Phase I study of 5-day continuous infusion fluorodeoxyuridine and high-dose folinic acid with oral hydroxyurea

Clinical pharmacology and clinical trials of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors: is it a viable cancer therapy?

PURPOSE

Ribonucleotide reductase (RR) enzymes (RR1 and RR2) play an important role in the reduction of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides which is involved in DNA replication and repair. Augmented RR activity has been ascribed to uncontrolled cell growth and tumorigenic transformation.

METHODS

This review mainly focuses on several biological and chemical RR inhibitors (e.g., siRNA, GTI-2040, GTI-2501, triapine, gemcitabine, and clofarabine) that have been evaluated in clinical trials with promising anticancer activity from 1960's till 2016. A summary on whether their monotherapy or combination is still effective for further use is discussed.

RESULTS

Among the RR2 inhibitors evaluated, GTI-2040, siRNA, gallium nitrate and didox were more efficacious as a monotherapy, whereas triapine was found to be more efficacious as combination agent. Hydroxyurea is currently used more in combination therapy, even though it is efficacious as a monotherapy. Gallium nitrate showed mixed results in combination therapy, while the combination activity of didox is yet to be evaluated. RR1 inhibitors that have long been used in chemotherapy such as gemcitabine, cladribine, fludarabine and clofarabine are currently used mostly as a combination therapy, but are equally efficacious as a monotherapy, except tezacitabine which did not progress beyond phase I trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of clinical trials, we conclude that RR inhibitors are viable treatment options, either as a monotherapy or as a combination in cancer chemotherapy. With the recent advances made in cancer biology, further development of RR inhibitors with improved efficacy and reduced toxicity is possible for treatment of variety of cancers.

Hydroxyurea: a key player in cancer chemotherapy

Hydroxyurea (HU) is a simple organic compound currently used as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent. It acts specifically on the S-phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting the enzyme ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase, thereby hindering the reductive conversion of ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides and thus limiting de novo DNA synthesis. HU is employed in hemotological settings as a first-line treatment of myeloproliferative disorders, such as polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis, apart from having a vital role in combination therapy for management of malignant melanoma, head and neck cancers and brain tumors. It offers an advantage that the patient may take this drug on an ambulatory basis with minimum clinical toxicity, while some of its limitations include gastrointestinal disturbance and bone marrow depression. This review will summarize and present the overall effects of HU and its combination therapy as an anticancer agent.

A phase II study of the modulation of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid with high-dose infusional hydroxyurea in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase, may potentiate the activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) by reducing the deoxyribonucleotide pool available for DNA synthesis and repair. However as HU may inhibit the formation of 5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine-5-monophosphate (FdUMP), one of the principal active metabolites of 5-FU, the scheduling of HU may be critical. In vitro experiments suggest that administration of HU following 5-FU, maintaining the concentration in the region of 1 mM for six or more hours, significantly enhances the efficacy of 5-FU.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

5-FU/FA was given as follows: days 1 and 2-FA 250 mg/m2 (max. 350 mg) over two hours followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 by intravenous bolus (i.v.b.) over 15 minutes and subsequently 5-FU 400 mg/m2 infusion (ivi) over 22 hours. HU was administered on day 3 immediately after the 5-FU with 3 g i.v.b. over 15 minutes followed by 12 g ivi over 12 hours.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were entered into the study. Median survival was nine months (range 1-51+ months). There were eight partial responses (28%, 95% CI: 13%-47%). The median duration of response was 6.5 (range 4-9 months). Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (grade 3 in eight patients and grade 4 in five), anaemia (grade 3 in one patient) and diarrhoea (grade 3 in two patients). Neutropenia was associated with pyrexia in two patients. Phlebitis at the infusion site occurred in five patients. The treatment was complicated by pulmonary embolism in one patient and deep venous thrombosis in another.

CONCLUSION

HU administered in this schedule is well tolerated. Based on these results and those of other phase II studies, a randomised phase III study of 5-FU, FA and HU versus 5-FU and FA using the standard de Gramont schedule is recommended.

Constipation and diarrhea: the neglected symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To review the symptom experience of constipation and diarrhea related to cancer and its treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Published articles and book chapters relating to constipation and diarrhea in patients with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Constipation and diarrhea often represent a major concern and source of discomfort for the cancer patients. Research is needed to establish prevention and treatment protocols for patients at risk for constipation or diarrhea.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses are in an excellent position to recognize individuals who are at high risk for constipation and diarrhea. Preventive strategies and treatment protocols are of utmost importance.