Infarct-related heart failure: the choice of ACE inhibitor does not matter

Influence of tissue affinity of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

The demonstration of local renin-angiotension systems has raised the question of whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with different tissue affinities differ with regard to their effects on postinfarction remodeling.

HYPOTHESIS

The study was undertaken to investigate the influence of ACE inhibitors with different tissue affinity on morphology and function of the infarcted left ventricle.

METHODS

In all, 52 patients (17 women, 35 men, 38-73 years) with large acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive either 25-75 mg/day captopril or 10-20 mg/day fosinopril beginning on the Day 7 after infarction. Of these, 28 had anterior and 24 had posterior wall infarctions. Infarct size was determined by the creatine kinase integral method. Fifty patients were examined by cinemagnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) 1 and 26 weeks after infarction. The following parameters were determined: left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index (LVEDVI, LVESVI), ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct weight, and muscle mass (LVMM). The volume-to-mass ratio (VMR) was calculated and the clinical status according to the guidelines of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) was documented at each examination time. The results were compared with those of a historical sample without ACE-inhibitor therapy examined in an identical manner (n = 31, 10 women, 21 men, 36-75 years).

RESULTS

LVEDVI and LVESVI increased in the first 6 months after infarction by 24.9 and 36.6%, respectively, in the historical sample; by 11.0 and 7.8%, respectively, under captopril; and by 13.1 and 10.7%, respectively, under fosinopril. LVEF decreased by 14.9% in the untreated sample, by 3.7% under captopril and by 5.0% under fosinopril. Infarct weight and LVMM increased by 12.7 and 15.3%, respectively, without ACE inhibition, by 5.7 and 10.1%, respectively, in patients treated with captopril, and by 6.1 and 9.3%, respectively, in patients treated with fosinopril. The VMR increased by 7.4% in the historical sample, by 3.5% in the captopril group, and by 1.8% in the fosinopril group. The NYHA clinical status improved by 18.2% without ACE inhibition, by 42.9% in the captopril group, and by 26.3% in the fosinopril group. The differences between the two ACE-inhibitor groups and the reference group were all significant, while the differences between the captopril group and the fosinopril group were significant only for VMR (p < 0.01) and NYHA class (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both captopril and fosinopril have a comparable positive influence on postinfarction remodeling and on clinical status. Lipophilicity and tissue affinity do not seem to play a clinically important role in ACE-inhibitor therapy after infarction.

The kidney in congestive heart failure: renal adverse event rate of treatment

In this paper we review the effect of medical treatment on renal function in patients with congestive heart failure. We have examined data from the large-scale heart failure studies with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, beta-receptor blockers, an aldosterone antagonist, and a vasopeptidase inhibitor. Renal outcome was reported in almost all of the studies with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Despite concern about renal adverse events with drugs in this class, they seem to be safe in patients with congestive heart failure. In contrast, we did not find any report about renal function in patients treated with beta-receptor blockers for congestive heart failure.

Evaluating the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for older nursing home residents with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Despite their well noted therapeutic benefits for heart failure (HF), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may be underprescribed and underdosed among older nursing home patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the use of ACE inhibitor therapy in older (> or =70 years) nursing home residents with systolic heart failure (HF).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Five long-term care facilities in Providence, Rhode Island.

SUBJECTS

Adults aged 70 years or older with left ventricular (LV) ejection fractions < or =40%.

MEASUREMENTS

New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, comorbid diseases, and cardiac medications with logistic regression analysis to clarify their bearing on the prescription of ACE inhibitors.

RESULTS

Of the 819 nursing home residents who were evaluated, 119 (24 men, 95 women) fulfilled exacting entry criteria, i.e., heart failure signs/symptoms and documented LV systolic dysfunction. Forty-one of these 119 (35%) older persons were receiving ACE inhibitor therapy, predominantly in doses (< or =50 mg captopril/day or < or =5 mg enalapril/ day) less than those of proven therapeutic efficacy. Compared with older residents not receiving ACE inhibitors, those receiving ACE inhibitors included fewer with NYHA Class I HF (0 vs 21%, P = .017), more men (58 vs 28%, P< or =.01), and more people with hypertension (61 vs 35%, P< or =.01). In contrast, diuretics were prescribed more frequently among those not receiving ACE inhibitors (83 vs 56%, P< or =.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACE inhibitors are underprescribed and underdosed among elderly nursing home patients carefully screened to include systolic HF and no contraindications to the medication. ACE inhibitors are particularly underused in those elderly with NYHA Class I HF and in those receiving diuretics.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part I

Understanding the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic properties of vasodilatory drugs facilitates optimal use in clinical practice. It should be kept in mind that a drug belongs to a class but is a distinct entity, sometimes derived from a prototype to achieve a specific effect. The most common pharmacokinetic drug improvement is the development of a drug with a half-life sufficiently long to allow an adequate once-daily dosage. Developing a controlled release preparation can increase the apparent half-life of a drug. Altering the molecular structure may also increase the half-life of a prototype drug. Another desirable improvement is increasing the specificity of a drug, which may result in fewer adverse effects, or more efficacy at the target site. This is especially important for vasodilatory drugs which may be administered over decades for the treatment of hypertension, which usually does not interfere with subjective well-being. Compliance is greatly increased with once-daily dosing. Vasodilatory agents cause relaxation by either a decrease in cytoplasmic calcium, an increase in nitric oxide (NO) or by inhibiting myosin light chain kinase. They are divided into 9 classes: calcium antagonists, potassium channel openers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, alpha-adrenergic and imidazole receptor antagonists, beta 1-adrenergic agonist, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, eicosanoids and NO donors. Despite chemical differences, the pharmacokinetic properties of calcium antagonists are similar. Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is high, with all substances undergoing considerable first-pass metabolism by the liver, resulting in low bioavailability and pronounced individual variation in pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment has little effect on pharmacokinetics since renal elimination of these agents is minimal. Except for the newer drugs of the dihydropyridine type, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nilvadipine, nisoldipine and nitrendipine, the half-life of calcium antagonists is short. Maintaining an effective drug concentration for the remainder of these agents requires multiple daily dosing, in some cases even with controlled release formulations. However, a coat-core preparation of nifedipine has been developed to allow once-daily administration. Adverse effects are directly correlated to the potency of the individual calcium antagonists. Treatment with the potassium channel opener minoxidil is reserved for patients with moderately severe to severe hypertension which is refractory to other treatment. Diazoxide and hydralazine are chiefly used to treat severe hypertensive emergencies, primary pulmonary and malignant hypertension and in severe preeclampsia. ACE inhibitors prevent conversion of angiotensin-I to angiotensin-II and are most effective when renin production is increased. Since ACE is identical to kininase-II, which inactivates the potent endogenous vasodilator bradykinin, ACE inhibition causes a reduction in bradykinin degradation. ACE inhibitors exert cardioprotective and cardioreparative effects by preventing and reversing cardiac fibrosis and ventricular hypertrophy in animal models. The predominant elimination pathway of most ACE inhibitors is via renal excretion. Therefore, renal impairment is associated with reduced elimination and a dosage reduction of 25 to 50% is recommended in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Separating angiotensin-II inhibition from bradykinin potentiation has been the goal in developing angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. The incidence of adverse effects of such an agent, losartan, is comparable to that encountered with placebo treatment, and the troublesome cough associated with ACE inhibitors is absent.

What is the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in congestive heart failure and after myocardial infarction?

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the controversies surrounding the choice of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and the timing, dosage, and duration of ACE inhibitor therapy for congestive heart failure (CHF) and after myocardial infarction (MI). The beneficial effects of ACE inhibition in patients with CHF and after MI are reviewed. Human clinical trials are reviewed and their clinical implications are discussed.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE searches (1985-1995) identified human clinical trials and review articles.

DATA EXTRACTION

Landmark human clinical trials with morbidity and mortality end points were included. The validity of the study data were assessed on the basis of study methods, population characteristics, and statistical power.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ACE inhibitors exert beneficial effects in patients with CHF by hemodynamic and neurohormonal mechanisms. The attenuation of ventricular remodeling that occurs with ACE inhibition does not fully explain the results of clinical trials in patients after MI. Routine determination of ejection fraction to guide ACE inhibitor therapy is not as important as the patient's clinical status. Clinicians should titrate the chosen ACE inhibitor on the basis of hemodynamic response to target doses used in major clinical trials. Because the beneficial effects of ACE inhibitors appear to be a class effect, choice of an agent should include cost considerations and the results of clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

ACE inhibitor reduce morbidity and mortality in selected CHF and post-MI patients. Patients with symptomatic CHF benefit most from ACE inhibitor therapy, and it should be continued indefinitely. Treatment effects in asymptomatic patients are delayed. The role of ACE inhibitor therapy in preventing morbidity and morality in asymptomatic patients with preserved ventricular function requires further study.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the clinical setting of chronic congestive heart failure

The addition of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor to digitalis and diuretics in chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) prolongs survival and improves the clinical condition of patients. These actions depend on the inhibition of ACE and are, therefore, common to all ACE inhibitors. Thus, the inclusion of an ACE inhibitor in the therapeutic regimen of chronic CHF is mandatory, whenever feasible. The use of ACE inhibitors in chronic CHF should avoid symptomatic hypotension and inordinate decreases in renal function. To this end, ACE inhibitor therapy should progress by gradually increasing doses, and sodium intake and dosages of diuretics and ACE inhibitors should be adjusted in the light of changing circumstances. ACE inhibitors with short elimination half-lives should be preferred in chronic CHF, since they allow quicker dose adjustment than their longer-acting congeners, and given that compliance with once and twice daily dosing would be similar.