Non-genotoxicity of acrylic acid and n-butyl acrylate in a mammalian cell system (SHE cells)

A review of the genotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic potentials of several lower acrylates

Lower alkyl acrylate monomers include methyl-, ethyl-, n-butyl-, and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate. These acrylates are used in the manufacture of acrylic polymers and copolymers for plastics, food packaging, adhesives, and cosmetic formulations. Although there is limited potential for human environmental exposure, occupational exposure can occur via inhalation and dermal contact. Recently, new genotoxicity data have been generated, along with in silico and in vitro read-cross analyses, for these acrylates. The availability of high-throughput screening (HTS) data through the ToxCast™/Tox21 databases allows for consideration of computational toxicology and organization of these data according to the ten key characteristics of carcinogens. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive review to evaluate the mechanistic, toxicokinetic, animal, and human data, including HTS data, for characterizing the potential carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, and genotoxicity of these acrylates. Toxicokinetic data demonstrate that these acrylates are metabolized rapidly by carboxylesterase hydrolysis and conjugation with glutathione. HTS data demonstrated an overall lack of bioactivity in cancer-related pathways. Overall, the genotoxicity and mutagenicity data support a cytotoxic, non-genotoxic mechanism for these acrylates. Cancer bioassay studies conducted by the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes in animal models with these acrylates did not show any increase in tumor incidence, with two exceptions. At high doses, and secondary to chronic site-of-contact irritation and corrosion, rodent forestomach tumors were induced by oral gavage dosing with ethyl acrylate, and skin tumors were observed following chronic dermal dosing with 2-ethylhexyl acrylate in C3H/HeJ inbred mice (a strain with deficiencies in wound healing), but not in the outbred NMRI strain. For both dermal and forestomach cancers, tumorigenesis is secondary to high doses and long-term tissue damage, shown to be reversible. With evidence that these chemicals are not genotoxic, and that they cause forestomach and dermal tumors through chronic irritation and regenerative proliferation mechanisms, these acrylates are unlikely to pose a human cancer hazard.

Toxicity of seven priority hazardous and noxious substances (HNSs) to marine organisms: Current status, knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research

Shipping industry and seaborne trade have rapidly increased over the last fifty years, mainly due to the continuous increasing demand for chemicals and fuels. Consequently, despite current regulations, the occurrence of accidental spills poses an important risk. Hazardous and noxious substances (HNSs) have been raising major concern among environmental managers and scientific community for their heterogeneity, hazardous potential towards aquatic organisms and associated social-economic impacts. A literature review on ecotoxicological hazards to aquatic organisms was conducted for seven HNSs: acrylonitrile, n-butyl acrylate, cyclohexylbenzene, hexane, isononanol, trichloroethylene and xylene. Information on the mechanisms of action of the selected HNS was also reviewed. The main purpose was to identify: i) knowledge gaps in need of being addressed in future research; and ii) a set of possible biomarkers suitable for ecotoxicological assessment and monitoring in both estuarine and marine systems. Main gaps found concern the scarcity of information available on ecotoxicological effects of HNS towards marine species and their poorly understood mode of action in wildlife. Differences were found between the sensitivity of freshwater and seawater organisms, so endpoints produced in the former may not be straightforwardly employed in evaluations for the marine environment. The relationship between sub-individual effects and higher level detrimental alterations (e.g. behavioural, morphological, reproductive effects and mortality) are not fully understood. In this context, a set of biomarkers associated to neurotoxicity, detoxification and anti-oxidant defences is suggested as potential indicators of toxic exposure/effects of HNS in marine organisms. Overall, to support the development of contingency plans and the establishment of environmental safety thresholds, it will be necessary to undertake targeted research on HNS ecotoxicity in the marine environment. Research should address these issues under more realistic exposure scenarios reflecting the prevailing spatial and temporal variability in ecological and environmental conditions.

Alkylating potential of α,β-unsaturated compounds

Alkylation reactions of the nucleoside guanosine (Guo) by the α,β-unsaturated compounds (α,β-UC) acrylonitrile (AN), acrylamide (AM), acrylic acid (AA) and acrolein (AC), which can act as alkylating agents of DNA, were investigated kinetically. The following conclusions were drawn: i) The Guo alkylation mechanism by AC is different from those brought about the other α,β-UC; ii) for the first three, the following sequence of alkylating potential was found: AN > AM > AA; iii) A correlation between the chemical reactivity (alkylation rate constants) of AN, AM, and AA and their capacity to form adducts with biomarkers was found. iv) Guo alkylation reactions for AN and AM occur through Michael addition mechanisms, reversible in the first case, and irreversible in the second. The equilibrium constant for the formation of the Guo-AN adduct is K(eq) (37 °C) = 5 × 10(-4); v) The low energy barrier (≈10 kJ mol(-1)) to reverse the Guo alkylation by AN reflects the easy reversibility of this reaction and its possible correction by repair mechanisms; vi) No reaction was observed for AN, AM, and AA at pH < 8.0. In contrast, Guo alkylation by AC was observed under cellular pH conditions. The reaction rate constants for the formation of the α-OH-Guo adduct (the most genotoxic isomer), is 1.5-fold faster than that of γ-OH-Guo. vii) a correlation between the chemical reactivity of α,β-UC (alkylation rate constants) and mutagenicity was found.

Final report on the safety assessment of Acrylates Copolymer and 33 related cosmetic ingredients

Ingredients in the Acrylates Copolymer group all contain the monomers acrylic acid or methacrylic acid or one of their salts or esters. These ingredients are considered similar in that they are uniformly produced in chemical reactions that leave very little residual monomer. Although residual acrylic acid may be as high as 1500 ppm, typical levels are 10 to 1000 ppm. There is sufficient odor if residual monomers are present to cause producers to keep levels as low as possible. These ingredients function in cosmetics as binders, film formers, hair fixatives, suspending agents, viscosity-increasing agents, and emulsion stabilizers. Concentrations may be as high as 25% if used as a binder, film former, or fixative; or as low as 0.5% if used as a viscosity-increasing agent, suspending agent, or emulsion stabilizer. These very large polymers exhibit little toxicity. In rabbits and guinea pigs, Acrylates Copolymer did produce irritation, but no evidence of sensitization was found. The principle concern regarding the use of these polymer ingredients is the presence of toxic residual monomers. In particular, although 2-ethylhexyl acrylate was not genotoxic, it was carcinogenic when applied at a concentration of 21% to the skin of C3H mice. Lower concentrations (2.5%) and stop-dose studies at high concentrations (43%) were not carcinogenic. 2-Ethylhexyl acrylate was not carcinogenic in studies using NMRI mice. Whether an increase in carcinogenesis was seen or not, there was evidence of severe dermal irritation in these 2-ethylhexyl acrylate studies. Another concern regarding residual monomers was inhalation toxicity. Although the acrylic acid monomer is a nasal irritant, exposure to the monomer from use of these polymers in cosmetic formulations would always be less than the established occupational exposure limits for nasal irritation. Although there appears to be a huge variation in the mix of monomers used in the synthesis of these polymers, they are similar in that the polymers, except for dermal irritation, are not significantly toxic, and residual monomer levels are kept as low as possible. Although the monomers may be toxic, the levels that would be found in cosmetic formulations are not considered to present a safety risk. Accordingly, these Acrylate Copolymers are considered safe for use in cosmetic formulations when formulated to avoid irritation.

Comparison of the standard and reduced pH Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell in vitro transformation assays in predicting the carcinogenic potential of chemicals

A comprehensive review of the Syrian Hamster Embryo (SHE) cell transformation literature was performed in order to catalogue the chemical/physical entities which have been evaluated for in vitro cell transformation potential. Both reduced pH (pH 6.7) and standard pH (pH 7.1-7.3) SHE cell testing protocols were considered. Based upon this analysis, over 472 individual chemical/physical agents and 182 combinations of chemical/physical agents have been tested under the standard pH conditions, while over 56 chemical/physical agents have been tested under reduced pH conditions. Of the 472 chemical/physical agents tested at the standard pH, 213 had in vivo carcinogenicity data available. Of these 213 chemical/physical agents, 177 were carcinogens while 36 were non-carcinogens. The results of testing the SHE transformability of these 213 chemical/physical agents indicates that the standard pH SHE cell transformation assay had a concordance of 80% (171/213), a sensitivity of 82% (146/177), and a specificity of 69% (25/36). Of these 213 chemical/physical agents, 53% (112/213) were tested more than once often in more than one laboratory, with a 82% (92/112) interlaboratory agreement rate, thus providing confirmatory results. Carcinogenicity data were available for 48 of the 56 chemical/physical agents tested for SHE cell transformation under the reduced pH conditions. The SHE cell transformation assay under reduced pH conditions had a concordance of 85% (41/48), a sensitivity of 87% (26/30), and a specificity of 83% (15/18). For Salmonella-negative carcinogens, the standard pH SHE assay correctly predicted carcinogenicity 75% (48/64) of the time while the reduced pH SHE assay correctly predicted carcinogenicity for Salmonella-negative carcinogens 78% (14/18) of the time. For chemical/physical agents tested under both the reduced pH and standard pH conditions, the standard pH and reduced pH SHE cell assays had a 69% (22/32) agreement rate. Under the reduced pH conditions, the SHE assay correctly predicted rodent carcinogenicity in 86% (25/29) of the chemicals tested under both reduced and standard pH conditions. Under standard pH conditions, the SHE assay correctly predicted rodent carcinogenicity in 69% (20/29) of the chemicals tested under both reduced and standard pH conditions. Collectively, these data indicate that the SHE cell transformation assay is predictive for rodent carcinogenicity under either reduced or standard pH conditions. Importantly, the assay displays better performance and appears to have improved carcinogen prediction capability under reduced pH conditions.

Subchronic and chronic studies of the effects of oral administration of acrylic acid to rats

In a 3-month study, groups of 10 male and 10 female Wistar rats were dosed by gavage, 5 times per week, with acrylic acid at doses of 150 or 375 mg/kg body weight. Five male and five female rats in the low-dose group died and six males and nine females given 375 mg/kg died. Pathological examination revealed a dose-dependent pronounced irritation in the forestomach and glandular stomach with ulcerations and purulent rhinitides and tubular necroses. Therefore, in comparison with drinking water administration using approximately equivalent doses (2000 or 5000 ppm; see below), administration by gavage was determined not to be suitable for long-term studies using as high as possible doses. In a 12-month study, Wistar rats (20 rats/group/sex) were given drinking water containing 120, 800, 2000 or 5000 ppm acrylic acid (providing doses of about 9, 61, 140 and 331 mg/kg body weight/day, respectively). Satellite groups (10 rats/group/sex) were treated concurrently for 3 months. Acrylic acid at 5000 ppm, and temporarily also at 2000 ppm, led to reduced drinking water consumption in male rats and, to a slight extent, also in female rats. In the males, feed consumption was reduced at 5000 ppm and body weight gain was retarded at 5000 ppm and marginally also at 2000 ppm. These findings indicate palatability problems and their consequences. There were no indications of systemic toxicity and/or any carcinogenic potential. In a carcinogenicity study, Wistar rats (50/group/sex) were given acrylic acid in the drinking water at concentrations of 0, 120, 400 or 1200 ppm (8, 27 or 78 mg/kg body weight/day, respectively) over 26 (males) or 28 (females) months. The concentrations were chosen on the basis of the interim results from the 12-month drinking water study, which had started earlier, and taking into account the longer study duration and geriatric effects to be expected. This carcinogenicity study did not reveal any toxic changes or indications of a carcinogenic potential of acrylic acid with the exception of slightly reduced (statistically not significant) consumption of drinking water.

Genetic toxicology of acrylic acid

Acrylic acid was tested for gene mutations in the in vitro CHO/HGPRT assay, for chromosome aberrations in CHO cells in culture, and for potential to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes in culture. In vivo assays performed included the Drosophila sex-linked recessive lethal assay by both the feeding and injection routes, the in vivo cytogenetic assay in rat bone marrow cells after both a 1-day and 5-day oral dosing regimen, and a dominant lethal assay in mice by both an acute and 5-day dosing regimen. All results were negative (non-mutagenic) except for the in vitro chromosome aberration assay. This latter result is consistent with the previously reported possible clastogenic activity suggested by the results of the mouse lymphoma L5178Y TK locus assay in which a predominance of small-colony mutants was observed (Moore et al., Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 1988, 11, 49-63). The rapid clearance of acrylic acid in animals and the weight of evidence of genetic toxicity testing, including negative in vivo data in both somatic and germ cells, indicate a lack of genetic toxicity of acrylic acid in vivo.