Visual, vestibular and voluntary contributions to human head stabilization

A Comparison of Walking Behavior during the Instrumented TUG and Habitual Gait

The timed up and go test (TUG) is a common clinical functional balance test often used to complement findings on sensorimotor changes due to aging or sensory/motor dysfunction. The instrumented TUG can be used to obtain objective postural and gait measures that are more sensitive to mobility changes. We investigated whether gait and body coordination during TUG is representative of walking. We examined the walking phase of the TUG and compared gait metrics (stride duration and length, walking speed, and step frequency) and head/trunk accelerations to normal walking. The latter is a key aspect of postural control and can also reveal changes in sensory and motor function. Forty participants were recruited into three groups: young adults, older adults, and older adults with visual impairment. All performed the TUG and a short walking task wearing ultra-lightweight wireless IMUs on the head, chest, and right ankle. Gait and head/trunk acceleration metrics were comparable across tasks. Further, stride length and walking speed were correlated with the participants' age. Those with visual impairment walked significantly slower than sighted older adults. We suggest that the TUG can be a valuable tool for examining gait and stability during walking without the added time or space constraints.

Balance alterations are associated with neck pain and neck muscle endurance in migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine patients may present with both cervical and balance dysfunctions. The neck plays an important role in balance by providing substantial proprioceptive input, which is integrated in the central nervous system and influences the balance control systems. Whether balance and neck dysfunctions are associated in patients with migraine is still to be explored.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the association between the sensory organization test of balance with neck pain features, cervical strength, endurance, and range of motion in patients with migraine.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with migraine underwent the sensory organization test assessed with the Equitest-Neurocom® device. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction, cervical flexion and extension range of motion, and cervical flexor and extensor endurance were assessed. In addition, the features of migraine and neck pain were collected. Patients were dichotomized according to cut-off scores of balance performance and the association between outcomes were explored.

RESULTS

Patients with reduced balance performance presented a higher frequency of migraine (p = 0.035), a higher frequency of aura (p = 0.002), greater neck pain intensity (p = 0.013), and decreased endurance of cervical flexors (p = 0.010) and extensors (p < 0.0001). The total balance score was correlated with age (r = -0.33; p = 0.007), migraine frequency (r = -0.29; p = 0.021), neck pain intensity (r = -0.26; p = 0.038), and endurance of the cervical flexors (r = 0.39; p = 0.001) and extensors (r = 0.36; p = 0.001). Migraine frequency, neck pain intensity, and endurance of the cervical flexors can predict 21% of the sensory organization test variability.

CONCLUSION

Neck pain features and endurance of the cervical muscles are related to reduced balance performance in patients with migraine. These results shed light to a better understanding of balance alterations in migraine patients.

Vestibular Contributions to Primate Neck Postural Muscle Activity during Natural Motion

To maintain stable posture of the head and body during our everyday activities, the brain integrates information across multiple sensory systems. Here, we examined how the primate vestibular system, independently and in combination with visual sensory input, contributes to the sensorimotor control of head posture across the range of dynamic motion experienced during daily life. We recorded activity of single motor units in the splenius capitis and sternocleidomastoid muscles in rhesus monkeys during yaw rotations spanning the physiological range of self-motion (up to 20 Hz) in darkness. Splenius capitis motor unit responses continued to increase with frequency up to 16 Hz in normal animals, and were strikingly absent following bilateral peripheral vestibular loss. To determine whether visual information modulated these vestibular-driven neck muscle responses, we experimentally controlled the correspondence between visual and vestibular cues of self-motion. Surprisingly, visual information did not influence motor unit responses in normal animals, nor did it substitute for absent vestibular feedback following bilateral peripheral vestibular loss. A comparison of muscle activity evoked by broadband versus sinusoidal head motion further revealed that low-frequency responses were attenuated when low- and high-frequency self-motion were experienced concurrently. Finally, we found that vestibular-evoked responses were enhanced by increased autonomic arousal, quantified via pupil size. Together, our findings directly establish the vestibular system's contribution to the sensorimotor control of head posture across the dynamic motion range experienced during everyday activities, as well as how vestibular, visual, and autonomic inputs are integrated for postural control.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Our sensory systems enable us to maintain control of our posture and balance as we move through the world. Notably, the vestibular system senses motion of the head and sends motor commands, via vestibulospinal pathways, to axial and limb muscles to stabilize posture. By recording the activity of single motor units, here we show, for the first time, that the vestibular system contributes to the sensorimotor control of head posture across the dynamic motion range experienced during everyday activities. Our results further establish how vestibular, autonomic, and visual inputs are integrated for postural control. This information is essential for understanding both the mechanisms underlying the control of posture and balance, and the impact of the loss of sensory function.

Advanced cueing of auditory stimulus to the head induces body sway in the direction opposite to the stimulus site during quiet stance in male participants

Under certain conditions, a tactile stimulus to the head induces the movement of the head away from the stimulus, and this is thought to be caused by a defense mechanism. In this study, we tested our hypothesis that predicting the stimulus site of the head in a quiet stance activates the defense mechanism, causing a body to sway to keep the head away from the stimulus. Fourteen healthy male participants aged 31.2 ± 6.8 years participated in this study. A visual cue predicting the forthcoming stimulus site (forehead, left side of the head, right side of the head, or back of the head) was given. Four seconds after this cue, an auditory or electrical tactile stimulus was given at the site predicted by the cue. The cue predicting the tactile stimulus site of the head did not induce a body sway. The cue predicting the auditory stimulus to the back of the head induced a forward body sway, and the cue predicting the stimulus to the forehead induced a backward body sway. The cue predicting the auditory stimulus to the left side of the head induced a rightward body sway, and the cue predicting the stimulus to the right side of the head induced a leftward body sway. These findings support our hypothesis that predicting the auditory stimulus site of the head induces a body sway in a quiet stance to keep the head away from the stimulus. The right gastrocnemius muscle contributes to the control of the body sway in the anterior-posterior axis related to this defense mechanism.

Voluntary suppression of neck reflexes during passive head-on-trunk rotations - reflex gain control vs. proprioceptive feedback

Normal subjects can completely eliminate resistance upon imposed head-on-trunk rotations when they are asked to relax. It is not, however, clear how neck reflexes to stretch can be voluntarily suppressed. Reflexive responses might be modified by adjusting the gain of the reflex loop through descending control. Theoretically, necessary corrections upon interfering disturbances during coordinated motor performance requiring the interplay of relaxation/activation may be missing if muscle relaxation is taking place exclusively by this mechanism. It has been alternatively proposed that sensory information from the periphery may be allowed to “neutralize” neck reflexes if it is fed back with opposite sign to the structures driving the reflexes. Six healthy subjects were asked to relax while subjected to head-on-trunk rotations generated by a head motor. After any initial resistance had completely subsided, the head was unexpectedly exposed to “ramp-and-hold” perturbations of up to 2° amplitude and 0.7 s duration. Resistance to stretch consistently reappeared thereupon, suggesting that stretch reflex gain had not been set to zero during the previously achieved complete relaxation. Resistance to perturbations under these circumstances was compared with the forces generated when the same ramp-and-hold displacements were delivered unpredictably to the head held stationary. A quantitative model of neck proprioceptive reflexes suppression has been thus constructed. Gain scheduling or “motor set” cannot sufficiently account for the voluntary reflex suppression during slow passive head rotations. Instead, we propose as underlying mechanism, the “neutralization” of the controlling servo by means of continuous feedback tracking displacement and force signals from the periphery.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY Head stabilizing neck reflexes can be voluntarily suppressed or activated depending on the task at hand. By applying brief perturbations unexpectedly, both during passive head-on-trunk movements and at rest, we investigated the mechanism of voluntary suppression of resistance to stretch. A physiologically plausible, neuromechanical model of voluntary/reflexive interactions was constructed favoring feedback over reflex gain adjustments. Accordingly, muscle relaxation during imposed head movements is based on sensory feedback similarly to muscle contractions during purposeful movements.

The Enduring Controversy of Cervicogenic Vertigo, and Its Place among Positional Vertigo Syndromes

The idea of cervicogenic vertigo (CV) was proposed nearly a century ago, yet despite considerable scrutiny and research, little progress has been made in clarifying the underlying mechanism of the disease, developing a confirmatory diagnostic test, or devising an appropriately targeted treatment. Given the history of this idea, we offer a review geared towards understanding why so many attempts at clarifying it have failed, with specific comments regarding how CV fits into the broader landscape of positional vertigo syndromes, what a successful diagnostic test might require, and some practical advice on how to approach this in the absence of a diagnostic test.

Rigid head-neck responses to unpredictable perturbations in patients with long standing neck pain does not change with treatment

In a previous study we have shown that patients with long standing non-specific neck-pain display more rigid neck movement behavior than controls in response to unpredictable perturbations. In the present study we investigated head/neck motor control in patients with neck-pain during a course of physiotherapy intervention and the associations with pain, neck disability and kinesiophobia. In this longitudinal observational study, 72 patients with non-specific neck-pain were exposed to unpredictable horizontal rotations by means of an actuated chair in three conditions; with a visual reference, and without vision with and without a cognitive task before first consultation with physiotherapist, after 2 weeks and 2 months of intervention. The neck movements were analyzed in the frequency domain to cover voluntarily and reflex controlled responses. Questionnaires encompassed Neck Disability Index, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and the Numerical Rating Scale for current pain. The results showed that the response pattern for the amplitudes of movement between head and trunk across frequencies did not change over time, whereas some changes in timing were found for some frequencies. Pain, neck disability, and kinesiophobia improved after intervention, but were not significantly associated with neck movement responses to perturbations across time or condition. Although physiotherapy intervention improved self-reported function, the rigid responses to unpredictable perturbations remained unchanged. This indicates altered function in reflex mediated control mechanisms, i.e., the vestibulocollic and the cervicocollic reflex systems that control the head in space and on the trunk. Future research should further investigate pain related changes in reflex systems and whether alterations in these systems are modifiable.

Head stabilization in small vertebrates that run at high frequencies with a sprawled posture

Small animals face a large challenge when running. A stable head is key to maintenance of a stable gaze and a good sense of self-motion and spatial awareness. However, trunk undulations caused by the cyclic limb movements result in involuntary head movements. Hence, the head needs to be stabilized. Humans are capable of stabilizing their head up to 2–3 Hz, but small animals run at cycle frequencies that are up to six times higher. We wondered how natural selection has adapted their head stabilization control. We observed that the relative contributions of vision, on the one hand, and vestibular perception and proprioception, on the other hand, remain the same when lizards undergo fast or slow body undulations in an experimental set-up. Lizards also maintain a short phase lag at both low and high undulation frequencies. Hence, we found no indication that they use a different control mechanism at high frequencies. Instead, head stabilization probably remains possible owing to faster reflex pathways and a lower head inertia. Hence, the intrinsic physical and neurological characteristics of lizards seem to be sufficient to enable head stabilization at high frequencies, obviating the need for evolutionary adaptation of the control pathways. These properties are not unique to lizards and might, therefore, also facilitate head stabilization at high frequencies in other small, fast animals.

Neural Mechanisms Underlying High-Frequency Vestibulocollic Reflexes In Humans And Monkeys

The vestibulocollic reflex is a compensatory response that stabilizes the head in space. During everyday activities, this stabilizing response is evoked by head movements that typically span frequencies from 0 to 30 Hz. Transient head impacts, however, can elicit head movements with frequency content up to 300-400 Hz, raising the question whether vestibular pathways contribute to head stabilization at such high frequencies. Here, we first established that electrical vestibular stimulation modulates human neck motor unit (MU) activity at sinusoidal frequencies up to 300 Hz, but that sensitivity increases with frequency up to a low-pass cutoff of ∼70-80 Hz. To examine the neural substrates underlying the low-pass dynamics of vestibulocollic reflexes, we then recorded vestibular afferent responses to the same electrical stimuli in monkeys. Vestibular afferents also responded to electrical stimuli up to 300 Hz, but in contrast to MUs their sensitivity increased with frequency up to the afferent resting firing rate (∼100-150 Hz) and at higher frequencies afferents tended to phase-lock to the vestibular stimulus. This latter nonlinearity, however, was not transmitted to neck motoneurons, which instead showed minimal phase-locking that decreased at frequencies >75 Hz. Similar to human data, we validated that monkey muscle activity also exhibited low-pass filtered vestibulocollic reflex dynamics. Together, our results show that neck MUs are activated by high-frequency signals encoded by primary vestibular afferents, but undergo low-pass filtering at intermediate stages in the vestibulocollic reflex. These high-frequency contributions to vestibular-evoked neck muscle responses could stabilize the head during unexpected head transients.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Vestibular-evoked neck muscle responses rely on accurate encoding and transmission of head movement information to stabilize the head in space. Unexpected transient events, such as head impacts, are likely to push the limits of these neural pathways since their high-frequency features (0-300 Hz) extend beyond the frequency bandwidth of head movements experienced during everyday activities (0-30 Hz). Here, we demonstrate that vestibular primary afferents encode high-frequency stimuli through frequency-dependent increases in sensitivity and phase-locking. When transmitted to neck motoneurons, these signals undergo low-pass filtering that limits neck motoneuron phase-locking in response to stimuli >75 Hz. This study provides insight into the neural dynamics producing vestibulocollic reflexes, which may respond to high-frequency transient events to stabilize the head.

Vision Does Not Necessarily Stabilize the Head in Space During Continuous Postural Perturbations

Vision favors head stabilization in space during perturbations of standing balance. This is particularly obvious under conditions of continuous predictable perturbations as during sinusoidal antero-posterior (A-P) translations of the supporting platform. We tested here the hypothesis that under this condition the head can instead undergo large A-P oscillations, when a precision visual task is concurrently performed. We compared the head oscillations across four conditions while standing on a continuously translating platform. Eyes open (EO, no visual task), EO while reading a text fixed to the moving platform (EO-TP), EO while reading a text fixed to earth-ground (EO-TG), eyes-closed (EC). The platform translated at 0.2 and 0.6 Hz. Participants were young adult subjects, who received no particular instruction except reading the text aloud when required. Markers fixed on head, platform and text-sheet were captured by an optoelectronic device. We found that head oscillations were larger with EC than under all EO conditions. The oscillations were the least with EO and EO-TG, and intermediate with EO-TP. This was true under both low and high translation frequency, in spite of broadly smaller head oscillations at high frequency, common to all visual conditions. The distance between the head and the text was quite constant with EO-TP but fluctuated with EO-TG. The basic whole-body coordination features were moderately similar under all conditions, as assessed by the head-platform correlation coefficients and time lags. It appears that vision does not produce head stabilization in space when a concurrent visual task requiring focusing on a reading-text moving with the platform is performed. Contrary to traditional views centered on the stabilizing effect of vision under both static and dynamic conditions, the results show that head stabilization, normally ensuring a reference for inertial guidance for body balance, can be revoked by the CNS to allow performance of a non-postural task. This novel paradigm can shift long-standing views on the effect of vision on equilibrium control and be considered a potential exercise treatment for enhancing the multisensory integration process in people with balance problems.

Gravito-inertial ambiguity resolved through head stabilization

It has been frequently observed that humans and animals spontaneously stabilize their heads with respect to the gravitational vertical during body movements even in the absence of vision. The interpretations of this intriguing behaviour have so far not included the need, for survival, to robustly estimate verticality. Here we use a mechanistic model of the head/otolith organ to analyse the possibility for this system to render verticality 'observable', a fundamental prerequisite to the determination of the angular position and acceleration of the head from idiothetic, inertial measurements. The intrinsically nonlinear head-vestibular dynamics is shown to generally lack observability unless the head is stabilized in orientation by feedback. Thus, our study supports the hypothesis that a central function of the physiologically costly head stabilization strategy is to enable an organism to estimate the gravitational vertical and head acceleration during locomotion. Moreover, our result exhibits a rare peculiarity of certain nonlinear systems to fortuitously alter their observability properties when feedback is applied.

Frequency-dependent deficits in head steadiness in patients with nonspecific neck pain

Motor control impairments are reported in patients with nonspecific neck pain but the particular deficits in underlying regulatory systems are not known. Head steadiness is controlled both by voluntary and reflex systems that are predominantly effective within different frequency intervals. The aim of the present study was to investigate within which frequency range(s) potential motor control deficits may reside. The ability to keep the head stationary in space in response to unpredictable perturbations was tested in 71 patients with nonspecific neck pain and 17 healthy controls. Participants were exposed to pseudorandom horizontal rotations across 10 superimposed frequencies (0.185-4.115 Hz) by means of an actuated chair in three conditions; with a visual reference, and without vision with, and without a cognitive task. Below 1 Hz, patients kept the head less stable in space compared to healthy controls. Between 1 and 2 Hz, the head was stabilized on the trunk in both groups. Patients kept the head more stable relative to the trunk than relative to space compared to healthy controls. This was interpreted as higher general neck muscle co-activation in patients, which may be explained by altered voluntary control, or/and upregulated gamma motor neuron activity which increases the contribution of reflex-mediated muscle activation. Alternatively, increased muscle activity is secondary to vestibular deficits.

Targeting head movements in humans: Compensation for disturbance from simultaneous body rotations

Vestibular information plays an important role in spatially oriented motor control and perception. With regard to reorienting head movements, little is known of (1) how vestibular mechanisms compensate for disturbances from concurrent passive trunk rotations (e.g. in a veering vehicle), and (2) whether and how this disturbance compensation is related to the perception of body orientation in space. We here address these two questions in a single experiment. Six healthy subjects (Ss) seated on a turning chair in darkness performed two tasks. (1) Head pointing: Ss made swift head movements in darkness towards the angular position in space of a previously shown visual target. These movements were disturbed by concurrent rotations of the chair, and hence the trunk, which were driven by scaled down versions of the Ss' own head-on-trunk rotations. Although unaware of the disturbance, Ss adjusted their head movements so as to attenuate its effect on head-in-space (HS) position by about 45%. (2) Visual straight ahead (VSA): Using a light pointer, Ss indicated their VSA before each head-pointing trial and tried to reproduce it after the trial. In all Ss, VSA accounted for the disturbing trunk rotation, although to individually varying degrees. No correlation could be detected between VSA reproduction and motor performance, neither within nor across subjects. A vestibular loss subject who performed the same two tasks made no compensatory movements during head pointing and did not account for the disturbance of his HS position during VSA reproduction. Three concepts of vestibular information processing for head movement control were explored with regard to their compatibility with the head-pointing results: (1) Conventional negative feedback, (2) Interaction with an efference copy, and (3) Interaction with neck proprioceptive information. Theoretical analyses and model simulations indicated that all three concepts can explain the observed disturbance compensation. However, they differ in terms of control stability in the presence of feedback time delays, with (3) being best and (1) worst. The different concepts might correspond to fast simple and slower complex compensation mechanisms, respectively, and possibly complement each other during natural behaviours. VSA reproduction may be based on analogous processing principles, but appears to involve different neural circuitries.

Investigating Head Movements Induced by 'Riloid' Patterns in Migraine and Control Groups Using a Virtual Reality Display

Certain striped patterns can induce illusory motion, such as those used in op-art. The visual system and the vestibular system work together closely, and so it is possible that illusory motion from a visual stimulus can result in uncertainty in the vestibular system. This increased uncertainty may be measureable in terms of the magnitude of head movements. Head movements were measured using a head-mounted visual display. Results showed that stimuli associated with illusory motion also seem to induce greater head movements when compared to similar stimuli. Individuals with migraine are more susceptible to visual discomfort, and this includes illusory motion from striped stimuli. However, there was no evidence of increased effect of illusory motion on those with migraine compared to those without, suggesting that while motion illusions may affect discomfort judgements, this is not limited to only those with migraine.

Direct and indirect effects of attention and visual function on gait impairment in Parkinson's disease: influence of task and turning

Gait impairment is a core feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) which has been linked to cognitive and visual deficits, but interactions between these features are poorly understood. Monitoring saccades allows investigation of real-time cognitive and visual processes and their impact on gait when walking. This study explored: (i) saccade frequency when walking under different attentional manipulations of turning and dual-task; and (ii) direct and indirect relationships between saccades, gait impairment, vision and attention. Saccade frequency (number of fast eye movements per-second) was measured during gait in 60 PD and 40 age-matched control participants using a mobile eye-tracker. Saccade frequency was significantly reduced in PD compared to controls during all conditions. However, saccade frequency increased with a turn and decreased under dual-task for both groups. Poorer attention directly related to saccade frequency, visual function and gait impairment in PD, but not controls. Saccade frequency did not directly relate to gait in PD, but did in controls. Instead, saccade frequency and visual function deficit indirectly impacted gait impairment in PD, which was underpinned by their relationship with attention. In conclusion, our results suggest a vital role for attention with direct and indirect influences on gait impairment in PD. Attention directly impacted saccade frequency, visual function and gait impairment in PD, with connotations for falls. It also underpinned indirect impact of visual and saccadic impairment on gait. Attention therefore represents a key therapeutic target that should be considered in future research.

Head orientation of walking blowflies is controlled by visual and mechanical cues

During locomotion animals employ visual and mechanical cues in order to establish the orientation of their head, which reflects the orientation of the visual coordinate system. However, in certain situations, contradictory cues may suggest different orientations relative to the environment. We recorded blowflies walking on a horizontal or tilted surface surrounded by visual cues suggesting a variety of orientations. We found that the different orientations relative to gravity of visual cues and walking surface were integrated, with the orientation of the surface being the major contributor to head orientation, while visual cues and gravity also play an important role. In contrast, visual cues did not affect body orientation much. Cue integration was modeled as the weighted sum of orientations suggested by the different cues. Our model suggests that in case of lacking visual cues more weight is given to gravity.

Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization during random rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane revisited

This study repeats the experimental protocol for investigation of head stabilization in healthy humans, described by Keshner and Peterson (1995) but with a modification of the analysis. Head movements were considered with respect to the room instead of relative to the trunk. The aim was to investigate the approximate contribution of reflex and voluntary control across perturbing frequencies and conditions with modulation of visual information and mental attention and discuss the resulting outcome while comparing methods. Seventeen healthy individuals were asked to keep the head steady in space while subjected to pseudorandom rotational perturbations in the horizontal plane, firmly seated on an actuated chair. Both methods confirmed the results for gain in previous studies showing fair ability to keep the head steady in space below 1 Hz with vision. Compensation deteriorated when vision was removed and worsened further with addition of a mental task. Between 1 and 2 Hz, unity gain occurred between head and trunk movements, whereas above 2 Hz the head moved more than the trunk. For phase angles, the original method demonstrated a phase split occurring from ~1 Hz, a purely mathematical artifact that caused subjects with virtually identical movements to appear as significantly different. This artifact was eliminated by analyzing the head‐room relative to trunk‐room rather than head–trunk relative to trunk‐room angles, thus preventing potentially erroneous interpretations of the results.

Trunk stabilization during sagittal pelvic tilt: from trunk-on-pelvis to trunk-in-space due to vestibular and visual feedback

The goal of this study was to investigate the human ability to stabilize the trunk in space during pelvic tilt. Upper body sway was evoked in kneeling-seated healthy subjects by angular platform perturbations with a rotation around a virtual low-back pivot point between the L4 and L5 vertebrae. To investigate motor control modulation, variations in task instruction (balance naturally or minimize trunk sway), vision (eyes open or closed), and perturbation bandwidth (from 0.2 up to 1, 3, or 10 Hz) were applied. Cocontraction and proprioceptive muscle spindle feedback were associated with minimizing low-back flexion/extension (trunk-on-pelvis stabilization), while vestibular and visual feedback were supposed to contribute to trunk-in-space stabilization. Trunk-in-space stabilization was only observed with the minimize trunk sway task instruction, while the task instruction to balance naturally led to trunk-on-pelvis stabilization with trunk rotations even exceeding the perturbations. This indicates that vestibular feedback is used when minimizing trunk sway but has only a minor contribution during natural trunk stabilization in the sagittal plane. The eyes open condition resulted in reduced global trunk rotations and increased global trunk reflexive responses, demonstrating effective visual contributions to trunk-in-space stabilization. On the other hand, increasing perturbation bandwidth caused a decreased feedback contribution leading to deteriorated trunk-in-space stabilization.

Task, muscle and frequency dependent vestibular control of posture

The vestibular system is crucial for postural control; however there are considerable differences in the task dependence and frequency response of vestibular reflexes in appendicular and axial muscles. For example, vestibular reflexes are only evoked in appendicular muscles when vestibular information is relevant to postural control, while in neck muscles they are maintained regardless of the requirement to maintain head on trunk balance. Recent investigations have also shown that the bandwidth of vestibular input on neck muscles is much broader than appendicular muscles (up to a factor of 3). This result challenges the notion that vestibular reflexes only contribute to postural control across the behavioral and physiological frequency range of the vestibular organ (i.e., 0-20 Hz). In this review, we explore and integrate these task-, muscle- and frequency-related differences in the vestibular system's contribution to posture, and propose that the human nervous system has adapted vestibular signals to match the mechanical properties of the system that each group of muscles controls.

Modulation of intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stabilization due to vision, task instruction, and perturbation bandwidth

The goal of this study is to assess how reflexes and intrinsic properties contribute to low-back stabilization and modulate with conditions. Upper body sway was evoked by anterior-posterior platform translations, while subjects were seated with a restrained pelvis and free upper body. Kinematic analysis of trunk translations and rotations illustrated that a fixed rotation point between the vertebrae L4 and L5 adequately captures lumbar bending up to 5 Hz. To investigate the motor control modulation, the conditions varied in vision (eyes open or closed), task instruction (Balance naturally or Resist perturbations by minimizing low-back motions), and perturbation bandwidth (from 0.2 up to 1, 3 or 10 Hz). Frequency response functions and physiological modeling parameters showed substantial modulation between all conditions. The eyes-open condition led to trunk-in-space behavior with additional long-latency visual feedback and decreased proprioceptive feedback. The task instruction to resist led to trunk-on-pelvis stabilization behavior, which was achieved by higher co-contraction levels and increased reflexive velocity feedback. Perturbations below the low-back natural frequency (~1 Hz) led to trunk-on-pelvis stabilization behavior, mainly attributed to increased intrinsic damping. This indicates that bandwidth effects should not be ignored and that experiments with high-bandwidth perturbations do not fully represent the intrinsic and reflexive behavior during most (low-bandwidth) daily life activities. The neck stabilized the head orientation effectively (head rotation amplitudes 2 % of trunk), but did not effectively stabilize the head in space (global head translations exceeded trunk translations by 20 %). This indicates that low-back motor control is involved in head-in-space stabilization and could explain the low-back motor control modulations due to vision.

Neck proprioception shapes body orientation and perception of motion

This review article deals with some effects of neck muscle proprioception on human balance, gait trajectory, subjective straight-ahead (SSA), and self-motion perception. These effects are easily observed during neck muscle vibration, a strong stimulus for the spindle primary afferent fibers. We first remind the early findings on human balance, gait trajectory, SSA, induced by limb, and neck muscle vibration. Then, more recent findings on self-motion perception of vestibular origin are described. The use of a vestibular asymmetric yaw-rotation stimulus for emphasizing the proprioceptive modulation of motion perception from the neck is mentioned. In addition, an attempt has been made to conjointly discuss the effects of unilateral neck proprioception on motion perception, SSA, and walking trajectory. Neck vibration also induces persistent aftereffects on the SSA and on self-motion perception of vestibular origin. These perceptive effects depend on intensity, duration, side of the conditioning vibratory stimulation, and on muscle status. These effects can be maintained for hours when prolonged high-frequency vibration is superimposed on muscle contraction. Overall, this brief outline emphasizes the contribution of neck muscle inflow to the construction and fine-tuning of perception of body orientation and motion. Furthermore, it indicates that tonic neck-proprioceptive input may induce persistent influences on the subject's mental representation of space. These plastic changes might adapt motion sensitiveness to lasting or permanent head positional or motor changes.

Reach endpoint formation during the visuomotor planning of free arm pointing

Volitional motor control generally involves deciding 'where to go' and 'how to go there'. Understanding how these two constituent pieces of motor decision coordinate is an important issue in neuroscience. Although the two processes could be intertwined, they are generally thought to occur in series, whereby visuomotor planning begins with the knowledge of a final hand position to attain. However, daily activities are often compatible with an infinity of final hand positions. The purpose of the present study was to test whether the reach endpoint ('where') is an input of arm motor planning ('how') in such ecological settings. To this end, we considered a free pointing task, namely arm pointing to a long horizontal line, and investigated the formation of the reach endpoint through eye-hand coordination. Although eye movement always preceded hand movement, our results showed that the saccade initiation was delayed by ~ 120 ms on average when the line was being pointed to as compared with a single target dot; the hand reaction time was identical in the two conditions. When the latency of saccade initiation was relatively brief, subjects often performed double, or even triple, saccades before hand movement onset. The number of saccades triggered was found to significantly increase as a function of the primary saccade latency and accuracy. These results suggest that knowledge about the reach endpoint built up gradually along with the arm motor planning process, and that the oculomotor system delayed the primary reach-related saccade in order to gain more information about the final hand position.

Interactions between voluntary head control and neck proprioceptive reflexes in cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

To investigate deficiencies in mechanisms of sensorimotor processing and reflexive-voluntary interactions leading to the impaired head position control in primary cervical dystonia.

METHODS

Thirteen patients and 23 healthy controls were subjected to transient, low amplitude, low velocity head-on-trunk, trunk-under-head and whole-body rotations in the horizontal plane. With the instruction not to resist the imposed displacements, resistance to horizontal neck deflections was evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients exhibited a torque offset (bias) in the direction of torticollis before stimulus application. While controls reduced and occasionally eliminated completely the initial resistance to head-to-trunk rotations, torque in patients increased throughout displacements. Change of resistance relative to baseline in patients was, however, symmetrical, i.e. independent of torticollis direction. Spontaneous torque fluctuations were significantly larger in patients. Strong correlations existed among these abnormal findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' ability to manipulate normal postural reactions to head-trunk rotations is impaired. The deficit is bilateral and correlates with the degree of abnormal posture. The present study extends previous work on reflexive-voluntary interactions and provides evidence that malfunctioning proprioceptive feedback may contribute to the pathophysiology of cervical dystonia.

Head movements evoked in alert rhesus monkey by vestibular prosthesis stimulation: implications for postural and gaze stabilization

The vestibular system detects motion of the head in space and in turn generates reflexes that are vital for our daily activities. The eye movements produced by the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) play an essential role in stabilizing the visual axis (gaze), while vestibulo-spinal reflexes ensure the maintenance of head and body posture. The neuronal pathways from the vestibular periphery to the cervical spinal cord potentially serve a dual role, since they function to stabilize the head relative to inertial space and could thus contribute to gaze (eye-in-head + head-in-space) and posture stabilization. To date, however, the functional significance of vestibular-neck pathways in alert primates remains a matter of debate. Here we used a vestibular prosthesis to 1) quantify vestibularly-driven head movements in primates, and 2) assess whether these evoked head movements make a significant contribution to gaze as well as postural stabilization. We stimulated electrodes implanted in the horizontal semicircular canal of alert rhesus monkeys, and measured the head and eye movements evoked during a 100 ms time period for which the contribution of longer latency voluntary inputs to the neck would be minimal. Our results show that prosthetic stimulation evoked significant head movements with latencies consistent with known vestibulo-spinal pathways. Furthermore, while the evoked head movements were substantially smaller than the coincidently evoked eye movements, they made a significant contribution to gaze stabilization, complementing the VOR to ensure that the appropriate gaze response is achieved. We speculate that analogous compensatory head movements will be evoked when implanted prosthetic devices are transitioned to human patients.

Keeping your head on target

The mechanisms by which the human brain controls eye movements are reasonably well understood, but those for the head less so. Here, we show that the mechanisms for keeping the head aimed at a stationary target follow strategies similar to those for holding the eyes steady on stationary targets. Specifically, we applied the neural integrator hypothesis that originally was developed for holding the eyes still in eccentric gaze positions to describe how the head is held still when turned toward an eccentric target. We found that normal humans make head movements consistent with the neural integrator hypothesis, except that additional sensory feedback is needed, from proprioceptors in the neck, to keep the head on target. We also show that the complicated patterns of head movements in patients with cervical dystonia can be predicted by deficits in a neural integrator for head motor control. These results support ideas originally developed from animal studies that suggest fundamental similarities between oculomotor and cephalomotor control, as well as a conceptual framework for cervical dystonia that departs considerably from current clinical views.

Balancing on a Slackline: 8-Year-Olds vs. Adults

Children are less stable than adults during static upright stance. We investigated whether the same holds true for a task that was novel for both children and adults and highly dynamic: single-legged stance on a slackline. We compared 8-year-olds with young adults and assessed the following outcome measures: time on the slackline, stability on the slackline (calculated from slackline reaction force), gaze movement, head-in-space rotation and translation, trunk-in-space rotation, and head-on-trunk rotation. Eight-year-olds fell off the slackline quicker and were generally less stable on the slackline than adults. Eight-year-olds also showed more head-in-space rotation and translation, and more gaze variability around a visual anchor point they were instructed to fixate. Trunk-in-space and head-on-trunk rotations did not differ between groups. The results imply that the lower postural stability of 8-year-olds compared to adults – as found in simple upright stance – holds true for dynamic, novel tasks in which adults lack the advantage of more practice. They also suggest that the lack of head and gaze stability constitutes an important limiting factor in children’s ability to master such tasks.

Head stabilization shows visual and inertial dependence during passive stimulation: implications for virtual rehabilitation

Sensorimotor coordination relies on the fine calibration and integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory input. Using virtual environments (VE) allows for the dissociation of visual and inertial inputs to manipulate human behavioral outputs. Our goal was to employ VE technology in a novel manner to investigate how head stabilization is affected by spatiotemporal properties of dynamic visual input when combined with passive motion on a linear sled. Healthy adults (n = 12) wore a head-mounted display during naso-occipital sinusoidal horizontal whole body translations while seated. Subjects were secured in a seat with a five-point harness, with the head free to move. Frequency and amplitude of sinusoidal input (i.e., inertial conditions) were set to create overlapping conditions of maximum acceleration (amax) or velocity (vmax). Four inertial conditions were combined with four visual conditions (VIS). VIS were created so that direction of optic flow either matched direction of passive motion or did not. The effect of near and far fixation distance within the VE was also tested. Head kinematics were collected with a three-axis gyro. Head stability showed a complex interaction dependent on changes in weighting of visual and inertial inputs that changed with the sled driving frequency. Inertial condition affected amplitude (p < 0.0000) and phase (p < 0.0000) of head pitch angular velocity. In the absence of visual input, head pitch velocity amplitude increased (p < 0.01). An interaction effect between inertial and VIS conditions on head yaw occurred in SW (p < 0.05). There was also a significant interaction of depth of field and inertial condition on amplitude (p < 0.001) and phase (p < 0.05) of head yaw velocity in SW, especially during high vmax conditions. We conclude visual flow can organize lateral cervical responses despite being discordant with inertial input. When using VE for rehabilitation, possible unintended, involuntary or reflexive motor responses that may not be present in traditional training environments should be taken into consideration.

Interaction between vestibulo-spinal and corticospinal systems: a combined caloric and transcranial magnetic stimulation study

We investigated the interaction between vestibular and corticospinal stimuli in 8 healthy volunteers. Vestibular stimulation was induced with unilateral ear caloric irrigation (30°C) with subjects supine. Single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses were delivered (double-cone coil, intensities 60-75% maximal output) every 10-20 s during vestibular activation and during baseline. Bilateral surface electromyography (EMG) from splenius capitis, sternocleidomastoid (SCM), obliquus externus abdominis, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris (BF), tibialis anterior and peroneus longus was obtained. During whole-body maximal rotatory voluntary isometric contraction (MRVC), only SCM and BF displayed EMG activation/inhibition patterns indicating axial rotatory action. TMS-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after caloric irrigation revealed that only SCM showed consistent vestibular-mediated excitation/inhibition responses, i.e. an increase in MEP area contralateral to the irrigation and a decrease in MEP area ipsilaterally (+12.7 and -6.3% of the MRVC, respectively). A putative head turn induced by this SCM activity pattern would be in the same direction of the slow-phase eye movement. EMG in the 100 ms preceding TMS showed muscle tone values of approximately 10% of MRVC. After caloric irrigation, these values increased by ca. 2% for all muscles bilaterally and hence cannot explain the direction-specific SCM MEP changes. Thus, SCM MEPs show caloric-induced amplitude modulation indicating that SCM is under both horizontal semicircular canal and corticospinal control. This vestibular modulation of corticospinal SCM control likely occurs at cortical levels. The direction of the MEP modulation indicates a directional coupling between vestibularly induced head and eye movements.

Vestibular control of the head: possible functions of the vestibulocollic reflex

Here, we review the angular vestibulocollic reflex (VCR) focusing on its function during unexpected and voluntary head movements. Theoretically, the VCR could (1) stabilize the head in space during body movements and/or (2) dampen head oscillations that could occur as a result of the head's underdamped mechanics. The reflex appears unaffected when the simplest, trisynaptic VCR pathways are severed. The VCR's efficacy varies across species; in humans and monkeys, head stabilization is ineffective during low-frequency body movements in the yaw plan. While the appearance of head oscillations after the attenuation of semicircular canal function suggests a role in damping, this interpretation is complicated by defects in the vestibular input to other descending motor pathways such as gaze premotor circuits. Since the VCR should oppose head movements, it has been proposed that the reflex is suppressed during voluntary head motion. Consistent with this idea, vestibular-only (VO) neurons, which are possible vestibulocollic neurons, respond vigorously to passive, but not active, head rotations. Although VO neurons project to the spinal cord, their contribution to the VCR remains to be established. VCR cancelation during active head movements could be accomplished by an efference copy signal negating afferent activity related to active motion. Oscillations occurring during active motion could be eliminated by some combination of reflex actions and voluntary motor commands that take into account the head's biomechanics. A direct demonstration of the status of the VCR during active head movements is required to clarify the function of the reflex.

Multimodal integration after unilateral labyrinthine lesion: single vestibular nuclei neuron responses and implications for postural compensation

Plasticity in neuronal responses is necessary for compensation following brain lesions and adaptation to new conditions and motor learning. In a previous study, we showed that compensatory changes in the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) following unilateral vestibular loss were characterized by dynamic reweighting of inputs from vestibular and extravestibular modalities at the level of single neurons that constitute the first central stage of VOR signal processing. Here, we studied another class of neurons, i.e., the vestibular-only neurons, in the vestibular nuclei that mediate vestibulospinal reflexes and provide information for higher brain areas. We investigated changes in the relative contribution of vestibular, neck proprioceptive, and efference copy signals in the response of these neurons during compensation after contralateral vestibular loss in Macaca mulata monkeys. We show that the time course of recovery of vestibular sensitivity of neurons corresponds with that of lower extremity muscle and tendon reflexes reported in previous studies. More important, we found that information from neck proprioceptors, which did not influence neuronal responses before the lesion, were unmasked after lesion. Such inputs influenced the early stages of the compensation process evidenced by faster and more substantial recovery of the resting discharge in proprioceptive-sensitive neurons. Interestingly, unlike our previous study of VOR interneurons, the improvement in the sensitivity of the two groups of neurons did not show any difference in the early or late stages after lesion. Finally, neuronal responses during active head movements were not different before and after lesion and were attenuated relative to passive movements over the course of recovery, similar to that observed in control conditions. Comparison of compensatory changes observed in the vestibuloocular and vestibulospinal pathways provides evidence for similarities and differences between the two classes of neurons that mediate these pathways at the functional and cellular levels.

Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management

SYNOPSIS

The term sensorimotor describes all the afferent, efferent, and central integration and processing components involved in maintaining stability in the postural control system through intrinsic motor-control properties. The scope of this paper is to highlight the sensorimotor deficits that can arise from altered cervical afferent input. From a clinical orthopaedic perspective, the peripheral mechanoreceptors are the most important in functional joint stability; but in the cervical region they are also important for postural stability, as well as head and eye movement control. Consequently, conventional musculoskeletal intervention approaches may be sufficient only for patients with neck pain and minimal sensorimotor proprioceptive disturbances. Clinical experience and research indicates that significant sensorimotor cervical proprioceptive disturbances might be an important factor in the maintenance, recurrence, or progression of various symptoms in some patients with neck pain. In these cases, more specific and novel treatment methods are needed which progressively address neck position and movement sense, as well as cervicogenic oculomotor disturbances, postural stability, and cervicogenic dizziness. In this commentary we review the most relevant theoretical and practical knowledge on this matter and implications for clinical assessment and management, and we propose future directions for research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries

Recent studies have proposed that a high rate of acceleration onset, i.e. high jerk, during a low-speed vehicle collision increases the risk of whiplash injury by triggering inappropriate muscle responses and/or increasing peak head acceleration. Our goal was to test these proposed mechanisms at realistic jerk levels and then to determine how collision jerk affects the potential for whiplash injuries. Twenty-three seated volunteers (8 F, 15 M) were exposed to multiple experiments involving perturbations simulating the onset of a vehicle collision in eyes open and eyes closed conditions. In the first experiment, subjects experienced five forward and five rearward perturbations to look for the inappropriate muscle responses and 'floppy' head kinematics previously attributed to high jerk perturbations. In the second experiment, we independently varied the jerk ( approximately 125 to 3 000 m s(-3)) and acceleration ( approximately 0.65 to 2.6 g) of the perturbation to assess their effect on the electromyographic (EMG) responses of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), scalene (SCAL) and cervical paraspinal (PARA) muscles and the kinematic responses of the head and neck. In the first experiment, we found neither inappropriate muscle responses nor floppy head kinematics when subjects had their eyes open, but observed two subjects with floppy head kinematics with eyes closed. In the second experiment, we found that about 70% of the variations in the SCM and SCAL responses and about 95% of the variations in head/neck kinematics were explained by changes in perturbation acceleration in both the eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Less than 2% of the variation in the muscle and kinematic responses was explained by changes in perturbation jerk and, where significant, response amplitudes diminished with increasing jerk. Based on these findings, collision jerk appears to have little or no role in the genesis of whiplash injuries in low-speed vehicle crashes.

Effect of changing visual condition and frequency of horizontal oscillations on postural balance of standing healthy subjects

The goal of this study was to describe the movement pattern of the body-segment rotations of healthy subjects in the horizontal plane while they were standing on a supporting platform that imposed steady sinusoidal horizontal rotations under three visual conditions: (a) eyes closed with no instructions (EC-NI), (b) eyes open with instructions to gaze at a stationary black dot located at eye level on a wall surface about four meters in front of them (EO-WI), and (c) eyes closed with instructions to imagine looking at the same target (EC-WI). The selected input signal was a sinusoid with an amplitude of +/-45 deg at different frequencies equal to 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 Hz, which were referred to as L, M and H. Bipedal balance measurements were taken in 10 adult subjects (mean age 30+/-9 years; three men and seven women). Subjects' kinematics were analyzed with an optoelectronic system. Under the three visual conditions, the movements of the pelvis, the trunk, and the head decreased and were inversely dependent on platform frequency; specifically, both the head and the trunk decreased their gain rotation of about 1.8-2.9 times from L to H, while the pelvis decreased its by about 1.3 times. However, the arm oscillations showed a gain and phase tendency opposite to that of the other body segments, with the gain rotation having increased of about 1.8-3.7 times from L to H. Comparing the three visual conditions, the finding suggests that the subjects were able to stabilize their head as a reference frame to maintain postural balance in a similar way under the EC-WI and EO-WI conditions. Instead, in the EC-NI trials, the subjects compensated less, in particular at the hip, the external perturbation producing higher absolute body rotations and lower relative body rotations. In fact, the head rotation was about four and three times the one showed in EC-WI and EO-WI, while for the trunk and the pelvis it was always equal to two and 1.5 times the correspondent rotation observed under the WI conditions. These results provide a quantitative assessment of compensatory balance reactions in healthy subjects to periodical horizontal perturbations.

Vestibular syndrome: a change in internal spatial representation

The vestibular system contributes to a wide range of functions from reflexes to spatial representation. This paper reviews behavioral, perceptive, and cognitive data that highlight the role of changes in internal spatial representation on the vestibular syndrome. Firstly, we review how visual vertical perception and postural orientation depend on multiple reference frames and multisensory integration and how reference frames are selected according to the status of the peripheral vestibular system (i.e., unilateral or bilateral hyporeflexia), the environmental constraints (i.e., sensory cues), and the postural constraints (i.e., balance control). We show how changes in reference frames are able to modify vestibular lesion-induced postural and locomotor deficits and propose that fast changes in reference frame may be considered as fast-adaptive processes after vestibular loss. Secondly, we review data dealing with the influence of vestibular loss on higher levels of internal representation sustaining spatial orientation and navigation. Particular emphasis is placed on spatial performance according to task complexity (i.e., the required level of spatial knowledge) and to the sensory cues available to define the position and orientation within the environment (i.e., real navigation in darkness or visual virtual navigation without any actual self-motion). We suggest that vestibular signals are necessary for other sensory cues to be properly integrated and that vestibular cues are involved in extrapersonal space representation. In this respect, vestibular-induced changes would be based on a dynamic mental representation of space that is continuously updated and that supports fast-adaptive processes.

Head stabilization by vestibulocollic reflexes during quadrupedal locomotion in monkey

Little is known about the three-dimensional characteristics of vestibulocollic reflexes during natural locomotion. Here we determined how well head stability is maintained by the angular and linear vestibulocollic reflexes (aVCR, lVCR) during quadrupedal locomotion in rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys. Animals walked on a treadmill at velocities of 0.4-1.25 m/s. Head rotations were represented by Euler angles (Fick convention). The head oscillated in yaw and roll at stride frequencies (approximately 1-2 Hz) and pitched at step frequencies (approximately 2-4 Hz). Head angular accelerations (100-2,500 degrees/s2) were sufficient to have excited the aVOR to stabilize gaze. Pitch and roll head movements were <7 degrees , peak to peak, and the amplitude was unrelated to stride frequency. Yaw movements were larger due to spontaneous voluntary head shifts and were smaller at higher walking velocities. Head translations were small (< or =4 cm). Cynomolgus monkeys positioned their heads more forward in pitch than the rhesus monkeys. None of the animals maintained a forward head fixation point, indicating that the lVCR contributed little to compensatory head movements in these experiments. Significantly, aVCR gains in roll and pitch were close to unity and phases were approximately 180 degrees over the full frequency range of natural walking, which is in contrast to previous findings using anesthesia or passive trunk rotation with body restraint. We conclude that the behavioral state associated with active body motion is necessary to maintain head stability in pitch and roll over the full range of stride/step frequencies encountered during walking.

Physiology and pathology of eye–head coordination

Human head movement control can be considered as part of the oculomotor system since the control of gaze involves coordination of the eyes and head. Humans show a remarkable degree of flexibility in eye-head coordination strategies, nonetheless an individual will often demonstrate stereotypical patterns of eye-head behaviour for a given visual task. This review examines eye-head coordination in laboratory-based visual tasks, such as saccadic gaze shifts and combined eye-head pursuit, and in common tasks in daily life, such as reading. The effect of the aging process on eye-head coordination is then reviewed from infancy through to senescence. Consideration is also given to how pathology can affect eye-head coordination from the lowest through to the highest levels of oculomotor control, comparing conditions as diverse as eye movement restrictions and schizophrenia. Given the adaptability of the eye-head system we postulate that this flexible system is under the control of the frontal cortical regions, which assist in planning, coordinating and executing behaviour. We provide evidence for this based on changes in eye-head coordination dependant on the context and expectation of presented visual stimuli, as well as from changes in eye-head coordination caused by frontal lobe dysfunction.

Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life

The patterns of eye movement that accompany static activities such as reading have been studied since the early 1900s, but it is only since head-mounted eye trackers became available in the 1980s that it has been possible to study active tasks such as walking, driving, playing ball games and ordinary everyday activities like food preparation. This review examines the ways that vision contributes to the organization of such activities, and in particular how eye movements are used to locate the information needed by the motor system in the execution of each act. Major conclusions are that the eyes are proactive, typically seeking out the information required in the second before each act commences, although occasional 'look ahead' fixations are made to establish the locations of objects for use further into the future. Gaze often moves on before the last act is complete, indicating the presence of an information buffer. Each task has a characteristic but flexible pattern of eye movements that accompanies it, and this pattern is similar between individuals. The eyes rarely visit objects that are irrelevant to the action, and the conspicuity of objects (in terms of low-level image statistics) is much less important than their role in the task. Gaze control may involve movements of eyes, head and trunk, and these are coordinated in a way that allows for both flexibility of movement and stability of gaze. During the learning of a new activity, the eyes first provide feedback on the motor performance, but as this is perfected they provide feed-forward direction, seeking out the next object to be acted upon.

Psychophysiological correlates of the inter-individual variability of head movement control in seated humans

We recently conducted experiments where 24 seated participants were subjected (with eyes closed) to small amplitude, high-jerk impulses of linear acceleration. Responses were distributed as a continuum between two extremes. The "stiff" participants showed little movement of the head relative to the trunk, whereas the "floppy" participants showed a large head rotation in the direction opposite the sled movement. We hypothesized that the stiff behavior resulted from the spontaneous use of an imagined visual frame of reference and undertook this larger-scale study to test that idea. The distribution along the "stiff-floppy" continuum was compared with the scores on psychophysiological tests measuring vividness of imagery, visual field-dependence and motion sickness susceptibility. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the "stiffness" of individuals was loosely, but significantly related to the vividness of their imagery. However, "stiffness" was not linked to visual field-dependence or motion sickness susceptibility. Even if it explains only 20% of the variance of the data, the increase of "stiffness" with vividness of imagery fits our hypothesis. With eyes closed, stiff people may use imagined external visual cues to stabilize their head and trunk. Floppy people, who are poorer imagers, may rely more on "egocentric", proprioceptive and vestibular inputs.

Head control strategies during whole-body turns

Recent reports have described the motion of individual body segments during turns toward visual targets. During a whole-body turn, the head's trajectory in space is determined by both body-in-space rotation and head-on-body rotation. To inform subsequent investigations of head control strategies during turns, we provide a kinematic description of head and pelvis rotation in 20 healthy human subjects as they performed step turns toward a visible target or in the direction of a previously seen target. At the time of peak head velocity in space, the head was moving faster than the pelvis by approximately 54 degrees s(-1) when turning toward a visible target, and approximately 25 degrees s(-1) when turning in a remembered direction. Peak head velocities were slower in the absence of a visual target, but pelvis velocities were not significantly different. The pattern of relative motion between the head and pelvis followed a temporal sequence. Early in the turn, the head rotated with respect to the pelvis in the same direction as the pelvis was rotating in space. During the mid portions of the turn, en bloc rotation of the head and pelvis predominated. Later in the turn, head-in-space velocity was lower than pelvis-in-space velocity, and was thus relatively stabilized. This pattern of head movement during turns is quite similar to eye-in-head movements during large eye-head gaze shifts. This suggests that in addition to saccadic and stabilization mechanisms, a specific control strategy to move segments together should be incorporated into models of gaze reorienting behavior.

Head control: volitional aspects of rehabilitation training in patients with multiple sclerosis compared with healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of voluntary mechanisms and motor learning in head stability and the impact of longitudinal biofeedback training in head control.

DESIGN

Crossover trial and single-subject research design.

SETTING

Neurorehabilitation research institute.

PARTICIPANTS

Head stability during treadmill gait was measured in healthy subjects and patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

INTERVENTION

The experimental condition in which subjects walked on the treadmill was compared with that in which the head was voluntarily stabilized. In another experimental condition, augmented feedback of head displacement was provided by means of a laser mounted on the head that projected a laser beam on a screen. The motor learning was investigated with biofeedback training sessions. Positional feedback was represented by the laser beam, with subjects having to stabilize the beam while walking on the treadmill.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Head angular oscillation in the sagittal and frontal planes.

RESULTS

Results showed that on verbal request, healthy subjects and patients further stabilized the head during gait, especially in the sagittal plane. Short-term feedback of head displacement was no better than self-stabilization at improving head control. Conversely, the motor learning was evident in the rehabilitation protocol: after 10 to 15 training sessions, patients with MS showed a clinically relevant decrease of head angular oscillations.

CONCLUSIONS

Voluntary mechanisms play a role in head stabilization during gait. Augmented biofeedback of head displacement may be effective in reducing head oscillations.

Vestibulo-collic reflex (VCR) in mice

The vestibulo-collic reflex (VCR) attempts to stabilize head position in space during motion of the body. Similar to the better-studied vestibulo-ocular reflex, the VCR is subserved by relatively direct, as well as indirect pathways linking vestibular nerve activity to cervical motor neurons. We measured the VCR using an electromagnetic technique often employed to measure eye movements; we attached a loop of wire (head coil) to an animal's head using an adhesive; then the animal was gently restrained with its head free to move within an electromagnetic field, and was subjected to sinusoidal (0.5-3 Hz) or abrupt angular acceleration (peak velocity approximately 200 degrees/s). Head rotation opposite in direction to body rotation was assumed to be driven by the VCR. To confirm that the compensatory head movements were in fact vestibular in origin, we plugged the horizontal canal unilaterally and then retested the animals 2, 8 and 15 days after the lesion. Two days after surgery, the putative VCR was almost absent in response to abrupt or sinusoidal rotations. Recovery commenced by day 8 and was nearly complete by day 15. We conclude that the compensatory head movements are vestibular in origin produced by the VCR. Similar to other species, there are robust compensatory mechanisms that restore the VCR following peripheral lesions.

Perturbation parameters associated with nonlinear responses of the head at small amplitudes

The head-neck system has multiple degrees of freedom in both its control and response characteristics, but is often modeled as a single joint mechanical system. In this study, we have attempted to quantify the perturbation parameters that would elicit nonlinear responses in a single degree-of-freedom neuromechanical system at small amplitudes and velocities of perturbation. Twelve healthy young adults seated on a linear sled randomly received anterior-posterior sinusoidal translations with +/-15 mm and +/-25 mm peak displacements at 0.81, 1.76, and 2.25 Hz. Head angular velocity and angular position data were examined using a nonlinear phase-plane analysis. Poincare sections of the phase plane were computed and Lyapunov exponents calculated to measure divergence (chaotic behavior) or convergence (stable behavior) of system dynamics. Variability of head angular position and velocity across the entire phase plot was compared to that of the Poincare sections to quantify spatial-temporal irregularity. Multiple equilibrium points and positive Lyapunov exponents revealed chaotic behavior at 0.81 Hz at both amplitudes whereas responses at 1.76 and 2.25 Hz exhibited periodic oscillations, clustered phase points, and negative Lyapunov exponents. However, intersubject variability increased at the lowest frequency and a few subjects presented chaotic behavior at all frequencies. An inverted pendulum with position and velocity threshold nonlinearity was adopted as a simplistic model of the head and neck. Simulations with the model resulted in features similar to those observed in the experimental data. Our principal finding was that increasing the perturbation amplitude had a stabilizing effect on the behavior across frequencies. Nonlinear behaviors observed at the lowest stimulus frequency might be attributed to fluctuations in control between the multiple sensory inputs. Although this study has not conclusively pointed toward any single mechanism as responsible for the responses observed, it has revealed clear directions for further investigation. To examine if changing the sensory modalities would elicit a significant change in the nonlinear behaviors observed here, further experiments that target a patient population with some sort of sensory deficit are warranted.

The coordination of rotations of the eyes, head and trunk in saccadic turns produced in natural situations

In real life situations large gaze saccades may involve rotations of the trunk, as well as the eyes and head. When this happens the rotation of the head-in-space is similar whether or not the trunk is also rotating. However, the rotation of the head on the trunk (i.e. the neck movement) is very different in the two circumstances. For similar head-in-space rotations to occur, the neck and trunk movements cannot simply add independently: they must be coordinated. It is argued that this is achieved via a feedback loop in which the semi-circular canals monitor the rotation of the head-in-space, and the neck is driven by an error signal representing the difference between the intended head-in-space trajectory and the actual trajectory. This mechanism, which is essentially the same as the vestibulo-collic reflex, nulls out disturbances to the head-in-space trajectory, whether these are caused by active or passive trunk rotation.