Intrathecal antispastic drug application with implantable pumps: results of a 10 year follow-up study

Dose escalation in intrathecal baclofen therapy based on disease etiology: Can an a priori target dose be established? A ten-year follow-up study

CONTEXT

Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy is administered for severe, persistent spasticity that cannot be addressed by oral medication or other treatments.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the target dose of ITB for severe, persistent spasticity based on disease etiology.

METHODS

Data at baseline (discharge), 1, and 10 years from 102 patients who received ITB therapy between 1985 and 2011 were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided based on disease etiology (cerebral, spinal, or multiple sclerosis [MS]) to evaluate differences in dose requirements. A comprehensive literature review of the dose trends in ITB therapy was conducted.

RESULTS

Patients with cerebral spasticity (n = 62) required the highest dose after discharge (102.66 ± 30.9 µg), 1 (402.29 ± 300.2 µg), and 10 years (578.74 ± 421.2 µg). Patients with spinal spasticity (n = 19) required an average of 82.89 ± 30.7 µg baclofen at discharge, 296.3 ± 224.6 µg after 1 year, and 522.63 ± 425.97 µg after 10 years. Patients with MS-related spasticity (n = 21) had a dose of 82.73 ± 39.3 µg baclofen at discharge, 226.95 ± 193.3 µg after 1 year, and 320.6 ± 261.4 µg after 10 years. The differences among the categories were significant after 1 and 10 years of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The largest dose escalation occurs within the first year of ITB therapy. Our work provides a guideline for the initial dose setting during the inpatient stay after implantation and potentially expected dosage over the years thereafter, although this must always be adjusted individually.

Spasticity following spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Up to 70% of patients with spinal cord injuries develop spasticity. The main aim of the paper is to provide an overview of spasticity management, primarily in patients with spinal cord injuries.

METHOD

The article is based on literature searches in PubMed using the keyphrases «spasticity» and «spasticity AND spinal cord injury», and own clinical experience and research.

RESULTS

Spasticity may be general, regional or localised. Factors such as an over-filled bladder, obstipation, acute infections, syringomyelia or bone fractures may substantially influence the degree of spasticity and must be determined. An assessment of the clinical and functional consequences for the patient is decisive before management. Active exercise, physiotherapy and peroral drugs are the simplest and cheapest options. Baclofen is the only centrally acting spasmolytic registered in Norway and is the first choice for peroral treatment. Benzodiazepines can also be used. The effect of the tablets is generally limited and there are often pronounced side effects. Local spasticity can be treated with botulinum toxin injections. The effect is time-limited and the treatment must be repeated. International guidelines recommend a combination of botulinum toxin injections and physiotherapy. In cases of regional spasticity, particularly in the lower limbs, intrathecal baclofen administered via a programmable pump may provide a continuous spasm-reducing effect. Orthopaedic surgery or neurosurgery may be an option for selected patients with intractable spasticity.

INTERPRETATION

Spasticity following a spinal cord injury must be assessed regularly. The treatment strategy depends on the degree of functional failure caused by the spasticity and its location.

Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2012: recommendations for the management of pain by intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel

INTRODUCTION

The use of intrathecal (IT) infusion of analgesic medications to treat patients with chronic refractory pain has increased since its inception in the 1980s, and the need for clinical research in IT therapy is ongoing. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC) panel of experts convened in 2000, 2003, and 2007 to make recommendations on the rational use of IT analgesics based on preclinical and clinical literature and clinical experiences.

METHODS

The PACC panel convened again in 2011 to update the standard of care for IT therapies to reflect current knowledge gleaned from literature and clinical experience. A thorough literature search was performed, and information from this search was provided to panel members. Analysis of published literature was coupled with the clinical experience of panel members to form recommendations regarding the use of IT analgesics to treat chronic pain.

RESULTS

After a review of literature published from 2007 to 2011 and discussions of clinical experience, the panel created updated algorithms for the rational use of IT medications for the treatment of neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The advent of new algorithmic tracks for neuropathic and nociceptive pain is an important step in improving patient care. The panel encourages continued research and development, including the development of new drugs, devices, and safety recommendations to improve the care of patients with chronic pain.