Does anticoagulation increase the risk of wound hematoma in inguinal hernia surgery?

Risk factors for postoperative hematoma after inguinal hernia repair: an update

BACKGROUND

We recently sensed an increase in the frequency of groin hematoma after inguinal hernia repair (IHR) at our institution. The aim of this study was to provide a more updated assessment of the risk factors inherent to this complication.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study of all adult patients (age ≥ 18 y) who developed a groin hematoma after IHR at our institution between 2003 and 2015. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess for independent predictors for groin hematoma.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients (among 6608 IHR) developed a groin hematoma, (60 were observed, 36 required intervention). The hematoma frequency increased from our previous study (1.4 % versus 0.9%, P < 0.01). Mean age was 64.6 y (range: 18-92), and 84.3% were men. There was no significant difference in the laterality, type, or technique of IHR between cases and controls. Univariate analysis (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P) identified warfarin usage (3.5, [1.6-6.4], P < 0.01), valvular heart disease (11.6, [2.6-51.3], P < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (2.6, [1.2-5.5], P = 0.01), hypertension (2.03, [1.1-3.6], P = 0.02), recurrent hernia (3.7, [1.4-9.7], P < 0.01), and coronary artery disease (2.1, [1.0-4.4 ], P = 0.05) as significant preoperative factors. The proportion of patients on warfarin decreased since our prior report (31% versus 42%, P = 0.20). On multivariable regression, warfarin and recurrent hernia were independent predictors of hematoma development.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent risk factors for the development of groin hematoma after IHR included warfarin use and recurrent hernia. Careful consideration for anticoagulation and surgical hypervigilance remains prudent in all patients undergoing IHR and especially those with recurrence.

The Stoppa procedure in inguinal hernia repair: to drain or not to drain

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of drainage in the Stoppa procedure for inguinal repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The use of a suction drain was randomized at the end of the surgical intervention in 26 male patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, divided into 2 groups: Group A, 12 patients undergoing drainage, and group B, 14 patients not undergoing drainage. On the second postoperative day, all patients underwent abdominal pelvic computed tomography scan examination to detect the presence of abdominal fluid collection. RESULTS: In group A, no patient developed fluid collection in the preperitoneal space, and 1 patient presented with an abscess in the preperitoneal space on the 15th postoperative day. In group B, 12 patients presented with fluid collections in the preperitoneal space on computed tomography scan evaluation. However, only 3 patients presented minor complications. None of the patients developed a major complication. CONCLUSION: The use of suction drainage with the Stoppa procedure does not provide any benefit.