Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy: tube function and malfunction

Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomy Tube Placement Guided by the Assessment and Primary Palliative Care Provided by an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Multidisciplinary Clinic: A Single-Arm Retrospective Clinical Study

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease with a median survival of about 3 years. An ALS multidisciplinary team can provide primary palliative care and improve outcomes and quality of life for patients. Feeding tube insertion may be considered for patients with significant weight loss, or respiratory insufficiency. While radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) tube placement may be an option, further studies are required to determine its best timing and appropriateness. This study's objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of RIG tube placement in ALS patients over a 90-day follow-up period through the assessment and primary palliative care provided by the multidisciplinary team. This retrospective study reviewed the placement of 16 or 18 French RIG-tube without intubation or endoscopy for 36 ALS patients at a single center between April 2019 and December 2021. Measures included ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores to determine the ALS stage. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data were reviewed. Results showed that the RIG tube placement had a low rate of minor adverse events (11%) and no major procedure-related adverse events. The mean ALSFRS-R score at the time of procedure in subjects who died within 90 days was lower than of those alive beyond 90 days (P = .04). This study found that RIG-tube placement is a safe and effective way to manage dysphagia in ALS patients and highlights the importance of educating members of the multidisciplinary clinic in palliative care principles to determine the appropriateness of RIG tube placement.

Radiology guided antegrade GASTROSTOMY deployment of mushroom (pull type) catheters with classical and modified methods in patients with oropharyngeal, laryngeal carcinoma, and anesthesia risk

OBJECTIVE

The aim of study is to evaluate the results of deployment of Percutaneous Radiological Gastrostomy (PRG), which is a good alternative to Surgical Gastrostomy (SG), with transoral approach in cases where Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) is contraindicated, difficult or unsuccessful, in patients with high risk of American Society of Anesthesiologists with four scores. In addition, we aimed to demonstrate the advantages of mushroom pull type catheters over push type gastrostomy catheters.

METHODS

This retrospective study included a total of 40 patients (18 females and 22 males) aged 21-92 years who underwent PRG with the antegrade transoral approach. PRG was performed by retrograde passing through the esophagus or snaring the guidewire from the stomach and taking out of the anterior abdominal wall. Patients' demographic data, indications for PRG, procedural outcomes and complications were screened and recorded.

RESULTS

PRG was performed in 39 of 40 patients included in the study. Technical success rate was 97.5%. Procedure-dependent major complications such as death, aspiration, colon perforation, and deep abscess were not observed. Aspiration occurred in the first patient during the first feeding on the day after the procedure. Major complication rate was 2.5%. The total minor complication rate was 17.5% in 7 patients; parastomal leakage in 2 patients (5%), skin rash and infection in 3 (7.5%) patients, minor bleeding in 2 (5%) patients with oropharynx cancer, minimal bleeding from the gastrostomy catheter 1 week after the procedure in 1 (2.5%) patient. None of the cases had buried buffer. Tube functionality was preserved in all patients without any damage.

CONCLUSION

Mushroom tip (pull type) gastrostomy catheter is a safe treatment method for patients requiring prolonged feeding because of wide diameter, endurance, long staying opening duration, less excessive dilatation and parastomal leakage, and no need for gastropexy. Lower cost and easier access are advantageous for mushroom tip pull type catheters compared to push type gastrostomy catheters in our country. The less invasive PRG is an alternative option in patients who are difficult to administer PEG, are at high anesthesia risk and cannot be sedated.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This article is valuable in terms of its contribution to develop an alternative radiological method for the deployment of gastrostomy tubes in medical difficult patients. This method has shortened the duration of the procedure and increased the success rate in patients with difficulty in transition from the stomach to the esophagus or with difficulty in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Mushroom tip catheters can be placed successfully by radiological methods.

Percutaneous radiologically guided gastrostomy tube placement: comparison of antegrade transoral and retrograde transabdominal approaches

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the antegrade transoral and the retrograde transabdominal approaches for fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement.

METHODS

Following institutional review board approval, all G-tubes at two academic hospitals (January 2014 to May 2015) were reviewed retrospectively. Retrograde approach was used at Hospital 1 and both antegrade and retrograde approaches were used at Hospital 2. Chart review determined type of anesthesia used during placement, dose of radiation used, fluoroscopy time, procedure time, medical history, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients (64 women, 85 men; mean age, 64.4±1.3 years) underwent G-tube placement, including 93 (62%) placed via the retrograde transabdominal approach and 56 (38%) placed via the antegrade transoral approach. Retrograde placement entailed fewer anesthesiology consultations (P < 0.001), less overall procedure time (P = 0.023), and less fluoroscopy time (P < 0.001). A comparison of approaches for placement within the same hospital demonstrated that the retrograde approach led to significantly reduced radiation dose (P = 0.022). There were no differences in minor complication rates (13%-19%; P = 0.430), or major complication rates (6%-7%; P = 0.871) between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

G-tube placement using the retrograde transabdominal approach is associated with less fluoroscopy time, procedure time, radiation exposure, and need for anesthesiology consultation with similar safety profile compared with the antegrade transoral approach. Additionally, it is hypothesized that decreased procedure time and anesthesiology consultation using the transoral approach are likely associated with reduced cost.

Fluoroscopy-guided placement of pull-type mushroom-retained gastrostomy tubes in 102 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical and clinical results of fluoroscopy-guided placement of pull-type mushroom-retained gastrostomy tubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 102 patients (61 men, 41 women) with a mean age of 59years±16.3 (SD) (range, 18-94years) who had fluoroscopy-guided placement of pull-type mushroom-retained gastrostomy tubes. All procedures were performed after inflating the stomach with air via an orally inserted 5-Fr catheter by retrograde catheterization of the esophagogastric junction. Demographic data, results of the procedures and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

A technical success was observed in 101/102 patients, yielding a technical success rate of 99%. Complications due to the procedure were observed in 17/102 patients yielding a procedure-related complication rate of 16.7%. Procedure-related complications included peristomal superficial cellulitis (6/102; 5.9%), peristomal abscess (4/102; 3.9%), subcutaneous hematoma (3/102; 2.9%), peristomal leakage (2/102; 2%), inadvertent removal of the tube (1/102; 1%) and death due to procedure-related peritonitis (1/102; 1%).

CONCLUSION

Fluoroscopy-guided placement of pull-type mushroom-retained gastrostomy tubes is a feasible and effective method for enteral nutrition.

Gastrostomy in head and neck cancer: current literature, controversies and research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article explores the literature on the role of gastrostomy tube feeding use in the management of head and neck cancer, with special attention to its indications, timing of insertion, advantages, complications and quality of life issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current guidelines in place across different countries and two ongoing randomized controlled trials are discussed in detail, and placed in the context of current evidence.

SUMMARY

There remains a lack of consensus about when and which enteral feeding routes (gastrostomy or nasogastric tube) should be used and controversy about the long-term effects on swallowing function as well as quality of life for patients. Local guidelines should be used or generated to guide practice or patients enrolled into existing trials until higher level evidence is generated.

Randomized Trial Comparing Radiologic Pigtail Gastrostomy and Peroral Image-Guided Gastrostomy: Intra- and Postprocedural Pain, Radiation Exposure, Complications, and Quality of Life

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare radiologically created pigtail gastrostomy (PG), in which the tube is inserted directly through the abdominal wall, versus peroral image-guided gastrostomy (POG), in which the tube is inserted through the mouth. Pain profiles (primary outcome measure), fluoroscopy times, total room times, technical success, complications, and quality of life (QOL) were measured.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients were prospectively randomized to receive 14-F PG or 20-F POG tubes. All patients received prophylactically created gastrostomies before radiation therapy for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma. Patients receiving palliative treatment were excluded, as were those with established pharyngeal obstruction. Pain was measured by numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for 6 weeks after the procedure and by intraprocedural fentanyl and midazolam doses and postprocedural 24-h morphine doses. Fluoroscopy times, total room times, technical success, complications up to 6 months, and gastrostomy-related QOL (using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Enteral Feeding questionnaire) were determined.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients underwent the randomized procedure. The POG group required significantly higher intraprocedural midazolam and fentanyl doses (mean, 1.2 mg and 67 μg, respectively, for PG vs 1.9 mg and 105 μg for POG; P < .001) and had significantly longer fluoroscopy times (mean, 1.3 min for PG vs 4.8 min for POG; P < .0001). NRS scores, morphine doses, total room times, technical success, complication rates, and QOL did not differ significantly between groups. The one major complication, a misplaced PG in the peritoneal cavity, followed a technical failure of POG creation.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the differences in insertion technique and tube caliber, the measured outcomes of POG and PG are comparable.

Nutrition management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurological disease with high risk of malnutrition. Symptoms of dysphagia, depression, cognitive impairment, difficulty with self-feeding and meal preparation, hypermetabolism, anxiety, respiratory insufficiency, and fatigue with meals increase the risk of malnutrition. Malnutrition negatively affects prognosis and quality of life, making early and frequent nutrition assessment and intervention essential. Implementation of an adequate calorie diet, dietary texture modification, use of adaptive eating utensils, and placement of a feeding tube aid in preventing malnutrition. When nutrition status is compromised by dysphagia and weight loss (5%-10% of usual body weight) or body mass index <20 kg/m(2) without weight loss and when forced vital capacity is >50%, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement is indicated. When forced vital capacity is <50%, a radiologically inserted gastrostomy is the preferred means of enteral placement due to lessened aspiration and respiratory risk. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated only when enteral nutrition (EN) is contraindicated or impossible. This article reviews the background of ALS, nutrition implications and risk of malnutrition, treatment strategies to prevent malnutrition, the role of EN and PN, and feeding tube placement methods according to disease stage.

Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy

Gastrostomy allows enteral nutrition to continue in patients who are unable to meet their caloric requirements orally. Though the indications for gastrostomy placement are varied, dysphagia secondary to a neurological condition is the most common. These catheters were initially placed surgically, but percutaneous endoscopic placement is now the routine in most centers. Interventional radiologists have been performing this procedure under fluoroscopic guidance for several years with encouraging results. Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy is reported to have a success rate comparable to that of the endoscopic method, with lower morbidity and mortality rates. A further benefit is that it may be performed in patients for whom the endoscopic method would be difficult or dangerous, such as those with head and neck malignancies. One of the main factors currently limiting the use of this procedure is the shortage of interventional radiology facilities and specialists.This article describes a technique for routine percutaneous radiological gastrostomy catheter placement and procedural variations for difficult cases. Indications and contraindications will be discussed, as will complication rates and how these compare with the traditional methods of gastrostomy tube placement.

Evaluation of two different methods for per-oral gastrostomy tube placement in patients with motor neuron disease (MND): PIG versus PEG procedures

Placement of a gastrostomy tube remains the gold standard procedure to maintain nutrition in patients with motor neuron disease (MND) and bulbar muscle weakness. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most commonly used procedure in this context. Per-oral image guided gastrostomy (PIG) is a new hybrid technique used successfully in non-MND patients. We have modified the PIG technique to improve patient tolerability and have undertaken a pilot evaluation of PIG compared to PEG in MND patients. Nineteen PIG and 16 PEG procedures performed over a period of four years were evaluated. Pre-procedural forced vital capacity (FVC), procedural oxygen saturation, post-procedural complications and survival duration were recorded. Results showed that a gastrostomy tube was successfully placed in 95% of the PIG group and 80% of the PEG group. Rates of minor complications were comparable in both groups (21% in PIG, 23% in PEG). No life-threatening complications occurred in either group. Procedural mean oxygen saturations were higher in the PIG group compared to the PEG group (p < 0.001). No significant survival differences were observed. This study provides evidence for the use of the PIG procedure as a safe and well tolerated alternative to PEG in MND patients.

Replacement of mushroom cage gastrostomy tube using a modified technique to allow percutaneous replacement with an endoscopic tube in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Radiologic inserted gastrostomy (RIG) is the preferred method in our institution for enteral feeding in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Skin-level primary-placed mushroom cage gastrostomy tubes become tight with weight gain. We describe a minimally invasive radiologic technique for replacing mushroom gastrostomy tubes with endoscopic mushroom cage tubes in ALS. All patients with ALS who underwent replacement of a RIG tube were included. Patients were selected for a modified replacement when the tube length of the primary placed RIG tube was insufficient to allow like-for-like replacement. Replacement was performed under local anesthetic and fluoroscopic guidance according to a preset technique, with modification of an endoscopic mushroom cage gastrostomy tube to allow percutaneous placement. Assessment of the success, safety, and durability of the modified technique was undertaken. Over a 60-month period, 104 primary placement mushroom cage tubes in ALS were performed. A total of 20 (19.2%) of 104 patients had a replacement tube positioned, 10 (9.6%) of 104 with the modified technique (male n = 4, female n = 6, mean age 65.5 years, range 48-85 years). All tubes were successfully replaced using this modified technique, with two minor complications (superficial wound infection and minor hemorrhage). The mean length of time of tube durability was 158.5 days (range 6-471 days), with all but one patient dying with a functional tube in place. We have devised a modification to allow percutaneous replacement of mushroom cage gastrostomy feeding tubes with minimal compromise to ALS patients. This technique allows tube replacement under local anesthetic, without the need for sedation, an important consideration in ALS.

Mushroom-cage gastrostomy tube placement in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a 5-year experience in 104 patients in a single institution

To review our experience of placement of a mushroom-cage gastrostomy tube (Entristar, Tyco Healthcare, Mansfield, MA), using radiological guidance, in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). All procedures were performed under local anaesthesia without sedation. Complications were recorded as peri-procedural, early (<24 h), late (>24 h), major or minor. Deaths were recorded as related to the underlying ALS or secondary to radiological-inserted gastrostomy (RIG) placement. Replacement RIG tube rate was recorded. Over a 5-year period RIG tubes were placed in 104 patients with ALS (male n = 52, female n = 52), with a median age of 62 years (range 34-86 years). All procedures were technically successful. Of the RIG procedures, 21/104 (20.2%) were performed with respiratory support. The 30-day mortality rate was 7/104 (6.7%); no patient died as a result of the procedure. There were 23/104 (22.1%) complications overall; 20/104 (19.2%) were minor and 3/104 (2.9%) major, requiring surgery (n = 2) and radiological-guided abscess drainage (n = 1). A median interval between replacement RIG procedures in 20/104 (19.2%) patients was 141.5 days (range 43-537 days). A mushroom-cage RIG tube may be safely and effectively inserted in a 'one-step' radiological procedure and may replace endoscopic-inserted gastrostomy tubes in the nutritional management of ALS.

Large or small bore, push or pull: a comparison of three classes of percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy catheters

PURPOSE

To compare the tube performance and complication rates of small-bore, large-bore push-type, and large-bore pull-type gastrostomy catheters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients (74 men, 86 women; mean age, 66.9 years, range, 22-95 y) underwent percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy placement between January 2004 and March 2006. Choice of catheter was based on the preference of the attending radiologist. Data were collected retrospectively with institutional review board approval. Radiology reports provided information on the catheter, indication for gastrostomy, technical success, and immediate outcome. Chart review provided data on medical history, postprocedural complications, progress to feeding goal, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the three classes of gastrostomy catheters.

RESULTS

All 160 catheters were placed successfully. Patients who received small-bore catheters (14 F; n = 88) had significantly more tube complications (17% vs 5.6%) and were less likely to meet their feeding goal (P = .035) compared with patients with large-bore catheters (20 F; n = 72). No difference was observed in terms of major or minor complications. Large-bore push-type (n = 14) and pull-type catheters (n = 58) were similar in terms of complication rates. Patients who received large-bore push-type catheters achieved their feeding goals in significantly less time than those with large-bore pull-type catheters (average, 3.8 days vs 6.0 days; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received small-bore gastrostomy catheters are significantly more prone to tube dysfunction. Large-bore catheters should be preferentially used, with push-type catheters performing better with regard to the time to achieve feeding goal.

Pneumocephalus in a patient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt after percutaneous gastrojejunostomy catheter placement: case report

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous gastrostomy and/or jejunostomy associated with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting in critically ill neurosurgical patients is not an uncommon combination. Massive intraventricular pneumocephalus has not been previously reported as a complication of percutaneous gastrostomy and/or jejunostomy placement in a patient with a VP shunt. A case is presented here where we believe such a complication occurred.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Our patient is a 68-year-old woman who experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage from a right anterior choroidal aneurysm rupture. The patient underwent endovascular coiling. The patient developed a communicating hydrocephalus and eventually necessitated a VP shunt. Two weeks after shunt placement, our patient had a fluoroscopic percutaneous gastrostomy and/or jejunostomy catheter placed. A computed tomographic scan of the brain obtained after feeding tube placement for a change in mental status revealed a significant amount of air in the lateral ventricles. The patient was managed expectantly over the next several days with slow clinical and radiographic improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The etiology for the increased intraventricular pneumocephalus is believed to be retrograde leakage of air into the ventricles via the VP shunt during insufflation of the abdomen for percutaneous placement of a gastrojejunostomy feeding tube.

Entristar skin-level gastrostomy tube: primary placement with radiologic guidance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

PURPOSE

To retrospectively review the authors' experience with a radiologic method of primary insertion of a skin-level gastrostomy tube (Entristar; Tyco Healthcare, Mansfield, Mass) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 12-month period (September 2002 through September 2003), 25 patients with ALS (mean age, 62.4 years; age range, 41-83 years; 15 men, 10 women) who had bulbar impairment and a body mass index of less than 20 kg/m(2) or weight loss of greater than 10% were selected for placement of an enteral feeding tube. Patients with overnight oxygen desaturation or respiratory acidosis were referred for placement of the Entristar tube with radiologic guidance. This procedure was performed with local anesthesia and without sedation by using a modified percutaneous lateral fluoroscopic technique that aided tube insertion in patients with elevation of the hemidiaphragm and a "high" stomach position. Technical success and immediate and delayed procedure complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The Entristar tube was successfully inserted in all 25 patients. Pneumoperitoneum as an early complication was documented in one patient, and one patient developed a pelvic abscess that required drainage. Follow-up for a median of 112 days (range, 14-343 days) revealed superficial wound infections in four patients and weight gain in two patients; weight gain necessitated tube replacement in one patient. There were no procedure-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Radiologically guided insertion of the Entristar skin-level gastrostomy tube is a safe procedure in patients with ALS that allows the creation of a permanent feeding gastrostomy without the need for sedation or endoscopy.

The role of the interventional radiologist in enteral alimentation

The provision of enteral nutrition through the placement of gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy tubes is a well-established procedure. Traditionally, these catheters have been placed either surgically or endoscopically; however, over the past two decades interventional radiologists have increasingly performed these procedures successfully. The perceived advantages of this route lie in the reported lower morbidity and mortality rates. In addition, percutaneous radiologically guided (PRG) catheters may be placed in certain subgroups of patients in whom it would be technically difficult or impossible by other routes, e.g., patients with head and neck or oesophageal tumours. The aim of this review is to describe the techniques of radiologically placed gastrostomy/gastrojejunostomy, discuss its indications and contraindications, describe any associated potential complications and compare PRG results with the more established techniques of open surgical and endoscopic placement. We also describe some recent procedural and catheter modifications.

Gastrostomy insertion: comparing the options--PEG, RIG or PIG?

AIM

To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) with radiologically inserted gastrostomy (RIG) and assess a hybrid gastrostomy technique (per-oral image-guided gastrostomy, PIG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty PEGs and 50 RIGs performed in three centres were prospectively compared and the endoscopic findings of 200 PEGs reviewed. A fluoroscopy-guided technique was modified to place 20 F over-the-wire PEG-tubes in 60 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

Technical success was 98%, 100% and 100% for PEG, RIG and PIG, respectively. Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduced stoma infection for orally placed tubes (p=0.02). Ten out of 50 (20%) small-bore RIG tubes blocked. Replacement tubes were required in six out of 50 PEGs (12%), 10 out of 50 RIGs (20%), but no PIGs (p<0.001). No procedure-related complications occurred. The function of radiologically placed tubes was significantly improved with the larger PIG (p<0.001), with similar wound infection rates. PIG was successful in 24 patients where endoscopic insertion could not be performed. Significant endoscopic abnormalities were found in 42 out of 200 PEG patients (21%), all related to peptic disease. Insignificant pathology was found in 8.5%.

CONCLUSION

PIG combines advantages of both traditional methods with a higher success and lower re-intervention rate. Endoscopy is unlikely to detect clinically relevant pathology other than peptic disease. PIG is a very effective gastrostomy method; it has better long-term results than RIG and is successful where conventional PEG has failed.

Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy

Gastrostomy is a preferred method of nutrition in patients with impaired ability to eat. Although surgical gastrostomy is a well-established method and has been widely performed in the last century, beginning with early 1980s, percutaneous gastrostomy techniques, either endoscopic or radiologic, has widely gained acceptance. As percutaneous methods have been shown to be an effective, safe, easy to perform and low-cost techniques with low morbidity and mortality rates, nowadays percutaneous gastrostomy is the first method of choice in need of nutrition in patients with functioning gut. In this article authors review the technique of percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy, as well as indications, contraindications, variations of technique, ethical considerations, controversies and comparison with surgical and endoscopic methods.

Radiologic gastrostomy placement: pigtail- versus mushroom-retained catheters

OBJECTIVE

Two different types of percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy procedures were prospectively evaluated.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 1998, and August 10, 1999, 127 percutaneous gastrostomy catheters were placed in 128 patients in 128 attempts. Seventy-five 12- or 14-French pigtail-retained catheters and fifty-two 20-French mushroom-retained catheters were inserted. Catheters were generally placed on the basis of operator preference except pigtail-retained tubes were preferentially placed in patients with head and neck or esophageal malignancies and mushroom-retained catheters were preferentially placed in neurologically compromised or combative patients. The technical success, procedural complications, and catheter complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine percent (127/128) of the procedures were successful, and there were no procedural complications. One catheter was not placed because the colon intervened between the abdominal wall and stomach. In patients who received pigtail-retained catheters, the major complication rate was 3% (2/75), the minor complication rate was 8% (6/75), and the tube complication rate was 36% (27/75). The following complications were seen: tube occlusion (n = 12), inadvertent catheter removal (n = 8), peristomal tube leakage (n = 7), superficial cellulitis (n = 4), aspiration pneumonia (n = 2), and T-fastener cellulitis (n = 2). In patients who received mushroom-retained catheters, the major complication rate was 0%, the minor complication rate was 2% (1/52), and the tube complication rate was 2% (1/52). Complications were superficial cellulitis (n = 1) and partial catheter fracture (n = 1). There were no significant differences in major and minor complications between procedures. Pigtail-retained catheters had a significantly higher rate of tube complications (p < 0.001)

CONCLUSION

Compared with pigtail-retained catheters, mushroom-retained gastrostomy catheters are more durable and secure and are less prone to tube dysfunction. These catheters should be preferentially placed when possible.

Radiologic peroral gastrostomy

PURPOSE

To develop an improved percutaneous technique for the insertion of large-bore gastrostomy tubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

With use of fluoroscopic guidance, the stomach is punctured and the esophagus is catheterized in a retrograde fashion. A guide wire is passed from the gastrostomy site, up the esophagus, and out of the patient's mouth. A large-bore (20-24 F) endoscopic push-type gastrostomy tube is advanced over the wire, through the mouth, down the esophagus, and out of the gastrostomy site.

RESULTS

Thirty-one successful tube placements were performed in 32 attempts (97% success rate). There were no major procedural or postprocedure complications. Minor complications included one lip laceration (one of 31 = 3%), one minor exit site infection (one of 31 = 3%), and two inadvertent tube dislodgements (two of 31 = 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologic placement of large-bore endoscopic gastrostomy tubes is possible without endoscopy. The procedure is rapid, easy to perform, and safe.

Importance of fungus colonization in failure of silicone rubber percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (PEGs)

Silicone rubber PEG tubes or replacements were recovered from 111 patients and examined for blockage, dilatations, tears, breaks, or loss of elasticity. All irregularities were stained and examined for fungus using lactophenol cotton blue stain. The intraabdominal portion of the PEG failed from obstructions, loss of elasticity, or tears related to fungus colonies in 36% of cases. An additional 34% were colonized with fungi but did not fail. On frozen section, the fungus invaded the wall of the tubing. The extraabdominal PEG tubing failed from fungi in 12, and 10 additional tubes had colonizations. Nine tubes had distal clogging with crystalline material that is believed to arise from medication. Fungus tube failure occurred in 37% of the tubes in place 250 days and in 70% of tubes in place 450 days. Fungus is an important cause of PEG failure; recommendations are provided to maintain tube patency.

Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with cystic fibrosis

The feasibility of fluoroscopically guided percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with cystic fibrosis is presented, highlighting differences between these and other patients undergoing the procedure.