A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the new anthracycline pirarubicin in breast cancer patients

Self/co-assembling peptide, EAR8-II, as a potential carrier for a hydrophobic anticancer drug pirarubicin (THP)--characterization and in-vitro delivery

A short ionic-complementary peptide, EAR8-II, was employed to encapsulate the hydrophobic anticancer drug pirarubicin (THP). EAR8-II was designed to inherit advantages from two previously introduced peptides, AAP8 and EAK16-II, in their self/co-assembly. This peptide is short, simple, and inexpensive to synthesize, while possessing a low critical assembly concentration (CAC). The choice of alanine (A) residues in the peptide sequence provides moderate hydrophobic interactions, causing a minimal degree of aggregation, compared with other more hydrophobic residues. EAR8-II is an ionic-complementary peptide, similar to EAK16-II, can self/co-assemble with hydrophobic compounds such as THP, and forms a stable fibular nanostructure in aqueous solution. Physiochemical properties and cellular activities of the EAR8-II and THP complexes were evaluated and show dependency on the peptide-to-drug ratio. The complex at the peptide-to-drug mass ratio of 5:1 provides a stable solution, uniform nanostructure, and highly effective anticancer activity against various cancer cell lines. This work forms the basis for detailed studies on EAR8-II and THP formulations in vitro and in vivo, for future development of peptide-based delivery systems for hydrophobic anticancer drugs.

Increased cytotoxicity and stability of Lipiodol-pirarubicin emulsion compared to classical doxorubicin-Lipiodol: potential advantage for chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

There is no well-defined curative treatment for advanced and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The widely used transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with a doxorubicin-Lipiodol emulsion has not been shown to improve survival in randomized studies. Further, obstruction of the hepatic artery used in the procedure is badly tolerated in patients with cirrhosis. Drugs with a more rapid penetration into the cancer cells are likely to eliminate the need for obstruction of the hepatic artery. We therefore compared the cytotoxicity of another anthracycline pirarubicin with that of the commonly used doxorubicin. In this report, we show that pirarubicin has a greater in vitro cytotoxic effect than doxorubicin on the HepG2 and Hu-H7 human hepatoma cell lines. Pirarubicin emulsion with Lipiodol is more stable at 37 degrees C than doxorubicin-Lipiodol. Moreover, pirarubicin accumulates at a greater extent in the oil phase, permitting Lipiodol to act as a slow-releasing vector for the anthracycline. Further, amiodarone, a multidrug resistance inhibitor, was shown to decrease the intrinsic resistance of HepG2 and Hu-H7 cells to both anthracyclines, and the presence of polysorbate 80 in the amiodarone preparation increased the stability of the anthracycline-Lipiodol emulsions. We therefore conclude that pirarubicin is a better candidate for TACE than doxorubicin. The rapid and increased cytotoxicity of pirarubicin on hepatoma cancer cells and the stability of the pirarubicin-Lipiodol amiodarone emulsion could avoid the complete obstruction of the hepatic artery by Gelfoam sponges, and provide a better tolerated method of TACE in patients with latent liver insufficiency.

Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents

Numerous studies have found a clear relationship between systemic exposure and the toxicity or (more rarely) the efficacy of anticancer agents. Moreover, the clearance of most of these drugs differs widely between patients. These findings, combined with the narrow therapeutic index of anticancer drugs, suggest that patient outcome would be improved if doses were individualised to achieve a target systemic exposure. Bayesian maximum a posteriori probability (MAP) forecasting is an efficient and robust method for the optimisation of drug therapy, but its use for anticancer drugs is not yet extensive. The aim of this paper is to review the application of population pharmacokinetics and MAP to anticancer drugs and to evaluate whether and when MAP Bayesian estimation improves the clinical benefit of anticancer chemotherapy. For each drug, the relationships between pharmacokinetic variables [e.g. plasma concentration or the area under the concentration-time curve] and pharmacodynamic effects are described. Secondly, the methodologies employed are considered and, finally, the results are analysed in terms of predictive performance as well as, where possible, the impact on clinical end-points. Some studies were retrospective and intended only to evaluate individual pharmacokinetic parameter values using very few blood samples. Among the prospective trials, a few studied the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships which provided the basis for routine pharmacokinetic monitoring. Others were performed in clinical context where MAP Bayesian estimation was used to determine maximum tolerated systemic exposure (e.g. for carboplatin, topotecan, teniposide) or for pharmacokinetic monitoring (e.g. for methotrexate or platinum compounds). Indeed, its flexibility in blood sampling times makes this technique much more applicable than other limited sampling strategies. These examples demonstrate that individual dose adjustment helps manage toxicity. The performance of pharmacokinetic monitoring is linked to the methodology used at each step of its design and application. Moreover, a limitation to the use of pharmacokinetic monitoring for certain anticancer drugs has been the difficulty in obtaining pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic data. Recent progress in analytical methods, as well as the development of noninvasive methods (such as positron emission tomography) for evaluating the effects of chemotherapy, will help to define pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships. Bayesian estimation is the strategy of choice for performing pharmacokinetic studies, as well as ensuring that a given patient benefits from the desired systemic exposure. Together, these methods could contribute to improving cancer chemotherapy in terms of patient outcome and survival.

Pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents in patients with impaired liver function

This report reviews published information on the clinical pharmacokinetics of antitumour agents in patients with liver dysfunction, associated with primary liver disease or liver metastases. Information was available for anthracyclines and their related compounds, antimetabolites, cyclophosphamide, vinca alkaloids, taxanes and epipodophyllotoxins. Changes in the pharmacokinetic profile or metabolism in patients with mild or severe hepatobiliary dysfunction are described and the relationships between serum levels, parameters employed for measuring hepatic function and toxic or therapeutic effects are examined. Current knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of antineoplastic agents in liver disease is far from complete, mostly obtained in small numbers of non-homogeneous patients often presenting only moderate liver dysfunction, and empirical guidelines for dose assessment are still largely applied in clinical practice. Because of the complex pathophysiological mechanisms of liver insufficiency in cancer patients, there is still doubt whether endogenous markers are useful. Although caution in treating cancer patients with liver insufficiency is compulsory, for most compounds there seems no need to recommend dose reductions for moderate impairment. However, for the tubulin acting agents, vincristine, vinblastine and possibly for paclitaxel and docetaxel, there is strong evidence that dose adjustment is mandatory in order to avoid excessive neutropenia and neurotoxicity.

Benefits of pharmacological knowledge in the design and monitoring of cancer chemotherapy

Prescribing chemotherapy is a difficult task, because of drug resistance, which prevents all tumors to respond to a given protocol and because of drug toxicity, which is generally unavoidable but which must be limited to acceptable levels. The therapeutic window of anticancer drugs is very narrow and clinicians have to try to optimize the individual doses and schedules of the drugs to be administered. They can rely upon simple anthropometric features, such as body weight or surface area; they can also take into account the physiological status of the patient: age, liver and kidney function, genetic characteristics of drug metabolism, etc. The best way for dose adaptation lies in the establishment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships, i.e., between the behavior of a drug in the body and its efficacy and toxicity. When it is established that the optimal effect of a drug is related to a given parameter, such as the area under the curve plotting plasma concentration vs. time (AUC), it becomes possible to administer the drug with the dose allowing to obtain the target parameter value. Individual dose adaptation can be achieved thanks to the study of the pharmacokinetics of a test dose preceding that of the therapeutic dose, or by the measure of drug plasma levels, either at steady state during a protracted infusion, or from cycle to cycle during repetitive protocols. Population analysis now allows the adaptation of anticancer drug dosing from a minimum knowledge of individual pharmacokinetic features, together with other characteristics of the patients such as age, gender or physiological functions.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of pirarubicin in humans: correlation with pharmacodynamics

The pharmacokinetic monitoring of anthracycline-containing regimens is warranted because of the important toxicity of these drugs and because pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships have been clearly established. We studied the pharmacokinetics of the new anthracycline pirarubicin in 80 courses of treatment performed in 27 patients, using a limited sampling protocol we had previously validated. We observed (for 47 of these courses) a significant correlation between the leucocyte cell kill and the pirarubicin area under the time x concentration curve, but the most significant correlation was obtained using the plasma concentration of doxorubicin, a metabolite of pirarubicin, at the end of the infusion. On the basis of this value, it is possible to predict for pirarubicin haematological toxicity in a way that can help the clinician in identifying patients at risk for toxicity.

Pharmacokinetics of 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin given on a weekly schedule in patients with advanced breast cancer

Improved quality of life has gained importance over shortly lasting remissions in yet incurable metastatic breast cancer. Fractionation of drug administration is one of the possible approaches to reduce the concentration-dependent toxicity of anthracyclines. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 4'-O-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (THP-ADM) under weekly administration in patients with advanced breast cancer (dose escalation, from 20 to 27 mg/m2 THP-ADM). The concentration-time curves of THP-ADM in plasma were best described by an open three-compartment model [half-life of the first disposition phase (t1/2 alpha), 3.15 min; terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 gamma), 13.9 h] with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 12.2 ng h ml-1mg-1 m-2, resulting in a mean plasma clearance of 86.9 1h-1 m-2. Metabolism included the formation of Adriamycin (ADM), Adriamycinol (ADM-OH), 13-dihydro-4'-O-tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (THP-OH), 7-deoxyadriamycinone (7H-ADn), and 7-deoxy-13-dihydroadriamycinone (7H-ADn-OH), with maximal plasma concentrations ranging from 2.8 to 5.5 ng/ml. The mean total amount of cytotoxic anthracyclines excreted into urine, mainly as the parent drug, was 5% of the delivered dose. ADM and ADM-OH, but not the parent drug, were observed in urine at up to 4 weeks after the last therapeutic cycle. There was a significant correlation between the leukocyte nadir under therapy and the AUC of ADM-OH (r = 0.800, P < 0.05). Since no shift in the plasma kinetics was observed from the first to the sixth cycle, the favorable ratio of the AUCs of THP-ADM and ADM after fractionation of THP-ADM suggests lower toxic side effects attributable to ADM. This hypothesis was confirmed in a clinical study, where no severe cardiotoxicity and only mild alopecia were observed in 19 patients. Thus, pharmacokinetics studies might be helpful in both individualization of therapy with THP-ADM and optimization of the administration schedule.

A limited sampling strategy for the study of pirarubicin pharmacokinetics in humans

Pirarubicin (4'-O-tetrahydropyranyldoxorubicin, THP-Adriamycin) is a new anthracycline antibiotic that has recently been developed because its reduced cardiac toxicity is associated with an antitumour efficacy similar to that of doxorubicin. Pirarubicin is characterised by strong haematological toxicity, which has been shown to be correlated with pharmacokinetic parameters, especially the area under the time-concentration curve. To obtain routine pharmacokinetic evaluations of pirarubicin for dose monitoring we developed a limited sampling strategy relying on three blood samples taken at the end of the infusion and at 12 and 24 h post-infusion. The characteristics of interindividual variability were assessed on the first courses of treatment performed in 18 patients; the model was then validated on 10 independent first courses of treatment performed in 10 other patients. The main pharmacokinetic parameters (half-lives, total volume of distribution, total plasma clearance) were estimated in the test group by maximum-likelihood estimation using all samples and by Bayesian estimation using three samples. The concordance between the two estimates was correct (the bias and precision for clearance were 2.3% and 12.1%, respectively), which shows that this limited sampling strategy can be used in routine drug monitoring.

Individual dose adaptation of anticancer drugs

The dose of anticancer drugs is currently adjusted to the patient body surface area, although patients have different abilities to clear anticancer drugs. The dose adjustment to physiological functions permits major toxic accidents to be avoided. The adjustment to tumour drug content is considered, but for ethical or technical reasons, it cannot be used routinely The best criterion for the dose adjustment seems to be drug plasma concentration. The relationship between plasma concentration and efficacy may not be excellent, since it depends on the presence of resistant cells and on the blood flow through the tumour. A relationship between plasma concentration and/or the area under the curve (AUC) with toxicity has been reported with all major anticancer drugs. Different methods of dose adjustment to the drug plasma concentration are reported. In conclusion, dose adjustment to the drug plasma concentration or to the AUC can improve the chemotherapy efficacy, while reducing toxicity.

The disposition of doxorubicin on repeated dosing

Twelve cancer patients (aged 49-74 years) receiving doxorubicin (66 +/- 8 mg/m2) as a 1-hour intravenous infusion had serial serum samples (0-48 hours) obtained after the first and second courses of therapy. Mean number of days between courses was 24.3, and all patients had normal liver function. Patients received the same concomitant antineoplastic agents and doses in both courses. Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol concentrations were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography and fitted to a two- or three-compartment infusion model. White blood cell and platelet toxicity were evaluated as (initial--nadir/initial)* 100. Differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a paired t test. Wide intrapatient and interpatient variability was seen between therapeutic courses. A significant decrease in the apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vc = 16.6 versus 10.4 L/m2; P < .05), and a nonsignificant decrease in clearance (CL = 748 versus 658 mL/min/m2) was observed on the second course of therapy. Doxorubicinol area under the curve and elimination half-life were similar between courses. Extensive chemotherapy-induced changes in white blood cell and platelet counts were observed but were similar in degree for courses 1 and 2. These data suggest that higher initial doxorubicin concentrations on the second course of therapy are secondary to an alteration in distribution volume (Vc). In this subset of patients, however, these changes were not associated with an increase in hematologic toxicity.