Freund MR, Emile SH, Horesh N, Garoufalia Z, Gefen R, Wexner SD. The importance of surgical resection in the management of rectal sarcoma: A national cancer database analysis of 133 cases.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023;
49:647-654. [PMID:
36756950 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejso.2022.10.014]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Rectal sarcomas (RS) are rare malignant tumors with a very poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of RS in the United States.
METHODS
This study was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2019 of patients with a diagnosis of RS. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and its predictors.
RESULTS
133 RS patients (39.1% female) with a mean age of 65.7 ± 15.6 years were included in the study. Mean tumor size was 6.1 ± 3 cm. The crude OS rate was 22.5% and median survival duration was 10.1 (IQR: 3.2-21) months. Factors associated with an improved OS on were private insurance (HR = 0.23, p = 0.001) and undergoing surgery (HR 0.23, p < 0.001), Factors associated with poor survival were age (HR 1.02, p = 0.005), male sex (HR 2.27, p = 0.001), Charlson score of 3 (HR 5.17, p = 0.003), and positive resection margins (HR: 2.64, p = 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that male sex (HR 2.16, p = 0.04) and positive resection margins (HR 2.31, p = 0.03) were predictors of poor survival whereas surgery was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.321, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: RS is a very rare rectal malignancy with an even poorer prognosis than previously reported. However, undergoing surgery with curative intent while obtaining negative margins may confer better OS.
Collapse