Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures

Management of benign anastomotic strictures following rectal resection: a systematic review

AIM

Benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgical resection are a commonly under-reported complication in up to 30% of patients, with a significant impact upon quality of life. In this systematic review, we aim to assess the utility of endoscopic techniques in avoiding the need for surgical reintervention.

METHOD

A literature search was performed for published full text articles using the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases. Additional papers were found by scanning the references of relevant papers.

RESULTS

A total of 34 papers were included, focusing upon balloon dilatation, endoscopic stenting, electroincision, stapler stricturoplasty and cortiocosteroids alone and in combination, with success rates varying from 20% to 100%. The most challenging strictures were reported as those with a narrow lumen, frequently observed following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or an anastomotic leak. Endoscopic balloon dilatation was the most commonly used first-line method; however, repeated dilatations were often required and this was associated with an increased risk of perforation. Although initial success rates for stents were good, patients often experienced stent migration and local symptoms. Only a small number of patients experienced endoscopic management failure and progressed to surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Following identification of an anastomotic stricture and exclusion of underlying malignancy, endoscopic management is both safe and feasible as a first-line option, even if multiple treatment exposures or multimodal management is required. Surgical resection or a defunctioning stoma should be reserved for emergency or failed cases. Further research is required into multimodal and novel therapies to improve quality of life for these patients.

Risk factors and endoscopic treatment for anastomotic stricture after resection in patients with colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Benign strictures are frequent complications following colorectal surgery, with an incidence of up to 20%. Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective but there is not enough evidence for establishing stricture management at that anatomic level.

AIM

To determine the risk factors associated with the development of stricture in patients with colorectal cancer and describe endoscopic treatment in those patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with colorectal cancer that underwent surgery and anastomosis, evaluated through colonoscopy, within the time frame of 2014 to 2019.

RESULTS

Of the 213 patients included in the study, 18.3% presented with stricture that was associated with the type of surgery. Intersphincteric resection was a risk factor (OR = 18.81, 95% CI: 3.31-189.40, p < .001). A total of 69.2% patients with stricture had a stoma, identifying it as a risk factor for stricture (OR = 7.07, 95% CI: 3.10-16.57, p < .001). Mechanical anastomotic stapling was performed in 87.4% of the patients that did not present with stricture, identifying it as a protective factor (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.16-1.1, p = .04). Endoscopic treatment was required in 69.2% of the patients and provided favorable results in 83.3%. Only 2.6% of the patients had recurrence. No complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Intersphincteric resection and the presence of a stoma were independent risk factors for stricture, and mechanical anastomosis was a protective factor against stricture development. Endoscopic treatment was safe and effective.

Endoscopic electrocautery incision therapy for benign lower gastrointestinal tract anastomotic strictures

Benign anastomotic strictures can occur in up to 22% of patients who undergo colonic or rectal resection. Traditionally, surgery was the preferred method of treatment, but, over time, endoscopic techniques, such as balloon dilation, have become the preferred modality. However, a high stricture recurrence rate of up to 18-20% and the increased risk of perforation due to uncontrolled stretching are its major drawbacks. Endoscopic electrocautery incision (EECI) allows for controlled mucosal incision in predetermined locations of stricture. In this meta-analysis, we have summarized case reports, case series, retrospective studies and prospective studies describing the different endoscopic EECI techniques used for benign lower gastrointestinal tract anastomotic strictures. Our analysis showed that EECI, either alone or in combination with other modalities (e.g. balloon dilation, steroid injection or argon plasma coagulation) is an effective treatment option for both treatment-naïve and refractory short non-inflammatory strictures. The overall success rate for EECI-based therapy for benign colorectal stricture was 98.4%, with a stricture recurrence rate of 6.0%. No major adverse event (bleeding, infection or perforation) was reported. Only minor adverse events (abdominal pain) were reported in 3.8% of the population.

Long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of colorectal anastomotic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Despite standardized techniques, anastomotic complications after colorectal resection remain a challenging problem. Among those, anastomotic stricture is a debilitating outcome which often requires multiple interventions and which is prone to recur. The present series investigates the long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for stenotic colorectal anastomosis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from a single institution who presented with an anastomotic stenosis after a colorectal resection were identified using a prospective clinical database. Medical records were systematically reviewed to detail patients' outcomes.

RESULTS

Over 17 years (1988-2015), 2361 consecutive patients underwent a colorectal anastomosis. Of those, 76 patients (3.2 %) suffered a symptomatic anastomotic stenosis within a median of 5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 2-13) of the index procedure. All stenoses were primarily treated by endoscopic balloon dilation. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR 7-14). In half the patients, one to two attempts at endoscopic balloon dilation definitively relieved the stenosis. Overall, the median number of endoscopic balloon dilation required was 3 (IQR 2-3). Recurrence rates at 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year were 11, 22, and 25 %, respectively. Median time to recurrence was 12 months (IQR 3-24). Ultimately, two patients (2.6 %) underwent an operation due to failure of endoscopic treatment. All other patients (97.4 %) were treated successfully with endoscopic balloon dilation. A total of 12 patients (15.7 %) suffered a complication from endoscopic dilation. Of those, 11 were minor bleeding and one was a perforation at the level of the anastomosis. All complications were managed conservatively, and no emergency procedure was required as a consequence of attempted endoscopic balloon dilation.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic balloon dilation is a safe approach to effectively relieve an anastomotic stenosis following a colorectal resection.

Evaluation of efficacy of endoscopic incision method in postoperative benign anastomotic strictures of gastrointestinal system

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative benign anastomotic strictures (POBAS) which develop after surgical resections of the gastrointestinal system (GIS) present with symptoms depending on location of the stricture. Diagnosis is confirmed by endoscopic and radiological methods. Although bougie or balloon dilatation is preferred in management, the endoscopic incision method (EIM) is also used with considerable success. In this trial, we aimed to evaluate EIM, which is one of the endoscopic dilatation techniques used in postoperative anastomotic stricture of GIS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 20 POBAS patients, 12 men and 8 women, subjected to EIM intervention for strictures, were enrolled in the trial. The number of patients with upper GIS strictures was 6 (30%), while the number of cases with lower GIS strictures was 14 (70%).

RESULTS

Dilatation of the stricture was achieved in 15 (75%) patients with one treatment session, while more than one session of EIM was needed in 5 (25%) cases. Mean duration of follow-up of patients was 10.65 ±5.86 (0-25) months. Procedure-related complications developed in 8 patients. Among them, 7 were minor complications and improved without any treatment. In only 1 (5%) patient, perforation was observed as a major complication. Following EIM, recurrence of POBAS was observed in 5 (25%) patients. The following parameters were found to have an impact on successful outcome in EIM: presence or absence of a tortuous lumen in POBAS (p = 0.035) and length of stricture (p = 0.02), complications during the procedure (if any), and presence of single or multiple strictures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic incision method may be regarded as a favorable approach among first choice treatment alternatives in uncomplicated anastomotic strictures of GIS, or it may be used as an adjunctive dilatation method.

Techniques and principles of endoscopic treatment of benign gastrointestinal strictures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The fundamental goal of treating any stenosis is luminal enlargement to ameliorate the underlying obstructive symptoms. Symptoms depend on the etiology and the site of the stricture and may include dysphagia, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, obstipation, or frank bowel obstruction. This article compares the various current technologies available for the treatment of gastrointestinal stenoses with regard to ease and site of application, patient tolerance, safety and efficacy data, and cost-benefit ratio.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies indicate that gastrointestinal dilation and stenting have evolved to a point at which in many if not most situations they can be the first line therapy and potentially the final therapy needed to treat the underlying condition.

SUMMARY

Following techniques and principles in the management of gastrointestinal strictures would allow for the well tolerated and effective treatment of most patients with the tools currently available today.

Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Benign anastomotic colonic stenosis sometimes occur after surgery and usually require surgical or endoscopic dilation. Endoscopic dilation of anastomotic colonic strictures by using balloon or bougie-type dilators has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in multiple uncontrolled series. However, few data are available on safety and efficacy of endoscopic electrocautery dilation. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate safety and efficacy of endoscopic electrocautery dilation of postsurgical benign anastomotic colonic strictures.

METHODS

Sixty patients (37 women; median age 63.6 years, range 22.6-81.7) with benign anastomotic colonic or rectal strictures treated with endoscopic electrocautery dilation between June 2001 and February 2013 were included in the study. Anastomotic stricture was defined as a narrowed anastomosis through which a standard colonoscope could not be passed. Only annular anastomotic strictures were considered suitable for electrocautery dilation which consisted of radial incisions performed with a precut sphincterotome. Treatment was considered successful if the colonic anastomosis could be passed by a standard colonoscope immediately after dilation. Recurrence was defined as anastomotic stricture reappearance during follow-up.

RESULTS

The time interval between colorectal surgery and the first endoscopic evaluation or symptoms development was 7.3 months (1.3-60.7). Electrocautery dilation was successful in all the patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Median follow-up was 35.5 months (2.0-144.0). Anastomotic stricture recurrence was observed in three patients who were successfully treated with electrocautery dilation and Savary dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic electrocautery dilation is a safe and effective treatment for annular benign anastomotic postsurgical colonic strictures.

Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic stricture or stenosis is a well-described complication of intestinal anastomosis. The incidence of stricture after colorectal anastomosis ranges from 0 to 30 %. The aim of this study was to identify possible factors related to postoperative colorectal anastomotic stricture and to indicate reoperative surgery outcomes.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, medical records were reviewed for patients who underwent surgery for colorectal anastomotic stricture at Cleveland Clinic Florida between January 2001 and December 2010. The main outcome measures were demographics, indications for initial surgery, body mass index, comorbidities, previous treatment, level of anastomosis, history of radiotherapy, and operative data for the reoperative surgery.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (15 males) were eligible for the study. Nine patients had a diagnosis of cancer, 7 of whom received radiotherapy. The initial surgeries were low anterior resection (n = 9; 47.4 %), high anterior resection (n = 9; 47.4 %), and sigmoidectomy (n = 1; 5.2 %). Six patients (31.6 %) had anastomotic leak after initial surgery. The majority of the patients (n = 17; 89.5 %) had an intact splenic flexure, inferior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric vein. In all patients, full mobilization of the splenic flexure and high ligation of the mesenteric vessels was performed. Seven patients (36 %) developed postoperative complications. Over a mean follow-up of 24.3 months, there was no recurrence of anastomotic stricture.

CONCLUSIONS

An intact splenic flexure and mesenteric vessels were the most prevalent in patients who underwent reoperation at our institution. Full mobilization of the splenic flexure, high ligation of the mesenteric vessels, anastomotic stricture resection, and re-anastomosis can be successfully performed with satisfactory outcomes.

Balloon dilatation of benign rectal anastomotic strictures -- a review

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of anastomotic stricture at the level of the rectum gives rise to three broad therapeutic options, namely major pelvic and abdominal revisional surgery, faecal diversion (stoma), or local revision by transanal approaches (including endoscopic and fluoroscopic). This article updates the current evidence and focuses on the results of the balloon dilatation technique.

METHODS

A Medline search was carried out using the search terms (dilatation OR dilatation) AND (stricture OR strictures OR stenosis OR stenotic) AND (rectum OR rectal). In an effort to lessen publication bias, articles included at least 10 patients who were consecutively referred for treatment.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

This review would suggest that probably relatively short strictures have been chosen for balloon dilatation and that the results have had a very low major morbidity (0.45%) and mortality (0%) rate.

Comparative study of balloon and metal olive dilators for endoscopic management of benign anastomotic rectal strictures: clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes

BACKGROUND

Postoperative anastomotic strictures frequently complicate colorectal resection. Currently, various endoscopic techniques are being employed in their management, but the establishment of an optimal therapeutic strategy is still pending. The purpose of our study is to compare through-the-scope (TTS) balloon dilators versus Eder-Puestow metal olive dilators in the treatment of postoperative benign rectal strictures, considering the clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of each method.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients with benign anastomotic rectal stenosis were retrospectively studied. In group A, 15 patients underwent dilation with Eder-Puestow metal olives, while in group B 19 patients were treated by means of TTS balloon dilators. The technical and clinical success of dilation, complications, number of repeated sessions required, disease-free time intervals, and the overall cost of each procedure were evaluated.

RESULTS

Dilations were technically successful in all patients. No major complications occurred in either group. The number of dilations needed, rate of stricture recurrence, and duration of stenosis-free time intervals were not statistically significantly different between the two groups. Both methods proved more effective in older patients, given the greater number of dilations required in younger patients of both groups and higher frequency of stricture relapse in younger balloon-dilated patients (median 64.00 years) compared with older ones (median 75.00 years) (p = 0.001). An indisputable advantage of the Eder-Puestow technique, compared with TTS balloon dilators, is the low cost of equipment (median 22.30 compared with 680 , respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic dilation of postoperative benign rectal strictures is equally effective and safe, especially in older patients, when performed by Eder-Puestow bougies or TTS balloon dilators. However, metal olivary tips seem to surpass balloon dilators when considering the obvious economical benefits of the first method.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of benign anastomotic strictures after oncologic anterior rectal resection: report on 24 cases

Colorectal anastomotic benign strictures represent a challenging complication. Endoscopic dilation represents a valid and safe treatment. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate the results of endoscopic balloon dilation for anastomotic stricture after anterior rectal resection for cancer in an institution. Twenty-four symptomatic patients with benign colorectal anastomotic stricture were treated between April 2001 and January 2005. All patients underwent dilation using through-the-scope balloon technique. The success of dilation, the number of sessions required, complications, recurrence, and the relationship between the number of dilation sessions and recurrence were assessed. Dilation was successful in 22 (91.7%) patients. There were no procedure-related complications. The mean number of sessions required was 2.3. There was no relationship between the number of dilation sessions and stricture recurrence. Through-the-scope dilation is effective and safe for benign colorectal anastomotic strictures after anterior resection. There was no relationship between the number of dilation sessions and recurrence.

Endoscopic dilation of benign colorectal anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection: A prospective comparison study of two balloon types

BACKGROUND

Benign strictures arise in 5.8% to 20% of colorectal anastomoses. For such strictures, endoscopic dilation has proven to be a valid and safe treatment. A variety of endoscopic techniques have been proposed, but controlled prospective trials are lacking. This study compared dilation of this colorectal anastomotic stricture with an over-the-wire balloon designed for treatment of achalasia and with a through-the-scope balloon.

METHODS

Thirty patients with symptoms caused by benign colorectal anastomotic stricture were randomly allocated to two treatment groups: 15 underwent dilation with a through-the-scope balloon and 15 had dilation with an over-the-wire balloon. Success was defined as an anastomotic lumen wide enough to allow passage of a standard 13-mm-diameter colonoscope, with resolution of symptoms. The success of dilation, the number of sessions required, the complications, and the duration of the dilation were recorded. Patients were followed for 24 months.

RESULTS

Dilation was successful in all patients, with no procedure-related complication. The mean number of sessions required was 2.6 (0.98) in the through-the-scope group and 1.6 (0.77) in the over-the-wire group ( p = 0.009). The duration of response in days was greater in the over-the-wire group vs. the through-the-scope group, 560.8 (248.5) days vs. 294.2 (149.3) days, respectively, p = 0.016.

CONCLUSIONS

Through-the-scope and over-the-wire dilation techniques are both effective and safe for treatment of benign colorectal anastomotic strictures. Using a greater diameter over-the-wire pneumatic balloon reduces the number of dilation sessions required and provides a longer-lasting response to dilation.

Endoscopic treatment of postoperative colorectal anastomotic strictures

BACKGROUND

The postoperative development of benign colorectal anastomotic stricture remains a frequent and unsolved problem.

METHODS

From 1996 until 2002, we analyzed 94 consecutive patients with postoperative colorectal anastomotic stenosis who were treated endoscopically.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were initially resected for malignant disease, and 26 patients for benign conditions. Most frequently, hydrostatic balloon dilatation was performed; in selected cases, it was combined with a laser or argon plasma coagulation (APC) incision, or a laser incision only. Dilatation was successful in 59% of patients resected for cancer and 88% resected for a benign condition. Complications developed in 17 patients (benign restenosis, perforation, abscess); they were significantly more frequent after initial cancer resection than after resection for a benign condition ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

High success and low complication rates make endoscopic dilatation the treatment of choice to avoid high-risk reoperations in patients with benign anastomotic stricture. The presence of stapler anastomosis, postoperative leakage, and/or radiotherapy does not significantly impede successful endoscopic dilatation.

Endoscopic laser stricturotomy and balloon dilatation for benign colorectal strictures

BACKGROUND

A fibrous stricture may develop at the site of a colorectal anastomosis or as a complication following abdominal aortic surgery. A major resection may be necessary if the stricture cannot be released. The authors' experience with endoscopic stricturotomy using neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser, together with balloon dilatation, as a conservative method of treating such strictures, is reported here.

METHODS

The case notes of all patients referred for laser treatment of benign distal large bowel strictures at Concord Hospital were reviewed.

RESULTS

Ten patients had endoscopic laser treatment combined with endoscopic balloon dilatation between October 1991 and July 1999. An anastomotic stricture had developed in eight patients and two patients had a fibrous stricture of the upper rectum after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Nine of the 10 patients had their stricture treated successfully without complication or recurrence (median follow up 82 months; range: 14-104 months). The remaining patient re-presented with a large bowel obstruction at the site of his stricture 6 years following initial treatment.

CONCLUSION

A protocol combining laser stricturotomy with balloon dilatation appears to be a safe and effective treatment of such strictures.

Therapeutic colonoscopy

Therapeutic colonoscopy has replaced or lessened to a significant degree the need or extent of traditional open surgical procedures. The common uses of therapeutic colonoscopy are hemostasis, resection and ablation of benign and malignant disease, decompression and recanalization of obstructed or dilated bowel, as well as foreign body extraction. Bleeding from arteriovenous and other vascular abnormalities can be controlled with 40% to 80% success rates using endoscopically delivered, monopolar, bipolar, or laser coagulation. The palliation of bleeding recurrent or inoperable colorectal cancer is achieved in up to 90% of patients. Virtually all pedunculated adenomas and most sessile adenomas are regularly removed colonoscopically, while large and recurrent villous adenomas in high risk individuals can be successfully managed by endoscopically delivered laser ablation techniques. Emergency colonoscopic reduction of sigmoid volvulus is performed pre-operatively and decompression of the dilated colon of non-obstructive colonic ileus is now regularly achieved. Colonic strictures have been dilated with a variety of techniques ranging from divulsion with through-the-scope balloon dilators to laser recanalization. Pre-operative endoscopic laser relief of tumor obstruction is employed to avoid preliminary or decompressing colostomy. Endoscopic laser debulking and recanalization of recurrent or inoperable cancer has been achieved with up to 80% success and various foreign bodies may be extracted from the colon with a number of endoscopic techniques. The morbidity of therapeutic colonoscopy has ranged from 1% to 2% for polypectomy to 11% for laser palliation of bleeding from advanced cancer, often with obstruction.

Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery

The double stapling technique for rectal reconstruction after resection involves closing the lower rectal segment with a linear stapler and performing the anastomosis using a circular stapler across the linear staple row. The purpose of this report is to review the results of double stapling, present our experience, and draw conclusions from the material available. We have utilized the double stapling technique in 80 patients for primary anastomoses and in 11 patients for secondary anastomoses following Hartmann procedures. Twenty-one anastomoses were at or near the dentate line. Fifty-six patients had rectal carcinoma, 29 patients had diverticulitis, 3 patients had carcinoma of the ovary, and 1 patient each had traumatic rectal perforation, volvulus, or rectal prolapse. Complications in the total 91 patients included 3 anastomotic leaks (3.3%), 1 postoperative hemoperitoneum (1.1%), and 3 strictures (3.3%). No anastomosis was protected by diverting colostomy. There were no operative deaths. Of 43 patients with cancer available for follow-up, 4 patients have developed local recurrence. The technique has been modified for ileoanal anastomosis during abdominal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis and early results are favorable. The double stapling technique provides a safe method for rectal reconstruction at or near the dentate line and offers the following advantages over other stapler techniques: (1) It eliminates the frustrating distal pursestring; (2) The rectal segment is not opened, minimizing contamination; and (3) It avoids gathering the sometimes generous circumference of the rectum on a pursestring thus allowing a more precise distal donut.

The radiological management of gastrointestinal strictures and other obstructive lesions

Balloon dilation of gastrointestinal strictures using a radiologic, endoscopic or combined approach is a safe, effective means of managing an ever-increasing variety of stricturing processes. At present the ability to dilate strictures in the gastrointestinal tract is limited mainly by access. Balloon dilation is now well established in the management of oesophageal and anastomotic lesions. The place of balloon dilation in the management of Crohn's disease and in the management of malignant disease requires further evaluation.