The effect of mastoid surgery on atelectatic ears and retraction pockets

Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review

Importance

Tympanic membrane retraction (TMR) is a relatively common otological finding. However, no consensus on its management exists. We are looking especially for a treatment strategy in the military population who are unable to attend frequent follow-up visits, and who experience relatively more barotrauma at great heights and depths and easily suffer from otitis externa from less hygienic circumstances.

Objective

To assess and summarize the available evidence for the effectiveness of surgical interventions and watchful waiting policy in patients with a tympanic membrane retraction.

Evidence review

The protocol for this systematic review was published at Prospero (207859). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched from inception up to September 2020 for published and unpublished studies. We included randomized trials and observational studies that investigated surgical interventions (tympanoplasty, ventilation tube insertion) and wait-and-see policy. The primary outcomes of this study were clinical remission of the tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforations and cholesteatoma development.

Findings

In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 1566 patients with TMRs. We included data from 2 randomized controlled trials (76 patients) and 25 observational studies (1490 patients). Seven studies (329 patients) investigated excision of the TMR with and without ventilation tube placement, 3 studies (207 patients) investigated the wait-and-see policy and 17 studies (1030 patients) investigated tympanoplasty for the treatment of TMRs.

Conclusions and relevance

This study provides all the studies that have been published on the surgical management and wait-and-policy for tympanic membrane retractions. No high level of evidence comparative studies has been performed. The evidence for the management of tympanic membrane retractions is heterogenous and depends on many factors such as the patient population, location and severity of the TMR and presence of other ear pathologies (e.g., perforation, risk of cholesteatoma and serous otitis media).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3.

Canal wall-down procedure with soft posterior meatal wall reconstruction in acquired cholesteatoma: focus on postoperative middle ear status. Acta Otolaryngol 2018. [PMID: 29519185 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1439593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

OBJECTIVES

We reviewed surgical results of canal wall-down tympanoplasty (CWDT) with soft posterior meatal wall reconstruction (SWR) for acquired cholesteatoma (AC), and identified factors associated with surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Results from 119 ears with AC (pars flaccida, n = 99; pars tensa, n = 20) that underwent CWDT with SWR were retrospectively reviewed. We defined postoperative balloon-like retraction (PBR) with web formation, which needed reoperation to clean accumulated cerumen, as postoperative deep retraction pocket (PDRP).

RESULTS

Residual cholesteatoma was found in 11 ears (9.2%). Seven residual cholesteatomas were treated with outpatient operation. Seven ears (5.9%) showed PDRP. A transcanal approach was applied to all PDRPs. Postoperative mastoid reaeration was observed in 57 ears (47.9%). No factors significantly associated with residual cholesteatoma or PDRP were identified. The frequency of postoperative mastoid reaeration was significantly higher among cases with young age (<50 years), stage I cholesteatoma, or type I ossiculoplasty.

CONCLUSION

CWDT with SWR showed low rates of residual cholesteatoma or postoperative deep retraction pocket (PDRP). Most residual cholesteatomas and PDRPs could be dealt with using a minimally invasive procedure. Young age, stage I cholesteatoma, and type I ossiculoplasty were associated with postoperative mastoid reaeration. This procedure seems fully feasible for surgical treatment of AC.

Atelectasis of the middle ear in pediatric patients: safety of surgical intervention

OBJECTIVE

There is no consensus amongst clinicians regarding the best treatment strategy for pediatric atelectasis of the middle ear. It is the policy in our pediatric otolaryngology department to intervene early in the disease process. In an attempt to provide evidence regarding the safety of early intervention we have analyzed the audiological outcome following surgery in different stages of the disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case note review.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study of children with atelectasis treated surgically at a Dutch tertiary referral centre. Disease severity was classified according to the Erasmus Classification of Pediatric Atelectasis, and pre- and postoperative four frequency ac and bc thresholds were compared.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 169 ears in 127 patients. The mean age at surgery was 9.6 years. There was an improvement in the average air-bone gap (ABG) for all stages. No deterioration in mean bone conduction thresholds was found following surgical intervention and there were no dead ears postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that surgical intervention had a favourable effect on hearing level across all stages, though hearing was markedly worse in stage V, and that a policy of intervention early in the disease process cannot be rejected on the grounds of risk of iatrogenic sensorineural hearing loss.

Middle ear atelectasis: what causes it and how is it corrected?

Many options are available to manage a patient who has atelectatic ears. Establishing normal middle ear ventilation and aeration is the cornerstone to successful control of these ears. Often, medical management with nasal steroids and decongestants is all that is needed. If recurrent infections have weakened the tympanic membrane progressively, or the middle ear environment is so severe that medical management does not correct the problem, then surgical correction is often necessary. This article explores the pathogenesis of middle ear atelectasis and explains a classification system to help the clinician determine the best course of management.

Aeration following intact canal wall mastoidectomy

This study examines the prevalence and extent of re-aeration of the mastoid cavity following intact canal wall (ICW) mastoidectomy. Temporal bone computed tomography scans from patients with prior unilateral ICW mastoidectomy were identified. Three-dimensional volume reconstruction of the temporal bone was performed to measure aeration bilaterally. Thirty-five scans were analyzed; 16 (46%) showed good aeration in the operated ear and 19 showed poor aeration. The aeration (volume) in the surgical ears and the contralateral ears was significantly less than that in subjects without a history of ear disease. Those with poor aeration were more likely to require additional surgery. For temporal bone pairs with greater volume in the operated ear, the average difference was 1.3 cm3. Surgical creation of a mastoid cavity does not produce a large increase in aeration as compared with the contralateral ear. Following surgery, mastoid opacification may presage recurrent disease. Routine use of mastoidectomy in an attempt to improve aeration is not advocated.

Secretory otitis media in adults: II. The role of mastoid pneumatization as a prognostic factor

The sequelae of secretory otitis media (SOM) were monitored in 72 adult patients with SOM who were followed up for an average of 33 months. It was found that SOM became chronic and retraction of the tympanic membrane appeared as a function of the pneumatization of the mastoid. Ears with poor pneumatization (less than 6 cm2) developed chronic SOM in 52.2% of cases, as compared with 20% in cases with well-pneumatized ears (6 cm2 and above). Atelectasis developed in 37.3% of poorly pneumatized ears, and in only 5.7% of well-pneumatized ears. These sequelae may therefore be linked pathogenetically to the extent of pneumatization, as both the SOM and the sequelae appeared many years after formation and maturation of the pneumatic system. This study supports other studies that view the mastoid pneumatic system as an organ, as a middle ear pressure buffer. Well-pneumatized ears rarely develop a negative pressure and are seldom associated with chronic sequelae. Ears with poorly pneumatized mastoids lack the physiological function of such a pressure buffer. Ears with a tendency to develop a negative gas balance, whether as a result of deficient ventilation or excessive diffusion, will therefore develop a negative pressure more readily when their pneumatic system is underdeveloped, and consequently will be more prone to develop chronic sequelae.