Blood biogenic amines during clozapine treatment of early-onset schizophrenia

Antipsychotic Drug-Induced Increases in Peripheral Catecholamines are Associated With Glucose Intolerance

The second-generation antipsychotic drugs are widely used in the field of psychiatry, for an expanding number of different conditions. While their clinical efficacy remains indispensable, many of the drugs can cause severe metabolic side-effects, resulting in an increased risk of developing cardiometabolic disorders. The physiological basis of these side-effects remains an ongoing area of investigation. In the present study, we examined the potential role of peripheral catecholamines in antipsychotic-induced glucose intolerance. Adult female rats were acutely treated with either the first-generation antipsychotic drug haloperidol (0.1, 0.5 or 1 mg/kg) or the second-generation drugs risperidone (0.25, 1.0 or 2.5 mg/kg), olanzapine (1.5, 7.5 or 15 mg/kg) or clozapine (2, 10 or 20 mg/kg) or vehicle. Fasting glucose levels were measured and then animals were subjected to the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test. Levels of peripheral norepinephrine, epinephrine and dopamine were concurrently measured in the same animals 75, 105 and 135 min after drug treatment. All antipsychotics caused glucose intolerance, with strongest effects by clozapine > olanzapine > risperidone > haloperidol. Plasma catecholamines were also increased by drug treatment, with greatest effects for norepinephrine and epinephrine caused by clozapine > risperidone > olanzapine > haloperidol. Importantly, there were strong and statistically significant associations between norepinephrine/epinephrine levels and glucose intolerance for all drugs. These findings confirm that increases in peripheral catecholamines co-occur in animals that exhibit antipsychotic-induced glucose intolerance, and these effects are strongly associated with each other, providing further evidence for elevated catecholamines as a substrate for antipsychotic metabolic side-effects.

A ganglionic blocker and adrenoceptor ligands modify clozapine-induced insulin resistance

Clozapine is a second generation antipsychotic drug that has proven to be helpful in the management of patients with psychotic disorders that are resistant to other medications. Unfortunately, the majority of patients treated with clozapine develop metabolic dysregulation, including weight gain and insulin resistance. There are few treatments available to effectively counter these side-effects. The goal of the present study was to use an established animal model to better understand the nature of these metabolic side-effects and determine whether existing drugs could be used to alleviate metabolic changes. Adult female rats were treated with a range of doses of clozapine (2, 10 and 20 mg/kg) and subjected to the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, to measure whole-body insulin resistance. Clozapine dose-dependently decreased the glucose infusion rate, reflecting pronounced insulin resistance. To reverse the insulin resistance, rats were co-treated with the ganglionic blocker mecamylamine (0.1, 1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg) which dose-dependently reversed the effects of 10 mg/kg clozapine. A 1.0 mg/kg dose of mecamylamine independently reversed the large increase in peripheral epinephrine caused by treatment with clozapine. To study the influence of specific adrenoceptors, rats were treated with multiple doses of α₁ (prazosin), α₂ (idazoxan), β₁ (atenolol) and β₂ (butoxamine) adrenoceptor antagonists after the onset of clozapine-induced insulin resistance. Both beta blockers were effective in attenuating the effects of clozapine, while idazoxan had a smaller effect; no change was seen with prazosin. The current results indicate that peripheral catecholamines may play a role in clozapine's metabolic effects and be a target for future treatments.

Differential Effects of Acute Treatment With Antipsychotic Drugs on Peripheral Catecholamines

Antipsychotic drugs represent the most effective treatment for chronic psychotic disorders. The newer second generation drugs offer the advantage of fewer neurological side-effects compared to prior drugs, but many cause serious metabolic side-effects. The underlying physiology of these side-effects is not well-understood, but evidence exists to indicate that the sympathetic nervous system may play an important role. In order to examine this possibility further, we treated separate groups of adult female rats acutely with either the first generation antipsychotic drug haloperidol (0.1 or 1 mg/kg) or the second generation drugs risperidone (0.25 or 2.5 mg/kg), clozapine (2 or 20 mg/kg), olanzapine (3 or 15 mg/kg) or vehicle by intraperitoneal injection. Blood samples were collected prior to drug and then 30, 60, 120, and 180 mins after treatment. Plasma samples were assayed by HPLC-ED for levels of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine. Results confirmed that all antipsychotics increased peripheral catecholamines, although this was drug and dose dependent. For norepinephrine, haloperidol caused the smallest maximum increase (+158%], followed by risperidone (+793%), olanzapine (+952%) and clozapine (+1,684%). A similar pattern was observed for increases in epinephrine levels by haloperidol (+143%], olanzapine (+529%), risperidone (+617%) then clozapine (+806%). Dopamine levels increased moderately with olanzapine [+174%], risperidone [+271%], and clozapine [+430%]. Interestingly, levels of the catecholamines did not correlate strongly with each other prior to treatment at baseline, but were increasingly correlated after treatment as time proceeded. The results demonstrate antipsychotics can potently regulate peripheral catecholamines, in a manner consistent with their metabolic liability.

Antipsychotic medication for early episode schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications in early episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders is common, but both short and long-term effects on the illness are unclear. There have been numerous suggestions that people with early episodes of schizophrenia appear to respond differently than those with multiple prior episodes. The number of episodes may moderate response to drug treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antipsychotic medication treatment on people with early episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group register (July 2007) as well as references of included studies. We contacted authors of studies for further data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies with a majority of first and second episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders comparing initial antipsychotic medication treatment with placebo, milieu, or psychosocial treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Working independently, we critically appraised records from 681studies, of which five studies met inclusion criteria. John Rathbone from the Schizophrenia Group supported us with the data extraction. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) where possible. For continuous data, we calculated mean difference (MD). We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies with a combined N = 998 met inclusion criteria. Four studies (N = 724) provided leaving the study early data and results suggested that individuals treated with a typical antipsychotic medication are less likely to leave the study early than those treated with placebo (Chlorpromazine: 3 RCTs N = 353, RR 0.4 CI 0.3 to 0.5, NNT 3.2, Fluphenaxine: 1 RCT N = 240, RR 0.5 CI 0.3 to 0.8, NNT 5; Thioridazine: 1 RCT N = 236, RR 0.44 CI 0.3 to 0.7, NNT 4.3, Trifulperazine: 1 RCT N = 94, RR 0.96 CI 0.3 to 3.6). Two studies (Cole 1964; May 1976) contributed data to assessment of side effects and present a general pattern of more frequent side effects among individuals treated with typical antipsychotic medications compared to placebo. Rappaport 1978 suggested a higher rehospitalisation rate for those receiving chlorpromazine compared to placebo (N = 80, RR 2.29 CI 1.3 to 4.0, NNH 2.9). However, a higher attrition in the placebo group is likely to have introduced a survivor bias into this comparison, as this difference becomes non-significant in a sensitivity analysis on intent-to-treat participants (N = 127, RR 1.69 CI 0.9 to 3.0). One study (May 1976) contributes data to a comparison of trifluoperazine to psychotherapy on long-term health in favour of the trifluoperazine group (N = 92, MD 5.8 CI 1.6 to 0.0); however, data from this study are also likely to contain biases due to selection and attrition. One study (Mosher 1995) contributes data to a comparison of typical antipsychotic medication to psychosocial treatment on six-week outcome measures of global psychopathology (N = 89, MD 0.01 CI -0.6 to 0.6) and global improvement (N = 89, MD -0.03 CI -0.5 to 0.4), indicating no between-group differences. On the whole, there is very little useable data in the few studies meeting inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

With only a few studies meeting inclusion criteria, and with limited useable data in these studies, it is not possible to arrive at definitive conclusions. The preliminary pattern of evidence suggests that people with early episode schizophrenia treated with typical antipsychotic medications are less likely to leave the study early, but more likely to experience medication-related side effects. Data are too sparse to assess the effects of antipsychotic medication on outcomes in early episode schizophrenia.

Clozapine versus typical neuroleptic medication for schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Long-term drug treatment of schizophrenia with typical antipsychotics has limitations: 25 to 33% of patients have illnesses that are treatment-resistant. Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug, which is claimed to have superior efficacy and to cause fewer motor adverse effects than typical drugs for people with treatment-resistant illnesses. Clozapine carries a significant risk of serious blood disorders, which necessitates mandatory weekly blood monitoring at least during the first months of treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of clozapine compared with typical antipsychotic drugs in people with schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the current update of this review (March 2006) we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All relevant randomised clinical trials (RCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis, based on a fixed-effect model. We calculated numbers needed to treat/harm (NNT/NNH) where appropriate. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) again based on a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

We have included 42 trials (3950 participants) in this review. Twenty-eight of the included studies are less than 13 weeks in duration, and, overall, trials were at significant risk of bias. We found no significant difference in the effects of clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs for broad outcomes such as mortality, ability to work or suitability for discharge at the end of the study. Clinical improvements were seen more frequently in those taking clozapine (n=1119, 14 RCTs, RR 0.72 CI 0.7 to 0.8, NNT 6 CI 5 to 8). Also, participants given clozapine had fewer relapses than those on typical antipsychotic drugs (n=1303, RR 0.62 CI 0.5 to 0.8, NNT 21 CI 15 to 49). BPRS scores showed a greater reduction of symptoms in clozapine-treated patients, (n=1145, 16 RCTs, WMD -4.22 CI -5.4 to -3.1), although the data were heterogeneous (Chi(2) 0.0001, I(2) 66%). Short-term data from the SANS negative symptom scores favoured clozapine (n=196, 5 RCTs, WMD -5.92 CI -7.8 to -4.1). We found clozapine to be more acceptable in long-term treatment than conventional antipsychotic drugs (n=982, 16 RCTs, RR 0.60 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 15 CI 12 to 20). Blood problems occurred more frequently in participants receiving clozapine (3.2%) compared with those given typical antipsychotics (0%) (n=1031, 13 RCTs, RR 7.09 CI 2.0 to 25.6). Clozapine participants experienced more drowsiness, hypersalivation, or temperature increase, than those given conventional neuroleptics. However, clozapine patients experienced fewer motor adverse effects (n=1433, 18 RCTs, RR 0.58 CI 0.5 to 0.7, NNT 5 CI 4 to 6).The clinical effects of clozapine were more pronounced in participants resistant to typical neuroleptics in terms of clinical improvement (n=370, 4 RCTs, RR 0.71 CI 0.6 to 0.8, NNT 4 CI 3 to 6) and symptom reduction. Thirty-four per cent of treatment-resistant participants had a clinical improvement with clozapine treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine may be more effective in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, producing clinically meaningful improvements and postponing relapse, than typical antipsychotic drugs - but data are weak and prone to bias. Participants were more satisfied with clozapine treatment than with typical neuroleptic treatment. The clinical effect of clozapine, however, is, at least in the short term, not reflected in measures of global functioning such as ability to leave the hospital and maintain an occupation. The short-term benefits of clozapine have to be weighed against the risk of adverse effects. Within the context of trials, the potentially dangerous white blood cell decline seems to be more frequent in children and adolescents and in the elderly than in young adults or people of middle-age.The existing trials have largely neglected to assess the views of participants and their families on clozapine. More community-based long-term randomised trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of clozapine on global and social functioning as trials in special groups such as people with learning disabilities.

Decreased NT-3 plasma levels and platelet serotonin content in patients with hypochondriasis

OBJECTIVE

Neurotrophins (NT) are a family of closely related proteins, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor, neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), and neurotrophin-4/5 (NT-4/5). NTs are deemed to regulate several aspects of neuronal survival, development, and function. Although NTs have been associated to a variety of mental disorders, the potential role of NT alterations in hypochondriasis (HC) has never been investigated.

METHODS

In the present study, plasma concentrations of NTs were evaluated in 23 adult patients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria for HC and 22 healthy controls. Platelet serotonin (5-HT) content was chosen as a measure of serotonergic function. Hypochondriacal symptoms were assessed using the Whiteley Index of Hypochondriasis (WIH).

RESULTS

Plasma NT-3 level (P=.004) and platelet 5-HT (P=.008) were significantly lower in patients with HC compared with controls. Correlation analyses showed that the WIH score was significantly and inversely associated with both NT-3 values (r=-.60, P=.002) and platelet serotonin content (r=-.53, P=.009). We used a multivariate regression model to determine independent predictors of the WIH score. After allowance for potential confounders, plasma NT-3 levels remained the unique independent predictor of the WIH (beta=.003, t=-3.5, P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased NT-3 concentration, alongside with serotonin dysfunction, may represent a biological correlate of HC.

Lower levels of whole blood serotonin in obsessive-compulsive disorder and in schizophrenia with obsessive-compulsive symptoms

It has been reported that some schizophrenic patients suffer from obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS), and clozapine treatment is quite often associated with an occurrence/increase of OCS in schizophrenic patients. The aim of the study was to explore whether differences would exist in the clinical symptomatology and the whole blood serotonin (5-HT) concentrations in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), schizophrenic patients with and without OCS (S+OCS, S-OCS), and clozapine-treated schizophrenic patients with and without clozapine-induced OCS (CLZ+OCS, CLZ-OCS). We found that S+OCS patients (n=15) showed significantly lower scores on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), but similar levels of compulsions and obsessions using Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) as compared to the patients (n=35) with OCD. S+OCS patients scored significantly lower on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) but higher on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) compared with S-OCS patients (n=19). However, CLZ+OCS patients (n=15) suffered from dominant compulsions but fewer obsessions compared with the OCD and S+OCS patients. OCD, S+OCS and CLZ+OCS groups had significantly lower levels of whole blood 5-HT than did the healthy volunteers (n=15), S-OCS and CLZ-OCS groups. It suggests that alterations in serotonin metabolism may be a common biological characteristic of OCS in OCD as well as in schizophrenia.

Influence of clozapine on platelet serotonin, monoamine oxidase and plasma serotonin levels

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of clozapine on plasma serotonin, platelet serotonin and monoamine oxidase (MAO) levels in schizophrenic patients and to compare their results with those of unmedicated healthy controls. Groups of 20 outpatients with schizophrenia and 20 healthy controls matched for age, sex and smoking status were recruited for the study. Psychopathology, neurocognitive functioning, plasma serotonin, platelet serotonin and MAO levels were assessed after 1-week drug free interval, and 8 weeks after initiation of clozapine treatment in an open design. The mean clozapine dose at week 8 was 382.5+/-96.4 (range: 250-600) mg/day. In the patient group, at baseline, plasma serotonin and platelet MAO levels were significantly lower, and platelet serotonin levels were significantly higher than in controls. After 8 weeks of clozapine treatment, plasma serotonin and platelet MAO levels increased significantly, while a significant decrease in platelet serotonin levels was detected compared with baseline values. Baseline platelet MAO levels explained 22% of the variance in Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) and improvement in attention, while baseline platelet serotonin predicted 23% of the variance in the improvement in positive symptoms during clozapine treatment. Our data indicate that clozapine may be reversing or compensating for a pre-existing alteration in serotonergic neurotransmission in schizophrenic patients. The prediction of response to clozapine through peripheral biochemical markers may have important clinical implications if repeated in larger samples.

Clozapine and haloperidol differentially regulate dendritic spine formation and synaptogenesis in rat hippocampal neurons

Antipsychotic drugs are the primary therapeutic treatment for schizophrenia. In addition to their dopaminergic/serotonergic function, atypical antipsychotics differ from conventional antipsychotics in the way they affect glutamatergic receptor function. A cellular correlate of this may be the modulation of dendritic spines (DS). Here, we demonstrate that in rat dissociated hippocampal neurons 1.0 microM clozapine administration increased DS-enriched protein spinophilin by 70%, increased post-synaptic protein shank1a puncta density by 26% and increased overall primary dendrite DS density by 59%. Filopodia and mushroom DS were particularly affected by clozapine. Conversely, 0.1 microM haloperidol decreased spinophilin protein by 40%, caused a 25% decrease in shank1a puncta and reduced the numbers of filopodia. In contrast, neither haloperidol nor clozapine induced any change in the levels of the pre-synaptic protein synapsin. This indicates that clozapine and haloperidol differentially regulate DS and post-synaptic plasticity. These findings may provide a molecular and cellular correlate to the superior therapeutic profile of clozapine when compared with haloperidol.

Serum concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine in the prediction of relapse of patients with schizophrenia

Schizophrenic outpatients (n=102) whose condition had stabilized with clozapine (CLZ) therapy and were being maintained on CLZ were followed for 1 year. Clinical status and concentrations of serum clozapine (CLZ) and its metabolite norclozapine (NCLZ) were evaluated periodically or when relapse occurred. Relapse was defined as a significant exacerbation of psychotic symptoms or hospitalization. Thirty-three patients relapsed and 69 did not. Relapse patients displayed significantly lower serum concentrations of CLZ and a sum of CLZ and NCLZ at endpoint than non-relapses (CLZ: 162 ng/ml vs. 237 ng/ml, p<0.001; CLZ+NCLZ: 225 ng/ml vs. 301 ng/ml, p<0.001). When all subjects were pooled together, a significant inverse correlation was observed between percent increase in the total score on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) from baseline and serum levels of CLZ alone (r=0.404, p<0.001) and the sum of CLZ and NCLZ (r=0.364, p<0.001). Relapses and non-relapses were well separated by a threshold CLZ serum concentration of 200 ng/ml with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 80%. The threshold value represented about a 40% lower serum CLZ level than concentration achieved in acute treatment. Survival analysis showed a similarity of the relapse risk over time defined by the CLZ serum threshold and by symptomatic criteria. These results suggest that effective relapse prevention may require maintenance of patients at CLZ serum concentrations above 200 ng/ml and above 60% of the acute-phase level during long-term maintenance treatment of schizophrenia.

Predictors and markers of clozapine response

RATIONALE

With other atypical antipsychotics now available, having predictors of clozapine response would be of considerable value, offering clinicians guidance in their decision as to when, and if, a trial of clozapine is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to review existing evidence regarding identified predictors and markers of clozapine response.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified through PUBMED searches (1975-June 2004) and cross-referencing of reviews and included studies. The data were summarized under two main categories: clinical (general, neurological, cognitive/neuropsychological, clozapine levels) and biological (biochemical, endocrine, genetic, metabolic, morphological, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy). 'Reliable' predictors/markers were defined a priori as those with support of at least two independent reports that addressed overall response, with no contradictory findings to date. 'Potential' predictors/markers had the support of a single report that addressed overall response and at least one other evaluating treatment outcome but not directly addressing response status.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Higher baseline clinical symptoms and functioning in the previous years and low cerebrospinal homovanillic acid/5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels were identified as reliable. Three potential measures were identified: reduction of frontal cortex metabolic activity, reduction of caudate volume, and improvement in P50 sensory gating.

Effects of clozapine and its metabolites on the 5-HT2 receptor system in cortical and hippocampal cells in vitro

PURPOSE

The goal of the present study was to determine the effects of clozapine (Cloz) and its metabolites norclozapine (Norcloz) and clozapine-N-oxide (Cloz-N-oxide) on the 5-HT(2) receptor system on the levels of protein and gene expression in in vitro systems of primary cortical cells of the rat and human hippocampal SHS5Y5 neuroblastoma cells.

METHODS

Clinically relevant concentrations of Cloz (200/400 ng/ml) and its metabolites (200 ng/ml) were used for the examination of the effects of Cloz and its metabolites on serotoninergic 5-HT(2) receptor parameters (density, affinity and mRNA levels) as well as on glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA levels in primary cortical cells of the rat after treatment for 24 h under in vitro conditions. To compare the results to human cells, we also measured treatment-induced changes in 5-HT(2) and GAPDH mRNA levels in human hippocampal SHS5Y5 cells.

RESULTS

A significant decrease was found in primary cortical cells for 5-HT(2) receptor density (Cloz 200/Cloz 400/Norcloz 200 and Cloz-N-oxide 200 vs. control) and 5-HT(2A) receptor mRNA levels (Cloz 200 vs. control). 5-HT(2A) receptor mRNA levels were also significantly reduced (Norcloz 200 vs. control) in SHS5Y5 cells. GAPDH mRNA levels were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study show that Cloz and Norcloz induce significant alterations on the 5-HT(2) receptor system in primary cortical cells of the rat and in human hippocampal cells.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Atypical Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia and Comorbid Disorders in Children and Adolescents

Evidence on the efficacy and safety of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia is limited. The purpose of this review is to assess the published data on the use of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents with schizophrenia alone and with comorbid disorders, and to establish benefit-risk guidelines for clinicians.Risperidone, olanzapine and clozapine were found to be effective in the treatment of aggression and mania. Risperidone, and possibly also olanzapine, may be the drugs of choice in children with comorbid tic disorders. Ziprasidone has some monoamine reuptake inhibition properties and may be administered as an augmenting agent in children and adolescents with schizophrenia and comorbid anxiety and mood disorders. Compared with the typical antipsychotics, the atypical drugs seem to be more effective, better tolerated and lead to better patient adherence. Importantly, the atypical antipsychotics have a lower propensity to induce extrapyramidal symptoms and a potential (shown so far only in adults) to improve cognitive function and inhibit suicidal behaviour (especially clozapine). Yet, the adverse effects associated with these agents, especially weight gain, which may also have long-term effects, can lead to non-compliance in the young population. In children and adolescents receiving clozapine, olanzapine and quetiapine (but not ziprasidone, which does not have a pro-appetite effect), particularly those with obesity or a family history of diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose and lipid levels must be monitored frequently. Weight gain might be better controlled when the children and their parents are properly informed about this adverse effect and diet is regulated. Another major disadvantage of the atypical antipsychotics, especially risperidone, is their association with hyperprolactinaemia, which can lead to hypogonadism-induced osteoporosis, galactorrhoea, gynaecomastia, irregular menstruation and sexual dysfunction, all seen also with typical antipsychotics. Other atypical antipsychotics, namely olanzapine and ziprasidone, have been reported to be prolactin sparing in adults, but may not be completely devoid of hyperprolactinaemic effects in children and adolescents. Thus, prolactin levels should be assessed routinely in young patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Further, children and adolescents with hyperprolactinaemia-related effects should be switched to a prolactin-sparing agent, such as quetiapine. All atypical antipsychotics may induce sedation and they are not devoid of extrapyramidal symptoms (especially risperidone). The use of typical antipsychotics has been limited to patients who are resistant to atypical antipsychotics, intolerant to their adverse effects, or require injections or depot preparations. Further double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and long-term safety assessments are needed before definitive conclusions can be reached about the place of atypical antipsychotics in the therapeutic armamentarium of childhood-onset schizophrenia.

Pharmacokinetics of clozapine and its metabolites in hippocampal HT22 cells

Up to now, it is not yet clear whether and how clozapine and its metabolites are metabolized in neuronal cells. The interconversion of clozapine and its metabolites, clozapine-N-oxide and norclozapine, was studied in the hippocampal neuronal in vitro system of HT22 cells. Clinically relevant concentrations of clozapine (200+400 ng/ml) and its metabolites (100+200 ng/ml) were used for the examination of the metabolizing effects after short- (4 h) and long- (24 h) term incubation. Two-way analysis of variance revealed a significant decrease of clozapine (P<0.01) and norclozapine (P<0.01) levels in the supernatants of HT22 cells after the treatment procedures. Student-Newman-Keuls tests showed a significant decrease of clozapine 400 after 24 h of incubation (P=0.01) as well as of all concentrations of norclozapine. No significant treatment effects were found for the clozapine-N-oxide degradation. Using semi-quantification by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction methods, we could show a significant increase of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 mRNA levels (P<0.05) after clozapine treatment with 200 ng/ml. The results of the present study strongly suggest that clozapine and norclozapine are metabolized in hippocampal neuronal HT22 cells by CYP1A2, whereas the levels of clozapine-N-oxide were not affected. Moreover, CYP1A2 mRNA levels were significantly changed by incubation with clozapine 200.

New generation antipsychotics for first episode schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

The new generation antipsychotics are associated with a lower risk of adverse effects compared with drugs such as haloperidol. Many treatment guidelines recommend the use of new generation ('atypical') antipsychotic drugs for people with a first episode of schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effects of the new generation antipsychotics for people with a first episode of schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewers searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (March 2002) and the included and excluded studies tables of relevant Cochrane reviews, references of all relevant studies, contacted industry and authors of relevant studies to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing new generation antipsychotics (amisulpride, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, sulpiride, ziprasidone, zotepine) with conventional antipsychotics for people with a first episode of schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Citations and, where possible, abstracts were independently inspected by three reviewers, papers ordered, re-inspected and quality assessed. We independently extracted data but excluded them if loss to follow up was greater than 50%. For homogeneous dichotomous data, we calculated the relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT), on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, reviewers calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

We include two short-term studies (total n=266), one of which was a report of a sub-group of a larger study. One compared risperidone with an average of 6 mg/day haloperidol and the other olanzapine with an average of 11 mg/day haloperidol. Compared with olanzapine, significantly more people receiving haloperidol left the study early (n=83, 1 RCT, RR 0.43 CI 0.3 to 0.7, NNH 3 CI 2 to 8). This was not so for the risperidone versus haloperidol comparison (n=183, 1 RCT, RR=0.7 CI 0.4 to 1.1). In terms of global effects, studies reported no differences between risperidone and haloperidol (n=183, RR not much improved 1.0 CI 0.6 to 1.5), and olanzapine and the same control (n=83, RR needing at least one dose of benzodiazepine 0.8 CI 0.5 to 1.1). More people allocated to olanzapine had clinically significant improvement in mental state compared with those given haloperidol (n=83, RR no 'clinically significant improvement' 0.45 CI 0.3 to 0.7, NNH 3 CI 2 to 6). In the risperidone study, however, no such difference was apparent (n=183, RR 'no clinically significant improvement in mental state' 0.85 CI 0.6 to 1.2). Significantly more people given haloperidol (4-16mg) experienced at least one adverse event when compared with risperidone (4-16mg) (n=183, RR 0.9 CI 0.8 to 0.98, NNH 8 CI 4 to 50). Use of anticholinergic medication for extrapyramidal adverse events was less prevalent for people allocated either olanzapine (n=83, RR 0.3 CI 0.2 to 0.7, NNH 4 CI 2 to 14) or risperidone (n=183, RR 0.7 CI 0.5 to 0.9, NNH 4 CI 3 to 9) compared with those given haloperidol. There are no data at all on outcomes such as compliance, cost, social and cognitive functioning, relapse, rehospitalisation, or quality of life. There are no medium to long-term data. Eight ongoing studies may provide more information.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The results of this review are inconclusive. Whether the use of new generation antipsychotics really makes the treatment less off putting and enhances long-term compliance is unclear. Pragmatic, well-designed and reported long-term trials would be useful to answer this question.

Serotonergic effects of clozapine and its metabolites in hippocampal HT22 cells

In the hippocampal neuronal in vitro system of HT22 cells, we studied the effects of clozapine (Cloz) and its metabolites clozapine-N-oxide (Cloz-N-oxide) and norclozapine (Norcloz) on 5-HT transporter affinity (K(M)) and uptake (V(max)), MAO-B affinity (K(M)) and maximal velocity (V(max)), as well as on 5-HT(2) receptor affinity and density. Clinically relevant concentrations of Cloz (200 and 400 ng/ml) and its metabolites (100 and 200 ng/ml) were used for the examination of the effects after short-term (4 h) and long-term (24 h) incubation. Statistical evaluation revealed that a significantly lowered 5-HT transporter affinity (higher K(M)) was related to higher concentrations of Cloz and its metabolites. A significantly higher 5-HT transporter uptake was dependent on both high concentrations of drugs and an increased time of incubation. No significant influence of the investigated independent variables on MAO-B affinity could be demonstrated, whereas a significant drug-related increase of MAO-B velocity was detectable. Additionally, low and high concentrations of Cloz and its metabolites induced a higher 5-HT(2) receptor affinity (lower K(D)). No significant influences of the investigated independent variables on 5-HT(2) receptor density were detectable. The results of the present study show that Cloz and its metabolites induce significant alterations in serotoninergic parameters of hippocampal HT22 cells, validating the system of hippocampal HT22 cells for further examinations of the mechanisms of action of atypical neuroleptics.

Relations of clinical features, subgroups and medication to serum monoamines in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Plasma and serum indices of monoaminergic activity reflect partly the illness of schizophrenia (e.g. HVA/deficit syndrome) and sometimes the symptoms (e.g. HVA/anhedonia). But, such studies have rarely taken both metabolites and parent amines or inter-amine activity ratios into account. We hypothesized that comparing the major symptom dimensions to measures of transmitter activity (with and without control for antipsychotic drug treatment) would show differential patterns of activity useful for the design of pharmacological treatments.

METHODS

Dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA), serotonin (5-HT), their three major metabolites and prolactin were measured in the serum of 108 patients with schizophrenia and 63 matched controls: DA D2-receptor blocking-activity was estimated from a regression of butyrophenone displacement in striatum in vitro on to PET reports of drug-binding in vivo. Symptoms were factored into four dimensions (disorganized/thought disorder, nonparanoid/negative, ideas-of-reference and paranoid/positive symptoms).

RESULTS

(1). Patients' DA activity did not differ from controls: but their 5-HT and NA turnovers increased/decreased, respectively, and the DA/5HT-metabolite ratio was lower. Increased DA-D2-receptor occupancy was predicted by decreased DA-metabolism and its ratio to 5-HT-metabolism. (2). Patients had higher levels of NA, DA-metabolites and DA-/5-HT-metabolite ratios on atypical vs typical drugs. (3). Increased D2-occupancy was associated with lower DA metabolism in paranoid patients but was unrelated to relative increases of DA/5-HT- and NA-metabolism in nonparanoid patients. (4). Low DA-/5-HT-metabolite ratios, high prolactin and low DA-metabolism characterized thought-disordered patients. (5). High DA-/5-HT-metabolite ratios paralleled many ideas-of-reference. The metabolites were sensitive, respectively, to control for D2-occupancy and prolactin.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of DA in paranoid, and 5-HT in thought-disordered and ideas-of-reference dimensions point both to the mechanisms underlying the features typical of these subgroups and the type of medication appropriate.

Atypical neuroleptics in child and adolescent psychiatry

Atypical neuroleptics have enriched our treatment programmes, especially in childhood and adolescent schizophrenia. This article reviews the use of atypical neuroleptics in children and adolescents with schizophrenic disorder. It considers the receptor binding profile and pharmacological properties, indications, side effects, clinical applications and trials of atypical neuroleptics in comparison to the classical neuroleptic haloperidol in adolescent schizophrenia. Special emphasis is placed on the most common atypical neuroleptics clozapine, olanzapine and risperidone since most studies are carried out with these compounds, especially with clozapine. More clinically controlled trials have to be conducted since only one was performed so far. The place of the atypical neuroleptics is discussed and further studies are necessary in order to differentiate the indications tested so far and to find out if the spectrum of indications can be broadened.

Management of schizophrenia in children and adolescents. The role of clozapine

Clozapine is a dibenzodiazepine derivative with established antipsychotic efficacy in adult patients with schizophrenic psychoses. There are more than 15 studies that have also demonstrated the antipsychotic efficacy of clozapine in childhood and adolescent schizophrenia. The main advantages of clozapine treatment in this age group in comparison with typical antipsychotics are: (i) high antipsychotic efficacy during an acute schizophrenic episode; (ii) better improvement in chronic cases with a high load of negative symptoms; and (iii) markedly fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects and, therefore, fairly good tolerability. However, because of its possible adverse effects on the haemopoetic system (granulocytopenia, agranulocytosis), clozapine should not be used as first-line antipsychotic medication. Other adverse effects are related to the cardiovascular system (hypotonia, tachycardia or arrhythmia), the central nervous system (epileptic seizures, fever) and liver function (transient increases in levels of hepatic transaminases). Two other frequent adverse effects are hypersalivation and body-weight gain, which may present a particular problem in adolescents and young adults. Careful monitoring of haematological parameters and other adverse effects are preconditions for a successful treatment programme.

Atypische Neuroleptika in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie

Zusammenfassung: Atypische Neuroleptika haben unsere Therapiemöglichkeiten in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie verbessert. Dieser Artikel faßt die Anwendung der atypischen Neuroleptika bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit schizophrenen Psychosen zusammen. Es werden das Rezeptor-Bindungsprofil, pharmakologische Eigenschaften, Indikationen, Nebenwirkungen, klinische Anwendungen und Studien der atypischen Neuroleptika, im Vergleich zu dem klassischen Neuroleptikum Haloperidol, berücksichtigt. Besondere Betonung wurde auf die am häufigsten verwendeten atypischen Neuroleptika Clozapin, Olanzapin und Risperidon gelegt, da weltweit die meisten Studien mit diesen Medikamenten durchgeführt worden sind. Der Stellenwert der atypischen Neuroleptika wird diskutiert und es werden weitere Studien gefordert, um die Indikationen zu differenzieren, und um zu sehen, ob das Indikationsspektrum erweitert werden kann.

Pharmacoclinical strategy in neuroleptic resistant schizophrenic patients treated by clozapine: clinical evolution, concentration of plasma and red blood cell clozapine and desmethylclozapine, whole blood serotonin and tryptophan

1. The aim of the study was to determine if a more rational therapeutic approach could be devised for neuroleptic resistant psychotic patients treated for months and years with clozapine. Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic medication, but its therapeutic benefit has been limited by a high incidence of agranulocytosis and seizures. 2. The study has been performed in an open setting and included 12 patients. Some of them developed a secondary depression and were treated with fluoxetine. 3. Pharmacokinetic analysis were conducted at the same time as clinical evaluations, grading using the BPRS, the PDS, and QLS, and determinations of plasma and red blood cell clozapine and desmethylclozapine, plasma and RBC fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, whole blood serotonin and tryptophan. 4. A positive linear correlation was found only between RBC concentration and the evolution of the QLS. 5. Clozapine is efficacious both on positive and negative symptoms but its mechanism of action remains unclear. Positive symptoms disappear more quickly, sometimes followed by a post psychotic depression. Negative symptoms improve more slowly but regularly. They seem to be correlated with serotoninergic mechanisms. For whole blood 5HT, an important increase was seen about 4 weeks after Cloza administration, and then a decrease. 6. Therapeutic drug monitoring (on the same sample drawn for haematological monitoring providing) could play a useful role in the management of patients treated by clozapine: compliance, lowest dose, possible toxicity, drug interaction, lack of efficacy, relapse predictivity.