Pandey PU, Guy P, Lefaivre KA, Hodgson AJ. What are the optimal targeting visualizations for performing surgical navigation of iliosacral screws? A user study.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;
143:677-690. [PMID:
34402930 DOI:
10.1007/s00402-021-04120-7]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Complex orthopaedic procedures, such as iliosacral screw (ISS) fixations, can take advantage of surgical navigation technology to achieve accurate results. Although the impact of surgical navigation on outcomes has been studied, no studies to date have quantified how the design of the targeting display used for navigation affects ISS targeting performance. However, it is known in other contexts that how task information is displayed can have significant effects on both accuracy and time required to perform motor tasks, and that this can be different among users with different experience levels. This study aimed to investigate which visualization techniques helped experienced surgeons and inexperienced users most efficiently and accurately align a surgical tool to a target axis.
METHODS
We recruited 21 participants and conducted a user study to investigate five proposed 2D visualizations (bullseye, rotated bullseye, target-fixed, tool-fixed in translation, and tool-fixed in translation and rotation) with varying representations of the ISS targets and tool, and one 3D visualization. We measured the targeting accuracy achieved by each participant, as well as the time required to perform the task using each of the visualizations.
RESULTS
We found that all 2D visualizations had equivalent translational and rotational errors, with mean translational errors below 0.9 mm and rotational errors below 1.1[Formula: see text]. The 3D visualization had statistically greater mean translational and rotational errors (4.29 mm and 5.47[Formula: see text], p < 0.001) across all users. We also found that the 2D bullseye view allowed users to complete the simulated task most efficiently (mean 30.2 s; 95% CI 26.4-35.7 s), even when combined with other visualizations.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show that 2D bullseye views helped both experienced orthopaedic trauma surgeons and inexperienced users target iliosacral screws accurately and efficiently. These findings could inform the design of visualizations for use in a surgical navigation system for screw insertions for both training and surgical practice.
Collapse