Rehabilitation and Discharge

Discharge to a Skilled Nursing Facility After Hip Fracture Results in Higher Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in elderly patients are associated with major morbidity and mortality. The influence of postoperative discharge location on recovery and outcomes after arthroplasty for hip fractures is not well understood.

METHODS

A multisite retrospective cohort from 9 academic centers identified patients who had FNF treated with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty between 2010 and 2019. Patients who had diagnoses of dementia, stroke, age > 80 years, or high energy fracture were excluded. Discharge location was identified, including home-based health services (HHS), inpatient rehabilitation (IPR), or a skilled nursing facility (SNF). Rates of reoperation, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), and mortality were compared between cohorts. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed, adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, body mass index, sex, and tobacco use. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 672 patients (315 HHS, 144 IPR, and 213 SNF) were included in this study. The average follow-up was 30 months. The SNF cohort was significantly older (P < .0001) with higher ASA scores (P < .0001) than the HHS cohort. In a logistic regression model adjusting for age, ASA score, and body mass index, the SNF cohort had higher mortality rates than the HHS cohort (P = .0296) and were more likely to have PJI within 90 days (odds ratio = 4.55, 95% confidence interval = 1.40, 4.74) and within 1 year (odds ratio = 3.08, 95% confidence interval = 1.08, 8.78). Time to PJI was significantly shorter in the SNF cohort (SNF 38 versus HHS 231 days, P = .0155). No differences were seen in dislocation or reoperation rates between the SNF and HHS cohorts. No differences were seen in complication rates between the IPR and HHS cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge to a SNF after arthroplasty for FNF is associated with increased mortality and higher rates of PJI. Hip fracture care pathways that uniformly discharge patients to SNFs may need to be re-evaluated, and surgeons should consider discharge to home with HHS when possible.

Delayed discharges at a tertiary rehabilitation centre in Saudi Arabia: contributing factors and cost impact

There are various challenges in discharging hospitalized patients with disabilities. Discharge process for individuals with disabilities is multifactorial and can vary from one health system to another. The current study is aimed to explore the factors contributing to delayed discharges and to determine the number of exceeded bed days and subsequent cost impact at a government rehabilitation facility in Saudi Arabia. This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Rehabilitation Hospital of King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh. All the 2285 discharges from inpatient rehabilitation from August 2011 to March 2017 were included in the study. Patients with delayed discharge were identified. Information about the diagnosis and reasons for delayed discharge was obtained from the rehabilitation hospital bed utilization data. The cost impact was calculated based on the number of days patients stayed beyond the estimated length of stay for each diagnosis. Of the 2285 discharges, 531 (23.3%) were delayed. The most common clinical conditions of patients with delayed discharge included spinal cord injury (n = 168, 31.6%) and traumatic brain injury (n = 145, 27.3%). The factors that led to delayed discharges were medical complications (n = 352, 66.7%), organizational factors (n = 83, 15.7%), family factors (n = 46, 8.7%), and external factors (n = 46, 8.7%). A total of 21 817 hospital bed days were exceeded, with an approximate estimated cost of 80 million Saudi Arabian Riyals. Early rehabilitation and enhancement of the discharge process may significantly decrease delayed discharge rates. Strategies need to be adapted to identify patients at risk of delayed discharge based on the factors highlighted in this study. Development of long-term care capacity, community services, and optimizing family and social support can promote timely discharge.

Skilled Nursing Facility Following Hip Fracture Arthroplasty Diminishes Care "Value"

BACKGROUND

Value is defined as outcome/cost. The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in the lengths of care, outcomes, and costs between skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and home with health services (HHS) for patients treated with arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF).

METHODS

Between October 2018 and September 2020, 192 patients eligible for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle program treated for a displaced FNF with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) and discharged to SNF or HHS were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, postoperative outcomes, costs of care, and discharge rehabilitation details. Variables were compared using chi-squared or t-tests as appropriate. There were 60 (31%) patients discharged to HHS (37% THA and 63% HA) and 132 (69%) patients discharged to SNF (14% THA and 86% HA). Patients discharged to SNF were older (P < .01), had lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool scores (P < .01), had higher comorbidity scores (P = .011), and had longer posthospitalization care (P < .01).

RESULTS

There were no differences in rates of inpatient minor complications (P = .520), inpatient major complications (P = .119), Intensive Care Unit admissions (P = .193), or readmissions within 30 (P = .690) and 90 days (P = .176). Costs of care at a SNF were higher than HHS (P < .01). In multivariate regressions, a lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool score was associated with discharge to SNF (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.83, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Among Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle patients treated for a displaced FNF with arthroplasty, discharge with HHS may be a more cost-effective option than discharge to a SNF that does not increase risk of readmission in medically appropriate patients.

Rehabilitation interventions for persons with hip fracture and cognitive impairment: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are common fall-related injuries, with rehabilitation and recovery often complicated by cognitive impairment. Understanding what interventions exist, and in what settings, for people with hip fracture and co-occurring cognitive impairment is important in order to provide more evidence on rehabilitation and related outcomes for this population.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the extent, nature, and range of literature on rehabilitation interventions for adults with hip fracture and cognitive impairment.

METHODS

Articles were required to: include an adult population with hip fracture and cognitive impairment, include a rehabilitation intervention, and be published between January 1, 2000 and November 19, 2021. Articles were excluded if they were opinion pieces, study protocols, conference abstracts, or if they did not describe the rehabilitation intervention. Relevant articles were searched on the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, APA PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. All articles were double-screened by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved through consensus. Data were extracted and synthesized using descriptive approaches.

RESULTS

Seventeen articles were included in this scoping review. We identified a variety of interventions targeting this population; about half were specific to physical rehabilitation, with the other half incorporating components that addressed multiple aspects of the care journey. Interventions had varying outcomes and no studies qualitatively explored patient or family experiences. All intervations were initiated in hospital, with less than half including cross-sectoral components. About half of the articles described modifying or tailoring the intervention to the participants' needs, but there was limited information on how to adapt rehabilitation interventions for individuals with cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

More work is need to better understand patient, family, and provider experiences with rehabilitation interventions, how to tailor interventions for those with cognitive impairment, and how to successfully implement sustainable interventions across sectors.

Exploring the perspectives of outpatient rehabilitation clinicians on the challenges with monitoring patient health, function and activity in the community

PURPOSE

Rehabilitation clinicians need information about patient activities in the home/community to inform care. Despite active efforts to develop technologies that can meet this need, clinicians' perspectives regarding how information is collected and used in outpatient rehabilitation have not been comprehensively described. Therefore, we aimed to describe: (1) what data pertaining to a patient's health, function and activity in their home/community are currently collected in outpatient rehabilitation, (2) how these data can impact clinical decisions, and (3) what challenges clinicians encounter when they manage the care of outpatients based on this information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight clinicians working in outpatient rehabilitation programs completed qualitative interviews that were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified: "Nature of data about a patient's health, function and activity in the home/community and how it is collected by clinicians," "Value of data from the home/community," "Perceived drawbacks of current data collection methods," and "Improving data collection to understand patient trajectory."

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians described the importance of understanding patient activities in the home/community, but perspectives varied regarding the suitability of current methods. These perceptions may inform the design of solutions to bridge the gap between the clinic and the community in outpatient rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationClinical decision-making in outpatient rehabilitation is guided by verbal and written reports about a patient's health and function in the community and adherence to treatment plans.Differing perceptions on the suitability of current data collection methods indicate that the development of new solutions, such as rehabilitation technologies, needs to carefully consider clinician workflows and what data are perceived as meaningful.Potentially impactful directions for new solutions include providing well validated data on adherence, movement quality, or longitudinal progression, presented in formats that match clinical decision criteria.