Standards of neurosurgical procedures

Using checklists in a gross anatomy laboratory improves learning outcomes and dissection quality

Checklists have been widely used in the aviation industry ever since aircraft operations became more complex than any single pilot could reasonably remember. More recently, checklists have found their way into medicine, where cognitive function can be compromised by stress and fatigue. The use of checklists in medical education has rarely been reported, especially in the basic sciences. We explored whether the use of a checklist in the gross anatomy laboratory would improve learning outcomes, dissection quality, and students' satisfaction in the first-year Human Structure didactic block at Mayo Medical School. During the second half of a seven-week anatomy course, dissection teams were each day given a hardcopy checklist of the structures to be identified during that day's dissection. The first half of the course was considered the control, as students did not receive any checklists to utilize during dissection. The measured outcomes were scored on four practice practical examinations and four dissection quality assessments, two each from the first half (control) and second half of the course. A student satisfaction survey was distributed at the end of the course. Examination and dissection scores were analyzed for correlations between practice practical examination score and checklist use. Our data suggest that a daily hardcopy list of anatomical structures for active use in the gross anatomy laboratory increases practice practical examination scores and dissection quality. Students recommend the use of these checklists in future anatomy courses.

Errors and Omissions in Anesthesia: A Pilot Study Using a Pilot???s Checklist

There are recent concerns that anesthesiologists are becoming less skilled in providing general anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. We considered whether a verbal checklist would help in the preparation for this event. We created a list of items to be checked when preparing to administer general anesthesia for a Cesarean delivery using expert opinion. This list was loaded onto an electronic checklist system with voice prompts and tested on 20 anesthesiologists using a high-fidelity anesthesia simulator. Participants omitted to check a median of 13 (range, 7-23) of 40 items. Common omissions included not checking that the difficult intubation trolley was available and not optimizing the patient's head position. Most (95%) participants felt that the checklist was useful and 80% would like to use it for practicing simulated scenarios; 60% preferred a written checklist and 40% preferred the verbal checklist. Important checks may be forgotten when preparing to give a general anesthetic for Cesarean delivery, and the use of a checklist could improve patient safety.

Internal regulations and general guidelines of a neurosurgical department and training programme

It is strongly recommended that general guidelines and internal regulations be laid down in written form by the department. The guidelines regulate the general workflow and related trainee duties and responsibilities, education and research, special procedures for particular diseases and conditions (standards of care). Regarding general workflow of the department, the following items should be laid down once in written form: time table of department, working hours, admission procedures, medical records directives, responsibilities on wards and in the emergency unit, patient information, discharge procedures, outpatient consultations, call schedule and on-call duty plan, as well as week-end and holiday regulations for rounds on wards and ICU. Regarding education and research, the following items should be written down: conferences and teaching rounds, policies on presentations and publications, policies regarding meetings and courses, research leave and vacation plan. The written definition of standards of care is still considered optional in neurosurgery at the present time.