Single and repeated dose kinetics of the hypnotic agent loprazolam in healthy volunteers

Benzodiazepine poisoning. Clinical and pharmacological considerations and treatment

Benzodiazepines are among the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide. This popularity is based not only on their efficacy but also on their remarkable safety. Pure benzodiazepine overdoses usually induce a mild to moderate central nervous system depression; deep coma requiring assisted ventilation is rare, and should prompt a search for other toxic substances. The severity of the CNS depression is influenced by the dose, the age of the patient and his or her clinical status prior to the ingestion, and the coingestion of other CNS depressants. In severe overdoses, benzodiazepines can occasionally induce cardiovascular and pulmonary toxicity, but deaths resulting from pure benzodiazepine overdoses are rare. Quantitative determinations of benzodiazepines are not useful in the clinical management of intoxicated patients since there is no correlation between serum concentrations and pharmacological and toxicological effects. Benzodiazepine overdoses occurring during pregnancy rarely induce serious morbidity in mothers or fetuses, although large doses administered near delivery can induce respiratory depression in neonates. The teratogenic potential of benzodiazepines remains controversial, but is probably small if it exists at all. There is clear evidence that the prolonged use of even therapeutic doses of benzodiazepines will lead to dependence. The risk of developing significant withdrawal symptoms is related to dosage and duration of treatment. Prevention of gastrointestinal absorption should be initiated in all intentional benzodiazepine overdoses. Forced diuresis and dialysis techniques are not indicated since they will not significantly accelerate the elimination of these agents. Intravenous administration of flumazenil, a pure benzodiazepine antagonist, effectively reverses benzodiazepine-induced CNS depression.

Neurochemical and pharmacokinetic correlates of the clinical action of benzodiazepine hypnotic drugs

Benzodiazepine derivatives are presumed to exert their pharmacologic activity via interaction with specific molecular recognition sites, termed benzodiazepine receptors, within the brain. The various benzodiazepines used in clinical practice differ considerably in their intrinsic receptor affinity, but the qualitative character of the drug-receptor interaction is similar or identical among this class of drugs. All benzodiazepines are lipophilic (lipid-soluble) substances that relatively rapidly cross the blood-brain barrier and equilibrate with brain tissue. After equilibrium is attained, a constant brain:plasma ratio is maintained, such that plasma concentrations proportionately reflect concentrations of drug in brain. Brain concentrations are proportional to the extent of receptor occupancy, which in turn determines the acute behavioral effect. Clinical differences among benzodiazepines largely reflect differences in pharmacokinetic properties. The onset of action after single oral doses reflects the rate of absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, whereas the duration of action is determined by the rate and extent of drug distribution to peripheral tissues, as well as by the rate of elimination and clearance. During multiple dosage, long half-life drugs accumulate, with the concurrent possibility of daytime sedation. However, a benefit of long half-life drugs is that rebound insomnia on abrupt termination is unlikely. Short half-life drugs accumulate minimally and have a lower likelihood of producing daytime sedation. However, they may be more likely to produce rebound insomnia on abrupt discontinuation.

Pharmacokinetics of the newer benzodiazepines

The assay methods used to determine the concentrations of the newer benzodiazepines include electron-capture gas-liquid chromatography, high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, radioassay and radioreceptor assay. The method used frequently is the highly sensitive and specific electron-capture gas-liquid chromatography. Other methods are associated with limitations. The triazolo- and imidazolebenzodiazepines differ structurally from the 'classical' benzodiazepines such as diazepam, and offer distinct differences in pharmacological activity and in time-course of effect. Alprazolam and triazolam, both 1,4-triazolobenzodiazepines, have high affinities for the benzodiazepine receptor as do midazolam and loprazolam, which are 1,4-imidazolebenzodiazepines. Absorption is characteristically rapid, with peak alprazolam and triazolam concentrations occurring within 1 hour after oral administration. Sublingual administration results in peak alprazolam and triazolam concentrations that are higher and occur earlier than with the oral route. The volume of distribution of alprazolam and triazolam is approximately 1L. Alprazolam is 70% bound to plasma proteins and the extent of binding is independent of concentration. Similarly, triazolam is approximately 85% bound to plasma proteins, variability in binding being explained by variations in alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentration. The 1,4-triazolo ring prevents the oxidative metabolism of the classical benzodiazepines which results in formation of active metabolites with long elimination half-lives. Alprazolam is extensively metabolised: 29 metabolites have been identified in the urine, and its major metabolite, alpha-hydroxyalprazolam, has pharmacological activity. alpha-Hydroxyalprazolam and 4-hydroxyalprazolam are detectable in plasma in amounts which account for less than 10% of the administered dose. Mean alprazolam elimination half-life in healthy adult subjects ranges from 9.5 to 12 hours; liver disease prolongs alprazolam elimination, but renal insufficiency does not. Triazolam also undergoes oxidation and subsequent glucuronidation. alpha-Hydroxytriazolam is the major metabolite, in addition to which 4-hydroxyalprazolam and alpha-4-hydroxytriazolam have been identified in plasma and urine. The elimination half-life of triazolam ranges between 1.8 and 5.9 hours, while that of the conjugated metabolites is short, approximately 3.8 hours. Accumulation of triazolam or its metabolites after multiple doses does not occur. Liver disease prolongs triazolam elimination from the body, but renal disease does not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

7-[125I]iodoclonazepam: purification by high-performance liquid chromatography for use in a very sensitive benzodiazepine radioimmunoassay of broad specificity

The purification of 7-[125I]iodoclonazepam by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for use in a very sensitive benzodiazepine radioimmunoassay is described. A silica column is used with a non-aqueous eluent and sequential ultra-violet and gamma-ray detection. A commercially available antiserum is used at a dilution of 1:1000. Blood samples are diluted 10-fold with buffer before analysis and only 25 microliters of diluted sample are required per assay tube. Benzodiazepines, but not the radiolabel, appear to be bound by blood proteins in competition with the antiserum and so, if undiluted blood is assayed, erroneously low results are obtained. The minimal sample requirement and the high sensitivity of the assay described here largely avoid this problem while maintaining acceptable detection limits. For diazepam, the detection limit is 2.5 ng/ml in blood or urine (after correction for the initial 10-fold dilution) and therapeutic or sub-therapeutic levels of many other benzodiazepines can be detected. In practice, the assay is reliable, simple to perform and extremely economical.

Serum and quantitative electroencephalographic pharmacokinetics of loprazolam in the elderly

This study was undertaken to determine the serum pharmacokinetic parameters of loprazolam, a new benzodiazepine hypnotic, in elderly subjects and to compare these with the kinetics of the drug as determined by quantitative EEG analysis. In addition, a 14-day study was undertaken to determine the steady-state serum levels achieved in this population with repeated drug administration. The study was conducted on 16 male and female subjects between the ages of 62 and 72 years, randomly assigned to two groups treated with 0.5 or 1.0 mg of loprazolam. The serum half-life of loprazolam was found to be 5 hours, and the peak serum concentration was reached after 2 hours. Quantitative EEG changes were observed after 30 minutes suggesting rapid access of the drug into the nervous system. Quantitative EEG changes were evident for 9.5 hours, suggesting the persistent effects of an active metabolite. The 14-day study indicated that loprazolam did not accumulate with continued use.

Clinical and psychometric evaluation of two doses of loprazolam and placebo in geriatric patients

A double-blind, parallel group, randomized trial was carried out to compare the hypnotic efficacy, tolerance and psychometric effects of two doses of loprazolam and placebo in 89 elderly hospital in-patients. All had disturbed sleep patterns, which were not the result of serious psychiatric or physical illness and, after a 1 or 2 day single-blind placebo baseline period, they received either 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg loprazolam or placebo administered double-blind for 5 days. The sleep of patients in all three treatment groups, as measured by patient self-rating scales, substantially improved during the study, with loprazolam being superior to placebo for measures of sleep latency, satisfaction with sleep, number of nocturnal awakenings and feeling refreshed on waking. Differences in hypnotic efficacy between the 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg loprazolam groups were not significant. The incidence of side-effects was low and, although there was a significant relationship with loprazolam treatment, this was not dose-related. Performance tests for residual effects (critical flicker fusion threshold and choice reaction time) showed no difference between the placebo and active treatment groups, suggesting that loprazolam, even in a dose of 1.0 mg, is unlikely to produce hangover effects. It is concluded that the findings confirm that loprazolam is an effective and well-tolerated hypnotic in the elderly and that a 0.5 mg dose would be an appropriate initial dose for older patients.

Correlation of the clinical pharmacodynamics of loprazolam with serum concentration

Six healthy fasted volunteers each received oral doses of a placebo, 1 mg and 2 mg loprazolam with one week between treatments using a double-blind balanced crossover design. Serum samples were obtained at selected times after dosing for measurement of loprazolam using a combined high-performance liquid and gas chromatographic assay. Drug effect was also measured at the corresponding times using self-assessment scales and psychomotor tests. The serum levels of loprazolam followed a somewhat irregular shape with secondary and tertiary peaks possibly associated with food intake. The maximum serum levels of loprazolam following 1 mg and 2 mg doses of the drug (6.0 +/- 2.6 and 11.3 +/- 2.9 ng/ml, respectively) occurred at approximately one hour after dosing. Both the maximum serum levels and the area under the curve of loprazolam measured to six hours increased in direct proportion to dose. Statistically significant drug effects were seen after 2 mg loprazolam, although the subjects also appeared sedated after 1 mg doses. There appeared to be a good correlation between the logarithm of the serum concentration of loprazolam and effect which suggested that the hypnotic activity of the drug was not mediated via a long-lived metabolite. A threshold serum concentration associated with evident sedation was observed at approximately 3 ng/ml.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following single and repeated nightly administrations of loprazolam, a new benzodiazepine hypnotic

The pharmacokinetics of oral loprazolam and pharmacodynamic responses on the morning following nightly drug administration were examined after single and after seven consecutive 1 mg doses in six non-fasting healthy subjects. The serum concentration-time profiles for unchanged loprazolam measured by a specific high pressure liquid chromatography/gas chromatography (h.p.l.c./g.c.) method and for benzodiazepine material measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) were qualitatively similar although RIA levels were consistently higher. Approximate elimination half-life of unchanged loprazolam after single doses was 8.0 h. For RIA measured material, approximate half-life was 11.7 h following acute administration and 12.8 h after seven consecutive doses. Compared to results after single doses, maximum serum concentration and AUC were greater following 1 week's treatment. Using RIA results, the increases were 27.2% (95% CL 6.9 to 47.4%) and 35.1% (95% CL 15.8 to 54.3%) respectively and using h.p.l.c./g.c. data, 11% (95% CL - 22.6% to 44.5%) and 41% (95% CL - 50.9 to 133.0%). After repeated doses of loprazolam, there were no significant changes with respect to results after single doses in psychomotor function assessed objectively by critical flicker fusion threshold or choice reaction time, or in sleep quality or behaviour on awakening assessed subjectively by 10 cm analogue scales. Mean time to maximum serum concentration was 4.95 h with considerable inter-individual variability (range 1-12 h) and there was a lag time of 1-1.5 h before drug was detectable in blood.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A multicentre hospital study to compare the hypnotic efficacy of loprazolam and nitrazepam

A multicentre, parallel group hospital study was carried out in 190 subjects with insomnia to compare the efficacy, incidence of hangover and the side-effects of loprazolam and nitrazepam. Following 2 nights single-blind phase on placebo, loprazolam (1.0 mg), nitrazepam (5.0 mg) or placebo was administered double-blind for 7 consecutive nights. Visual analogue scales and questions were used to rate efficacy. There was no statistically significant difference between loprazolam and nitrazepam for 'ease of getting to sleep', 'restfulness of sleep' and 'depth of sleep'. Like nitrazepam, loprazolam diminished the number of periods of wakefulness and made it 'easier to get to sleep again'. Subjective evaluation showed that hangover was not a feature of loprazolam. It did not affect morning alertness and patients thought they had improved balance and co-ordination while on this drug. These findings are in keeping with the evidence of other workers who have shown only minimal psychomotor impairment, if any, with loprazolam (1.0 mg). There was no statistically significant difference between treatments with respect to frequency or incidence of side-effects.

Effects of loprazolam and of triazolam on sleep and overnight urinary cortisol

Nine poor sleepers of mean age 61 years were studied while they took loprazolam 0.5 mg, loprazolam 1 mg and triazolam 0.5 mg for 3-week periods. Loprazolam 1 mg and triazolam 0.5 mg increased sleep duration, but there was some tolerance to both, particularly triazolam, by the 3rd week. Withdrawal of either drug led to sleep significantly shorter than baseline. This rebound effect was significant greater than withdrawing triazolam. After withdrawing loprazolam 1 mg, the rebound was maximal on the 3rd night and after withdrawing triazolam it was maximal and severe on the 1st night. In the third week of use neither drug was associated with late-night wakefulness. Total overnight urinary cortisol was lower during drug intake and there were significant withdrawal rebounds to above baseline levels, immediately so after triazolam.