Skin Tests for Immediate Hypersensitivity

Symptomatic oral lesions may be associated with contact allergy to substances in oral hygiene products

OBJECTIVE

Dental materials and oral hygiene products may be responsible for oral contact allergic reactions. We aimed to determine the occurrence of allergies in patients with symptomatic oral lichen planus (OLP), oral lichenoid lesions (OLLs) and stomatitis and investigate if patch testing could identify contact allergies to dental materials and oral hygiene products in these patients.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients (7 men, 42 women) aged 31 to 77 years (61 ± 10.3 years) with symptomatic OLP, OLL or stomatitis and 29 healthy age- and gender-matched control subjects were included. They underwent an interview, clinical examination, oral mucosal biopsy and epicutan testing to the European baseline series, a toothpaste and dental material series.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients had OLP, 19 OLL and 11stomatitis. Oral burning/itching was the most common symptom (83.7%), and 65.3% patients had more than one symptom. Patients visited their dentist more often than the healthy subjects and had statistically higher DMF-T and DMF-S scores. Nineteen patients (38.8%) and 10 healthy control subjects (34.5%) had allergic contact reactions primarily to fragrance ingredients. No differences could be found between OLP, OLL, stomatitis and healthy controls with regard to allergic contact reactions. However, contact allergy to aroma substances differed significantly between the patients and the healthy control subjects (p = 0.02). This type of contact allergy was most common in patients with OLP and OLL (p = 0.01). Avoidance cleared symptoms in all cases.

CONCLUSION/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Allergic reactions to aroma substances in oral hygiene products are common in patients with symptomatic OLP, OLL and stomatitis.

Hand eczema guidelines based on the Danish guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema

BACKGROUND

Classification of hand eczema has traditionally been based both on aetiology and clinical appearance. For 20% of cases, the aetiology is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To suggest a classification based on well-defined aetiology as well as on predefined clinical patterns and on the dynamics of hand eczema.

METHODS

Literature studies and discussions among members of the Danish Contact Dermatitis Group.

RESULTS

Criteria are given for the aetiological diagnoses of allergic contact dermatitis of the hands, irritant contact dermatitis of the hands, protein contact dermatitis of the hands, atopic hand eczema and aetiologically unclassifiable hand eczema. Six different clinical patterns are described and illustrated. Suggestions for general treatment principles are given.

CONCLUSION

Operational guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hand eczema are described.

"New" techniques for more sensitive patch testing?

The patch test is the mainstay of diagnosis in allergic contact dermatitis. In its nearly 120-year-long history, numerous efforts to standardize several methodical aspects proved successful. The aim was always to enhance the validity and reliability of patch testing. This article reviews modifications of the basic patch test technique for enhancing test sensitivity. We expand on the recently validated strip patch test, which is a modification that involves affixing tape strips to the skin and removing them prior to patch testing. Although it was first described in 1953, we proposed the first protocol for standardized performance of the "strip patch test." The protocol was then tested in studies. As a result, test sensitivity of standardized strip patch test versus patch test was increased. The protocol produced a uniform reduction in the thickness of the stratum corneum and a good inter-rater agreement. Additionally, there was evidence of a non-specific stimulation of the inflammatory epidermal system. With regard to patient history, the standardized strip patch test showed a vastly better sensitivity than the patch test with only marginally lower specificity. As a complementary measure to patch testing diagnostic accuracy could be improved significantly by performing the standardized strip patch test. Further studies are needed on the reproducibility of the standardized strip patch test.