Observations on the function of normal adrenomedullary tissue in patients with phaeochromocytomas and other paragangliomas

Adrenal functional imaging - which marker for which indication?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, a broad spectrum of molecular image biomarkers for assessment of adrenal functional imaging have penetrated the clinical arena. Those include positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography radiotracers, which either target glucose transporter, CYP11B enzymes, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4, norepinephrine transporter or somatostatin receptors. We will provide an overview of key radiopharmaceuticals and determine their most relevant clinical applications, thereby providing a roadmap for the right image biomarker at the right time for the right patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous radiotracers for assessment of adrenal incidentalomas ([18F]FDG; [123I]IMTO/IMAZA), ACC ([123I]IMTO/IMAZA; [18F]FDG; [68Ga]PentixaFor), pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas ([123I]mIBG; [18F]flubrobenguane; [18F]AF78; [68Ga]DOTATOC/-TATE), or primary aldosteronism ([11C]MTO, [68Ga]PentixaFor) are currently available and have been extensively investigated in recent years. In addition, the field is currently evolving from adrenal functional imaging to a patient-centered adrenal theranostics approach, as some of those radiotracers can also be labeled with ß-emitters for therapeutic purposes.

SUMMARY

The herein reviewed functional image biomarkers may not only allow to increase diagnostic accuracy for adrenal gland diseases but may also enable for achieving substantial antitumor effects in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma, pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Diagnostic performance of [124I]m-iodobenzylguanidine PET/CT in patients with pheochromocytoma

^123/131I-MIBG scintigraphy has shown a high specificity for imaging pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma however with low sensitivity due to low spatial resolution. ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET may overcome this limitation to improve the staging of patients with (suspected) pheochromocytoma. Methods: We analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET in 43 consecutive patients with suspected (recurrence of) pheochromocytoma using histopathological (n = 25) and clinical validation (n = 18) as standard of truth. Furthermore, we compared ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET versus contrast enhanced CT (CE-CT) per-patient and per-lesion detection rate of ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET in 13 additional patients with known metastatic malignant pheochromocytoma (MMP). Results: ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET/CT was positive in 19/43 (44%) patients with suspected pheochromocytoma. Presence of pheochromocytoma was confirmed in 22/43 (51%). ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV were 86%, 100%, 100%, 88%, respectively. ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET was positive in 11/13 (85%) MMP patients. Combined ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET and CE-CT detected 173 lesions, of which 166 (96%) and 118 (68%) were visible on ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET and CE-CT, respectively. Discussion: ¹²⁴I-MIBG PET detects pheochromocytoma with high accuracy at initial staging and high detection rate at re-staging. Superior diagnostic performance aids guidance of surgical and medical management including personalized ¹³¹I-MIBG therapy.

123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for the detection of neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma: results of a meta-analysis

CONTEXT

(123)I-mIBG scintigraphy has been in clinical use for more than 20 yr for diagnostic assessment of patients with neural crest and neuroendocrine tumors. Prospective validation of the performance characteristics of this method has recently been published.

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was performed to obtain best estimates of performance characteristics of (123)I-mIBG imaging for the two most common applications, evaluation of patients with neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma.

DATA SOURCES

Articles published between 1980 and 2007 were identified from searches of multiple computer databases, including MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, and SciSearch.

STUDY SELECTION

Primary inclusion criteria were: acceptable reference standard(s) for confirming subjects with disease (histopathology and/or a combination of imaging and catecholamine results); reference standards applied to all subjects who received (123)I-mIBG; and data on a minimum of 16 patients confirmed to have or not have the disease(s) under consideration. Two physician reviewers independently evaluated all articles against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Twenty-two of 100 articles reviewed were included in the final analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The two reviewers extracted the data from eligible articles using a standardized form, capturing both study quality and efficacy information. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sensitivity of (123)I-mIBG scans for detection of neuroblastoma was 97% [95% confidence interval (CI), 95 to 99%]; data were insufficient to estimate specificity. For pheochromocytoma, with application of the random-effects model, sensitivity and specificity were 94% (95% CI, 91-97%) and 92% (95% CI, 87-98%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based upon the literature, (123)I-mIBG scintigraphy has sensitivity and specificity greater than 90% for detection of neuroblastoma and pheochromocytoma.

Usefulness of 123I-MIBG scintigraphy in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma: results from a prospective multicenter trial

Although (123)I-MIBG has been in clinical use for the imaging of pheochromocytoma for many years, a large multicenter evaluation of this agent has never been performed. The present study was designed to provide a prospective confirmation of the performance of (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients with a prior history of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and 69 with suspected pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma based on symptoms of catecholamine excess, CT or MRI findings, or elevated catecholamine or metanephrine levels underwent whole-body planar and selected SPECT 24 h after the administration of (123)I-MIBG. Images were independently interpreted by 3 masked readers, with consensus requiring agreement of at least 2 readers. Final diagnoses were based on histopathology, correlative imaging, catecholamine or metanephrine measurements, and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 140 patients with definitive diagnoses (91, disease present; 49, disease absent), (123)I-MIBG planar scintigraphy had a sensitivity and specificity of 82%. For patients evaluated for suspected disease, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 84%, respectively. For the subpopulations of adrenal (pheochromocytoma) and extraadrenal (paraganglioma) tumors, sensitivities were 88% and 67%, respectively. The addition of SPECT increased reader confidence but minimally affected sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study demonstrated a sensitivity of 82%-88% and specificity of 82%-84% for (123)I-MIBG imaging used in the diagnostic assessment of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma.

Magnetic resonance imaging or metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy for the demonstration of paragangliomas? Correlations and disparities

Paragangliomas are tumours arising from paraganglionic tissue dispersed from the base of the skull to the pelvic diaphragm. These tumours produce symptoms by secreting catecholamines (functioning tumours) or by local tumour expansion. They can be part of several hereditary disorders. The introduction of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy has provided new insights into paragangliomas and has tremendously changed the topographic diagnosis of paragangliomas. Both techniques have proven to be adequate in localising paragangliomas. In this report, the performance of these two noninvasive imaging methods in the examination of paragangliomas is compared and the merits and deficits of the two techniques are discussed. Both techniques produce comparable results in the detection of functioning paragangliomas. MR imaging, however, also demonstrates tumours that do not take up MIBG. MR imaging does not involve the use of ionising radiation and is not hampered by medication. Moreover, MR imaging has a higher spatial resolution. Because of these merits it is concluded that for demonstration of paragangliomas, whole-body MR imaging is the preferred and initial method of investigation. MIBG scintigraphy, on the other hand, continues to be a reliable method for non-invasive detection of functioning paragangliomas. At present it is clearly faster in whole-body imaging than MRI and it is definitely patient-friendly (no claustrophobia). It could be reserved for cases where a strong suspicion of a functioning paraganglioma persists, despite normal MR imaging findings, and for cases where doubt exists about the functional activity of one or more multicentric tumours. MIBG scintigraphy must be used in the evaluation of patients referred for iodine-131 MIBG treatment.