Dextropropoxyphene kinetics after single and repeated oral doses in man

CYP3A4 mediates dextropropoxyphene N-demethylation to nordextropropoxyphene: humanin vitroandin vivostudies and lack of CYP2D6 involvement

The individual cytochrome P450 isoforms in dextropropoxyphene N-demethylation to nordextropropoxyphene were determined and the pharmacokinetics of dextropropoxyphene and nordextropropoxyphene in cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) extensive (EM) and poor (PM) subjects were characterized. Microsomes from six CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers and one CYP2D6 poor metabolizer were used with isoform specific chemical and antibody inhibitors and expressed recombinant CYP enzymes. Groups of three CYP2D6 EM and PM subjects received a single 65-mg oral dose of dextropropoxyphene, and blood and urine were collected for 168 and 96 h, respectively. Nordextropropoxyphene formation in vitro was not different between the CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (Km = 179 +/- 74 microM, Cl(int) = 0.41 +/- 0.26 ml mg(-1)h(-1)) and the PM subject (K = 225 microM, Cl(int) = 0.19 ml mg(-1) h(-1)) and was catalysed predominantly by CYP3A4. There was no apparent difference in the pharmacokinetics of dextropropoxyphene and nordextropropoxyphene in CYP2D6 EM and PM subjects. CYP3A4 is the major CYP enzyme catalysing the major metabolic pathway of dextropropoxyphene metabolism. Hence variability in the pharmacodynamic effects of dextropropoxyphene are likely due to intersubject variability in hepatic CYP3A4 expression and/or drug-drug interactions. Reported CYP2D6 phenocopying is not due to dextropropoxyphene being a CYP2D6 substrate.

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Management of chronic pain. Part I

Chronic pain is associated with substantial psychosocial and economic stress, coupled with functional loss and various levels of vocational dysfunction. The role of a pain center is to focus on chronic pain in a multidisciplinary, comprehensive manner, providing the patient with the most effective opportunity to manage his or her chronic disease syndrome. This article focuses on methods to manage many types of chronic pain and describes a broad range of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions and options available to the patient. Part I of this two-part monograph describes pharmacotherapeutic interventions and regional nerve blocks. Part II focuses on psychologic assessment and treatment and physical therapy. A multimodal management strategy offers patients the greatest improvement potential for specific chronic pain syndromes. Cognitive and behavioral therapies and physical therapies are described. This combination of therapies may provide patients with the skills and knowledge needed to increase their sense of control over pain. The integration of appropriate pharmacotherapeutic regimens, neural blockades, physical therapy, and psychologic techniques maximizes a patient's effectiveness in dealing with chronic pain. Three case studies are presented in Part II.

Cardiovascular function measured by ultrasound Doppler in healthy young men after ingestion of dextropropoxyphene napsylat

In a double blind cross-over study 10 healthy male volunteers were given either 300 mg dextropropoxyphene napsylat (DP) or placebo daily for 16 days. The serum levels of DP and the metabolite nordextropropoxyphene were measured on day 3, 6 and 16. Haemodynamic measurements were made on day 1 and day 16, both at rest and during exercise. The measurements were made non-invasively, with a pulsed ultrasound Doppler. Blood pressure, heart rate, velocity, cardiac output, left cardiac work, increased during work, but showing no significant differences between the groups. The systolic time intervals were also measured by the ultrasound Doppler. The preejection period increased significantly in the DP-group, whereas the ratio preejection period/left ventricular ejection time which reflects the contractility of the heart did not differ significantly. It is concluded that DP taken daily in a normal dose for 16 days did not affect the heart function in healthy young men.

Psychomotor performance of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: cross-over comparison of dextropropoxyphene, dextropropoxyphene plus amitriptyline, indomethacin, and placebo

Actions on performance of dextropropoxyphene (DXP) alone and in combination with amitriptyline (AMI), indomethacin (IN), and placebo were compared in 15 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The patients were on their prescribed maintenance regimen excluding analgesics. In four randomized test sessions at two-week intervals, they received double blind and crossover single oral doses of DXP 130 mg, IN 50 mg, DXP 65 mg + AMI 25 mg or placebo, each after two days' pretreatment with the same drug. Objective and subjective effects were measured at baseline and 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. DXP impaired critical flicker discrimination, symbol copying and body balance without modifying tracking, choice reactions or attention. It rendered the subjects elated, muzzy, mentally slow and calm. Actions of AMI + DXP were about the same. IN impaired body balance and critical flicker recognition. Plasma concentrations of DXP were moderate to high whilst those of IN and AMI were fairly low. We conclude that therapeutic doses of DXP and IN are relatively safe in regard to driving skills. Small doses of AMI may not enhance the mild psychomotor effects of DXP. Earlier single dose studies carried out with healthy volunteers might have overestimated the decremental effects of analgesics on psychomotor performance.