Results of microsurgical carotid endarterectomy. A prospective study with transcranial Doppler and EEG monitoring, and elective shunting

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. The shunt may improve the outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2002, 2009, and 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting, and to assess the best method for selective shunting on death, stroke, and other complications in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2021), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2021, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2021), Embase (1980 to April 2021), and the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) (1980 to April 2021). We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and handsearched relevant journals, conference proceedings, and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent review authors performed data extraction, selection, and analysis. A pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for all outcomes of interest. Best and worse case scenarios were also calculated in case of unavailable data. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias, and quality of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

No new trials were found for this updated review. Thus, six trials involving 1270 participants are included in this latest review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Only three trials comparing routine shunting and no shunting were eligible for meta-analysis. Major findings of this comparison found that the routine shunting had less risk of stroke-related death within 30 days of surgery (best case) than no shunting (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.96, I² not applicable, P = 0.05, low-quality evidence), the routine shunting group had a lower stroke rate within 24 hours of surgery (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.78, I² = not applicable, P = 0.02, low-quality evidence), and ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (best case) (Peto OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, I² = 52%, P = 0.04, low-quality evidence) than the no shunting group. No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring. However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy when performed under general anaesthesia. Large-scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy may significantly reduce the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks that may be minimised by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetics. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2004, 2008, and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthetic: 1) reduces the risk of perioperative stroke and death compared with general anaesthetic; 2) reduces the complication rate (other than stroke) following carotid endarterectomy; and 3) is acceptable to individuals and surgeons.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers (to February 2021). We also reviewed reference lists of articles identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of local anaesthetics to general anaesthetics for people having carotid endarterectomy were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and evaluated quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool. We calculated a pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the following outcomes that occurred within 30 days of surgery: stroke, death, ipsilateral stroke, stroke or death, myocardial infarction, local haemorrhage, and arteries shunted.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs involving 4839 participants, of which 3526 were obtained from the single largest trial (GALA). The main findings from our meta-analysis showed that, within 30 days of operation, neither incidence of stroke nor death were significantly different between local and general anaesthesia. Of these, the incidence of stroke in the local and general anaesthesia groups was 3.2% and 3.5%, respectively (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.26; P = 0.58; 13 studies, 4663 participants; low-quality evidence). The rate of ipsilateral stroke under both types of anaesthesia was 3.1% (Peto OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.48; P = 0.89; 2 studies, 3733 participants; low-quality evidence). The incidence of stroke or death in the local anaesthesia group was 3.5%, while stroke or death incidence was 4.1% in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.16; P = 0.31; 11 studies, 4391 participants; low-quality evidence). A lower rate of death was observed in the local anaesthetic group but evidence was of low quality (Peto OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.06; P = 0.08; 12 studies, 4421 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of stroke and death were not convincingly different between local and general anaesthesia for people undergoing carotid endarterectomy. The current evidence supports the choice of either approach. Further high-quality studies are still needed as the evidence is of limited reliability.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting people for shunting.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2013), EMBASE (1980 to August 2013) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to August 2013). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. For this update, we identified two new relevant randomised controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six trials involving 1270 participants in the review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. In general, reporting of methodology in the included studies was poor. For most studies, the blinding of outcome assessors and the report of prespecified outcomes were unclear. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Large scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy may significantly reduce the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks that may be reduced by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2004 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthetic: (1) reduces the risk of perioperative stroke and death compared with general anaesthetic; (2) reduces the complication rate (other than stroke) following carotid endarterectomy; and (3) is acceptable to patients and surgeons.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (September 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2013), EMBASE (1980 to September 2013) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP) (1980 to September 2013). We also handsearched relevant journals, and searched the reference lists of articles identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing the use of local anaesthetic to general anaesthetic for carotid endarterectomy were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We calculated a pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the following outcomes that occurred within 30 days of surgery: stroke, death, stroke or death, myocardial infarction, local haemorrhage, cranial nerve injuries, and shunted arteries.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 randomised trials involving 4596 operations, of which 3526 were from the single largest trial (GALA). In general, reporting of methodology in the included studies was poor. All studies were unable to blind patients and surgical teams to randomised treatment allocation and for most studies the blinding of outcome assessors was unclear. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of stroke within 30 days of surgery between the local anaesthesia group and the general anaesthesia group. The incidence of strokes in the local anaesthesia group was 3.2% compared to 3.5% in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.28). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a stroke or died within 30 days of surgery. In the local anaesthesia group 3.6% of patients had a stroke or died compared to 4.2% of patients in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.16). There was a non-significant trend towards lower operative mortality with local anaesthetic. In the local anaesthesia group 0.9% of patients died within 30 days of surgery compared to 1.5% of patients in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.07). However, neither the GALA trial or the pooled analysis were adequately powered to reliably detect an effect on mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients who had a stroke or died within 30 days of surgery did not differ significantly between the two types of anaesthetic techniques used during carotid endarterectomy. This systematic review provides evidence to suggest that patients and surgeons can choose either anaesthetic technique, depending on the clinical situation and their own preferences.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2001.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective, or never, shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting patients for shunting.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched September 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2008), EMBASE (1980 to November 2008) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to November 2008). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. We identified one new relevant randomised controlled trial.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials in the review: three trials involving 686 patients compared routine shunting with no shunting; the other trial involving 131 patients compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Allocation was adequately concealed in one trial, and one trial was quasi-randomised. Analysis was by intention-to-treat where possible. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared to pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. It was suggested that large scale randomised trials between routine shunting versus selective shunting were required. No one method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

The GALA Trial: Will It Influence Clinical Practice?

The General Anesthesia vs. Local Anesthesia for Carotid Surgery (GALA) trial did not show a difference in 30-day postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction and death rates between patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under local vs. general anesthesia. The present article discusses some limitations of the GALA trial. Firstly, the expected stroke and death rates following CEA is so low, that it was unlikely that the GALA trial would show any significant difference between local and general anesthesia. Secondly, preoperative statin use was not recorded. Thirdly, intraoperative shunt usa ge rates (a possible parameter for the development of stroke) varied considerably between the 2 groups (43% vs. 14%, for general vs. local anesthesia, respectively; P < .0001), as well as between UK and non-UK surgeons who always (73.6% vs. 20.8%, respectively; P < .0001), never (4.2% vs. 26%, respectively; P < .0002), or selectively (22.2% vs. 53.2%, respectively; P < .0001) used a shunt. Furthermore, no information was provided regarding the type of shunts used; for example, atraumatic shunts may be associated with lower perioperative stroke rates. These limitations could influence the interpretation of the results of the GALA trial. Due to lack of differences between the 2 groups and the presence of the above limitations, it seems likely that this trial will have little effect on clinical practice.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2004.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched December 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007) EMBASE (1980 to April 2007) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP, 1980 to April 2007). We also handsearched six relevant journals to April 2007, and searched the reference lists of articles identified. For the previous version of this review we handsearched a further seven journals to 2002 and in August 2001 advertised the review in Vascular News, a newspaper for European vascular specialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials and non-randomised studies comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised trials involving 812 operations, and 47 non-randomised studies involving 24,181 operations were included. Meta-analysis of the randomised studies showed that there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke, but the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a significant reduction in local haemorrhage (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.77) within 30 days of the operation. However, the randomised trials were too small to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn, and in some studies intention-to-treat analyses were not possible because of exclusions. Meta-analsis of the non-randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with significant reductions in the odds of stroke (38 studies), death (42 studies), stroke or death (27 studies), myocardial infarction (27 studies), and pulmonary complications (seven studies), within 30 days of the operation. The methodological quality of the non-randomised trials was questionable. Thirteen of the non-randomised studies were prospective and 36 reported on a consecutive series of patients. In eleven non-randomised studies the number of arteries, as opposed to the number of patients, was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy performed under local and general anaesthetic. Non-randomised studies suggest potential benefits with the use of local anaesthetic, but these studies may be biased.

Selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective treatment for significant carotid atherosclerosis. Perioperative stroke, a devastating complication, may be partially circumvented by shunting. However, routine shunt use is not without complications and does not benefit every patient. Our study is designed to determine whether CEA under general anesthesia, without cerebral monitoring, can be safely done with shunting only in the presence of poor internal carotid artery back-bleeding or contralateral carotid occlusion or critical stenosis. The medical records of 995 carotid operations were reviewed. A subset of 117 operations was performed on 112 patients using selective shunting. Data were analyzed and outcomes compared. For the selective shunt group, indications for redo operations (n=13) were recurrent asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 69% and amaurosis fugax or transient ischemic attack in 31%. Indications for primary CEA (n=104) were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 59%, amaurosis fugax or transient ischemic attack in 36%, previous stroke in 3%, and global ischemia in 2%. A selective shunt was used in 29% of all symptomatic and 11% of all asymptomatic patients. No cerebral monitoring was used. There were no perioperative deaths and no permanent cranial nerve injuries, and there was one stroke (0.8%) from postoperative carotid thrombosis in a shunted patient. The average length of stay was 1.6 days for the non-shunt group and 2.2 days for the shunt group. The routine shunt group (n=878) had an overall stroke rate of 0.7%, no permanent cranial nerve deficits, and a mean hospital stay of 2.6 days. CEA under general anesthesia with selective shunting can be performed safely without cerebral monitoring.

Comparison of monitoring techniques for intraoperative cerebral ischemia

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare somatosensory evoked potentials, electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) for detection of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Somatosensory evoked potentials and EEG recordings were attempted in 156 consecutive CEAs and TCD was also attempted in 91 of them. Recordings from all three modalities were obtained for at least 10 minutes before CEA, during CEA and for at least 15 minutes after CEA. Somatosensory evoked potentials peak-to-peak amplitude decrease of >50%, EEG amplitude decrease of >75%, and ipsilateral middle cerebral artery mean blood flow velocity (mean VMCAi) decrease >75% persisting for the entire period of internal carotid artery occlusion were individually considered to be diagnostic of cerebral ischemia. Clinical neurological examination was performed immediately prior to surgery and following recovery from general anaesthesia.

RESULTS

Somatosensory evoked potentials, EEG, and TCD were successfully obtained throughout the entire period of internal carotid artery occlusion in 99%, 95%, and 63% of patients respectively. Two patients (1.3%) suffered intraoperative cerebral infarction detected by clinical neurological examination and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging. Somatosensory evoked potentials accurately predicted intraoperative cerebral infarction in both instances without false negatives or false positives, EEG yielded one false negative result and no false positive results and VMCAi one true positive, four false positive and no false negative results. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound detection of emboli did not correlate with postoperative neurological deficits. Nevertheless the sensitivity and specificity of each test was not significantly different than the others because of the small number of disagreements between tests.

CONCLUSION

A >50% decrease in the cortically generated P25 amplitude of the median somatosensory evoked potentials, which persisted during the entire period of internal carotid artery occlusion, appears to be the most reliable method of monitoring for intraoperative ischemia in our hands because it accurately detected both intraoperative strokes with no false positive or false negative results.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Stroke Group trials register (April 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). We handsearched 13 relevant journals up to 2002, and searched the reference lists of articles identified. We also advertised the review in Vascular News (a newspaper for European vascular specialists) in August 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials and non-randomised studies comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer selected studies for inclusion and another independently checked the decisions. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and independently extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised trials involving 554 operations, and 41 non-randomised studies involving 25622 operations were included. The methodological quality of the non-randomised trials was questionable. Eleven of the non-randomised studies were prospective and 29 reported on a consecutive series of patients. In nine non-randomised studies the number of arteries, as opposed to the number of patients, was unclear. Meta-analysis of the non-randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with significant reductions in the odds of death (35 studies), stroke (31 studies), stroke or death (26 studies), myocardial infarction (22 studies), and pulmonary complications (7 studies), within 30 days of the operation. Meta-analysis of the randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a significant reduction in local haemorrhage (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.79) within 30 days of the operation, but there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke. However, the trials were too small to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn, and in some studies intention-to-treat analyses were not possible because of exclusions.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy performed under local and general anaesthetic. Non-randomised studies suggest potential benefits with the use of local anaesthetic, but these studies may be biased. More randomised studies are needed.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of routine versus selective, or never, shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting patients for shunting.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the original review the authors searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Medline (1966 to 1994), Embase (1980 to 1995) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). They also hand searched Annals of Surgery (1981 to 1995), British Journal of Surgery (1985 to 1995), European Journal of Vascular Surgery (1988 to 1995) and World Journal of Surgery (1978 to 1995). For the updated review, for the dates January 1994 - December 2000 we: 1. Repeated all these searches performed for the original review and developed more comprehensive search strategies for Medline and Embase. The Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register was last searched in May 2001. 2. Hand searched the Journal of Vascular Surgery, Stroke, Annals of Vascular Surgery, American Journal of Surgery and Cardiovascular Surgery. 3. Hand searched the abstracts from the International Stroke Conference, AGM of the Vascular Surgical Society (UK), AGM of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland and the Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery (USA). 4. Searched reference lists from all relevant trials All the authors of studies included in the initial review, and other authors known to have published relevant work, were contacted requesting information about further published or unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For the original review two reviewers independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. The data were extracted by one reviewer and double-checked. Trial quality was assessed. During the update, two reviewers independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. No new relevant randomised controlled trials were found.

MAIN RESULTS

Despite recommendation from the original review that further studies were required, no new trials of adequate quality and fitting the inclusion criteria were found. The initial review included three trials. Two trials involving 590 patients compared routine shunting with no shunting. The other trial involving 131 patients compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement, with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Allocation was adequately concealed in one trial, and one trial was quasi-randomised. Analysis was by intention-to-treat where possible. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared to pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

When first published in 1995, this review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. It was suggested that large scale randomised trials using no shunting as the control group were required. No one method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes. No further prospective randomised or quasi-randomised trials have been performed since then and the conclusions therefore remain unchanged.

Reconstructive surgery of the extracranial arteries

The first carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually accredited to Eastcott who reported in 1954 the successful incision of a diseased carotid bulb with end-to-end anastomosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to the common carotid artery (CCA). During the following years surgeons were quick to adopt and improve the intuitively attractive procedure. But by the early to mid 1980s several leading neurologists began to question the growing number of CEAs performed at that time. Six major CEA trials were then designed which are now completed or nearing completion. Most conclusive data are available from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) for symptomatic carotid disease, and from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) for asymptomatic carotid disease. The key result of these studies is that CEA is beneficial to high grade symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. While the benefit in symptomatic disease is clear, it may be negligible in asymptomatic patients suffering from other medical conditions, the most important being coronary artery disease. Since the conclusions from the different studies vary significantly, guidelines and recommendations with regard to CEA have been issued by a number of interest groups, so-called consensus conferences. The best known guidelines are published by the American Heart Association (AHA). However, the practice of interest groups to issue guidelines is currently being criticized, the main reason being that interest groups have different ideas and all claim the right to issue guidelines. At present we recommend CEA for symptomatic high-grade stenosis in patients without significant coincident disease. With regard to asymptomatic stenosis we suggest surgery to otherwise healthy patients if the stenosis is very narrow or progressive. Preoperative evaluation has changed over the years. Currently we recommend duplex sonography in combination with intra- and extracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Concurrent coronary artery disease is a major consideration in the perioperative management, and the use of a specific algorithm is recommended. Surgery is performed under general anaesthesia with intraoperative monitoring such as electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). A temporary intraluminal shunt is used selectively if after cross-clamping the flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline. For years we employed routine barbiturate neuroprotection during cross-clamping. At the present time we use barbiturate selectively, if the flow velocity in the MCA falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline and if the use of a temporary intraluminal shunt is not possible due to difficult anatomic conditions. The reason to abandon systematic barbiturate protection was to accelerate recovery from anaesthesia. Our patients are monitored overnight on the ICU or a surveillance unit. Routine hospitalization after surgery is 5 to 7 days with a control duplex sonography being performed prior to discharge. A number of details with regard to surgical technique and perioperative management are a matter of discussion. Our surgical routine is described here step by step. Such management resulted in 6 major complications among the 402 cases with 4 of cardiopulmonary and 2 of cerebrovascular origin. For the future we can expect the development of percutaneous transluminal techniques competing with standard carotid endarterectomy. At the present time several comparative studies are under way. Irrespective of the technical approach to treat carotid stenosis, several other issues have to be clarified before long. One of the major unresolved items is the timing of treatment after completed stroke. In this regard prospective trials need to be performed. Although numerically not as important as carotid stenosis, vertebral artery (VA) and subclavian artery (SA) stenoses are more and more accepted as indication for surgical

Flow redistribution in the major cerebral arteries after carotid endarterectomy: a study with transcranial Doppler scan

PURPOSE

This open single-center prospective study aimed to determine the redistribution of blood flow within the circle of Willis and through collateral pathways after carotid endarterectomy. Blood flow velocity and flow direction in the major cerebral arteries were determined, both at rest and during CO(2) inhalation.

METHODS

Carotid endarterectomy was performed in 148 patients with a 70% or greater diameter stenosis of the internal carotid artery while patients were under general anesthesia. Arteriotomy closure was done with a venous patch. Selective shunting was performed with an electroencephalogram. Baseline blood flow velocity of the basal cerebral arteries was measured by means of transcranial Doppler sonography preoperatively (within 1 week before surgery) and 3 months postoperatively. At the same times, cerebrovascular reactivity was calculated during CO(2) inhalation insonating both middle cerebral arteries.

RESULTS

Baseline blood flow velocity in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery hardly changed 3 months postoperatively, but there was a considerable redistribution of flow in the circle of Willis. This was characterized by a decrease in contribution from the contralateral hemisphere through the anterior communicating artery, reduced cerebropetal flow rates in the ophthalmic artery, and smaller contribution of the posterior collateral sources. The CO(2) reactivity on the side of surgery increased in all patients. In patients with a contralateral occlusion, CO(2) reactivity increased on both sides. The redistribution of flow was most pronounced in patients who needed intraoperative shunting and in patients with a contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion.

CONCLUSION

After carotid endarterectomy, flow redistribution, as expressed by changes in blood flow velocity values, occurs in the circle of Willis. The contribution of collateral sources is diminished, and the CO(2) reactivity increases, both of which reflect improvement of the hemodynamic condition. The most improvement occurs in patients with contralateral occlusion.

Computer-assisted EEG monitoring during carotid endarterectomy

The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable method of EEG analysis during carotid endarterectomy. EEGs of 104 patients under general anesthesia were processed by three different methods: a) "on-line" visual analysis during surgery, b) "off-line" visual analysis in laboratory, and c) computer analysis. To identify pathological EEGs, variability and asymmetry indexes of the 0.5-3.5 Hz and 8-15 Hz bands, absolute power and variability indexes of spectral edge frequency (SEF), and main dominant frequency were evaluated. On-line visual analysis showed clamp-related modifications in 29 EEGs (27.9%). Off-line visual analysis detected 24 pathological EEGs (23.1%): 18 with major changes and 6 with moderate changes. Computer analysis showed 21 EEGs (20.19%) with at least one altered index and 7 (6.7%) with altered variability for both SEF and 8-15 Hz power. The statistical analysis was significant for SEF variability and for 8-15 Hz power variability and asymmetry (P < 0.0001, analysis of variance test). While SEF and 8-15 Hz power variability did not appear influenced by anesthesia and single electrode artifacts, 8-15 Hz power asymmetry index was confounded by the presence of contralateral internal carotid occlusion. The data show that the use of these spectral indexes adds objective information to visual analysis, supporting and making easier intraoperative strategies. Their routine clinical use does not involve additional costs remaining technical requirements unchanged compared to traditional recording.

Transcranial Doppler findings during balloon test occlusion of the internal carotid artery

The authors performed transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) during internal carotid artery (ICA) balloon test occlusion (BTO) and observed changes in mean flow velocity (Vm) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA), and pulsatility index (PI) while monitoring the stump pressure (Sp) of the internal carotid artery (ICA), and neurologic findings. A group of 17 patients requiring possible temporary or permanent occlusion of the ICA in the course of planned procedures first underwent BTO. A patient who either developed neurologic changes or maintained less than 60% of preocclusion Sp or Vm in the ipsilateral MCA during BTO was considered to have a positive test. Eleven patients had negative results, while in six patients, tests were positive. Mean flow velocity showed a decrease after occlusion in all cases but not to a remarkable extent in some patients. Stump pressure decreased in all negative cases after balloon inflation and than tended to increase progressively during 15 minutes of BTO. Pulsatility index tended to decrease gradually during BTO in all negative patients. However, in positive cases, PI and Sp fell steeply. Only one positive case had a neurologic symptom of severe headache. The decreased PI in the MCA reflected autoregulatory dilation of cerebral vessels to compensate for decreased absolute cerebral blood volume following ICA occlusion. Changes in PI are a good indicator for evaluating blood flow during BTO.

Transcranial Doppler monitoring and causes of stroke from carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The value of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) depends on the safety of the operation. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) was used to evaluate the possibilities of hypoperfusion, hyperperfusion, and embolization as causes of stroke and to evaluate the significance of Doppler microembolic signals (DMES).

METHODS

Five hundred CEAs were monitored with TCD of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery during various phases of CEA to determine hemodynamic changes and incidence of DMES. Complications were graded according to their severity, and their probable cause was determined from TCD criteria and review of hospital charts.

RESULTS

We observed 24 cerebrovascular complications (4.8%), including 9 with transient ischemic attacks and 15 (3%) with permanent deficits. Among all cerebrovascular complications, embolism was judged to be responsible in 13 (54%; P < .02 compared with hypoperfusion), hyperperfusion in 7 (29%; P < .14 compared with hypoperfusion), and hypoperfusion in 4 (17%; P < .08 compared with embolism plus hyperperfusion). The surgeons responded to TCD information by several strategies depending on the TCD information. The incidence of permanent deficits diminished from 7% in the first 100 operations to 2% in the last 400 (P < or = .01). Shunting was more strongly associated with cerebrovascular complications than nonshunting, but this difference was not significant (P = .24). Intraoperative prevalence of DMES was strongly associated with cerebrovascular complications (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Embolism is the principal cause of cerebrovascular complications from CEA; hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion are also important causes. TCD provides information that allows prompt identification and treatment of these three major causes of stroke from this operation. The perioperative stroke rate can be reduced by appropriate measures, taken by the surgeons, based on findings of TCD monitoring.

Carotid endarterectomy--when to do it, how to do it?

With the completion of the major carotid endarterectomy trials the indications for this procedure can be defined. The procedure, if done by experienced teams, has been shown to improve the chance of stroke free survival in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with a high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. In asymptomatic patients the risk reduction gained by prophylactic carotid endarterectomy may be small in relation to the risk of coincident factors particularly coronary artery disease. The benefit gained by carotid endarterectomy depends closely on the risk of the procedure itself, and a single little flaw during the management can annulate the benefit of the operation in asymptomatic patients. There are still considerable controversies with regard to peri-operative management and surgical technique, e.g., the necessity of routine pre-operative arteriography has recently been questioned. Quality control programmes become a requirement with the publication of performance standards for carotid endarterectomy. According to a consensus of the American Heart Association, the surgical morbidity/mortality must be less than 6% for symptomatic carotid lesions and less than 3% for asymptomatic lesions. The present review discusses the steps of the pre-operative work-up, the procedure itself and the post-operative management with the aim to identify accepted safety standards as well as areas of uncertainty.

Technical issues in carotid artery surgery 1995

In reviews in the 1980s, we discussed both indications for and surgical techniques in carotid endarterectomy. Significant changes in the practice of extracranial cerebrovascular reconstruction have occurred over the past few years. The newest indications and cooperative study data have recently been discussed by Camarata and Heros in this topic review series. In this article, we aim to review the advances in operative monitoring and surgical techniques of the last decade. We would be remiss, however, not to note that the latest Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study data, released in September 1994, indicate that carotid endarterectomy is significantly superior to medical therapy for asymptomatic stenosis of > 60%. These data, along with the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial results, will revitalize and lend scientific validity to carotid artery reconstruction.

Prediction of tolerance to carotid artery occlusion using transcranial Doppler ultrasound

Surgical sacrifice of the carotid artery is a frequently anticipated event during the treatment of certain aneurysms and tumors. The ability to predict tolerance to carotid artery occlusion is therefore of benefit when planning procedures in which the carotid artery is at risk. A trial of carotid artery occlusion using an angiographic balloon during concurrent neurological examination or blood flow studies is an accepted method for testing tolerance, but it carries the risks of an angiogram and cannot be performed at the bedside. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is a noninvasive modality that permits measurement of blood velocity in cerebral vessels. The immediate effects of carotid artery occlusion on middle cerebral artery (MCA) perfusion can be obtained by insonating this artery during manual carotid artery compression. To compare the TCD response to carotid artery compression with the data obtained with more formal testing, the MCA of 22 patients was insonated during manual carotid artery compression and the results compared with the clinical tolerance to balloon occlusion in all patients and to blood flow studied by single photon emission computerized tomography before or during balloon occlusion in 14 of the 22 patients. Surgery was planned to treat giant unruptured aneurysms in 17 cases, intracranial tumors in three, a carotid-cavernous fistula in one, and a carotid artery injury in one. Fifteen patients showed a reduction in TCD flow velocities by no more than 65%; of these, 14 (93%) clinically tolerated the balloon occlusion test. Of the seven patients showing a TCD flow velocity decrease of more than 65%, six (86%) developed a transient focal deficit during the occlusion. It is concluded that the change in MCA velocity measured with TCD studies during manual carotid artery occlusion is a useful predictor of the clinical and blood flow responses to a trial of carotid artery occlusion with an angiographic balloon.

Risks and benefits of shunting in carotid endarterectomy. The International Transcranial Doppler Collaborators

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Controversy continues about the pathogenesis of perioperative stroke in carotid endarterectomy and the use of shunting. The purpose of this study was to determine, using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography, the severity of ischemia during clamping of the carotid artery as a basis for analysis of complications in patients operated on with and without shunting.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 11 centers contributed 1,495 carotid endarterectomies monitored with transcranial Doppler. The cases were divided into groups with severe, mild, and no ischemia, and each group was subdivided according to shunt use. The perioperative rate of severe stroke attributable to intraoperative ischemia, in addition to total perioperative stroke, was determined for each subgroup.

RESULTS

Severe ischemia occurred in 7.2% of our cases but cleared spontaneously in about half of these. In those with persisting ischemia the rate of severe stroke was very high, while shunting protected against stroke in such cases. If ischemia did not occur, the stroke rate was higher with shunting, although not so high as in unshunted cases with severe ischemia. Slightly more than one third of the severe strokes were due to postoperative cerebral hemorrhage or carotid thrombosis, unrelated to clamp-induced ischemia or shunting.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid endarterectomy complications might be reduced by selectively shunting only for severe persisting ischemia. Monitoring of cerebral ischemia would be essential to selective shunting.

Relation between middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity and stump pressure during carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Many patient monitoring techniques have been used for detecting cerebral hypoperfusion during carotid endarterectomy. We compared middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities with carotid artery stump pressures to evaluate the indications for common carotid artery cross-clamp shunting and the probable hemodynamic causes of cerebrovascular complications.

METHODS

Blood flow velocities were monitored with transcranial Doppler ultrasound and carotid stump pressures were measured at the time of common carotid artery cross-clamping during 97 carotid endarterectomy procedures. Stump pressures measured with the gauge zero reference at the common carotid artery level were correlated with the percentage change of velocities.

RESULTS

Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities usually decreased upon common carotid artery cross-clamping, depending on collateral availability and the autoregulation response. The best fit of the data was to an exponential function concave to the pressure axis, with velocity as a percentage of the pre-cross-clamp value reaching zero at 15 mm Hg stump pressure (r = 0.85 and p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a less critical margin of error with percentage middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity decreases than with stump pressure measurements. This relation establishes changes in middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities as a reliable parameter for judging the effects of carotid cross-clamping on cerebral blood flow and providing an excellent indicator as to the necessity for shunting.

The carotid endarterectomy: experience with 260 cases and discussion of the indications

During 1978 to 1989, 235 patients were operated upon with 260 procedures for cervical carotid endarterectomy. The patients were classified according to the presence or absence of ischaemic symptomatology, and for symptomatic patients, according to the reversibility or persistence of ischaemic symptoms. So the selection of patients was: reversible ischaemia 46%, stroke 29%, asymptomatic patients 25%. In the stroke group, no patient was operated on as an emergency, the endarterectomy was only performed after stabilization of the clinical state. Three subgroups were included in patients operated on for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: casual discovery 40%, treatment of the second carotid artery (previous endarterectomy for symptomatic contralateral stenosis) 34%, and treatment of the second carotid artery (previous ECIC by-pass for contralateral carotid occlusion) 26%. All patients were operated upon after angiographic exploration (femoral catheterisation in most cases), and after cerebral CT scan. The surgical technique included general anaesthesia, systematic shunting, endarterectomy after longitudinal arteriotomy, closure without patch. The operating microscope has been used since 1985. The surgical results were studied in terms of uneventful postoperative course (87%), reversible complications (8%) and long lasting complications (5%). The long lasting complications were of local origin (1%), of neurological origin (2%), of general origin (1%). Overall the operative outcome at 6 months was: return to previous clinical state 95%, neurological sequelae 2%, death 3%. In the patients operated on for asymptomatic carotid stenosis the overall outcome was: previous clinical state 97%, death 3%. The legitimacy of carotid endarterectomy procedure is discussed in relation to some recent pertinent literature.