Physiological reactions during brush saw operation

Force-induced tissue compression alters circulating hormone levels and biomarkers of peripheral vascular and sensorineural dysfunction in an animal model of hand-arm vibration syndrome

Workers regularly using vibrating hand tools may develop a disorder referred to as hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). HAVS is characterized by cold-induced vasospasms in the hands and fingers that result in blanching of the skin, loss of sensory function, pain, and reductions in manual dexterity. Exposure to vibration induces some of these symptoms. However, the soft tissues of the hands and fingers of workers are compressed as a result of the force generated when a worker grips a tool. The compression of these soft tissues might also contribute to the development of HAVS. The goal of this study was to use an established rat tail model to determine the mechanisms by which compression of the tail tissues affects (1) the ventral tail artery (VTA) and ventral tail nerves (VTN), (2) nerves and sensory receptors in the skin, (3) dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and (4) spinal cord. Tissue compression resulted in the following changes (1) circulating pituitary and steroid hormone concentrations, (2) expression of factors that modulate vascular function in the skin and tail artery, and (3) factors associated with nerve damage, DRG, and spinal cord. Some of these observed effects differed from those previously noted with vibration exposure. Based upon these findings, the effects of applied force and vibration are different. Studies examining the combination of these factors might provide data that may potentially be used to improve risk assessment and support revision of standards.

Acute physiological and functional effects of repetitive shocks on the hand-arm system - a pilot study on healthy subjects

PURPOSE

Exposure to hand-transmitted shocks is a widespread phenomenon at the workplace. Separate risk assessments for shocks do not exist in current international hand-arm vibration regulations, leading to a potential underestimation of associated health risks.

METHODS

In a pilot study approach, N = 8 healthy males were exposed to sets of 3×5 minutes of repetitive shocks and 1×5 minutes of random vibration, controlled at a weighted vibration total value of 10 m/s² respectively. Baseline and post-exposure measurements of vibration perception thresholds, finger skin temperature, maximal grip / pinch force and the Purdue Pegboard test were conducted. Muscle activity was monitored continuously by surface electromyography.

RESULTS

Shock exposures evoked a temporary increase of vibration perception thresholds with high examination frequencies. A decrease of skin temperature was hinted for 1 s^-1 and 20 s^-1 shocks. Electromyographical findings indicated an additional load on two forearm muscles during shock transmission. Maximum grip force and manual dexterity were not affected, pinch force only partially reduced after the exposures.

CONCLUSION

Physiological effects from shock exposure conform to those described for hand-arm vibration exposure in principle, although some divergence can be hypothesized. Randomized designs are required to conclusively assess the need of occupational health concepts specifically for hand-transmitted shocks.

Health effects associated with occupational exposure to hand-arm or whole body vibration

Workers in a number of different occupational sectors are exposed to workplace vibration on a daily basis. This exposure may arise through the use of powered-hand tools or hand-transmitted vibration (HTV). Workers might also be exposed to whole body vibration (WBV) by driving delivery vehicles, earth moving equipment, or through use of tools that generate vibration at low dominant frequencies and high amplitudes, such as jackhammers. Occupational exposure to vibration has been associated with an increased risk of musculoskeletal pain in the back, neck, hands, shoulders, and hips. Occupational exposure may also contribute to the development of peripheral and cardiovascular disorders and gastrointestinal problems. In addition, there are more recent data suggesting that occupational exposure to vibration may enhance the risk of developing certain cancers. The aim of this review is to provide an assessment of the occupations where exposure to vibration is most prevalent, and a description of the adverse health effects associated with occupational exposure to vibration. This review will examine (1) various experimental methods used to measure and describe the characteristics of vibration generated by various tools and vehicles, (2) the etiology of vibration-induced disorders, and (3) how these data were employed to assess and improve intervention strategies and equipment that reduces the transmission of vibration to the body. Finally, there is a discussion of the research gaps that need to be investigated to further reduction in the incidence of vibration-induced illnesses and injuries.