Comparison between two static autoregulation evaluation methods

Multimodality monitoring consensus statement: monitoring in emerging economies

The burden of disease and so the need for care is often greater at hospitals in emerging economies. This is compounded by frequent restrictions in the delivery of good quality clinical care due to resource limitations. However, there is substantial heterogeneity in this economically defined group, such that advanced brain monitoring is routinely practiced at certain centers that have an interest in neurocritical care. It also must be recognized that significant heterogeneity in the delivery of neurocritical care exists even within individual high-income countries (HICs), determined by costs and level of interest. Direct comparisons of data between HICs and the group of low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs) are made difficult by differences in patient demographics, selection for ICU admission, therapies administered, and outcome assessment. Evidence suggests that potential benefits of multimodality monitoring depend on an appropriate environment and clinical expertise. There is no evidence to suggest that patients in LAMICs where such resources exist should be treated any differently to patients from HICs. The potential for outcome benefits in LAMICs is arguably greater in absolute terms because of the large burden of disease; however, the relative cost/benefit ratio of such monitoring in this setting must be viewed in context of the overall priorities in delivering health care at individual institutions.

One-minute dynamic cerebral autoregulation in severe head injury patients and its comparison with static autoregulation. A transcranial Doppler study

OBJECTIVE

To compare dynamic and static responses of cerebral blood flow to sudden or slow changes in arterial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 12 severe TBI patients, age 16-63 years, and median GCS 6. We determined the dynamic cerebral autoregulation: response of cerebral blood flow velocity to a step blood pressure drop, and the static cerebral autoregulation: change in cerebral blood flow velocity after a slow hypertensive challenge.

RESULTS

During the dynamic response, the median drop in arterial pressure was 21 mm Hg. Dynamic response was graded between 9 (best) and 0 (worst). The median value was 5; four patients showed high values, (8-9), five patients showed intermediate values (4-6). In three patients (value = 0), the CBFV drop was greater than the cerebral perfusion pressure drop, and maintained through 60 s. The static cerebral autoregulation was preserved in 6/11 patients. The comparison between the two showed four different combinations. The five patients with impaired static cerebral autoregulation showed unfavorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A sharp dynamic vasodilator response could not be sustained, and a slow or absent reaction to a sudden hypotensive challenge could show an acceptable cerebral autoregulation in the steady state. We found that patients with impaired static cerebral autoregulation had a poor outcome, whereas those with preserved static cerebral autoregulation experience favorable outcomes.