Validity of cause of death statements from relatives

Baby walker injury, disability, and death in a high-income middle eastern country, as reported by siblings

Background

Baby walkers (BWs) are frequent causes of infant injuries. Little research is reported from the Middle East and few population-based studies anywhere.

Methods

Using multistage random sampling in a city of the United Arab Emirates, 4 of 8 female Arab government high schools and 3 final-year classes each from science and arts tracks were selected. Structured self-administered questionnaires assessed prevalence, frequency, severity, and external causes of BW incidents and injuries, and residential hazards.

Results

Response was 100 %, 696 students, 55 % (n = 385) Emirati citizens. 87 % (n = 605) of families used/had used BWs. Among 646 injuries were 118 ER (emergency) visits, 42 hospitalizations, 11 disabilities, and 3 deaths. Average risk was 1 incident/user, 1 injury/4 users, 1 ER visit/20, 1 hospitalization/55, 1 disability/200, 1 death/1000. Odds ratios for >1:1 floor levels were 2.3 (95 % confidence interval: 1.2, 4.3) for hospitalization, 16.8 (95 % CI: 2.1, 132.5) disability. Incidents included hitting objects 48 % (n = 1322), overturning 23 % (n = 632), accessing hazardous objects 17 % (n = 473), and falling down stairs 11 % (n = 300); 1 % (n = 32) fell into swimming pools. In 49 % (n = 297/605) of user families, ≥1 child had been injured.

Conclusions

Despite causing many injuries including disabilities and fatalities, BWs were used by nearly all families. Governments should consider Canada’s lead in prohibiting importation, sales, and advertising of BWs.

A multicentre mortality study of workers exposed to ethylene oxide

A multicentre cohort study was carried out to study the possible association between exposure to ethylene oxide and cancer mortality. The cohort consisted of 2658 men from eight chemical plants of six chemical companies in the Federal Republic of Germany who had been exposed to ethylene oxide for at least one year between 1928 and 1981. The number of subjects in the separate plants varied from 98 to 604. By the closing date of the study (31 December 1982) 268 had died, 68 from malignant neoplasms. For 63 employees who had left the plant (2.4%) the vital status remained unknown. The standardised mortality ratio for all causes of death was 0.87 and for all malignancies 0.97 compared with national rates. When local state rates were used the SMRs were slightly lower. Two deaths from leukaemia were observed compared with 2.35 expected (SMR = 0.85). SMRs for carcinoma of the oesophagus (2.0) and carcinoma of the stomach (1.38) were raised but not significantly. In one plant an internal "control group" was selected matched for age, sex, and date of entry into the factory and compared with the exposed group. In both groups a "healthy worker effect" was observed. The total mortality and mortality from malignant neoplasms was higher in the exposed than in the control group; the differences were not statistically significant. There were no deaths from leukaemia in the exposed group and one in the control group.

[Mortality analysis: when is single evaluation of the basic cause of death allowable, when should multi-causality be assessed?]

Data quality is often a critical point in mortality studies. The purpose of the present report is to present criteria for assessing the value of death-certificate-based mortality studies. For this purpose all 57,454 Swiss death certificates of the year 1979 were analysed. Reliability of the diagnosis listed on the death certificate was investigated by comparing for each case of a linked sample of 12,478 deaths the cause of death with medical information available from the hospital record. Retrieval rates (percentage of cases for which the given diagnosis appears in both registries) were calculated for the primary diagnoses named in each data set. These can be considered as measures of reliability of diagnoses. The graphs given indicate a high reliability for cancers and accidents. Reliability was lower for other causes of death such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus, rheumatic diseases. Restriction to the primary cause of death can be accepted for most cancers, accidents and violent deaths. For other causes of death, decisions must be made individually and multicausal analysis may be indicated. In addition, knowledge of the reliability of the diagnoses of interest is necessary for the interpretation of results derived from death certificate-based mortality studies.