2-Acetylfuran, a confounder in urinalysis for 2,5-hexanedione as an n-hexane exposure indicator

Free and total 2,5-hexanedione in biological monitoring of workers exposed to n-hexane in the shoe industry

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the role of total 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) compared with free 2,5-HD as a biological indicator of exposure to n-hexane at work.

METHODS

One-hundred and thirty two workers in contact with this solvent during their occupation in the shoe industry in the province of Alicante (Spain) were studied. Environmental and biological tests were carried out analysing variations of the concentration of the metabolite in urine corresponding to different working conditions. Environmental exposure was evaluated in each work place using active personal monitors and measured by gas chromatography (GC). Dichloromethane extracts of the urine samples collected at the end of the working shifts were analysed, before (determining free 2,5-HD, the toxic metabolite) and after acid hydrolysis (pH 0.1) (yielding the total 2,5-HD) and also by GC. The concentration of conjugated metabolite 4,5-dihydroxy-2-hexanone was calculated from the difference between total and free 2,5-HD.

RESULTS

Free 2,5-HD represented an average of 14.2% of the total 2,5-HD determined in urine, and this percentage increased significantly (P<0.01) with higher environmental levels of acetone. Other factors, such as absorption through the skin (depending on the use of gloves) and the day on which samples were taken also significantly affected the relation between the two indicators and their respective relationships with environmental concentrations of n-hexane.

CONCLUSION

Although analyses of the relationship between the levels of atmospheric n-hexane and those of metabolites in urine show a greater correlation for total 2,5-HD than for free 2,5-HD, our results suggest that free 2,5-HD could be a better indicator in evaluating risk of exposure to n-hexane, since the concentration is directly related to the neurotoxic effect.

Evaluation of 2,5-hexanedione in urine of workers exposed to n-hexane in Brazilian shoe factories

Urinary 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD) is used as a biomarker for biological monitoring of workers exposed to n-hexane. The purpose of this study was to compare two types of treatment of urine samples during clean-up (with and without acidic hydrolysis) and to study the exposure situation of workers exposed to n-hexane during shoe manufacturing. There, various glues containing n-hexane are used. Quantification of 2,5-HD was carried out by gas chromatography and flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Fifty-two urine samples taken from workers of seven shoe factories were analyzed. Thirty-four persons from the administrative staff of the same factories served as controls. They were not known to be exposed to n-hexane. The samples treated with acidic hydrolysis showed levels (average 0.94 mg/l) approximately 10 times higher than samples without acidic hydrolysis (0.09 mg/l). The difference is predominantly caused by the conversion of other metabolites of n-hexane (e.g. 4,5-dihydroxy-2-hexanone) to 2,5-HD in the presence of acids. Our results also show, that exposure to n-hexane is different between various industries. Levels of 2,5-HD in urine are predominantly dependent on the type of operation (how the glue is applied on the leather during shoe manufacturing). Simple measures, e.g. using a glue handgun instead of a paintbrush significantly decreased exposure to n-hexane.

High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of urinary 2,5-hexanedione as mono-2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone using ultraviolet detection

The good correlation between exposure to n-hexane and 2,5-hexanedione urinary excretion confers on this diketone an important toxicological meaning. this paper proposes a reversed-phase HPLC method which includes, after acid hydrolysis, a derivatization step of 2,5-hexanedione with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine at 70 degrees C for 20 min. The reaction conditions, such as temperature, reagent concentration and time, are optimized so as to allow the condensation of a single carbonyl group. A linear response was obtained in the 0.19-20.0 mg/l range with a detection limit of 0.03 mg/l, corresponding to a signal-to-noise ratio of 3. A phosphate buffer (pH 3.3)-acetonitrile mixture (50:50) as the eluent and UV detection at 334 nm were used.

Monitoring of exposure to methylpentanes by diffusive sampling and urine analysis for alcoholic metabolites

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the possibilities of personal ambient monitoring and biological monitoring for methylpentane isomers.

METHODS

The performance of activated carbon cloth to absorb 2- and 3-methylpentane was studied by experimental vapour exposure followed by solvent extraction and gas chromatography (GC). Urine from workers and rats exposed to 2- and 3-methylpentane was analysed by GC with or without acid or enzymatic hydrolysis.

RESULTS

Carbon cloth absorbed 2- and 3-methylpentane linearly to exposures up to eight hours and to 400 ppm, and was sensitive enough to detect a 15 minute peak of exposure. The two isomers were clearly separated from hexane on a DB-1 column. For analysis of the urine, enzymatic hydrolysis was superior to acid hydrolysis. Exposure of rats to methylpentane vapours showed that 2-methyl-2-pentanol and 3-methyl-2-pentanol were excreted in urine in proportion to the dose of 2-methylpentane and 3-methylpentane, respectively. 2-Methyl derivatives of 1-, 3-, and 4-propanol, 2-methylpentane-2,4-diol, and 3-methyl-2-pentanol were minor metabolites. Analysis of urine from the exposed workers showed that 2-methyl- and 3-methyl-2-pentanol are leading urinary metabolites after exposure to the corresponding methylpentane.

CONCLUSIONS

Diffusive sampling is applicable to monitor 2- and 3-methylpentane vapours as is the case for hexane vapour. 2-Methyl-2-pentanol and 3-methyl-2-pentanol will be markers of occupational exposure to 2-methylpentane and 3-methylpentane, respectively. Also, 2-methylpentane-2,4-diol might be a marker of exposure to 2-methylpentane.

Chromatographic determination of volatile solvents and their metabolites in urine for monitoring occupational exposure

The determination of volatile solvents and their metabolites in biological materials such as expired air, blood or urine allows the estimation of the degree of exposure of these chemicals. Chromatographic methods are now universally employed for this purpose and numerous analytical procedures are available for the determination of the most commonly used volatile solvents and their metabolites in urine. GC methods appear well adapted to the determination of the parent volatile solvents in blood and urine and may be used for the determination of their urinary metabolites, but these methods often require several prechromatographic steps. However, HPLC is becoming a powerful tool for the accurate and easy determination of urinary metabolites of volatile solvents, considering its decisive advantages for routine monitoring. Further, recent developments in HPLC could widen the usefulness of this method for most complex analytical problems that could be encountered during this measurement. However, despite the relative neglect of planar chromatography in this area of concern and considering the great interest in methods that could permit the simultaneous assay of numerous samples often required by routine monitoring, new approach using improved methods such as overpressured TLC could be very fruitful in the future.

On the need of a sampling strategy in biological monitoring: the example of hexane exposure

Ambient and biological monitoring of hexane exposure were repeatedly carried out in 14 female shoe makers. Airborne hexane (Ci-H) was measured in 4-h samples collected by a diffusive method. Urinary spot samples were collected before, during (at noon), and at the end of a work shift. 2,5-Hexanedione (2,5HD) in urine collected at noon was poorly related to morning Ci-H. End-of-shift 2,5HD were also poorly related to afternoon air samples. The correlation was still relatively low when end-of-shift 2,5HD was related to 8-h TWA Ci-H (r = 0.44; P < 0.01 on a linear scale, and r = 0.58, P < 0.01 on a log-log scale). End-of-shift 2,5HD levels estimated on the basis of pre-shift values using a mathematical model were much higher (2.3 times on average) than those experimentally measured during the study period. Owing to its relatively long half-time, 2,5HD seems to be influenced not only by current exposure, but also by hexane absorbed during the day(s) preceding sampling. The lack of a sampling strategy may account not only for inconsistencies between environmental and biological data, but also for a possible misuse of biological monitoring when utilized for risk assessment. Despite sometimes poor correlations with Ci-H, 2,5HD may still be preferred to other indicators as a marker of effective internal dose. A sampling strategy should ensure that measured values are representative of the individual risk for adverse effects.

Dose-dependent increase in 2,5-hexanedione in the urine of workers exposed to n-hexane

The concentrations of 2,5-hexanedione (2,5-HD), an n-hexane metabolite, and 2-acetylfuran (2-AF) were measured in urine samples from 123 workers who had predominantly been exposed to n-hexane vapor and 53 workers who had experienced no exposure to solvents. The time-weighted average intensity of exposure to n-hexane vapor was determined by a diffusive sampling method. For biological monitoring of exposure, urine samples were collected late in the afternoon during the second half of a working week and were analyzed in the presence and absence of acid hydrolysis (at pH less than 0.5) for 2,5-HD and 2-AF by gas chromatography on a nonpolar capillary DB-1 column. The urinary 2,5-HD concentration increased as a linear function of the intensity of exposure to n-hexane, showing a correlation coefficient of 0.64-0.77 after acid hydrolysis and that of 0.73-0.83 in the absence of hydrolysis, depending on the correction for urinary density (P less than 0.01 in all cases, with no improvement in the coefficient occurring after the corrections). In contrast, 2-AF levels were independent of n-hexane exposure. The geometric mean 2,5-HD concentration in urine samples from 53 nonexposed men was 0.26 mg/l as observed (i.e., with no correction), 0.19 mg/l after correction for a urinary specific gravity of 1.016, and 0.23 mg/g creatinine after correction for creatinine concentration, and the geometric standard deviation was approximately 2.