1
|
Butrim MJ, Lowe AJ, Currano ED. Leaf mass per area: An investigation into the application of the ubiquitous functional trait from a paleobotanical perspective. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY 2024; 111:e16419. [PMID: 39397294 DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
PREMISE Leaf mass per area (LMA) is a widely used functional trait in both neobotanical and paleobotanical research that provides a window into how plants interact with their environment. Paleobotanists have used site-level measures of LMA as a proxy for climate, biome, deciduousness, and community-scale plant strategy, yet many of these relationships have not been grounded in modern data. In this study, we evaluated LMA from the paleobotanical perspective, seeking to add modern context to paleobotanical interpretations and discover what a combined modern and fossil data set can tell us about how LMA can be best applied toward interpreting plant communities. METHODS We built a modern data set by pulling plant trait data from the TRY database, and a fossil data set by compiling data from studies that have used the petiole-width proxy for LMA. We then investigated the relationships of species-mean, site-mean, and site-distribution LMA with different climatic, phylogenetic, and physiognomic variables. RESULTS We found that LMA distributions are correlated with climate, site taxonomic composition, and deciduousness. However, the relative contributions of these factors are not distinctive, and ultimately, LMA distributions cannot accurately reconstruct the biome or climate of an individual site. CONCLUSIONS The correlations that make up the leaf economics spectrum are stronger than the correlations between LMA and climate, phylogeny, morphospace, or depositional environment. Fossil LMA should be understood as the culmination of the influences of these variables rather than as a predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Butrim
- Department of Geology and Geophysics, Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, 82071, Wyoming, USA
| | - Alexander J Lowe
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, Washington, USA
| | - Ellen D Currano
- Department of Geology and Geophysics, Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, 82071, Wyoming, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
He Y, Mulqueeney JM, Watt EC, Salili-James A, Barber NS, Camaiti M, Hunt ESE, Kippax-Chui O, Knapp A, Lanzetti A, Rangel-de Lázaro G, McMinn JK, Minus J, Mohan AV, Roberts LE, Adhami D, Grisan E, Gu Q, Herridge V, Poon STS, West T, Goswami A. Opportunities and Challenges in Applying AI to Evolutionary Morphology. Integr Org Biol 2024; 6:obae036. [PMID: 40433986 PMCID: PMC12082097 DOI: 10.1093/iob/obae036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize many aspects of science, including the study of evolutionary morphology. While classical AI methods such as principal component analysis and cluster analysis have been commonplace in the study of evolutionary morphology for decades, recent years have seen increasing application of deep learning to ecology and evolutionary biology. As digitized specimen databases become increasingly prevalent and openly available, AI is offering vast new potential to circumvent long-standing barriers to rapid, big data analysis of phenotypes. Here, we review the current state of AI methods available for the study of evolutionary morphology, which are most developed in the area of data acquisition and processing. We introduce the main available AI techniques, categorizing them into 3 stages based on their order of appearance: (1) machine learning, (2) deep learning, and (3) the most recent advancements in large-scale models and multimodal learning. Next, we present case studies of existing approaches using AI for evolutionary morphology, including image capture and segmentation, feature recognition, morphometrics, and phylogenetics. We then discuss the prospectus for near-term advances in specific areas of inquiry within this field, including the potential of new AI methods that have not yet been applied to the study of morphological evolution. In particular, we note key areas where AI remains underutilized and could be used to enhance studies of evolutionary morphology. This combination of current methods and potential developments has the capacity to transform the evolutionary analysis of the organismal phenotype into evolutionary phenomics, leading to an era of "big data" that aligns the study of phenotypes with genomics and other areas of bioinformatics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y He
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - J M Mulqueeney
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Ocean & Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - E C Watt
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Salili-James
- AI and Innovation, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Digital, Data and Informatics, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - N S Barber
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Camaiti
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - E S E Hunt
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - O Kippax-Chui
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Grantham Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Knapp
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Lanzetti
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - G Rangel-de Lázaro
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- School of Oriental and African Studies, London, UK
| | - J K McMinn
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Minus
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - A V Mohan
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Biodiversity Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - L E Roberts
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - D Adhami
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imaging and Analysis Centre, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - E Grisan
- School of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, UK
| | - Q Gu
- AI and Innovation, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Digital, Data and Informatics, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - V Herridge
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S T S Poon
- AI and Innovation, Natural History Museum, London, UK
- Digital, Data and Informatics, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - T West
- Centre for Integrative Anatomy, University College London, London, UK
- Imaging and Analysis Centre, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| | - A Goswami
- Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lauer DA, Lawing AM, Short RA, Manthi FK, Müller J, Head JJ, McGuire JL. Disruption of trait-environment relationships in African megafauna occurred in the middle Pleistocene. Nat Commun 2023; 14:4016. [PMID: 37463920 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39480-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammalian megafauna have been critical to the functioning of Earth's biosphere for millions of years. However, since the Plio-Pleistocene, their biodiversity has declined concurrently with dramatic environmental change and hominin evolution. While these biodiversity declines are well-documented, their implications for the ecological function of megafaunal communities remain uncertain. Here, we adapt ecometric methods to evaluate whether the functional link between communities of herbivorous, eastern African megafauna and their environments (i.e., functional trait-environment relationships) was disrupted as biodiversity losses occurred over the past 7.4 Ma. Herbivore taxonomic and functional diversity began to decline during the Pliocene as open grassland habitats emerged, persisted, and expanded. In the mid-Pleistocene, grassland expansion intensified, and climates became more variable and arid. It was then that phylogenetic diversity declined, and the trait-environment relationships of herbivore communities shifted significantly. Our results divulge the varying implications of different losses in megafaunal biodiversity. Only the losses that occurred since the mid-Pleistocene were coincident with a disturbance to community ecological function. Prior diversity losses, conversely, occurred as the megafaunal species and trait pool narrowed towards those adapted to grassland environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Lauer
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
| | - A Michelle Lawing
- Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Rachel A Short
- Department of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, SD, 57703, USA
| | - Fredrick K Manthi
- Department of Earth Sciences, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Johannes Müller
- Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jason J Head
- Department of Zoology and University Museum of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK
| | - Jenny L McGuire
- Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
- School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
- School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mechenich MF, Žliobaitė I. Eco-ISEA3H, a machine learning ready spatial database for ecometric and species distribution modeling. Sci Data 2023; 10:77. [PMID: 36750720 PMCID: PMC9905527 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-01966-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
We present the Eco-ISEA3H database, a compilation of global spatial data characterizing climate, geology, land cover, physical and human geography, and the geographic ranges of nearly 900 large mammalian species. The data are tailored for machine learning (ML)-based ecological modeling, and are intended primarily for continental- to global-scale ecometric and species distribution modeling. Such models are trained on present-day data and applied to the geologic past, or to future scenarios of climatic and environmental change. Model training requires integrated global datasets, describing species' occurrence and environment via consistent observational units. The Eco-ISEA3H database incorporates data from 17 sources, and includes 3,033 variables. The database is built on the Icosahedral Snyder Equal Area (ISEA) aperture 3 hexagonal (3H) discrete global grid system (DGGS), which partitions the Earth's surface into equal-area hexagonal cells. Source data were incorporated at six nested ISEA3H resolutions, using scripts developed and made available here. We demonstrate the utility of the database in a case study analyzing the bioclimatic envelopes of ten large, widely distributed mammalian species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Mechenich
- Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Indrė Žliobaitė
- Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, 00014, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Toivonen J, Fortelius M, Žliobaitė I. Do species factories exist? Detecting exceptional patterns of evolution in the mammalian fossil record. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20212294. [PMID: 35382595 PMCID: PMC8984811 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A species factory refers to the source that gives rise to an exceptionally large number of species. However, what is it exactly: a place, a time or a combination of places, times and environmental conditions, remains unclear. Here we search for species factories computationally, for which we develop statistical approaches to detect origination, extinction and sorting hotspots in space and time in the fossil record. Using data on European Late Cenozoic mammals, we analyse where, how and how often species factories occur, and how they potentially relate to the dynamics of environmental conditions. We find that in the Early Miocene origination hotspots tend to be located in areas with relatively low estimated net primary productivity. Our pilot study shows that species first occurring in origination hotspots tend to have a longer average longevity and a larger geographical range than other species, thus emphasizing the evolutionary importance of the species factories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaakko Toivonen
- Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mikael Fortelius
- Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,The Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Indrė Žliobaitė
- Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,The Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grossnickle DM. Feeding ecology has a stronger evolutionary influence on functional morphology than on body mass in mammals. Evolution 2020; 74:610-628. [PMID: 31967667 DOI: 10.1111/evo.13929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2019] [Revised: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Ecological specialization is a central driver of adaptive evolution. However, selective pressures may uniquely affect different ecomorphological traits (e.g., size and shape), complicating efforts to investigate the role of ecology in generating phenotypic diversity. Comparative studies can help remedy this issue by identifying specific relationships between ecologies and morphologies, thus elucidating functionally relevant traits. Jaw shape is a dietary correlate that offers considerable insight on mammalian evolution, but few studies have examined the influence of diet on jaw morphology across mammals. To this end, I apply phylogenetic comparative methods to mandibular measurements and dietary data for a diverse sample of mammals. Especially powerful predictors of diet are metrics that capture either the size of the angular process, which increases with greater herbivory, or the length of the posterior portion of the jaw, which decreases with greater herbivory. The size of the angular process likely reflects sizes of attached muscles that produce jaw movements needed to grind plant material. Further, I examine the impact of feeding ecology on body mass, an oft-used ecological surrogate in macroevolutionary studies. Although body mass commonly increases with evolutionary shifts to herbivory, it is outperformed by functional jaw morphology as a predictor of diet. Body mass is influenced by numerous factors beyond diet, and it may be evolutionarily labile relative to functional morphologies. This suggests that ecological diversification events may initially facilitate body mass diversification at smaller taxonomic and temporal scales, but sustained selective pressures will subsequently drive greater trait partitioning in functional morphologies.
Collapse
|