketing withdrawals of approved drugs. To date, these drugs have been collated by the FDA to form the DILIRank database, which classifies DILI severity and potential. These classifications have been used by various research groups in generating computational predictions for this type of liver injury. Recently, groups from Pfizer and AstraZeneca have collated DILI in vitro data and physicochemical properties for compounds that can be used along with data from the FDA to build machine learning models for DILI. In this study, we have used these data sets, as well as the Biopharmaceutics Drug Disposition Classification System data set, to generate Bayesian machine learning models with our in-house software, Assay Central. The performance of all machine learning models was assessed through both the internal 5-fold cross-validation metrics and prediction accuracy of an external test set of compounds with known hepatotoxicity. The best-performing Bayesian model was based on the DILI-concern category from the DILIRank database with an ROC of 0.814, a sensitivity of 0.741, a specificity of 0.755, and an accuracy of 0.746. A comparison of alternative machine learning algorithms, such as k-nearest neighbors, support vector classification, AdaBoosted decision trees, and deep learning methods, produced similar statistics to those generated with the Bayesian algorithm in Assay Central. This study demonstrates machine learning models grouped in a tool called MegaTox that can be used to predict early-stage clinical compounds, as well as recent FDA-approved drugs, to identify potential DILI.

Genomic impact of cigarette smoke, with application to three smoking-related diseases

There is considerable evidence that inhaled toxicants such as cigarette smoke can cause both irreversible changes to the genetic material (DNA mutations) and putatively reversible changes to the epigenetic landscape (changes in the DNA methylation and chromatin modification state). The diseases that are believed to involve genetic and epigenetic perturbations include lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cardiovascular disease (CVD), all of which are strongly linked epidemiologically to cigarette smoking. In this review, we highlight the significance of genomics and epigenomics in these major smoking-related diseases. We also summarize the in vitro and in vivo findings on the specific perturbations that smoke and its constituent compounds can inflict upon the genome, particularly on the pulmonary system. Finally, we review state-of-the-art genomics and new techniques such as high-throughput sequencing and genome-wide chromatin assays, rapidly evolving techniques which have allowed epigenetic changes to be characterized at the genome level. These techniques have the potential to significantly improve our understanding of the specific mechanisms by which exposure to environmental chemicals causes disease. Such mechanistic knowledge provides a variety of opportunities for enhanced product safety assessment and the discovery of novel therapeutic interventions.

Biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury

Of the estimated 10,000 documented human drugs, more than 1000 have been associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), although causality has not always been established clearly. Numerous biomarkers for DILI have been explored, but less than ten are adopted or qualified as valid by the US FDA. The biomarkers for DILI are individual or a panel of proteins, nucleic acids or metabolites from various sources, such as the liver, blood and urine. While most DILI biomarkers are drug independent, some possibly 'drug-specific' DILIs have been explored, but specificity and sensitivity of both types need to be improved for the diagnosis of DILI during drug development and in clinical practice. Novel approaches for DILI biomarkers have been actively investigated recently, but produced mainly animal-based biomarkers, which are possibly useful for drug development, but are not suitable or have not been validated for clinical applications. This review summarizes the current practice and future perspectives for DILI biomarkers.