Combined effects of NO inhalation and intravenous PGF2 alpha on pulmonary circulation and gas exchange in an ovine ARDS model

Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction

It has been known for more than 60 years, and suspected for over 100, that alveolar hypoxia causes pulmonary vasoconstriction by means of mechanisms local to the lung. For the last 20 years, it has been clear that the essential sensor, transduction, and effector mechanisms responsible for hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) reside in the pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cell. The main focus of this review is the cellular and molecular work performed to clarify these intrinsic mechanisms and to determine how they are facilitated and inhibited by the extrinsic influences of other cells. Because the interaction of intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms is likely to shape expression of HPV in vivo, we relate results obtained in cells to HPV in more intact preparations, such as intact and isolated lungs and isolated pulmonary vessels. Finally, we evaluate evidence regarding the contribution of HPV to the physiological and pathophysiological processes involved in the transition from fetal to neonatal life, pulmonary gas exchange, high-altitude pulmonary edema, and pulmonary hypertension. Although understanding of HPV has advanced significantly, major areas of ignorance and uncertainty await resolution.

Overview of the pathology of three widely used animal models of acute lung injury

Acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are syndromes of acute diffuse damage to the pulmonary parenchyma by a variety of local or systemic insults. Increased alveolar capillary membrane permeability was recognized as the common end organ injury and a central feature in all forms of ALI/ARDS. Although great strides have been made in understanding the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS and in intensive care medicine, the treatment approach to ARDS is still relying on ventilatory and cardiovascular support based on the recognition of the clinical picture. In the course of evaluating novel treatment approaches to ARDS, 3 models of ALI induced in different species, i.e. the surfactant washout lavage model, the oleic acid intravenous injection model and the endotoxin injection model, were widely used. This review gives an overview of the pathological characteristics of these models from studies in pigs, dogs or sheep. We believe that a good morphological description of these models, both spatially and temporally, will help us gain a better understanding of the real pathophysiological picture and apply these models more accurately and liberally in evaluating novel treatment approaches to ARDS.

Inhaled nitric oxide and vasoconstrictors in acute respiratory distress syndrome

It has been suggested that the increase in PO(2) observed with nitric oxide (NO) should be enhanced by the addition of a vasoconstrictor agent. The vasoconstrictor used in combination with NO should mimic or enhance hypoxic vasoconstriction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory and hemodynamic effects of norepinephrine (a nonspecific vasoconstrictor), almitrine bismesylate (a specific pulmonary vasoconstrictor), and inhaled NO, alone or together. During a 6-mo period, 16 patients presenting with ARDS were prospectively investigated. On inclusion, no patient was receiving cardiovasoactive drugs. The protocol consisted of seven consecutive phases: baseline, norepinephrine (in order to obtain a 3 mm Hg rise in mean pulmonary arterial pressure [Ppa]), almitrine bismesylate (16 micrograms/kg/min), inhaled NO (20 ppm delivered during inspiration), norepinephrine + inhaled NO, almitrine bismesylate + inhaled NO, almitrine bismesylate + norepinephrine + inhaled NO. General factorial analysis of variance showed that inhaled NO and almitrine bismesylate increased oxygenation (p < 0.0001). Norepinephrine had no effect on oxygenation. A synergistic effect between inhaled NO and almitrine bismesylate was found (p < 0.05), whereas norepinephrine did not affect the response to inhaled NO. Nitric oxide produced a significant decrease in Ppa and pulmonary vascular resistances (PVRI) (p < 0.0001). Both almitrine bismesylate and norepinephrine induced an increase in Ppa (p < 0.0001). Norepinephrine increased PVRI (p < 0.002), whereas almitrine bismesylate had no effect on PVRI. The present results support the hypothesis that a selective pulmonary vasoconstrictor enhances the increase in oxygenation induced by inhaled NO, whereas norepinephrine attenuates this effect.