Evidence for a noradrenergic mechanism in the grooming produced by (+)-amphetamine and 4, alpha-dimethyl-m-tyramine (H 77/77) in rats

Major tranquillizers can be distinguished from minor tranquillizers on the basis of effects on marble burying and swim-induced grooming in mice

The effects of psychotropic compounds on grooming and burying were compared in mice. Burying behaviour was provoked by glass marbles and grooming was observed after 3 min swimming. Compounds with minor tranquilizing properties, such as diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, flunitrazepam, clonazepam, meprobamate and ethyl alcohol, were more effective in reducing burying than grooming. Drugs with an anticholinergic effect, e.g. scopolamine and atropine were also more effective against burying. A number of neuroleptic drugs, such as haloperidol, chlorpromazine, perphenazine and trifluperidol reduced grooming more effectively than burying. Non-selective inhibitory effects were observed with clozapine, thioridazine, diphenhydramine, imipramine, mianserin and apomorphine. It is concluded that, with certain limitations, the burying-grooming test described offers a simple tool for identifying novel compounds as potential major or minor tranquilizers.

Implications for multiple transmitter mediation of amphetamine-induced stereotypies

Gerbils were pretreated with the dopamine (DA) receptor blocker, pimozide, prior to stereotypy-inducing injections of d-amphetamine. Some of the stereotypies induced with amphetamine were blocked, but some were not, supporting the hypothesis that multiple neurotransmitters are involved in the mediation of amphetamine-induced stereotypy. In addition, when apomorphine hydrochloride was injected, different stereotypic motor behaviors were induced than were induced with amphetamine. The behavioral changes following amphetamine treatment could be classified into four groups: (1) those that are probably DA related, based on the fact that they were induced with either amphetamine or apomorphine, and amphetamine induction was blocked with pimozide; (2) those that are probably not DA related because they were not induced by apomorphine, and amphetamine induction was not blocked by pimozide; (3) those behaviors that may be incompatible with stereotypic behaviors, were reduced with either amphetamine or apomorphine, but were not maintained with pimozide; and (4) circling, which was induced with amphetamine, blocked with pimozide, but not induced with apomorphine.

Swim-induced grooming in mice is mediated by a dopaminergic substrate

Grooming induced in mice after a period of swimming was potently and dose-dependently blocked by neuroleptics. The order of potency of the neuroleptics was spiroperidol greater than haloperidol greater than cis-flupenthixol greater than pimozide greater than chlorpromazine greater than thioridazine. The trans isomer of flupenthixol was inactive at 40 microM/kg. The alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists, phentolamine and phenoxybenzamine, and the catecholamine synthesis inhibitor, alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine were essentially without effect on the grooming behaviour. Amitriptyline inhibited grooming behaviour only in doses which severely affected the animals motor function. Fluoxetine was without effect. Cis-flupenthixol was less active in inhibiting grooming in animals chronically treated with haloperidol than in control animals, indicating the presence of supersensitive dopamine receptors. The data indicate that swim-induced grooming in mice is mediated via dopaminergic systems.

Influence of the new 5-HT-uptake inhibitor paroxetine on hypermotility in rats produced by p-chloroamphetamine (PCA) and 4,alpha-dimethyl-7-tyramine (H 77/77)

Two different forms of hypermotility produced by the amphetamine derivatives PCA and H 77/77, 5 mg/kg of each, was studied in rats treated s.c. with the new 5-HT uptake inhibitor paroxetine. The substance inhibited the effect of PCA but did not influence that of H 77/77. The 5-HT-uptake inhibitors paroxetine, imipramine, and chlorimipramine were also administered p.o. at various times before PCA. The three substances inhibited PCA-induced hypermotility. Paroxetine 0.5-2 mg/kg, was active at intervals of 1-4 h and 4 mg/kg was active at 18-h interval. Imipramine and chlorimipramine 25-30 mg/kg showed PCA inhibition at treatment intervals of 1-2h, but 80-100 mg/kg or more was required to inhibit PCA at intervals of 4 and 18 h. Previous results have shown that PCA-induced hypermotility is antagonized by substances inhibiting 5-HT synthesis and uptake, whereas H 77/77-induced hypermotility is inhibited by substances blocking NA synthesis, uptake, and receptors. The previous and present results indicate that paroxetine is a selective 5-HT-uptake inhibitor. After oral administration paroxetine presumably produces a more potent and long-lasting 5-HT-uptake inhibition than imipramine and chlorimipramine.