Assessment of Optimal Arterial Pressure with Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy based blood pressure variations and hemodynamic activity of brain monitoring following postural changes: A systematic review

Postural change from supine or sitting to standing up leads to displacement of 300 to 1000 mL of blood from the central parts of the body to the lower limb, which causes a decrease in venous return to the heart, hence decrease in cardiac output, causing a drop in blood pressure. This may lead to falling down, syncope, and in general reducing the quality of daily activities, especially in the elderly and anyone suffering from nervous system disorders such as Parkinson's or orthostatic hypotension (OH). Among different modalities to study brain function, functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a neuroimaging method that optically measures the hemodynamic response in brain tissue. Concentration changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb) are associated with brain neural activity. fNIRS is significantly more tolerant to motion artifacts compared to fMRI, PET, and EEG. At the same time, it is portable, has a simple structure and usage, is safer, and much more economical. In this article, we systematically reviewed the literature to examine the history of using fNIRS in monitoring brain oxygenation changes caused by sudden changes in body position and its relationship with the blood pressure changes. First, the theory behind brain hemodynamics monitoring using fNIRS and its advantages and disadvantages are presented. Then, a study of blood pressure variations as a result of postural changes using fNIRS is described. It is observed that only 58 % of the references concluded a positive correlation between brain oxygenation changes and blood pressure changes. At the same time, 3 % showed a negative correlation, and 39 % did not show any correlation between them.

Neuromonitoring in the ICU - what, how and why?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We selectively review emerging noninvasive neuromonitoring techniques and the evidence that supports their use in the ICU setting. The focus is on neuromonitoring research in patients with acute brain injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Noninvasive intracranial pressure evaluation with optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, transcranial Doppler waveform analysis, or skull mechanical extensometer waveform recordings have potential safety and resource-intensity advantages when compared to standard invasive monitors, however each of these techniques has limitations. Quantitative electroencephalography can be applied for detection of cerebral ischemia and states of covert consciousness. Near-infrared spectroscopy may be leveraged for cerebral oxygenation and autoregulation computation. Automated quantitative pupillometry and heart rate variability analysis have been shown to have diagnostic and/or prognostic significance in selected subtypes of acute brain injury. Finally, artificial intelligence is likely to transform interpretation and deployment of neuromonitoring paradigms individually and when integrated in multimodal paradigms.

SUMMARY

The ability to detect brain dysfunction and injury in critically ill patients is being enriched thanks to remarkable advances in neuromonitoring data acquisition and analysis. Studies are needed to validate the accuracy and reliability of these new approaches, and their feasibility and implementation within existing intensive care workflows.

Cerebral Autoregulation-guided Management of Adult and Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

Cerebral autoregulation (CA) plays a vital role in maintaining cerebral blood flow in response to changes in systemic blood pressure. Impairment of CA following traumatic brain injury (TBI) may exacerbate the injury, potentially impacting patient outcomes. This focused review addresses 4 key questions regarding the measurement, natural history of CA after TBI, and potential clinical implications of CA status and CA-guided management in adults and children with TBI. We examine the feasibility and safety of CA assessment, its association with clinical outcomes, and the potential for reversing deranged CA following TBI. Finally, we discuss how the knowledge of CA status may affect TBI management and outcomes.