Positive Feedback Loops Between Inflammatory, Bone and Cancer Cells During Metastatic Niche Construction

Biology of cancer; from cellular and molecular mechanisms to developmental processes and adaptation

Cancer research has been largely focused on the cellular and molecular levels of investigation. Recent data show that not only the cell but also the extracellular matrix plays a major role in the progression of malignancy. In this way, the cells and the extracellular matrix create a specific local microenvironment that supports malignant development. At the same time, cancer implies a systemic evolution which is closely related to developmental processes and adaptation. Consequently, there is currently a real gap between the local investigation of cancer at the microenvironmental level, and the pathophysiological approach to cancer as a systemic disease. In fact, the cells and the matrix are not only complementary structures but also interdependent components that act synergistically. Such relationships lead to cell-matrix integration, a supracellular form of biological organization that supports tissue development. The emergence of this supracellular level of organization, as a structure, leads to the emergence of the supracellular control of proliferation, as a supracellular function. In humans, proliferation is generally involved in developmental processes and adaptation. These processes suppose a specific configuration at the systemic level, which generates high-order guidance for local supracellular control of proliferation. In conclusion, the supracellular control of proliferation act as an interface between the downstream level of cell division and differentiation, and upstream level of developmental processes and adaptation. Understanding these processes and their disorders is useful not only to complete the big picture of malignancy as a systemic disease, but also to open new treatment perspectives in the form of etiopathogenic (supracellular or informational) therapies.

Extracellular Vesicles in Tumors: A Potential Mediator of Bone Metastasis

As one of the most common metastatic sites, bone has a unique microenvironment for the growth and prosperity of metastatic tumor cells. Bone metastasis is a common complication for tumor patients and accounts for 15-20% of systemic metastasis, which is only secondary to lung and liver metastasis. Cancers prone to bone metastasis include lung, breast, and prostate cancer. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid membrane vesicles released from different cell types. It is clear that EVs are associated with multiple biological phenomena and are crucial for intracellular communication by transporting intracellular substances. Recent studies have implicated EVs in the development of cancer. However, the potential roles of EVs in the pathological exchange of bone cells between tumors and the bone microenvironment remain an emerging area. This review is focused on the role of tumor-derived EVs in bone metastasis and possible regulatory mechanisms.

Assessment of intra-tumoural colorectal cancer prognostic biomarkers using RNA in situ hybridisation

Genome-wide expression studies using microarrays and RNAseq have increased our understanding of colorectal cancer development. Translating potential gene biomarkers from these studies for clinical utility has typically relied on PCR-based technology and immunohistochemistry. Results from these techniques are limited by tumour sample heterogeneity and the lack of correlation between mRNA transcript abundance and corresponding protein levels. The aim of this research was to investigate the clinical utility of the RNA in situ hybridisation technique, RNAscope^®, for measuring intra-tumoural gene expression of potential prognostic markers in a colorectal cancer cohort. Two candidate gene markers (GFI1 and TNFRSF11A) assessed in this study were identified from a previous study led by the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Network, and analysis was performed on 112 consecutively collected, archival FFPE colorectal cancer tumour samples. Consistent with the TCGA Network study, we found reduced GFI1 expression was associated with high-grade and left-sided tumours, and reduced TNFRSF11A expression was associated with metastasis and high nodal involvement. RNAscope^® combined with image analysis also enabled quantification of GFI1 and TNFRSF11A mRNA expression levels at the single cell level, allowing cell-type determination. These data showed that reduced mRNA transcript abundance measured in patients with poorer prognosis occurred in carcinoma cells, and not lymphocytes, stromal cells or normal epithelial cells. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the intra-tumoural expression patterns of GFI1 and TNFRSF11A and to validate their microarray expression profiles using RNAscope. We also demonstrate the utility of RNAscope^® technology to show that expression differences are derived from carcinoma cells rather than from cells located in the tumour microenvironment.