Anatomy of the tarsometatarsal joint and its applications to dislocation of this articular interface

Support system of Lisfranc joint complex: An anatomical investigation with an evolutionary perspective

BACKGROUND

The anatomical arrangement of the Lisfranc joint between the midfoot and forefoot is complex and not just critical for bipedal gait but also for prevention, management, and rehabilitation of injuries in this region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In forty adult cadaveric lower limbs, the Lisfranc mortise, the ligaments and supports were observed and noted.

RESULTS

The structural arrangement that accords stability to the joint has osseous, ligamentous, and tendinous components. A bony mortise, which is deep medially, disrupts the linearity of the joint line. An extensive Lisfranc ligament with confluent interosseous and plantar parts was observed. Tibialis posterior, peroneus Longus and Lisfranc ligament exhibit a unique anatomical arrangement that supports the joint inferiorly.

CONCLUSION

The study documents a unique lattice of tendons and ligament offering dynamic support to the joint. Demands of assumption of erect posture and bipedal walking in humans like adduction of the first ray of the foot, maintenance of longitudinal and transverse arches of the foot and ability stiffen midfoot for efficient forefoot take-off are well reflected in the joint structure and supports.

Subtle Lisfranc Injuries: A Topical Review and Modification of the Classification System

Lisfranc injuries are relatively uncommon. No specific incidence of subtle injuries has been reported; however, almost one-third are missed on initial review. These missed injuries are a common cause of litigation. Although seen in high-energy injuries with direct application of forces, they are also associated with lower-energy indirect mechanisms, often on the athletic field. This article provides a topical review of subtle Lisfranc disruptions, focusing on contemporary perspectives, and describes a modification to the most prevalent classification system. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):e168-e175.].

[Anatomical reconstruction of chronically instable Lisfranc's ligaments]

BACKGROUND

From June 2001 to May 2013 four selected patients with an isolated and old Lisfranc's ligament rupture were treated at the Trauma Department of the University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden with an anatomical repair of the ligament using half of the extensor hallucis longus tendon. This kind of graft 7 cm in length was used in three cases and in the fourth case the whole extensor hallucis brevis tendon was used. Of the four patients three were female with an average age of 28.6 years (range 15-39 years). The fourth patient was a 23-year-old male who was followed up for only 3 months due to emigration abroad. The three female patients were postoperatively followed up for a minimum of 1 year clinically and at the 1 year follow-up all three women had a stable Lisfranc's joint, two were absolutely pain free and one was relatively pain free.

RESULTS

The youngest of the three females was 15 years old at the time of surgery and in preparation for the Olympic Games as a gymnast. This gave rise to the idea for an anatomical repair to avoid partial fusion of the Lisfranc's joint in this very young and extremely competitive sportswoman. The Lisfranc's joint was completely stable and pain free 2 years postoperatively and 10 years after surgery she qualified for the 2005 World Championships in Australia and the Olympic Games in Beijing in 2008.

Lisfranc joint ligamentous complex: MRI with anatomic correlation in cadavers

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to clarify the ligamentous anatomy of the Lisfranc joint complex and show the diagnostic capability of MRI in the assessment of the Lisfranc joint complex with detailed anatomic correlation in cadavers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten fresh cadaveric feet were studied with high-spatial-resolution MRI before and after the intraarticular injection of a gadopentetate dimeglumine solution. MR images were evaluated by two readers in consensus, with emphasis on the visibility of the ligamentous structures and their appearance. Readers also measured the dimensions (length, width, and thickness) of the Lisfranc ligament and of the first plantar tarsometatarsal ligament, or plantar Lisfranc ligament. For anatomic analysis, nine cadaveric specimens were sectioned in 3-mm-thick slices in the same planes used during MRI. One additional foot specimen was used for dissection.

RESULTS

In all 10 cadaveric specimens we were able to identify and characterize with MRI the different ligamentous elements that contribute to the overall stability of the Lisfranc joint complex.

CONCLUSION

By clearly defining the normal ligaments that contribute to the stability of the Lisfranc joint, MRI allows a more precise and correct diagnosis of the origin of the Lisfranc joint instability, perhaps permitting a more specific surgical management. MRI also allows a better understanding of the normal imaging anatomy of the different ligamentous components of the Lisfranc joint, mainly of the Lisfranc and plantar Lisfranc ligaments.