Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients with idiopathic gastric acid hypersecretion

Review article: Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection rates in duodenal ulcer (DU) patients may be lower than previously estimated.

AIM

To review the real prevalence of H. pylori-negative DUs and its possible causes.

METHODS

Bibliographical searches in MEDLINE looking for the terms 'H. pylori' and 'duodenal ulcer'.

RESULTS

Mean prevalence of H. pylori infection in DU disease, calculated from studies published during the last 10 years including a total of 16 080 patients, was 81%, and this figure was lower (77%) when only the last 5 years were considered. Associations with H. pylori-negative DU were: (1) False negative results of diagnostic methods, (2) NSAID use (21% in studies with <90% infection rate), (3) Complicated DU (bleeding, obstruction, perforation), (4) Smoking, (5) Isolated H. pylori duodenal colonization, (6) Older age, (7) Gastric hypersecretion, (8) Diseases of the duodenal mucosa, (9) Helicobacter'heilmanii' infection and (10) Concomitant diseases.

CONCLUSION

In patients with H. pylori-negative DU disease, one should carefully confirm that the assessment of H. pylori status is reliable. In truly H. pylori-negative patients, the most common single cause of DU is, by far, the use of NSAIDs. Ulcers not associated with H. pylori, NSAIDs or other obvious causes should, for the present, be viewed as 'idiopathic'. True idiopathic DU disease only exceptionally exists.

Hypersecretory duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection: a four-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

About 10% of duodenal ulcer patients are characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion with normal gastrin values. Relapsing duodenal ulcer after Helicobacter pylori cure has been related to high acid output and maintenance antisecretory therapy has been suggested in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients. The role of Helicobacter pylori infection and the effects of Helicobacter pylori cure in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients still remain to be fully studied.

AIM

To study: a) whether gastric acid hypersecretion "per se" is a risk factor for duodenal ulcer recurrence; b) whether maintenance antisecretory therapy is necessary after eradication in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients.

PATIENTS

The study population comprised 8 hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients, selected from a population of 79 Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients.

METHODS

Hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients were followed-up for at least 4 years after eradication. Gastric acid secretion was measured again 12 months after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastroscopy with histology was performed 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after treatment, 13C-urea breath test after 42 months; clinical questionnaires were completed every 6 months.

RESULTS

After eradication, despite a not significantly reduced high acid output (median value of basal acid output and pentagastrin-stimulated acid output, respectively, 23.1 mEq/h and 64.1 mEq/h before treatment vs 16 mEq/h and 49.7 mEq/h 12 months after treatment), all patients were free from symptoms, none of them had duodenal ulcer relapse or complications (7/8 before treatment), or needed antisecretory maintenance therapy, except for one patient taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings, obtained in a selected population of hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients with long-term follow-up, suggest that after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication gastric acid hypersecretion "per se" is not able to determine the recurrence of duodenal ulcer.

Helicobacter pylori infection rates in duodenal ulcer patients in the United States may be lower than previously estimated

OBJECTIVE

Published studies have estimated the rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients with duodenal ulcer disease to be as high as 95%; the majority of remaining duodenal ulcers have been attributed to the use of ulcerogenic drugs such as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We aimed to assess the H. pylori prevalence rates of U.S. duodenal ulcer patients in large, well-controlled studies.

METHODS

More than 2900 patients with endoscopically diagnosed non-NSAID duodenal ulcers were enrolled in a series of six placebo-controlled, double-blind studies conducted in the United States that assessed H. pylori using a combination of tests. Patients were considered infected with H. pylori only if culture growth was observed, or both histological and CLOtest results were positive. Patients were considered uninfected if the results of at least two tests were negative. Patients with missing test results, results of only a single test, or conflicting test results were not evaluable for H. pylori assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 2394 endoscopically diagnosed evaluable duodenal ulcer patients, 73% (1737) were confirmed infected with H. pylori at study entry.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of six carefully designed and controlled studies suggest that an assumed H. pylori infection rate of approximately 95% may overestimate the actual rate of H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients in the United States. Although H. pylori infection is an important factor in the etiology of noniatrogenic duodenal ulcer disease, other factors may predominate in some patients and should not be overlooked in determining an appropriate course of treatment. The empiric use of antibiotic therapy for ulcer patients without confirmation of the presence of H. pylori cannot be recommended.