Concurrent genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability

The cost-effectiveness of preoperative testing (basic office assessment vs. urodynamics) for stress urinary incontinence in women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of preoperative testing strategies in women with stress incontinence symptoms, as although urodynamic testing is used to improve the diagnostic accuracy in women with incontinence, the clinical and economic consequences of different levels of testing have not been evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Decision analysis was used to evaluate basic office assessment (BOA) and urodynamic testing for women with stress incontinence symptoms who were candidates for primary surgical treatment. Costs were calculated using the Federal Register. Parameter estimates for the effectiveness of treatment for different diagnoses of incontinence were based on published reports. Incremental cost-effectiveness was defined as the cost in dollars per additional patient cured of incontinence.

RESULTS

Urodynamics did not improve the effectiveness of treatment; both strategies of a BOA and urodynamic testing resulted in a cure rate of 96% after initial and secondary treatments. The mean cost of care (including initial and secondary treatments and outcomes) was similar for the two strategies ($5042 for BOA, $5046 for urodynamic testing). With BOA reduced testing costs were balanced by increased costs for patients who failed the initial treatment. Under baseline assumptions, one additional cure of incontinence (incremental cost-effectiveness) using the urodynamic strategy cost $3847, compared with BOA. By sensitivity analyses, BOA was less costly than urodynamics when the prevalence of genuine stress incontinence was > or = 80%.

CONCLUSION

These findings do not support the routine use of urodynamics before surgery in women likely to have genuine stress incontinence, and provide the justification for randomized trials of preoperative testing strategies.

Cost-effectiveness of urodynamic testing before surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare cost-effectiveness between 2 preoperative testing strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

We developed decision-analytic models that evaluated the cost-effectiveness of basic office evaluation before surgery in women with prolapse and stress urinary incontinence symptoms and contrasted it with that of urodynamic testing. Costs were obtained from the Federal Register; effectiveness of treatment for urinary incontinence was based on the published literature.

RESULTS

The strategies of basic office evaluation and urodynamic testing had the same cure rate of urinary incontinence (96%) after initial and secondary treatment. Under baseline assumptions incremental cost-effectiveness (cost for single extra cure of urinary incontinence) of urodynamic testing was $328,601. According to sensitivity analyses, basic office evaluation was more cost-effective than urodynamic testing when the prevalence of pure detrusor instability was <8% or when the cost of urodynamic testing was >$103.

CONCLUSION

Urodynamic testing before surgery in women with prolapse and stress urinary incontinence symptoms is not cost-effective relative to basic office evaluation.

The Burch colposuspension for women with and without detrusor overactivity

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of the Burch colposuspension in women with stress urinary incontinence and detrusor overactivity with those obtained in women with stress incontinence and stable bladders. Additionally, to analyse the value of two detrusor instability indexes and of standard cystometric parameters in predicting the surgical outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Secondary referral centre Urodynamics Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza.

SAMPLE

Forty-four women with detrusor overactivity (21 with low compliance bladder and 23 with detrusor instability) and 44 with stable bladders. They were matched for age, parity, dystocia, menopause, body mass index, previous vaginal surgery, heavy work, urethral functional length and maximum urethral closure pressure.

RESULTS

At two years follow up, the cure rate of stress incontinence was 95% in the control group (patients with stable bladders) and 75% in detrusor overactivity group (odds ratio 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.9, P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between cured and failed patients according to both detrusor instability indexes. Likewise, mean pre-operative standard cystometric values of cured and failed patients showed no differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Although results were better in women with stable bladders, we believe that the success of the Burch colposuspension in cases with mixed incontinence should be considered satisfactory. No pre-operative cystometric parameter consistently predicting the surgical outcome on stress incontinence was identified.