Bradycardia progressing to cardiac arrest during adenosine thallium myocardial perfusion imaging in occult sino-atrial disease

Deactivation vs. asynchronous pacing - prospective evaluation of a protocol for rhythm management in patients with magnetic resonance conditional pacemakers undergoing adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Background

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging with adenosine stress is an important diagnostic tool in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the method is not yet established for CAD patients with pacemakers (PM) in clinical practice. A possible reason is that no recommendations exist for PM setting (paused pacing or asynchronous mode) during adenosine stress. We elaborated a protocol for rhythm management in clinical routine for PM patients that considers heart rate changes under adenosine using a test infusion of adenosine in selected patients.

Methods

47 consecutive patients (mean age 72.3 ± 10,0 years) with MR conditional PM and known or suspected CAD who underwent CMR in clinical routine were studied in this prospective observational study. PM indications were sinus node dysfunction (SND, n = 19; 40,4%), atrioventricular (AV) block (n = 26; 55.3%) and bradyarrhythmia in permanent atrial fibrillation (AF, n = 2; 4.3%). In patients with SND, normal AV-conduction and resting HR >45 bpm at the time of CMR and in AF the PM was deactivated for the scan. In intermittent AV-block a test infusion of adenosine was given prior to the scan. All patients with permanent higher degree sinuatrial or AV-block or deterioration of AV-conduction in the adenosine test were paced asynchronously during CMR, in patients with preserved AV-conduction under adenosine the pacemaker was deactivated. CMR protocol included cine imaging, adenosine stress perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement.

Results

The adenosine test was able to differentiate between mandatory PM stimulation during CMR and safe deactivation of the device. In patients with permanent sinuatrial or AV-block (n = 11; 23.4%) or deterioration of AV conduction in the adenosine test (n = 5, 10.6%) asynchronous pacing above resting heart rate did not interfere with intrinsic rhythm, no competitive stimulation was seen during the scan. 10 of 15 (66,7%) patients with intermittent AV-block showed preserved AV-conduction under adenosine. As in SND and AF deactivation of the PM showed to be safe during CMR, no bradycardia was observed.

Conclusion

Our protocol for rhythm management during adenosine stress CMR showed to be feasible and safe and may be recommended for pacemaker patients undergoing routine CMR.

Sinus arrest during adenosine stress testing in liver transplant recipients with graft failure: three case reports and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Nuclear stress imaging is used frequently to evaluate patients with end-stage liver disease who are being considered for orthotopic liver transplantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We present three patients who, following graft failure, developed sinus arrest during adenosine stress testing performed in anticipation of repeat liver transplantation. All had undergone uneventful adenosine stress imaging prior to initial transplantation. The mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of adenosine are reviewed, and possible reasons for this phenomenon are discussed. Finally, cautions regarding the use of adenosine and treatment of adenosine-induced sinoatrial and atrioventricular block are reviewed.

CONCLUSION

Adenosine should be used with caution in patients following orthotopic liver transplantation due to an increased risk of sinus arrest. Should sinus arrest or atrioventricular block occur, it appears to respond readily to cessation of adenosine infusion and intravenous aminophylline with no significant sequelae.

Proarrhythmic effects of adenosine: a review of the literature

Adenosine is widely used as an antiarrhythmic agent for the investigation and management of both narrow complex and, less often, broad complex tachycardias. Over the past 10 years or so, reports of severe bradycardias and tachyarrhythmias being induced by this agent have appeared in the literature. As adenosine is increasingly used in emergency departments and indeed outside the hospital setting, a greater awareness of these potential problems is important. In this paper the evidence for such effects is summarised, and the mechanisms involved discussed.

Myocardial infarction during adenosine stress test

A 65 year old woman with history of ischaemic heart disease underwent standard adenosine stress test for myocardial perfusion imaging. She sustained inferior myocardial infarction during the final stages of the stress test. She was admitted to the coronary care unit and received thrombolytic treatment. The patient made an uneventful recovery. Adenosine is widely used for myocardial stress imaging tests and has a good safety profile. So far there has been only one other reported myocardial infarction during adenosine stress test, which was under special circumstances because three days before the test the patient had undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty when a severe circumferential dissection was noted. The present patient's case highlights the need to be aware of rare but potentially serious complications of adenosine, even though it generally has an excellent safety record for use in myocardial stress testing.

Adenosine combined with dynamic exercise for myocardial perfusion imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether combining exercise with adenosine would reduce the adverse effects of adenosine vasodilation.

BACKGROUND

Adenosine vasodilation is effective for perfusion imaging but causes frequent unpleasant noncardiac adverse effects, high noncardiac tracer uptake and occasional arrhythmias.

METHODS

Of 500 consecutive patients referred for thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging, 407 were randomized to three study groups: 6 min of adenosine infusion alone; 6 min of adenosine with submaximal exercise; or symptom-limited exercise with continuous adenosine. Minimal detectable differences are presented; a significance level of 0.05 with a power of 80% is assumed.

RESULTS

There was no difference among the three groups in sensitivity and specificity (overall 96% and 78%, minimal detectable differences 5.5% and 11%, respectively) for detection of coronary artery disease or stenosis in individual coronary arteries. There was a trend toward improved sensitivity in the combined exercise groups compared with that in the adenosine-only group (98% vs. 93%, p = 0.07, minimal detectable difference 6%). Noncardiac side effects were reduced by 43% in the exercise groups (p < 0.0001), and major arrhythmias were reduced by 90% (p < 0.0001). There was no effect on minor arrhythmias (25% vs. 22%, p = 0.6, minimal detectable difference 12%). The heart/background ratios were higher in the exercise groups (all p < 0.02). Each ratio was correlated with the exercise level achieved (all p < 0.001). The reversibility score increased with exercise (p = 0.04), as did the number of patients and segments with reversible defects (both p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining exercise with adenosine infusion reduced the noncardiac side effects of vasodilation and major arrhythmias while improving redistribution and heart/background ratios. These findings may be clinically important. Although maximal exercise with adenosine infusion produced optimal results, the improvement over the submaximal exercise protocol was minor, and this has the advantage of being simple and achievable within the normal 6-min duration of the adenosine infusion.