Bilateral sacroiliac dislocation with intrapelvic intrusion of the lumbosacral spine. A case report

Reduction and fixation of displaced U-shaped sacral fractures using lumbopelvic fixation: technical recommendations

PURPOSE

U-shaped sacral fractures are extremely rare injuries that usually occur as a result of falls from considerable heights. Almost all treatment methods described to date aim solely at stabilizing the fracture but do not contribute to supporting the reduction of such fractures. Using existing implants the purpose of this study is to present a surgical technique that facilitates both the reduction and the stabilization of these injuries. The presented technique was evaluated in a series of three cases.

METHODS

Polyaxial pedicle screws were placed through vertebral bodies L4 and L5. Two long pedicle screws were implanted in the posterior iliac spine. The lumbar pedicle screws were held with two longitudinal rods, and the pelvic screws with one transverse connecting rod. The lumbar longitudinal and pelvic transverse rods were connected via two hinge-like connecting elements. First, distraction was performed between lumbar pedicle screws L5 and the sacral transverse rod. Lordosis was then restored via the hinge joint, thereby eliminating kyphosis. After tightening all moving elements, the fracture was reduced and stabilized.

RESULTS

Computed tomography documented anatomical reduction and fracture healing was achieved in all cases. Two of three patients could be fully mobilized immediately; mobilization of the third patient was delayed due to multiple injuries. Two patients showed neurological symptoms. In one case, complete remission was achieved within 3 weeks, while in the other patient a clear improvement was observed. In all cases, the implant was removed after 8-12 months. There were no post-operative complications, such as infections, wound-healing disorders, neurological deterioration, implant failure, or premature loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical procedure was successful, since it considerably facilitated reduction, thereby shortening surgery time. The stabilization was sufficient to fully mobilize the patients. The procedure is based on existing implant components and is thus routinely available.

A new classification for complex lumbosacral injuries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The optimal classification and treatment algorithm for complex lumbosacral injuries, in particular high-energy sacral fractures and lumbosacral dissociation (LSD) injuries, remains controversial. Currently used classification systems are largely descriptive, lacking validity, reproducibility, treatment considerations, and prognostic information.

PURPOSE

We set out to develop a comprehensive, yet practical, classification system for complex lumbosacral injuries that assists in clinical decision making.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed a new classification system for complex lumbosacral injuries derived through literature review, expert opinion, and our clinical experience treating combat casualties over the past 10 years. We have seen an increased incidence of complex sacral fractures and LSD injuries after high-energy blast trauma, motor vehicle collisions, and aircraft crashes.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature review and discussed the proposed classification with spinal trauma surgeons from a variety of institutions familiar with the treatment of complex high-energy sacral fractures and LSD injuries. We identified the significant clinical and radiographic variables encountered in the decision-making process for the treatment of complex lumbosacral injuries. Existing classification systems were reviewed in light of these essential characteristics, and their limitations were defined and addressed with the new system.

RESULTS

A new classification system called lumbosacral injury classification system (LSICS) was devised based on three injury characteristics: injury morphology, posterior ligamentous complex integrity, and neurologic status. A composite injury severity score was calculated by summing a weighted score from each category, allowing patients to be stratified into surgical and nonsurgical treatment groups based on threshold values. Modifiers to determining appropriate selection for operative treatment include systemic injury load and physiological status of the polytraumatized patient, soft-tissue status, and expected time to mobility. Finally, an algorithm was developed to determine the optimum operative technique based on the previously outlined injury characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The LSICS provides a comprehensive and practical approach for evaluating injury severity and guiding clinical decision making. This system provides common language for surgeons to communicate various injury patterns and formulate treatment modalities. Further studies are necessary to determine the reliability and validity of this new classification system.

Bilateral sacroiliac joint dislocation without associated fracture or anterior pelvic ring injuries

SI joint dislocations are serious injuries. They are often associated with posterior fractures or anterior ring disruptions. This case report documents the outcome of a patient with an uncommon injury involving bilateral SI joint dislocation without associated anterior pelvic injuries or posterior pelvic fracture.