The role of transvaginal sonography as compared with endorectal sonography in the evaluation of rectal cancer: preliminary study

Sigmoid cancer mimicking ovarian echotexture on transvaginal ultrasound: Case report with literature review

Ultrasound is a first line imaging modality for the evaluation of female pelvic pain. Pelvic pain constitutes one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department with increasing use of point of care ultrasound. Infrequently, point of care or formal ultrasound evaluation may lead to misdiagnosis of extraovarian disease. This can have serious consequences, especially if an extraovarian malignancy is mistaken for a normal ovary or an ovary with a benign process. We present a case of a 41-year-old female who presented to the emergency department for a chief complaint of pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding. Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated a left adnexal mass, later characterized as a sigmoid colon cancer on MRI and pathology, simulating ovarian echotexture with peripheral hypoechoic components resembling follicles. This article will review the literature of various cases of extraovarian pathology misidentified as ovarian processes and highlight the importance of considering these extraovarian mimickers to prevent potential morbidity and mortality of a missed diagnosis.

Transvaginal Sonography as an Adjunct to Endorectal Sonography in the Staging of Rectal Cancer in Women

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contribution of transvaginal sonography (TVS) in the staging of rectal cancer in women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty women with rectal tumors underwent TVS. Forty-five of the 60 women also underwent endorectal sonography. Forty-nine of the women had rectal carcinoma; nine, tubulovillous adenoma; and two, gastrointestinal stromal tumor confirmed at surgical pathologic examination (n = 41) and biopsy before chemoradiation therapy (n = 19). Four of the 49 rectal carcinomas were T1; seven, T2; 35, T3; and three, T4. Images from TVS and endorectal sonography were shown independently to two blinded reviewers, who staged the tumors and assessed examination adequacy for tumor presence, size, and depth and nodal status. Staging results with TVS were compared with those obtained with endorectal sonography and histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

All tumors were seen with TVS. In 30 of the 49 rectal carcinomas confirmed at surgical pathologic examination TVS tumor staging was accurate in 25 (83.3%) of the cases. Two (6.7%) of the 30 tumors were understaged, and 3 (10%) were overstaged. All tumors selected for chemoradiation (n = 19) were correctly staged T3. Endorectal sonography was suboptimal for tumors that were stenotic (n = 3), large (n = 2), high at the rectosigmoid junction (n = 4), or low at the anal canal (n = 3). In these 12 cases, TVS successfully depicted the lesion, and the images gave enough information for prediction of stage. In interpretation of the images of 45 patients who underwent both TVS and endorectal sonography, the blinded reviewers had good agreement and comparable accuracy for staging in adequate examinations with each technique. Four of the nine villous adenomas were overstaged as T1 on TVS. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors manifested as intramural vascular masses.

CONCLUSION

TVS is an excellent adjunct to endorectal sonography in the staging of rectal cancer in women. It helps resolve the findings after endorectal sonography has been unsuccessful because the tumors are stenotic or in a high or low position.

Nongynecologic applications of transvaginal US

Transvaginal ultrasonography (US) is a noninvasive, readily available imaging technique that has greatly enhanced diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for both gynecologic and nongynecologic disease. High-frequency US probes placed in the vagina allow high-resolution assessment of all the pelvic viscera, including portions of the gut and urinary tract. In addition, they allow visualization of the peritoneum of the pelvic pouch and the pelvic side walls without interference from bowel gas or adipose tissue. Evaluation of these areas requires a modified US technique that includes the use of the highest-frequency probes with angulation of the transducer to allow assessment of the region of interest. In women of childbearing age, the similarity of symptoms in gynecologic and gastrointestinal tract disease in particular underscores the potential utility of transvaginal US, which may, for example, help differentiate appendicitis in a pelvic appendix from pelvic inflammatory disease. Transvaginal US may also help determine the correct course of therapy, thereby improving patient management. Other indications for transvaginal US include assessment for pelvic appendicitis and diverticulitis, rectal and perianal complications of Crohn disease, and ureteric and bladder calculi and tumors as well as evaluation of the anal sphincters in women with fecal incontinence. Transvaginal US is also superior to routine US in the detection and characterization of ascites and peritoneal disease. Transvaginal US examination should include the entire pelvic cavity and contents, especially in women at risk for pelvic sepsis or peritoneal disease.

Transrectal and transvaginal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma

To evaluate the diagnostic ability of transrectal and transvaginal ultrasonography (TRUS and TVUS), 132 patients with rectal carcinoma were examined. Analysis of the data obtained has shown that the high quality of endosonographic imaging allows the performance of detailed staging of rectal carcinoma. In the great majority of patients (91%) the staging was carried out correctly. Neoplastic invasion was overstaged in only five cases and understaged in another five cases. Altered pararectal lymph nodes could be visualized by endosonographic examination in 54.5% of patients.

Future developments in high-technology abdominal surgery: ultrasound, stereo imaging, robotics

The surgical world is experiencing a revolution brought about by the proliferation of minimally invasive techniques. These developments have had most impact on abdominal surgery and chest surgery, but there are ramifications affecting other fields as well. One feature of this change is the increasing dependence of surgeons on technology. Developments in video imaging, ultrasound and robotics are required to make complex endoscopic procedures surgeon-friendly, just as the minimally invasive approach has made surgery more patient-friendly. In the future, integration of stereo imaging systems, computers, microrobots and robotic manipulators will result in technically sophisticated but ergonomic operating systems that will allow surgeons to perform endoscopically almost any type of surgery that can be done today.