Phase-II trial of 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (DMDR) for advanced hypernephroma

Stage migration and increasing proportion of favorable-prognosis metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: implications for clinical trial design and interpretation

BACKGROUND

The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk model classifies patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by 5 pretreatment features as favorable, intermediate, and poor risk. The number of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center patients in each risk group was examined by year of treatment to analyze stage migration.

METHODS

The distribution of risk groups was examined retrospectively in 789 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center patients with metastatic RCC treated in a first-line therapy clinical trial from 1975 to 2007. Date of treatment onset was divided into 6 cohorts between 1975 and 2007 (1975-1980, 1981-1985, 1986-1990, 1991-1995, 1996-2001, and 2001-2007).

RESULTS

The median age of the first-line metastatic RCC clinical trial patients was 59 years (range, 20-82 years). Most patients received cytokine therapy (55%), 37% received chemotherapy/other, and 8% received vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapies. Overall survival increased with each consecutive cohort year group (P < .001). Median survival was 0.43 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.68) in the 1973-1980 cohort and 1.5 years in the 2001-2007 cohort (95% CI, 1.15-2.11). Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center risk-group distribution shifted between 1975 and 2007 (P < .0001). The poor-risk group proportion became smaller (from 44% in 1975-1980 to 13% in 2001-2007), whereas the favorable-risk group increased (from 0% in 1975-1980 to 49% in 2001-2007). The intermediate-risk group remained stable at 50%. After adjusting for type of therapy, the shifts continue to be significant (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk-group distribution for metastatic RCC patients in clinical trials shifted from 1975 to 2007. These shifts have direct implications for data analysis, interpretation of metastatic RCC trends, and drug development.

Prognostic factors for survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To describe survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are candidates for clinical trials of new agents as second-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival was studied in 251 patients with advanced RCC treated during 29 consecutive clinical trials between 1975 and 2002. Clinical features were first examined in univariate analyses, and then a stepwise modeling approach based on Cox regression was used to form a multivariate model.

RESULTS

Median survival for the 251 patients was 10.2 months and differed according to year of treatment, with patients treated after 1990 showing longer survival. In this group, the median overall survival time was 12.7 months. Because the purpose of this analysis was to establish prognostic factors for present-day clinical trial design, prognostic factor analysis was performed on these patients. Pretreatment features associated with a shorter survival in the multivariate analysis were low Karnofsky performance status, low hemoglobin level, and high corrected serum calcium. These were used as risk factors to categorize patients into three different groups. The median time to death in patients with zero risk factors was 22 months. The median survival in patients with one of these prognostic factors was 11.9 months. Patients with two or three risk factors had a median survival of 5.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with novel agents during a clinical trial is indicated for patients with metastatic RCC after progression to cytokine treatment. Three prognostic factors for predicting survival were used to categorize patients into risk groups. These risk categories can be used in clinical trial design and interpretation.

Effect of cytokine therapy on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between treatment with cytokine therapy and survival, investigate the effect of nephrectomy on survival, and identify long-term survivors among a cohort of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 670 patients with advanced RCC treated on 24 clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy or cytokine therapy were the subjects of this retrospective analysis. Treatment was categorized as cytokine (containing interferon alfa and/or interleukin-2) in 396 patients (59%) and as chemotherapy (cytotoxic or hormonal therapy) in 274 (41%). Among the 670 patients, those with survival times of greater than 5 years were identified as long-term survivors.

RESULTS

Patients treated with cytokine therapy had a longer survival time than did those treated with chemotherapy, regardless of the year of treatment or risk category based on pretreatment features. The median survival times for favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk patients were 27, 12, and 6 months for those treated with cytokines and 15, 7, and 3 months for those treated with chemotherapy, respectively. The magnitude of difference in median survival was greater in the favorable- and intermediate-risk groups. The median survival time was less than 6 months in the poor-risk group for both treatment programs. Median survival time was 14 months among patients with prior nephrectomy plus time from diagnosis to treatment greater than 1 year versus 8 months among those with time from diagnosis to treatment less than 1 year, regardless of pretreatment nephrectomy status. Thirty patients (4.5%) among the 670 patients were identified as long-term survivors; 12 were free of disease after nephrectomy and treatment with interferon alfa, interleukin-2, or surgical resection of metastasis.

CONCLUSION

The low proportion of patients with advanced RCC who achieve long-term survival emphasizes the need for clinical investigation to identify more effective therapy.

Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors and a model predictive for survival in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival was studied in 670 patients with advanced RCC treated in 24 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center clinical trials between 1975 and 1996. Clinical features were first examined univariately. A stepwise modeling approach based on Cox proportional hazards regression was then used to form a multivariate model. The predictive performance of the model was internally validated through a two-step nonparametric bootstrapping process.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 10 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9 to 11 months). Fifty-seven of 670 patients remain alive, and the median follow-up time for survivors was 33 months. Pretreatment features associated with a shorter survival in the multivariate analysis were low Karnofsky performance status (<80%), high serum lactate dehydrogenase (> 1.5 times upper limit of normal), low hemoglobin (< lower limit of normal), high "corrected" serum calcium (> 10 mg/dL), and absence of prior nephrectomy. These were used as risk factors to categorize patients into three different groups. The median time to death in the 25% of patients with zero risk factors (favorable-risk) was 20 months. Fifty-three percent of the patients had one or two risk factors (intermediate-risk), and the median survival time in this group was 10 months. Patients with three or more risk factors (poor-risk), who comprised 22% of the patients, had a median survival time of 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Five prognostic factors for predicting survival were identified and used to categorize patients with metastatic RCC into three risk groups, for which the median survival times were separated by 6 months or more. These risk categories can be used in clinical trial design and interpretation and in patient management. The low long-term survival rate emphasizes the priority of clinical investigation to identify more effective therapy.

Relationship between diagnosis-specific activity of cytotoxic drugs in fresh human tumour cells ex vivo and in the clinic

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the relationship between the disease-specific activity of cytotoxic drugs in the clinic and in fresh human tumour cells from patients, as detected by a non-clonogenic cytotoxicity assay. The activity of 18 different cytotoxic drugs in fresh human tumour cells ex vivo was analysed in up to 15 samples from each of 13 different diagnoses using the fluorometric microculture cytotoxicity assay (FMCA). For each drug and diagnosis, relative activity indices (RAIs) were calculated, defined as the fraction of samples within the diagnosis having a survival index (SI) less than the median SI for the drug in all tested samples. Clinical response rates for the drug in the same diagnoses were collected from published phase II trials and were compared with the RAIs using Spearman's rank correlation (Rho) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (R). Correlation coefficients could be calculated for 12 drugs. The coefficients varied between 0.02 and 0.92 (Rho) and between 0.07 and 0.91 (R), but for most drugs the correlation between RAI and clinical response rates was good, with Rho > 0.6 and R > 0.7. Weak correlations were observed for cyclophosphamide and vincristine (Rho = 0.32 and 0.16, respectively), which might be due to old clinical data, and for paclitaxel (Rho = 0.02), which perhaps could be explained by in vitro activity of the solvent, Cremophor EL. The 18 drugs were also categorised according to their suggested clinical use in solid or haematological tumours, and were then compared regarding the activity in solid compared with haematological tumours ex vivo, expressed as the ratio between the number of responders among solid and haematological tumours (S/H ratio). The mean ex vivo S/H ratios in the group of drugs registered for use in haematological tumours was only 0.09 and was significantly different (P = 0.05) from the mean S/H ratios for the drugs used in both haematological and solid tumours (0.31) and in solid tumours only (0.47). Furthermore, the FMCA could identify the 50% most and least sensitive diagnoses with respect to clinical phase II activity with 74% (78/106) correct classifications. The results indicate that the relative activity of cytotoxic drugs in different diagnoses may be detected by the FMCA. Thus, 'phase II trials ex vivo' using non-clonogenic cytotoxicity assays might be used to make clinical trials more effective by targeting trials to diagnoses in which a new agent is most likely to be active.

Phase II evaluation of menogaril in patients with advanced hypernephroma

Fifteen patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated with Menogaril, 200 mg/m2 by one-hour, intravenous infusion at four-week intervals. No objective regressions were observed. Median time to progression was two months, and median survival was seven months. All patients experienced neutropenia. Platelet toxicity was negligible. Venous irritation and phlebitis at the infusion site was seen in 47% of patients. Menogaril as administered in this protocol is ineffective in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Idarubicin: a second-generation anthracycline

Because of its in vitro activity in leukemic cell lines and Phase I studies of acute leukemia, Phase II and III clinical trials with idarubicin hydrochloride were conducted in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. In the Phase III comparative trials between the combinations of idarubicin and cytarabine and daunorubicin hydrochloride and cytarabine, the idarubicin/cytarabine combination resulted in significantly greater complete remission rates and longer overall survival in two of three studies conducted in the US. As a result, the Food and Drug Administration approved intravenous idarubicin with a Class 1A rating in September 1990 for use in combination with other antileukemic drugs (e.g., cytarabine) for the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia in adults. The recommended dose of idarubicin is 12 mg/m2 daily for three days by slow intravenous injection in combination with cytarabine. Although idarubicin causes myelosuppression similar to that described with daunorubicin, the incidence of cardiotoxicity in animal models is lower. Idarubicin also has the advantage of oral administration, but the oral formulation of the drug remains investigational. The use of idarubicin in pediatric patients also remains to be established.

New anthracycline antitumor antibiotics

Doxorubicin is an essential component of the treatment of aggressive lymphoma, childhood solid tumors, bone and soft tissue sarcomas, and breast cancer and additional indications are emerging. On the other hand, daunorubicin has occupied the central position of interest in the treatment of acute leukemia. Epirubicin has a spectrum very similar to doxorubicin but lesser toxicity. The ability to protect against cardiotoxicity with ICRF-187 further enhances clinical interest in exploiting modifications in doze intensity to therapeutic advantage. Idarubicin has at least equivalent activity to daunorubicin and doxorubicin in leukemia. New areas of research in relation to anthracycline antibiotics include introduction of new the analogs, insight into mechanisms of resistance, the reversal of multidrug resistance in vitro, the protection of cardiac toxicity, and the study of other important biochemical reactions relevant to cytotoxicity. Orally active anthracyclines such as idarubicin and compounds which lack cross-resistance with the parent drugs or have other mechanisms for cytotoxicity are being developed. It is likely that these modifications will lead to an expanding therapeutic spectrum for these already widely useful drugs.

Rationale for immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma

Metastasis to distant organs is the principal cause of death from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). No commonly accepted therapy is available for disseminated RCC at present. Immunotherapy is a mode of therapy that either interferes with the immune system or makes use of drugs that have been derived from soluble mediators of the immune system. Several lines of evidence suggest that combinations of genetically engineered cytokines (e.g. interleukin-2 and interferon alpha) may be particularly active in the treatment of advanced RCC. There are two major rationales for considering immunotherapy for RCC: (1) there is currently no other therapy available, and (2) there is hardly any innovative approach besides immunotherapy. Still, immunotherapy is far from being a standard therapy for disseminated RCC.

Pharmacokinetics of idarubicin (4-demethoxydaunorubicin; IMI-30; NSC 256439) following intravenous and oral administration in patients with advanced cancer

The plasma pharmacokinetics of idarubicin (4-demethoxydaunorubicin) were studied in 20 patients with advanced malignant disease after intravenous (21 occasions) and oral (14 occasions) administration. Idarubicin plasma concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated for the intravenous plasma drug concentration, time data revealed a terminal half-life of 12.9 +/- 6.0 h (mean +/- s.d.), clearance 98.7 +/- 47.3 1 h-1 m-2 and volume of distribution 1533 +/- 536 1 m-2. A bi-exponential equation corresponding to a two compartment open model best fitted the data. Half-life and clearance were not significantly different following oral administration. Bioavailability of oral idarubicin was 0.29 +/- 0.20 (mean +/- s.d.). There was a wide range of bioavailability between and within subjects. Plasma concentrations of idarubicinol (the only metabolite detected) rapidly exceeded those of the parent drug, and exposure to this metabolite was greater than to the parent drug. The mean half-life of idarubicinol was not significantly different after i.v. (63.1 +/- 28.2 h) and oral (45.8 +/- 16.0 h) administration. Much larger amounts of this metabolite were formed following the oral route of administration. This may have implications for the clinical use of this drug as idarubicinol may have appreciable cytotoxic activity.