Antilymphocyte globulin treatment in severe aplastic anemia--comparison with bone marrow transplantation. Report of 60 cases

First-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of HLA-matched sibling donors compared with first-line ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin for acquired severe aplastic anemia

BACKGROUND

Acquired severe aplastic anemia is a rare and potentially fatal disease, which is characterized by hypocellular bone marrow and pancytopenia. The major signs and symptoms are severe infections, bleeding, and exhaustion. First-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) is a treatment for newly diagnosed patients with severe aplastic anemia. First-line treatment with ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin (as first-line immunosuppressive therapy) is an alternative to MSD-HSCT and is indicated for patients where no MSD is found.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of first-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of HLA-matched sibling donors compared to first-line immunosuppressive therapy including ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin in patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), and The Cochrane Library CENTRAL (Wiley) for published articles from 1946 to 22 April 2013. Further searches included trial registries, reference lists of recent reviews, and author contacts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The following prospective study designs were eligible for inclusion: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials if the allocation of patients to treatment groups was consistent with 'Mendelian randomization'. We included participants with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia who received MSD-HSCT or immunosuppressive therapy without prior HSCT or immunosuppressive therapy, and with a minimum of five participants per treatment group. We did not apply limits on publication year or languages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors abstracted the data on study and patient characteristics and assessed the risk of bias independently. We resolved differences by discussion or by appeal to a third review author. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were treatment-related mortality, graft failure, no response to first-line immunosuppressive therapy, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), relapse after initial successful treatment, secondary clonal and malignant disease, health-related quality of life, and performance score.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified three trials that met the inclusion criteria. None of these trials was a RCT. 302 participants are included in this review. The three included studies were prospectively conducted and had features consistent with the principle of 'Mendelian randomization' as defined in the present review. All studies had a high risk of bias due to the study design. All studies were conducted more than 10 years ago and may not be applicable to the standard of care of today. Primary and secondary outcome data showed no statistically significant difference between treatment groups. We present results for first-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of an HLA-matched sibling donor, which we denote as the MSD-HSCT group, versus first-line treatment with ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin, which we denote as the immunosuppressive therapy group in the following section.The pooled hazard ratio for overall mortality for the MSD-HSCT group versus the immunosuppressive therapy group was 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.43 to 2.12, P = 0.90, low quality evidence). Therefore, overall mortality was not statistically significantly different between the groups. Treatment-related mortality ranged from 20% to 42% for the MSD-HSCT group and was not reported for the immunosuppressive therapy group (very low quality evidence). The authors reported graft failure from 3% to 16% for the MSD-HSCT group and GVHD from 26% to 51% (both endpoints not applicable for the immunosuppressive therapy group, very low quality evidence). The authors did not report any data on response and relapse for the MSD-HSCT group. For the immunosuppressive therapy group, the studies reported no response from 15% (not time point stated) to 64% (three months) and relapse in one of eight responders after immunosuppressive therapy at 5.5 years (very low quality evidence). The authors reported secondary clonal disease or malignancies for the MSD-HSCT group versus the immunosuppressive therapy group in 1 of 34 versus 0 of 22 patients in one study and in 0 of 28 versus 4 of 86 patients in the other study (low quality evidence). None of the included studies addressed health-related quality of life. The percentage of the evaluated patients with a Karnofsky performance status score in the range of 71% to 100% was 92% in the MSD-HSCT group and 46% in the immunosuppressive therapy group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient and biased data that do not allow any conclusions to be made about the comparative effectiveness of first-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of an HLA-matched sibling donor and first-line treatment with ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin (as first-line immunosuppressive therapy). We are unable to make firm recommendations regarding the choice of intervention for treatment of acquired severe aplastic anemia.

First-line matched related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared to immunosuppressive therapy in acquired severe aplastic anemia

Introduction

Acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare and progressive disease characterized by an immune-mediated functional impairment of hematopoietic stem cells. Transplantation of these cells is a first-line treatment option if HLA-matched related donors are available. First-line immunosuppressive therapy may be offered as alternative. The aim was to compare the outcome of these patients in controlled trials.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in the bibliographic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. To show an overview of various outcomes by treatment group we conducted a meta-analysis on overall survival. We evaluated whether studies reported statistically significant factors for improved survival.

Results

26 non-randomized controlled trials (7,955 patients enrolled from 1970 to 2001) were identified. We did not identify any RCTs. Risk of bias was high except in 4 studies. Young age and recent year of treatment were identified as factors for improved survival in the HSCT group. Advanced age, SAA without very severe aplastic anemia, and combination of anti-lymphocyte globulin with cyclosporine A were factors for improved survival in the IST group. In 19 studies (4,855 patients), summary statistics were sufficient to be included in meta-analysis. Considerable heterogeneity did not justify a pooled estimate. Adverse events were inconsistently reported and varied significantly across studies.

Conclusions

Young age and recent year of treatment were identified as factors for improved survival in the transplant group. Advanced age, SAA without very severe aplastic anemia, and combination of anti-lymphocyte globulin with cyclosporine A were factors for improved survival in the immunosuppressive group. Considerable heterogeneity of non-randomized controlled studies did not justify a pooled estimate. Adverse events were inconsistently reported and varied significantly across studies.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of stem cells of patients with aplastic anaemia

3 different methods, (1) assays of CFU-Cs and CFU-Es, (2) responsiveness of CFU-Cs and CFU-Es to low doses of CSF and ESF, respectively and (3) effects of ALG on CFU-C colony formation in vitro, were used to evaluate the quantitative and qualitative defects of stem cells in 28 patients with aplastic anaemia. Some patients with aplastic anaemia who had attained complete remission several years previously, exhibited severely depressed in vitro CFU-C colony formation. This suggests that the defect persists for a long time after clinical complete remission. Residual marrow CFU-Cs and CFU-Es did not have defective responses to the humoral stimulating factors, CSF and ESF. No patient showed a rise of colony number after treatment with ALG in vitro.

Severe aplastic anaemia: correlation of in vitro test with clinical response to immunosuppression in 20 patients

Colony formation in agar (CFU-c) was studied in 20 patients with severe aplastic anaemia by three different assays: (1) cultures of light density untreated marrow cells; (2) cultures of marrow cells manipulated in order to enhance colony formation (pretreatment with antilymphocytic globulin, ALG, or 6-methylprednisolone, 6-MPr, T cell depletion, adherent cell (AC) depletion, depletion of both AC and T cells), and (3) co-culture of putative suppressor T cells with autologous T-depleted marrow cells. By the first assay, all patients showed poor colony formation (1 +/- 1.5 colonies/10(5) cells; normal controls 46 +/- 18 colonies/10(5) cells). By the second assay, ALG and 6-MPr had no significant effect on colony formation. Removal of adherent cells proved equally without effect on colony growth. On the contrary, removal of T cells enhanced significantly (P less than 0.001) colony formation in 10 out of 20 patients. By the third assay, colony formation of marrow cells (deprived of T lymphocytes) was inhibited by the addition of autologous T cells in six patients studied. All patients were given high dose bolus 6-MPr as first treatment on admission: only patients who had detectable suppressor T cells in their marrow achieved a complete autologous haematologic reconstitution after 6-MPr or after 6-MPr and ALG. The results of this study indicate the detection of CFU-c/suppressor T cells correlates with responses to immunosuppressive regimens, and may thus help to identify patients with immune mediated aplastic anaemia.