2
|
Gandolfi S, Laubach JP, Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Anderson KC, Richardson PG. The proteasome and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2018; 36:561-584. [PMID: 29196868 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-017-9707-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Proteasome inhibitors are one of the most important classes of agents to have emerged for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the past two decades, and now form one of the backbones of treatment. Three agents in this class have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration-the first-in-class compound bortezomib, the second-generation agent carfilzomib, and the first oral proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib. The success of this class of agents is due to the exquisite sensitivity of myeloma cells to the inhibition of the 26S proteasome, which plays a critical role in the pathogenesis and proliferation of the disease. Proteasome inhibition results in multiple downstream effects, including the inhibition of NF-κB signaling, the accumulation of misfolded and unfolded proteins, resulting in endoplasmic reticulum stress and leading to the unfolded protein response, the downregulation of growth factor receptors, suppression of adhesion molecule expression, and inhibition of angiogenesis; resistance to proteasome inhibition may arise through cellular responses mediating these downstream effects. These multiple biologic consequences of proteasome inhibition result in synergistic or additive activity with other chemotherapeutic and targeted agents for myeloma, and proteasome inhibitor-based combination regimens have become established as a cornerstone of therapy throughout the myeloma treatment algorithm, incorporating agents from the other key classes of antimyeloma agents, including the immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and histone deacetylase inhibitors. This review gives an overview of the critical role of the proteasome in myeloma and the characteristics of the different proteasome inhibitors and provides a comprehensive summary of key clinical efficacy and safety data with the currently approved proteasome inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Gandolfi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jacob P Laubach
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Teru Hideshima
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Dharminder Chauhan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Kenneth C Anderson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Paul G Richardson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Dana 1B02, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Niewerth D, Kaspers GJL, Jansen G, van Meerloo J, Zweegman S, Jenkins G, Whitlock JA, Hunger SP, Lu X, Alonzo TA, van de Ven PM, Horton TM, Cloos J. Proteasome subunit expression analysis and chemosensitivity in relapsed paediatric acute leukaemia patients receiving bortezomib-containing chemotherapy. J Hematol Oncol 2016; 9:82. [PMID: 27599459 PMCID: PMC5011854 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-016-0312-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Drug combinations of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with cytotoxic chemotherapy are currently evaluated in phase 2 and 3 trials for the treatment of paediatric acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL). Methods We investigated whether expression ratios of immunoproteasome to constitutive proteasome in leukaemic cells correlated with response to bortezomib-containing re-induction chemotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory acute leukaemia, enrolled in two Children’s Oncology Group phase 2 trials of bortezomib for ALL (COG-AALL07P1) and AML (COG-AAML07P1). Expression of proteasome subunits was examined in 72 patient samples (ALL n = 60, AML n = 12) obtained before start of therapy. Statistical significance between groups was determined by Mann-Whitney U test. Results Ratios of immunoproteasome to constitutive proteasome subunit expression were significantly higher in pre-B ALL cells than in AML cells for both β5i/β5 and β1i/β1 subunits (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001). These ratios correlated with therapy response in AML patients; β1i/β1 ratios were significantly higher (p = 0.028) between patients who did (n = 4) and did not reach complete remission (CR) (n = 8), although for β5i/β5 ratios, this did not reach significance. For ALL patients, the subunit ratios were also higher for patients who showed a good early response to therapy but this relation was not statistically significant. Overall, for this study, the patients were treated with combination therapy, so response was not only attributed to proteasome inhibition. Moreover, the leukaemic blast cells were not purified for these samples. Conclusions These first ex vivo results encourage further studies into relative proteasome subunit expression to improve proteasome inhibition-containing therapy and as a potential indicator of bortezomib response in acute leukaemia. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0312-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Niewerth
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gertjan J L Kaspers
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Jansen
- Department of Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan van Meerloo
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gaye Jenkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James A Whitlock
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stephen P Hunger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Todd A Alonzo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter M van de Ven
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Terzah M Horton
- Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jacqueline Cloos
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|