Enhancement of propoxyphene bioavailability by ethanol. Relation to psychomotor and cognitive function in healthy volunteers

Carisoprodol Single and Multiple Dose PK-PD. Part II: Pharmacodynamics Evaluation Method for Central Muscle Relaxants. Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Centrally acting skeletal muscle relaxants (CMR) such as carisoprodol are used to treat acute, painful musculoskeletal conditions, though its precise mode of action has not been characterized. A double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics–pharmacodynamics (PKPD) of CMR after single (350 mg), double (700 mg), and multiple doses (up to 350 mg/8 h, 14 days) of carisoprodol. Muscular (Electromyogram–EMG, muscular strength dynamometry), central (sedation), and tolerability (psychomotor activity test, adverse events) parameters, as well as withdrawal symptoms, were evaluated. Thirteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. No evidence of direct muscle relaxation was evidenced, but some differences on sedation were evidenced throughout the study, suggesting that CMRs act, at least partly, through sedation. Most significant differences were detected at 1.5 h after dosing. The effect on psychomotor impairment was variable, most prominently after 1.5 h, too, suggesting that it is produced by carisoprodol rather than by meprobamate. No withdrawal symptoms were detected, so the risk of dependence following maximum doses and duration of treatment recommended, and under medical supervision, should be low.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions with ethanol (alcohol)

Ethanol (alcohol) is one of the most widely used legal drugs in the world. Ethanol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2E1 drug-metabolizing enzyme that is also responsible for the biotransformation of xenobiotics and fatty acids. Drugs that inhibit ADH or CYP2E1 are the most likely theoretical compounds that would lead to a clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction with ethanol, which include only a limited number of drugs. Acute ethanol primarily alters the pharmacokinetics of other drugs by changing the rate and extent of absorption, with more limited effects on clearance. Both acute and chronic ethanol use can cause transient changes to many physiologic responses in different organ systems such as hypotension and impairment of motor and cognitive functions, resulting in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Evaluating drug interactions with long-term use of ethanol is uniquely challenging. Specifically, it is difficult to distinguish between the effects of long-term ethanol use on liver pathology and chronic malnutrition. Ethanol-induced liver disease results in decreased activity of hepatic metabolic enzymes and changes in protein binding. Clinical studies that include patients with chronic alcohol use may be evaluating the effects of mild cirrhosis on liver metabolism, and not just ethanol itself. The definition of chronic alcohol use is very inconsistent, which greatly affects the quality of the data and clinical application of the results. Our study of the literature has shown that a significantly higher volume of clinical studies have focused on the pharmacokinetic interactions of ethanol and other drugs. The data on pharmacodynamic interactions are more limited and future research addressing pharmacodynamic interactions with ethanol, especially regarding the non-central nervous system effects, is much needed.

Evaluation of the safety, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic effects following oral coadministration of immediate-release morphine with ethanol in healthy male participants

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to evaluate the effects of coadministered immediate-release morphine and ethanol on safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic measures.

METHODS

In the first stage of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 16 healthy men with a history of moderate drinking received morphine 50 mg+ethanol 0.7 g/kg, morphine 50 mg+ethanol placebo, and morphine placebo+ethanol 0.7 g/kg. In the second stage, participants received either a lower (30 mg) or higher (80 mg) morphine dose (alone and in combination with ethanol) depending on their tolerability to treatments in stage 1. Safety, pharmacodynamic (including visual analog scales, pupillometry, capnography, and psychomotor and cognitive measures), and pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted.

RESULTS

With the exception of one severe adverse event (AE), all others were mild or moderate in intensity. Morphine resulted in dose-related increases in AEs. When morphine was administered with ethanol, similar AEs were observed (dizziness, headache, somnolence, nausea, and vomiting), but these were sometimes more frequent compared with those observed with either drug alone. No consistent additive or interaction effects were observed on pharmacodynamic measures. Ethanol had no apparent effects on the pharmacokinetics of morphine or its metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of single doses of morphine and ethanol tested in this study did not affect the safety, pharmacodynamics, or pharmacokinetics of morphine or ethanol administered alone. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of oxycodone alone and in combination with ethanol in healthy volunteers

RATIONALE

Nonmedical use of prescription opioids is sometimes accompanied by the ingestion of ethanol. Whether ethanol increases the abuse liability-related effects of prescription opioids has not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of oxycodone, a widely prescribed and abused opioid, and ethanol, alone and in combination.

METHODS

Fourteen volunteers participated in a randomized, crossover trial in which they were exposed to placebo, oxycodone (10 mg), two doses of ethanol (0.3 and 0.6 g/kg), and oxycodone combined with the lower dose and the higher dose of ethanol on separate sessions.

RESULTS

Several abuse liability-related subjective effects (drug liking, take again, pleasant bodily sensations) were not increased by the low dose of ethanol or oxycodone alone relative to placebo, but were when the two were combined. Self-reported liking of the higher dose of ethanol was higher than that of placebo, but oxycodone neither increased nor decreased this effect. Psychomotor and cognitive performance was not affected by any of the active drug conditions. Absorption of ethanol was decreased by oxycodone.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 10 mg of oral oxycodone combined with a low dose of ethanol generated abuse liability-related effects, but when tested separately, they did not. Further psychopharmacological investigations of this combination are warranted in light of these findings and the fact that nonmedical use of prescription opioids is sometimes accompanied by use of ethanol.

Cholestasis and endogenous opioids: liver disease and exogenous opioid pharmacokinetics

A class of endogenous opioids is upregulated in liver disease particular to cholestasis, which contributes to symptoms in liver disease such as pruritus, hypotension and encephalopathy. Symptoms associated with cholestasis are reversed or at least ameliorated by mu opioid receptor antagonists. Palliation of symptoms related to cholestatic liver disease also involves bile acid binding agents. Opioid receptor antagonists, unlike bile acid binding agents, have been reported to relieve multiple symptoms, except for pruritus, and improve liver function as demonstrated in experimental cholestasis. Exogenous opioid pharmacology is altered by liver disease. Dose reduction or prolongation of dose intervals is necessary depending on the severity of liver disease.

Cocaine and alcohol interactions in the rat: effect on cocaine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

The effect of alcohol coadministration on cocaine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics was investigated in awake, freely moving rats. Cocaine plasma and brain extracellular fluid (ECF) concentration-time profiles were characterized after intraperitoneal (ip) administration of 30 mg/kg cocaine to rats that were pretreated with either normal saline or alcohol at 5 g/kg in a balanced crossover experimental design. The neurochemical response to cocaine administration, measured as the change in dopamine concentration in the nucleus accumbens (N ACC) and the change in the mean arterial blood pressure were monitored simultaneously. Intragastric alcohol administration significantly increased cocaine systemic bioavailability after ip administration from 0.550 +/- 0.044 to 0. 754 +/- 0.071. Also, the absorption rate constant increased from 0. 199 +/- 0.045 to 0.276 +/- 0.059 min-1 due to alcohol coadministration; however, this increase was not significant. Alcohol inhibition of cocaine metabolism caused an increase in cocaine elimination half-life from 26.3 +/- 3.6 to 40.0 +/- 8.1 min. Also, cocaine tissue distribution was enhanced by alcohol, resulting in a significant increase in cocaine volume of distribution. Analysis of the brain cocaine concentration-neurochemical effect relationship by the sigmoid-Emax pharmacodynamic model showed that Emax increased from 850 +/- 200 to 1550 +/- 640% of baseline due to alcohol coadministration, whereas EC50 decreased from 3400 +/- 580 to 2000 +/- 650 ng/mL, indicating higher cocaine potency in the presence of alcohol. The estimates of the indirect inhibitory pharmacodynamic model used to examine the plasma cocaine concentration-change in blood pressure relationship were not significantly different after the two treatments. These results indicate that alcohol significantly alters cocaine absorption, distribution, and elimination, resulting in higher and prolonged cocaine plasma concentration. Alcohol coadministration also potentiates the neurochemical response to cocaine administration.

Comparative effects on psychomotor performance of the muscle relaxant afloqualone, alone and with ethanol

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction between 40 mg afloqualone, a new centrally acting muscle relaxant and 0.5 g/kg ethanol using a double-blind three-way cross-over trial in which subjects were each given afloqualone with ethanol, ethanol alone and afloqualone alone. We first compared the effects of 40 mg oral afloqualone and 15 mg diazepam (considered as a reference drug) on the psychomotor and cognitive performance and muscular relaxation of 12 healthy male volunteers. Performance was assessed by six objective tests and eight visual analogue self-rating scales. All the above treatments were separated by a 2-week interval. Volunteers performed the objective tests 1 h after drug ingestion, and the self-rating scale evaluations before drug intake and 1, 3.5, 6 and 8 h thereafter. Afloqualone impaired psychomotor performance less than diazepam as shown by the number of correct answers in the digit symbol cancellation test and the time needed to complete this test. However, the measurement of the frontalis muscle action potential showed that the muscle relaxant activity of 40 mg afloqualone was equivalent to that of 15 mg diazepam. Furthermore, afloqualone given at an effective relaxant dose did not enhance the effects of a single dose of ethanol which predominated on either psychomotor performance or subjective feelings.