Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Hepatitis

Advances in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy of Malignant Melanoma

Malignant melanoma (MM) is a malignant tumor, resulting from mutations in melanocytes of the skin and mucous membranes. Its mortality rate accounts for 90% of all dermatologic tumor mortality. Traditional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy are unable to achieve the expected results due to MM's low sensitivity, high drug resistance, and toxic side effects. As treatment advances, immunotherapy and targeted therapy have made significant breakthroughs in the treatment of MM and have demonstrated promising application prospects. However, the heterogeneity of tumor immune response causes more than half of patients to not benefit from clinical immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which delays the patient's condition and causes them to suffer adverse immune events' side effects. The combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy can help improve therapeutic effects, delay drug resistance, and mitigate adverse effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current development status and research progress of immune checkpoints, targeted genes, and their inhibitors, with a view to providing a reference for the clinical treatment of MM.

Immune checkpoint inhibition of metastatic melanoma: achieving high efficacy in the face of high toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the treatment of metastatic melanoma by blocking immune system down-regulators enhancing T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. However, many ICIs induce immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that can impact many organ systems.

AREAS COVERED

Strategies used to manage irAEs include corticosteroids, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agents, other biological therapies, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and emerging regimens. In this review, we describe current evidence for the efficacy of ICIs, acute and chronic immune toxicities, and strategies to manage toxicities for patients treated with ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

IrAE management will likely evolve by developing more tailored approaches to prevent toxicities, improving non-steroidal management strategies and tailoring the dose of steroids, and identifying biomarkers of severe toxicities.

Hepatitis-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, have become a standard treatment for multiple cancer types. However, ICIs can induce immune-related adverse events, with hepatitis-related adverse events (HRAEs) being of particular concern. Our objective is to identify and characterize HRAEs that exhibit a significant association with ICIs using real-world data. Methods: In this observational and retrospective pharmacovigilance study, we extracted real-world adverse events reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database spanning from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2023. We conducted both Frequentist and Bayesian methodologies in the framework of disproportionality analysis, which included the reporting odds ratios (ROR) and information components (IC) to explore the intricate relationship between ICIs and HRAEs. Results: Through disproportionality analysis, we identified three categories of HRAEs as being significantly related with ICIs, including autoimmune hepatitis (634 cases, ROR 19.34 [95% CI 17.80-21.02]; IC025 2.43), immune-mediated hepatitis (546 cases, ROR 217.24 [189.95-248.45]; IC025 4.75), and hepatitis fulminant (80 cases, ROR 4.56 [3.65-5.70]; IC025 0.49). The median age of patients who report ICI-related HRAEs was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53.8-72), with a fatal outcome observed in 24.9% (313/1,260) of these reports. Cases pertaining to skin cancer, lung cancer, and kidney cancer constituted the majority of these occurrences. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies exhibited a higher frequency of immune-mediated hepatitis in comparison to those undergoing anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, with a ROR of 3.59 (95% CI 1.78-6.18). Moreover, the dual ICI therapy demonstrated higher reporting rates of ICI-related HRAEs compared to ICI monotherapy. Conclusion: Our findings confirm that ICI treatment carries a significant risk of severe HRAEs, in particular autoimmune hepatitis, immune-mediated hepatitis, and hepatitis fulminant. Healthcare providers should exercise heightened vigilance regarding these risks when managing patients receiving ICIs.

Cancer Immunotherapy and Medical Imaging Research Trends from 2003 to 2023: A Bibliometric Analysis

Purpose

With the rapid development of immunotherapy, cancer treatment has entered a new phase. Medical imaging, as a primary diagnostic method, is closely related to cancer immunotherapy. However, until now, there has been no systematic bibliometric analysis of the state of this field. Therefore, the main purpose of this article is to clarify the past research trajectory, summarize current research hotspots, reveal dynamic scientific developments, and explore future research directions.

Patients and Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database to identify publications related to immunotherapy specifically for the medical imaging of carcinoma. The search spanned the period from the year 2003 to 2023. Several analytical tools were employed. These included CiteSpace (6.2.4), and the Microsoft Office Excel (2016).

Results

By searching the database, a total of 704 English articles published between 2003 and 2023 were obtained. We have observed a rapid increase in the number of publications since 2018. The two most active countries are the United States (n=265) and China (n=170). Pittock, Sean J and Abu-sbeih, Hamzah are very concerned about the relationship between cancer immunotherapy and medical images and have published more academic papers (n = 5; n = 4). Among the top 10 co-cited authors, Topalian Sl (n=43) cited ranked first, followed by Graus F (n=40) cited. According to clustering, timeline, and burst word analysis, the results show that the current research focus is on "MRI", "deep learning", "tumor microenvironment" and so on.

Conclusion

Medical imaging and cancer immunotherapy are hot topics. The United States is the country with the most publications and the greatest influence in this field, followed by China. "MRI", "PET/PET-CT", "deep learning", "immune-related adverse events" and "tumor microenvironment" are currently hot research topics and potential targets.

Successful treatment of severe immune checkpoint inhibitor associated autoimmune hepatitis with basiliximab: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its corresponding ligand PD-L1 are being increasingly used for a wide variety of cancers, including refractory sarcomas. Autoimmune hepatitis is a known side effect of ICIs, and is typically managed with broad, non-specific immunosuppression. Here, we report a case of severe autoimmune hepatitis occurring after anti-PD-1 therapy with nivolumab in a patient with osteosarcoma. Following prolonged unsuccessful treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, steroids, everolimus, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and anti-thymoglobulin, the patient was eventually treated with the anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody basiliximab. This resulted in prompt, sustained resolution of her hepatitis without significant side effects. Our case demonstrates that basiliximab may be an effective therapy for steroid-refractory severe ICI-associated hepatitis.

Hypertransaminasemia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving immune-based combinations: a meta-analysis

Aims: We performed a meta-analysis to assess the relative risk (RR) of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia in studies comparing immune-based combinations with sunitinib in treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Materials & methods: Outcomes of interest included all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia measured as RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: RRs for all-grade hypertransaminasemia were 1.73 (95% CI: 1.25-2.4) and 1.63 (95% CI: 1.25-2.12) in patients receiving immunocombinations and sunitinib, respectively. The pooled RRs for grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia were 3.24 and 3.04 in patients treated with immunocombinations or sunitinib. Conclusion: Immune-based combinations were associated with higher hypertransaminasemia risk. Physicians should pay attention to these common but overlooked events. Careful monitoring of tolerability remains a crucial need.

Hypertransaminasemia in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and immune-based combinations: the MOUSEION-05 study

BACKGROUND

The antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has increasingly emerged during the last few years. However, there is a need to identify the safety profile of these agents more comprehensively, including liver toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia in cancer patients receiving ICIs-as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. All the relevant trials were retrieved through EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/Medline databases; eligible studies were selected according to PRISMA statement. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine studies were included. The pooled RRs for all-grade AST and ALT increase were 1.45 (95% CI 1.26-1.67) (Supplementary Fig. 3) and 1.51 (95% CI 1.29-1.77) in patients receiving ICIs monotherapy and immune-based combinations compared to control treatment, respectively. The pooled RRs for grade 3-4 AST and ALT increase were 2.16 (95% CI 1.77-2.64) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.91-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

According to our results, ICIs monotherapy and immune-based combinations were associated with higher risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 hypertransaminasemia. Monitoring liver function should be recommended in cancer patients treated with ICIs monotherapy or immune-based combination, and in case of underlying liver disease, a careful risk-benefit assessment appears as a mandatory need.

Sex disparity and drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a potentially serious clinical condition that remains a major problem for patients, physicians and those involved in the development of new drugs. Population and hospital-based studies have reported incidences of DILI varying from 1.4 to 19.1/100.000. Overall, females have a 1.5- to 1.7-fold greater risk of developing adverse drug reactions and the female/male ratio increases after the age of 49 years, suggesting a clear susceptibility of DILI after menopause. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic, sex-specific hormonal effects or interaction with signalling molecules that can influence drug efficacy and safety and differences in abnormal immune response following drug exposure are the main probable causes of the higher vulnerability observed among female patients. A novel phenotype of autoimmune-mediated DILI following the use of check-point inhibitors in oncology and haematology has been recently described. Finally, there have been increasing reports of DILI associated with use of herbal and dietary supplements that is more frequently reported in women.

Therapeutic targets and biomarkers of tumor immunotherapy: response versus non-response

Cancers are highly complex diseases that are characterized by not only the overgrowth of malignant cells but also an altered immune response. The inhibition and reprogramming of the immune system play critical roles in tumor initiation and progression. Immunotherapy aims to reactivate antitumor immune cells and overcome the immune escape mechanisms of tumors. Represented by immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive cell transfer, tumor immunotherapy has seen tremendous success in the clinic, with the capability to induce long-term regression of some tumors that are refractory to all other treatments. Among them, immune checkpoint blocking therapy, represented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (nivolumab) and CTLA-4 inhibitors (ipilimumab), has shown encouraging therapeutic effects in the treatment of various malignant tumors, such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma. In addition, with the advent of CAR-T, CAR-M and other novel immunotherapy methods, immunotherapy has entered a new era. At present, evidence indicates that the combination of multiple immunotherapy methods may be one way to improve the therapeutic effect. However, the overall clinical response rate of tumor immunotherapy still needs improvement, which warrants the development of novel therapeutic designs as well as the discovery of biomarkers that can guide the prescription of these agents. Learning from the past success and failure of both clinical and basic research is critical for the rational design of studies in the future. In this article, we describe the efforts to manipulate the immune system against cancer and discuss different targets and cell types that can be exploited to promote the antitumor immune response.

The modern therapeutic & imaging landscape of metastatic prostate cancer: a primer for radiologists

Prostate cancer represents one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the United States and the most common cancer among men. Treatment paradigms for the management of advanced stages of prostate cancer have continued to evolve in recent years. These advancements in the therapeutic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer and diagnostic imaging modalities have fundamentally changed the treatment of patients with prostate cancer. In this review article we provide a primer for radiologists highlighting the most recent developments in treatment options and imaging techniques utilized in the modern oncologic management of metastatic prostate cancer. We will examine current therapy options and associated toxicities with an emphasis on relevant imaging findings commonly encountered by radiologists. We also summarize the role of modalities including CT, MRI, PET, bone scintigraphy, and PET in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Toxicity of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hematological Malignancies

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially those targeting the programmed-death 1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligands, have become indispensable agents in solid tumor anti-cancer therapy. Concerning hematological malignancies, only nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma to date. Nevertheless, clinical research in this field is very active. The mechanism of action of ICIs is based on unblocking the hindered immune system to recognize and eliminate cancer cells, but that also has its costs in the form of ICI-specific immune related adverse events (irAEs), which can affect any organ system and can even be lethal. In this article, we have reviewed all prospective blood cancer clinical trials investigating ICIs (both monotherapy and combination therapy) with available toxicity data with the purpose of determining the incidence of irAEs in this specific setting and to offer a brief insight into their management, as the use of immune checkpoint blockade is not so frequent in hemato-oncology.

Occurrence of hepatitis in an elderly woman during the treatment of pembrolizumab for right advanced renal pelvis, ureteral cancer, and bladder cancer

Recently, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapeutic agents has been increasing in the treatment for advanced cancer. Here, we report the occurrence of liver failure after the use of pembrolizumab in an 82‐year‐old woman with metastatic liver disease derived from right advanced renal pelvis, ureteral cancer, and bladder cancer. She was successfully treated with 0.6 mg/kg daily prednisolone. In patients treated with ICIs, ICI‐induced hepatitis is occasionally observed. Even if patients are older, it appears important to diagnose and treat ICI‐induced hepatitis earlier by multidisciplinary therapies including steroid treatment. This is a first report of pembrolizumab‐induced liver failure in elder patient with age over 80 years. Even if patients are older, it appears important to diagnose and treat ICI‐induced hepatitis earlier by multidisciplinary therapies including steroid treatment.

Pathologic Manifestations of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Injury in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

CONTEXT.—

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors and the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, are being increasingly used for treating many advanced malignancies. However, CPI therapy is also associated with gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES.—

To review the adverse effects of CPI therapy on the gastrointestinal tract and hepatobiliary system. To describe histopathologic patterns and discuss differential diagnostic considerations in the diagnosis of CPI injuries.

DATA SOURCES.—

Published peer-reviewed literature in the English language and personal experience in the diagnosis of CPI injuries.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The pathologic manifestations of CPI therapy-induced gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary injury are broad. The patterns of esophageal CPI injury include lymphocytic inflammation and ulcerative esophagitis, while those of gastric injury include chronic active gastritis, lymphocytic gastritis, focal enhancing gastritis, and periglandular inflammation. The duodenal injury may present as duodenitis with villous blunting and granulomas. We also noticed active colitis, microscopic colitis, chronic active colitis, increased apoptosis, ischemic colitis, and nonspecific inflammatory reactive changes in colonic injuries. The reported histologic features of hepatobiliary injuries are panlobular hepatitis, centrilobular necrosis, portal inflammation with bile duct injury, steatosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and secondary sclerosing cholangitis. In summary, we discuss the pathologic features and differential diagnosis of CPI therapy-induced gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary injury. Recognition of CPI injury is important to determine the proper management that often includes cessation of CPI therapy, and administration of steroids or other immunosuppressive agents, based on severity of injury.

A Review of Cancer Immunotherapy Toxicity: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Cancer immunotherapy, which leverages features of the immune system to target neoplastic cells, has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. The use of these therapies has rapidly expanded in the past two decades. Immune checkpoint inhibitors represent one drug class within immunotherapy with its first agent FDA-approved in 2011. Immune checkpoint inhibitors act by disrupting inhibitory signals from neoplastic cells to immune effector cells, allowing activated T-cells to target these neoplastic cells. Unique adverse effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are termed immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) and are usually immunostimulatory in nature. Almost all organ systems may be affected by irAEs including the dermatologic, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, endocrine, and cardiovascular systems. These effects range from mild to life-threatening, and their onset can be delayed several weeks or months. For mild irAEs, symptomatic care is usually sufficient. For higher grade irAEs, discontinuation of therapy and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy may be necessary. The management of patients with irAEs involves multidisciplinary care coordination with respect to the long-term goals the individual patient. Clinicians must be aware of the unique and sometimes fatal toxicologic profiles associated with immunotherapies to ensure prompt diagnosis and appropriate management.

Multimodal Non-Surgical Treatments of Aggressive Pituitary Tumors

Up to 35% of aggressive pituitary tumors recur and significantly affect mortality and quality of life. Management can be challenging and often requires multimodal treatment. Current treatment options, including surgery, conventional medical therapies such as dopamine agonists, somatostatin receptor agonists and radiotherapy, often fail to inhibit pituitary tumor growth. Recently, anti-tumor effects of chemotherapeutic drugs such as Temozolomide, Capecitabine, and Everolimus, as well as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy on aggressive pituitary tumors have been increasingly investigated and yield mixed, although sometimes promising, outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide thorough information on non-surgical medical therapies and their efficacies and used protocols for aggressive pituitary adenomas from pre-clinical level to clinical use.

Adverse Effects of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Immune-modulatory therapy, especially with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has reshaped cancer therapeutics. Immunotherapy is relatively a novel approach that can effectively delay the progression of aggressive tumors and inhibit tumor recurrence and metastasis in many different tumor types. In the past years, ICIs have shown a sustained response and promising long-term survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nevertheless, ICI therapy can unbalance the immune system and result in a wide range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are generally manageable but occasionally lead to a fatal outcome. HCC generally develops in the context of liver cirrhosis which is typically caused by viral hepatitis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. These underlying diseases may cause symptoms that overlap with irAEs and lead to consequences such as late recognition, inadequate work-up, and inappropriate treatment. Owing to the growing use of immunotherapy in HCC, it is necessary for clinicians to strengthen their understanding of the frequency, clinical features, and management of irAEs. This review focuses on the common toxicities associated with ICI therapy in patients with HCC and summarizes therapeutic strategies that can be used to monitor and manage such toxicities.

Pembrolizumab-Induced Delayed-Onset Hepatitis

Hepatitis is one of the serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, delayed-onset hepatitis induced by immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is rare, and the histopathological features remain to be clarified. A 65-year-old woman with advanced lung adenocarcinoma in the right upper lobe (cT4N3M1c, c-stage IVB) received four courses of pembrolizumab. Her hepatic and biliary tract enzyme levels started increasing 2 months after the final administration of pembrolizumab, and the elevated levels of these enzymes prolonged. Liver biopsy revealed panlobular infiltration of inflammatory cells, and most of the infiltrating inflammatory cells were lymphocytes; however, there were a small number of neutrophils, eosinophils, and plasma cells. There was no confluent necrosis. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analyses proved that infiltrating lymphocytes were predominantly CD3-positive (CD3+) and CD8+, and few CD20+ and CD4+ lymphocytes were observed. Based on these findings, she was diagnosed with a case of hepatitis as an irAE. Administration of prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg/day) as well as the addition of azathioprine failed to suppress the deterioration. However, an increase in the dose of prednisolone (up to 1 mg/kg/day) enabled us to control hepatitis. This case showed that hepatitis can occur even after discontinuation of ICIs, and that liver biopsy may be useful in the diagnosis. Clinicians should not hesitate to perform liver biopsy for confirmation of the diagnosis.

Side effects and management in immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which exert their antitumor effects by targeting suppressive immune molecules, are a class of monoclonal antibody drugs based on certain immune checkpoints. Cancer immunotherapies lead to unique toxicity profiles distinct from the toxicities of other cancer therapies, depending on their mechanism of action. Immune-related adverse events can involve any organ or system. These effects are frequently low grade and reversible, affecting the skin, gastrointestinal tract, liver, endocrine system, and lung most commonly. However, some adverse effects can be severe and life-threatening. Therefore, the effective management of immune-related adverse events and reducing the occurrence of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events are critical in optimizing treatment outcomes. In this review, we summarize the clinical guidelines and the latest studies, and focus on the common toxic effects and management of the adverse events related to anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 or programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand-1 monoclonal antibody drugs, in order to provide better management of immune-related adverse events.

Early Onset Immune-Related Adverse Event to Identify Pseudo-Progression in a Patient With Ovarian Cancer Treated With Nivolumab: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown clinical benefit in many advanced tumors, however, pseudo-progression is a noted phenomenon of ICIs characterized by radiologic enlargement of the tumor burden, followed by regression. How to differentiate pseudo-progression from progression remains a critical clinical issue. Recent studies have demonstrated the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and efficacy of ICIs. Here we demonstrated an ovarian cancer patient treated with nivolumab in whom the early-onset irAE was identified to differentiate pseudo-progression from progression.

Case presentation: Here we present the case of a 47-years-old woman with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic ovarian cystadenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical examination showed 10% of tumor cells to express the programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) and a 381-gene panel sequencing in a College of American Pathologists (CAP) certificated lab revealed a moderate mutational tumor burden with 5.7 Mutants/Mb. The patient received nivolumab 100 mg every 2 weeks as a fourth line treatment. Within the first 2 months, the tumor volume increased by 23.6%. However, the patient experienced an elevation of Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate aminotransmerase (AST), which was diagnosed as the immune-related hepatitis. Thus, the treatment continued and afterwards, the patient reached a partial response (PR) to nivolumab and the progression-free survival was 9 months.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first case describing early-onset immune-related adverse events to identify pseudo-progression in a patient with ovarian cancer treated with nivolumab, and PD-L1 expression level may be a predictive biomarker in the immunotherapy of ovarian cancer.

Fatal fulminant hepatitis induced by combined ipilimumab and nivolumab therapy despite favorable histologic response and confirmed by autopsy in a patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Effective management of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving immunotherapy for cancer is problematic. In this report, we present the case of a 58-year-old man with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma who responded well to a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. However, after two courses of treatment, he developed fulminant hepatitis and died. An autopsy confirmed that the primary lesion in the left kidney was more than 99% necrotic with only six small residual tumor lesions. These lesions were infiltrated by large numbers of CD8-positive/TIA-1-positive lymphocytes. However, a metastatic lesion in the right kidney harbored few lymphocytes. Furthermore, the tumor cells in the metastatic lesion and one of the residual lesions showed decreased expression of HLA class I molecules, which are a prerequisite for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-mediated immunotherapy in tumor cells. In this patient, more than 80% of hepatocytes were destroyed and the parenchyma was infiltrated with CD8-positive/TIA-1-positive lymphocytes. The patient had polyuria, which was attributed to neurohypophysitis caused by the infiltration of CD8-positive/TIA-1-positive lymphocytes. We believe that this is an instructive case for immuno-oncologists.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of immune-mediated liver dysfunction in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been identified as validated medications in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, they are often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including liver dysfunction. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and performed a meta-analysis to ascertain overall incidence and risk of immune mediated liver dysfunction in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) were searched from inception to December 2019. Studies regarding all grade (1-5), high grade (3-5) hepatitis and ALT or AST elevation were included.

RESULTS

A total of 11 clinical trials including 7086 patients were selected for further assessment. The overall incidence of ALT elevation, AST elevation and hepatitis for the application of ICIs was 6.18%, 4.99% and 1.09%, respectively. Compared with chemotherapy group, treatment with ICIs had a significantly higher risk of all grade (RR: 7.27, p = 0.001) and high grade (RR: 6.70, p = 0.003) hepatitis. When ICIs combined with chemotherapy, the relative risk of all grade hepatitis was higher than monotherapy group (RR: 7.89, p = 0.044 vs RR: 6.94, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The application of ICIs could result in a higher incidence and relative risk of all grade immune-induced liver dysfunction. Moreover, immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may also increase relative risk of all grade hepatic AEs when compared with monotherapy. Prompt recognition and proper administration is required for clinicians to prevent potentially hepatic deterioration.

Management Considerations for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Enterocolitis Based on Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has significantly improved the outcomes of various advanced malignancies that were deemed unruly prior to its invention. Immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis are among the most frequently encountered adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Given the increasing use of these therapies in the treatment of an ever-growing number of malignancies, providing appropriate treatment for such adverse effects has become crucial.

METHODS

In this review, we summarize the current body of evidence concerning the management of immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis. Additionally, management of immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis is likened to that of inflammatory bowel disease, given the resemblance between both entities in pathogenesis and clinical features. Reviewing the literature raised several points regarding this devastating toxicity that still need further investigation by future efforts.

RESULTS

Endoscopic and histologic evaluation is pivotal in the assessment of immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis and provides vital information regarding the severity of the disease to guide treatment. Corticosteroids are the main therapy for immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis, with infliximab and vedolizumab as second-line agents. Recently, fecal microbiota transplantation has emerged as a treatment option for immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis that is refractory to corticosteroids. Restarting immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy after resolution of immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis carries a risk of recurrence that is mostly controllable with current immune-suppressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lastly, we propose a management algorithm for immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis. Prospective research, preferably as collaborative efforts from oncology and gastroenterology specialists, is needed to refine the management of immune-mediated diarrhea and enterocolitis.

Clinical diagnosis and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated adverse events in the digestive system

Immunotherapy for malignant tumors is a hot spot in current research and the treatment of cancer. The activation of programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA)-4 relevant signaling pathway can inhibit the activation of T lymphocytes. Tumor cells can achieve immune escape by activating this signaling pathway. By inhibiting this signaling pathway, immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) activate T lymphocytes to clear the tumor cells. Therefore, the adverse effects of ICIs are mainly immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The digestive system, including the gastrointestinal tract and liver which are vital organs of digestion and absorption, metabolism and detoxification, as well as important immune-related organs, is the most commonly affected system of irAEs. This review explains the incidence, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of liver and gastrointestinal adverse events in ICIs.

Gastrointestinal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized cancer therapy and is now the standard treatment for several different types of cancer, supported by favorable outcomes and good tolerance. However, it is linked to multiple immune manifestations, referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These adverse events frequently affect the skin, colon, endocrine glands, lungs, and liver. The gastrointestinal system is one of the most commonly affected organ systems and is responsible for the most frequent emergency visits resulting from irAEs. However, because immune checkpoint inhibitors are a recent addition to our arsenal of cancer drugs, many health-care providers remain unfamiliar with the management of irAEs. Gastroenterologists involved in the treatment of oncology patients who have received checkpoint inhibitors are currently encountering cases of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and other nonspecific symptoms that may be challenging to manage. This article reviews the gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors and provides an approach to their diagnosis and recommended workup. It also highlights the management of irAEs according to their toxicity grading and specifically discusses the instances in which corticosteroids should be administered and/or the immune checkpoint inhibitors should be withheld.

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms and associated endoscopic and histological features in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated effectiveness in treating many malignancies. Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events are commonly reported; however, few reports describe upper GI tract toxic effects. We aimed to describe clinical features of upper GI injury related to ICI. Methods: We studied consecutive patients who received ICIs between April 2011 and March 2018 and developed upper GI symptoms requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Results: Sixty patients developed upper GI symptoms between ICI initiation and 6 months after the last infusion. Among patients who had both EGD and colonoscopy (n = 38), 21 had endoscopic evidence of inflammation involving both the upper and lower GI tract. Overall, histological signs of inflammation of the stomach were evident in 83% of patients, but inflammation of the duodenum in 38%. Total of 42 patients had other risk factors of gastritis, i.e., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Only isolated gastric inflammation was seen on endoscopy in patients without these risk factors. The rates of ulceration were similar in the cohorts with and without other risk factors for gastritis. Isolated upper GI inflammation was related to anti-PD-1/L1 in 47% of patients. Immunosuppressive therapy in our cohort with upper GI toxicity consisted of steroids (42%) and infliximab or vedolizumab (23%). Most isolated upper GI symptoms were treated with proton pump inhibitors (65%) or H₂ blockers (35%). Conclusion: We observed a correlation between ICI use and onset of upper GI inflammation even when other risk factors were excluded. Gastric involvement was evident more often than duodenal involvement on endoscopic and histological level.