Micro-anatomo politics: mapping the Human Genome Project

La edad molecular: reimaginando la vejez desde laboratorios de experimentación en telómeros

El proceso conocido como “envejecimiento celular” se manifiesta en el acortamiento de los telómeros, que son los extremos de los cromosomas. En las últimas décadas, la posibilidad de la manipulación genética para preservar la longitud de los telómeros ha suscitado formas de pensar el envejecimiento como un proceso maleable y aplazable. Mediante una etnografía de los laboratorios de telómeros y su entorno de divulgación científica, aquí trazamos la emergencia de una “biopolítica molecular” (Rose, 2007) que desestabiliza la idea de una edad lineal y “cronológica”. En su lugar, se plantea una edad “biológica” que, siendo relativa a la longitud y velocidad de acortamiento de los telómeros, puede ser medida y manipulada a nivel micrométrico. Aquí describimos cómo la manipulación molecular de la edad se despliega junto a una intrínseca patologización de la vejez. Como consecuencia, la episteme y práctica biomédica transitan del objetivo de “curar” enfermedades hacia el de la optimización de la fisiología celular para frenar el envejecimiento. La huella del tiempo en el cuerpo deja de ser entendida como un proceso “natural”, y pasa re-imaginarse como un “fallo técnico”, accidental y corregible.

Illich, Education, and the Human Genome Project: Reflections on Paradoxical Counterproductivity

The Human Genome Project (HGP) brings genetics and genetic knowledge to the point of paradoxical counterproductivity. Population-wide genetic screens, replacing specific tests intended for and useful to those at risk, become counterproductive when the HGP's "normal human " defines everybody as at risk. More over, the knowledge generated by the HGP disables those whom it is meant to serve: We are rendered impotent as a laity, subject to expertise regarding the truth of our being. The standard response here is that we need more science education and easier access to scientific knowledge. But that is simply to beg the question. The question to ask about knowledge is not whether it is true or properly scientific (which it may very well be) but rather whether it is good. The good of knowledge must be demonstrated and not uncritically assumed. Thus, more education can, too, be paradoxically counterproductive. What, then, are our prospects?

Towards a genealogy of pharmacological practice

Following Foucault's work on disciplinary power and biopolitics, this article maps an initial cartography of the research areas to be traced by a genealogy of pharmacological practice. Pharmacology, as a practical activity, refers to the creation, production and sale of drugs/medication. This work identifies five lines of research that, although often disconnected from each other, may be observed in the specialized literature: (1) pharmaceuticalization; (2) regulation of the pharmaceutical industry; (3) the political-economic structure of the pharmaceutical industry; (4) consumption/consumerism of medications; (5) and bio-knowledge. The article suggests that a systematic analysis of these areas leads one to consider pharmacological practice a sui generis apparatus of power, which reaches beyond the purely disciplinary and biopolitical levels to encompass molecular configurations, thereby giving rise not only to new types of government over life, but also to new struggles for life, extending from molecular to population-wide levels.