Does every hernia demand a mesh repair? A critical review

The new 4DDome prosthesis: an original light and partially absorbable composite mesh for hernia repair

INTRODUCTION

The use of non-absorbable meshes for the repair of inguinal hernias has become standard; however, these meshes have been associated with complications including long-term postoperative pain. To this end, a new partially absorbable composite mesh has been developed, and the aim of this study was to investigate its efficacy in animal and human trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty male Wistar rats were used to evaluate the behavior of the newly designed composite mesh. Composite meshes were implanted in the extra-peritoneal plane for 2, 4 and 8 weeks and compared to a standard polypropylene mesh. Forty patients with symptomatic inguinal hernias were treated using a new 4DDome designed prosthesis. Follow-up was by clinical and ultrasound examination at 1, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The animal study demonstrated that the inflammatory reaction associated with the new composite mesh was significantly lower than a standard polypropylene mesh, characterized by a lower macrophage infiltrate (P < 0.001). The mesh did not shrink over the 8-week period, unlike the polypropylene mesh (P < 0.05). The human study showed that there were three minor postoperative complications, no recurrences and the mesh was well tolerated. Follow-up with serial ultrasound showed that at 10 days and 1 month the dome was clearly visible in position; however, by 6 months it had flattened out, been partially absorbed and become incorporated into the repair.

CONCLUSION

These experimental and clinical studies have validated the concept of the new 4DDome composite mesh. It was well tolerated and was associated with good short-term results. The combination of the dome shape and the new composite mesh means that less polypropylene is required and represents a significant advance in anterior hernia repair.

Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis

The aim of this study was to analyze and evaluate the long-term recurrence rate and risk factors for inguinal hernia recurrence in patients treated by the Shouldice suture repair. A total of 293 hernias treated by Shouldice suture technique in 1992 were studied retrospectively. After a 10-year follow-up, 15 potential risk factors for recurrence were assessed in 142 patients undergoing 171 Shouldice repairs. Recurrent hernias showed a significantly higher (22.0%) recurrence rate than primary inguinal hernias (7.7%). Furthermore, an age of more than 50 years, smoking, and the presence of two or more similarly affected relatives were found to be independent risk factors for recurrence. The present study underlines the importance of patient-related risk factors for the development of a recurrent inguinal hernia. Patients at risk should preoperatively be identified in order to improve treatment by, for example, the application of mesh techniques.

Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) vs Shouldice groin hernia repair

Endoscopic techniques are commonly used for many different types of surgery. It is claimed that videoendoscopic procedures have the advantage of being less traumatic and of offering higher postoperative patient comfort than conventional open techniques. The extent of tissue trauma can be evaluated on the basis of the inflammatory response observed in the wake of surgery. Available studies that have compared endoscopic and conventional techniques suggest that endoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic colorectal resection, and thoracoscopic pulmonary resection have immunologic advantages over conventional approaches. The objective of this prospective study was to determine whether endoscopic hernia repair techniques are also preferable to conventional procedures and to what extent the anesthetic technique (local or general anesthesia) influences the postoperative inflammatory response. For this purpose, biochemical monitoring of cytokine activity [C-reactive protein (CRP), prostaglandin F1alpha (PGF1alpha), neopterin, interleukin-6 (IL-6)] was done prospectively in 101 patients [totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) n=32, unilateral n=12, bilateral n=20; Shouldice n=69, local anesthesia (LA) n=23, general anesthesia (GA) n=46] before and until 3 days after surgery. The parameters IL-6 and PGF1alpha suggested that the immune trauma immediately after surgery was significantly higher in the group of patients with endoscopic hernia repair than in the group of patients who received a Shouldice repair. No significant differences were observed after the first postoperative day. A comparison between the TEP group and the patients who received conventional surgery under local anesthesia showed that the TEP approach was also associated with a higher postoperative neopterin level. Within the first 3 days after surgical intervention, bilateral endoscopic hernia repair induced no significantly higher inflammatory response than the surgical treatment of unilateral conditions. The anesthetic procedure that was used in the Shouldice operation had no significant effect on inflammatory response. Unlike other types of endoscopic surgery, the repair of groin hernias using an endoscopic technique cannot be regarded as a minimally invasive procedure that is less traumatic than conventional approaches. Instead, the conventional Shouldice procedure appears to cause the lowest inflammatory response and to be the least traumatic approach to hernia repair, especially when it is performed under local anesthesia.

[The Rives technique (direct inguinal approach) in treatment of large inguino-scrotal and recurrent hernias]

In solving inguinal hernias, surgeons today have in front of them many variations of different operative procedures (both tensional and non-tensional techniques). They are performed through operative or endoscope approach. Classical tension techniques present the operation of choice for smaller indirect, direct or femoral hernias among younger patients while non/tensional techniques are the best solution for all types of inguinal hernia among older patients with big destruction of transversal fascia and the best solution for most of recurrent hernias. Positioning of mesh with non-tensional techniques can be completed on different levels, with big hernias where the biggest part of transversal fascia of miopectineal orifitium is destroyed it is anatomically the most useful to place the mesh in preperitoneal space. Rives technique is the base of that concept and it presents one of good solutions in that kind of situations. In the period January 2001 until december 2002 using different operative techniques the authors treated 99 inguinal hernias of which 78 were primary and 21 recurrent hernias. Rives technique was performed in 46 cases (46.5%) among which 26 cases were primary inguinoscrotal hernias (3 patients IIIA, 22 patients IIIB, 1 patient IIIC, according to Nyhus classification) and 20 cases were recurrent hernias (6 patients IVA, 11 IVB, 3 IVD). Complications after Rives technique were the following: 1 recurrence (2.17%), 1 ischemic orchitis (2.17%) and 1 scrotal hematoma (2.17%). Infections and chronic pain were not present. The follow up was from 30 days to 2 years. Authors have shown that Rives technique is reliable solution for primary indirect, direct and femoral hernias with big hernial defect (especially for big, so called "giant" inquinoscrotal hernias) and for all types of recurrent hernias. The advantage of the technique is an easy performance without some previous special training because of the fact that dissection and preparation is the same as for the tension techniques. With small amount of prosthetic material all weak points of miopectineal orifitium are closed. The real risks of this technique are ischemic orchitis and chronis neuralgia in treatment of recurrent hernias and the presence of polypropylene mesh in Bogras space.

[Modified Rives technic in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia]

After the introduction of prosthetic material in hernia surgery the fundamental changes in operative strategy occurred. This is because the coverage of myopectineal orifitium with non-absorbable prosthesis decreases the incidence of recurrences. Because of the appearance of lateral re-recurrences after the classical Rives procedure, we modified the operative technique. The modified Rives technique consists of the following: always polypropilen mesh 15x10 cm; creation of the new internal inguinal ring between Poupart's ligament and mesh; no lateral notching the mesh and anchoring mesh 2-3 cm from the medial, inferior, lateral and superior edge. During the period January 2001-December 2003, 34 cases of recurrent hernias were operated on 7th dept. of I Surgical Clinic of CCS. The recurrences were managed by classical (10/34) or modified Rives technique through direct inguinal approach (22/34), less frequently Lichtenstein procedure (1/34) and McVay (1/34) technique. Among 10 patients with recurrent inguinal hernias managed by classical Rives technique 2 re-recurrences appeared (indirect and interstitial) and 2 cases of infection (immediately after the operation or 7 months after the operation), and in the group of 22 cases with recurrent inguinal hernias managed by modified Rives technique the aim complications didn't appear. Using the modified Rives technique we managed the primary hernias in 56 cases without recurrences and infections. The modified Rives technique, because of the way of mesh fixation (all around), no lateral notching of mesh and remaining hem in all directions secures abdominal wall protection 2-3 cm from the line of fixation and prevents any movement of the mesh. This procedure enables management of all inguinal hernias regardless to their size and full protection of the medial, femoral and lateral inguinal triangle. The modified Rives technique is the technique of choice for big multiple defects (giant inguino-scrotal and re-recurrences), especially among patients with increased intra-abdominal pressure when other techniques may be insufficient because of mesh protrusion.