Multifocal intraductal papillary adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: report of a case

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of 118 consecutive patients from a single center

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Appropriate surgical treatment strategies based on clinicopathological findings are unavailable for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. We investigated the clinical features of pancreatic IPMN in a single-center database in order to design an optimal surgical strategy.

METHODS

The medical records of 118 consecutive patients who had undergone surgical resection between August 1994 and December 2004, in whom IPMN was histologically confirmed, were reviewed retrospectively for radiological and pathological findings.

RESULTS

Most of the invasive carcinomas in these patients were detected as the main-duct type (88.5%). The type of tumor (main-duct type vs branched-duct type), the tumor size, and the dilated duct size were significant predictive factors associated with malignancy. The relative risk of malignancy was greatest at 13-mm or more ductal dilation in the main-duct type (Odds ratio, 4.1), at 35-mm or more tumor size (Odds ratio, 7.6), and for main-duct type (Odds ratio, 3.9). Major pancreatic resections such as total pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy were performed in 14.5% and 69% of the patients, respectively. There was a 19.5% rate of incomplete resection, with these patients having a positive resection margin. However, significant recurrence did not occur in patients with a benign IPMN lesion which remained at the resection margin. The overall postoperative survival rate at 5 years was 98.2% for benign IPMN and 65.3% for malignant IPMN.

CONCLUSIONS

Function-preserving strategies, based on the clinical status of the patient, are necessary in order to avoid possible severe metabolic complications following extended pancreatectomy in patients with benign IPMN because of the low recurrence rate and good prognosis of this entity, irrespective of margin status.

Pancreatic mucinous ductal ectasia and intraductal papillary neoplasms. A single malignant clinicopathologic entity

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study is to review a single institutional experience with mucinous ductal ectasia (MDE) and intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPNs) and to compare the clinicopathologic features of the two groups of tumors.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Mucinous ductal ectasia and IPNs represent newly recognized categories of pancreatic exocrine tumors, previously confused with pancreatic cystic neoplasms. The natural history of MDE and IPN is not well understood, and it is unclear whether MDE and IPN represent two distinct tumors or the same clinicopathologic entity.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the clinical presentation, treatment, histopathology, and outcomes of 23 patients diagnosed with MDE or IPN at their institution over the past 6 years.

RESULTS

The mean age at presentation for the cohort of patients with MDE and IPN was 62.5 years. The prevalence of abdominal pain was 75%, jaundice 25%, weight loss 42%, steatorrhea 37.5%, diabetes 37.5%, and history of pencreatitis 29%. Serum CA 19-9 levels ranged from 0 to 5350 units/mL with high levels reflecting advanced disease. There were no significant differences between MDE and IPN with respect to these parameters. Both MDE and IPN comprised papillary villous epithelial neoplasms involving the main and large pancreatic ducts. The tumors ranged from a few millimeters in size to panductal and were distinguished easily from cystic neoplasms in all cases. Invasive carcinoma was present in 11 (46%) of 24 patients, carcinoma in situ in an additional 10 (42%) of 24 patients, and low grade dysplasia in the remaining 3 (12%) of 24 patients. Mucinous ductal ectasia and IPN differed histopathologically only in degree of mucin secretion and tumor location. Mucinous ductal ectasia, but not IPN, was characteristically mucin-hypersecreting and more frequently involved the head of the gland than did IPN (11/16 vs. 1/8 p < 0.04). All patients were explored surgically and 20 (83%) of 24 of the tumors were resectable with frozen section control of the duct margins (9 pancreatoduodenectomies, 4 distal pencreatectomies, 7 total pancreatectomies). Despite the 88% prevalence of cancer, the overall survival at a mean follow-up of 21 months was 13 (87%) of 15 for MDE and 5 (71%) of 7 for IPN.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraductal papillary neoplasms with or without MDE represent a spectrum of main duct papillary tumors ranging from adenoma to carcinoma with differing amounts of extracellular mucin production. Malignant IPNs with or without MDE typically exhibit extensive intraductal growth but are slow to invade the periductal tissues and slow to metastasize. The majority of patients with these tumors have resectable disease and a favorable prognosis; endoscopic therapy is inappropriate. The encompessing term intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors is appropriate.

Mucin-producing neoplasms of the pancreas. Intraductal papillary and mucinous cystic neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared the clinicopathologic features of the intraductal papillary and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas and clarified the similarities as well as the differences between these two tumors. In addition, they reviewed 104 cases of the intraductal papillary neoplasm in the English literature to provide a global view of the condition.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Controversy about the term and clinicopathologic entity still exist regarding intraductal papillary neoplasm of the pancreas. Currently, with only a few cases of this rare tumor in each report, there continues to be inadequate knowledge available regarding the tumor and methods by which to distinguish it from the mucinous cystic neoplasm.

METHODS

Multiple demographic and clinicopathologic parameters were compared between intraductal papillary and mucinous cystic neoplasms identified from 1985 to 1994 in the Medical Center, Veterans General Hospital--Taipei.

RESULTS

There were four intraductal papillary adenocarcinomas and 10 mucinous cystic neoplasms (8 cystadenocarcinoma and 2 cystadenoma). The sex, age, size, tumor location, and pathologic findings were quite different between these two groups. Clinical presentation of intraductal papillary adenocarcinomas were similar to those of periampullary tumors. The most common presentations of mucinous cystic neoplasm were epigastric pain and abdominal mass. All four intraductal papillary adenocarcinoma showed mucin secretion from a patulous orifice of the ampulla of Vater and filling defects in the dilated main pancreatic duct by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Accurate preoperative diagnosis was not easy regarding either group. Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) was more useful for diagnosis in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The intraductal papillary neoplasm is a unique clinical entity but not a variant of mucinous cystic neoplasm in terms of sex, age, size, tumor location, or pathologic picture. The pathognomonic findings of ERCP should lead to diagnosis. Very aggressive surgical procedures should be attempted for these two mucin-producing neoplasms with low-grade malignancy.