Mitoxantrone, cisplatin, and methyl-glyoxal bis-guanylhydrazone chemotherapy for refractory malignant lymphoma: a Southwest Oncology Group phase II trial

Mitoxantrone-DHAP with GM-CSF: an active but myelosuppressive salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of dose intensifying DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) salvage chemotherapy by adding mitoxantrone with GM-GSF support in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). From March 1992 to January 1995, 22 patients with intermediate and high grade (aggressive) NHL refractory or relapsed after adriamycin containing chemotherapy regimens were treated with M-DHAP+GM-CSF, (dexamethasone 40 mg i.v. days 1-4, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. by continuous infusion over 24 hours on day 1, cytarabine 2 gm/m2, i.v. every 12 hours for 2 doses on day 2, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 i.v. on days 3 and 4 and GM-CSF 250-500 microg/m2 s.c. daily beginning day 5 until absolute neutrophil count recovery. Most patients had poor prognostic factors including primary refractory disease (18/22), bulky disease (12/22), elevated LDH (9/22), or bone marrow involvement (8/22). All 22 patients were evaluable. The overall response rate was 41% (CR 23% and PR 18%). There were three toxic deaths, all related to sepsis. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 5.2 months and 11.8 months respectively. At the same time of the analysis two patients were alive after high-dose therapy and bone marrow transplant at 34 and 36 months follow-up and two were alive with disease. The maximal acceptable dosage of mitoxantrone was 10 mg/m2 x 2 due to serious hematologic toxicity. Treatment delays and dose reductions compromised delivering the optimal dose intensity of M-DHAP. A poor prognostic group of patients with refractory or recurrent aggressive lymphoma, many of whom were not eligible for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation were treated with repeated cycles of dose intensified DHAP with growth factor support. Although M-DHAP had therapeutic activity even in patients considered to have primary refractory disease, myelosuppression was dose limiting and frequently limited the number of cycles. Therefore, if M-DHAP is to be further evaluated, therapeutic results may be improved further by incorporating strategies to reduce myelotoxicity such as the use of growth factors to reduce platelet transfusion requirements or the use of autologous stem cell support after each cycle.

Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer

Mitoxantrone is a dihydroxyanthracenedione derivative which as intravenous mono- and combination therapy has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy similar to that of standard induction and salvage treatment regimens in advanced breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute nonlymphoblastic leukaemia and chronic myelogenous leukaemia in blast crisis; it appears to be an effective alternative to the anthracycline component of standard treatment regimens in these indications. Mitoxantrone is also effective as a component of predominantly palliative treatment regimens for hepatic and advanced ovarian carcinoma. Limited studies suggest useful therapeutic activity in multiple myeloma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Regional therapy of malignant effusions, hepatic and ovarian carcinomas has also been very effective, with a reduction in systemic adverse effects. Mitoxantrone inhibits DNA synthesis by intercalating DNA, inducing DNA strand breaks, and causing DNA aggregation and compaction, and delays cell cycle progression, particularly in late S phase. In vitro antitumour activity is concentration- and exposure time-proportional, and synergy with other antineoplastic drugs has been demonstrated in murine tumour models. Leucopenia may be dose-limiting in patients with solid tumours, whereas stomatitis may be dose-limiting in patients with leukaemia. Other adverse effects are usually of mild or moderate severity although cardiac effects, particularly congestive heart failure, may be of concern, especially in patients with a history of anthracycline therapy, mediastinal irradiation or cardiovascular disease. Mitoxantrone displays an improved tolerability profile compared with doxorubicin and other anthracyclines, although myelosuppression may occur more frequently. Thus, mitoxantrone is an effective and better tolerated alternative to the anthracyclines in most haematological malignancies, in breast cancer and in advanced hepatic or ovarian carcinoma. Further studies may consolidate its role in the treatment of these and other malignancies.