Pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide in epileptic patients: effects of enzyme induction and urine pH on chlorpropamide elimination

Effect of genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome p450 (CYP) 2C9 and CYP2C8 on the pharmacokinetics of oral antidiabetic drugs: clinical relevance

Type 2 diabetes mellitus affects up to 8% of the adult population in Western countries. Treatment of this disease with oral antidiabetic drugs is characterised by considerable interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and adverse effects. Genetic factors are known to contribute to individual differences in bioavailability, drug transport, metabolism and drug action. Only scarce data exist on the clinical implications of this genetic variability on adverse drug effects or clinical outcomes in patients taking oral antidiabetics. The polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 is the main enzyme catalysing the biotransformation of sulphonylureas. Total oral clearance of all studied sulphonylureas (tolbutamide, glibenclamide [glyburide], glimepiride, glipizide) was only about 20% in persons with the CYP2C9*3/*3 genotype compared with carriers of the wild-type genotype CYP2C9*1/*1, and clearance in the heterozygous carriers was between 50% and 80% of that of the wild-type genotypes. For reasons not completely known, the resulting differences in drug effects were much less pronounced. Nevertheless, CYP2C9 genotype-based dose adjustments may reduce the incidence of adverse effects. The magnitude of how doses might be adjusted can be derived from pharmacokinetic studies. The meglitinide-class drug nateglinide is metabolised by CYP2C9. According to the pharmacokinetic data, moderate dose adjustments based on CYP2C9 genotypes may help in reducing interindividual variability in the antihyperglycaemic effects of nateglinide. Repaglinide is metabolised by CYP2C8 and, according to clinical studies, CYP2C8*3 carriers had higher clearance than carriers of the wild-type genotypes; however, this was not consistent with in vitro data and therefore further studies are needed. CYP2C8*3 is closely linked with CYP2C9*2. CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 are the main enzymes catalysing biotransformation of the thiazolidinediones troglitazone and pioglitazone, whereas rosiglitazone is metabolised by CYP2C9 and CYP2C8. The biguanide metformin is not significantly metabolised but polymorphisms in the organic cation transporter (OCT) 1 and OCT2 may determine its pharmacokinetic variability. In conclusion, pharmacogenetic variability plays an important role in the pharmacokinetics of oral antidiabetic drugs; however, to date, the impact of this variability on clinical outcomes in patients is mostly unknown and prospective studies on the medical benefit of CYP genotyping are required.

Clinically relevant anti-epileptic drug interactions

Anti-epileptic drugs frequently interact due to pharmacokinetic features (induction or inhibition of metabolism, production of active metabolites, low therapeutic indices) and the need for prolonged treatment with possible addition of other drugs to treat concomitant diseases. The most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those that inhibit phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbitone metabolism and thus increase their toxicity. Drugs inhibiting metabolism include antibiotic macrolides, chloramphenicol, isoniazide, some sulphonamides, propoxyphene, cimetidine, valproic acid and sulthiame. Anti-epileptic drugs can induce hepatic microsomal enzymes and, therefore, may increase metabolism of corticosteroids, oral contraceptives, oral anticoagulants, cardiovascular agents, antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, psychotropic drugs and non-opiate analgesics, thereby reducing their efficacy. Advantageous pharmacodynamic interactions include synergism of ethosuximide plus valproic acid and of carbamazepine plus valproic acid. A pharmacodynamic mechanism may be responsible for the reduced sensitivity of chronically treated epileptics to some neuromuscular blockers.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of oral hypoglycaemic agents. An update

Oral hypoglycaemic drugs, sulphonylureas and biguanides, occupy an important place in the treatment of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients who fail to respond satisfactorily to diet therapy and physical exercise. Although the precise mechanisms of action of these compounds are still poorly understood, there is sufficient agreement that sulphonylureas have both pancreatic and extrapancreatic effects, whereas biguanides have predominantly extrapancreatic actions. By using labelled compounds or measuring the circulating concentrations, the main pharmacokinetic properties of oral hypoglycaemic agents have been assessed and, in some cases, their pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships have been evaluated. A correlation between diabetes control and plasma sulphonylurea or biguanide concentrations is generally lacking at the steady-state, with the possible exception of long-acting agents; after either oral or intravenous dosing, the reduction of plasma glucose is usually related to the increased circulating drug concentrations. The toxic effects of oral hypoglycaemic drugs are more frequent in the elderly and in the presence of conditions that may lead to drug accumulation or potentiation (increased dosage, use of long-acting compounds, hepatic and renal disease, interaction with other drugs); however, a relationship between toxic effects and drug plasma levels has been reported only for biguanides.

The influence of nutrition on the systemic availability of drugs. Part II: Drug metabolism and renal excretion

Plasma concentrations of an active compound vary between individuals and within a subject, even if the same drug dosage is used. These differences are related to variations of drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, of presystemic drug metabolism in the intestine or the liver, and of drug elimination from the systemic circulation, for instance by hepatic metabolism or renal excretion. All of these processes can be modified by nutrition. However it is necessary to emphasize the significance of the pharmaceutical formulation for variations of both drug absorption and elimination. The role of nutrition should receive adequate attention during therapeutic use of drugs as well as in drug disposition studies. Recent guidelines for the assessment of the systemic availability of drugs therefore do recommend nutrition to be controlled.