Family history and bilateral primary breast cancer

Bilateral breast cancer in China: A 10-year single-center retrospective study (2006-2016)

Bilateral breast cancer (BBC) is an uncommon subset of breast cancer (BC), and it may present as synchronous bilateral breast cancer (sBBC) or metachronous bilateral breast cancer (mBBC). Through this study, we aimed to evaluate the proportion of BBC in BC and compare the clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of sBBC and mBBC at an academic cancer center in China. Patients with BC consecutively treated between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with BBC were included. In total, 3924 patients with BC were analyzed and 127 patients with BBC (28 sBBC, 99 mBBC) with a median follow-up of 98 months were identified. The proportion of BBC was 3.2% (0.7%, sBBC; 2.5%, mBBC). The median age at the first diagnosis of mBBC was significantly younger than that at the first diagnosis of sBBC (p = 0.027). Patients diagnosed as having sBBC were more likely to have a positive family history (p = 0.047). The first tumors of mBBC were detected at a significantly earlier tumor stage compared with those of sBBC (p = 0.028). The concordance rates of histopathologic type in the first and second tumors were 60.7% and 58.0% in sBBC and mBBC, respectively. sBBC had a significantly poorer disease-free survival than mBBC did (p = 0.001). BBC is a rare disease affecting the Chinese population. sBBC is associated with a greater prevalence of a family history of breast cancer and poorer prognosis, compared with mBBC.

[Role of imaging procedures in the diagnosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of imaging procedures in the diagnosis of synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patient group consisted of consecutive women undergoing managed for SBBC in our institution between January 2006 and July 2012. We defined SBBC as bilateral breast tumors diagnosed simultaneously or up to 3 months after initial diagnosis. Clinical data included comorbidities, BMI (kg/m(2)), preoperative breast imaging modalities used and their findings.

RESULTS

Of the 2322 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer treated on the study period, 46 patients with the diagnosis of SBBC were enrolled to the study. A total of 41.3% patients had family history of breast cancer. A total of 56.52% had clinical symptoms. The most frequent situation of diagnosis (32.6%) was the association of a palpable tumor and a contralateral radiologic abnormality. MRI permitted the diagnosis of 19.6% occult contralateral lesions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Clinical examination and conventional imaging procedures (mammography and sonography) detects the majority (76%) of synchronous contralateral breast cancers. A family history of breast cancer, a multifocal breast tumor or the presence of an invasive lobular carcinoma should be arguments for the realization of a breat MRI to eliminate contralateral malignancy.

Risk assessment and management of high risk familial breast cancer

The demand for genetic services by women with a family history of breast cancer has increased exponentially over the last few years. It is important that risks to women are accurately assessed and that processes are in place for appropriate counselling and management. The classification of risk into average, moderate, and high, depending upon the assessed lifetime risk of breast cancer, allows for the management of moderate risk women within cancer units and high risk women within the regional genetic centres. Management of high risk women includes discussion of options including screening, chemoprevention, and preventive surgery. The majority of these options are still unproven in the long term and continuing research is needed for their evaluation. Mutation screening and predictive testing are now a reality for a minority of families, allowing for a more informed basis for decisions regarding management options.

Breast-conservation therapy in early-stage breast cancer patients with a positive family history

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to evaluate the role of breast-conservation therapy in early-stage breast cancer patients with a family history (FH) of breast cancer.

METHODS

Between 1970 and 1994, 1324 female patients with breast cancer were treated with breast-conservation therapy at our institution. From these, we identified 985 patients with stage 0-II breast cancer and who had available information on FH status. FH was considered positive in any patient who had a relative who had been previously diagnosed with breast cancer. Disease-specific survival was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The stage distribution for the 985 patients was as follows: 0 in 65 (7%), I in 500 (51%), and II in 420 (43%). The median age was 50 years (range, 21-88), with a median follow-up time of 8.8 years (range,.25-29). The median tumor size was 1.5 cm. FH was positive in 31%. There were no significant differences in locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-specific survival, or incidence of contralateral breast cancer in patients with a positive FH versus patients with a negative FH.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast-conservation therapy is not contraindicated in early-stage breast cancer patients with a positive FH.

The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours

AIM

There is uncertainty in the literature as to whether bilateral breast cancer carries a worse prognosis than unilateral disease because some studies suggest that the development of a second primary does not influence survival, while others report a decreased survival in patients suffering from bilateral disease.

METHODS

A prospectively accrued and regularly validated database of 1945 patients with breast cancer treated in a district general hospital between 1963 and 1999 was analysed for clinical and pathological tumour characteristics including family history, grade, type of tumour, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

Five per cent of patients (92) suffered from metachronous and 43 (2%) from synchronous bilateral breast cancer. A family history of breast cancer was more common in patients with metachronous bilateral breast cancer (38%), compared with the unilateral group (15%) and the synchronous bilateral breast cancer group (17%) (chi(2)=22.9, P<0.001). Patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer had a significantly worse overall survival when compared with those with metachronous bilateral or unilateral breast cancer (log-rank test chi(2)=6.1, P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Women with metachronous breast cancer were more likely to have positive family history, while those with synchronous bilateral breast cancer tend to have shorter survival when compared with those with unilateral breast cancer. Synchronous bilaterality is not, however, an independent risk factor on multivariate analysis.

Efficacy of Breast Conservation Therapy in Early Stage Bilateral Breast Cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with bilateral breast cancer as compared to unilateral breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Sixty patients with bilateral breast cancer (BBC) and 1,080 unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients treated with breast conservation therapy from 1977 to 1994 were analyzed for outcome. Of the 60 bilateral patients, 44 were metachronous bilateral breast cancer patients (MBBC) and 16 were synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients (SBBC). The majority of patients received lumpectomy, axillary node dissection, and localized radiation therapy. Median tumor size was 1.4 cm for BBC and 1.5 cm for UBC patients. Median total dose to the tumor bed was 60 Gy for both unilateral and bilateral patients. Of the 44 MBBC patients, 14 received breast conservation for both the first and second lesions, while 30 received breast conservation for only the second metachronous lesion. Thus 58 lesions in 44 patients were treated with breast conservation therapy. Of the SBBC patients, 13 of 16 patients received breast-conserving therapy for both breasts, while 3 received a mastectomy for the second synchronous primary. Median follow-up was 50 months for SBBC patients, 45 months for MBBC patients, and 52 months for UBC patients. Local control and survival were analyzed in patients with SBBC, MBBC, and UBC. The interval to development of local recurrence and survival were calculated from the time of development of the second breast lesion in patients with MBBC. No differences were found for survival and failure-free survival in patients with SBBC, MBBC, or UBC. Five-year overall survival by lifetable analysis was 76% for SBBC, 78% for MBBC, and 87% for UBC patients (p = 0.32 by log-rank analysis). The 5-year failure-free survival was 79% for SBBC, 73% for MBBC, and 85% for UBC patients (p = 0.28 by log-rank analysis). No significant differences were seen for median age, tumor size, pathologic node status, tamoxifen use, chemotherapy use, or median total radiation dose for SBBC, MBBC, or UBC patients. A significant difference was found in the incidence of family history of breast cancer in patients with unilateral versus bilateral breast cancer (p = 0.028 by chi-square analysis). However, there was no difference in outcome of patients by family history of breast cancer. The local control was identical in both BBC and UBC patients, with a local failure rate of 3%. Therefore, breast conservation therapy in local-regional, early stage breast cancer is a rational and efficacious treatment modality for patients with SBBC, MBBC, and UBC.

A case-control study of unilateral and bilateral breast carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Women with unilateral breast carcinoma are at increased risk for developing contralateral disease. The clinical significance of bilateral breast carcinoma has not been fully defined, and the subset of patients who may benefit from medical or surgical risk-reduction intervention has not yet been characterized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors and outcomes for bilateral breast carcinoma.

METHODS

A subject group of 70 bilateral breast carcinoma patients (62% metachronous) was matched by age and survival interval with a control group of 70 unilateral breast carcinoma patients. Median follow-up was 103 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-two percent of the unilateral patients and 80% of the bilateral patients had Stage I or II disease at diagnosis. Median age at presentation was 53 years. In the bilateral group, the contralateral cancer was diagnosed at the same or earlier stage than the first cancer in 87% of cases. Bilateral patients were significantly more likely to have multicentric disease and to have a positive family history for breast carcinoma compared with the unilateral group. There were no significant differences regarding history of exogenous hormone exposure, lobular histology, hormone-receptor status, or HER-2/neu expression. Five-year disease-free survival was 94% for the unilateral breast carcinoma patients and 91% for the bilateral breast carcinoma patients (P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival for patients with bilateral breast carcinoma is similar to that of patients with unilateral disease; however, prophylactic risk-reduction intervention for the contralateral breast should be considered in patients who have multicentric unilateral disease or a positive family history for breast carcinoma.

Relationship of family history and outcome after breast conservation therapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between a family history of breast or ovarian cancer and outcome after breast-conserving surgery and radiation in women presenting with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 146 consecutive women with a pathologic diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ as their first diagnosis of any breast cancer were identified; 28 (19%) had a positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer in a first-degree relative, 27 (19%) had a positive family history in a second-degree relative, and 91 (62%) had no family history. Pathologic, clinical, and treatment factors, and clinical outcomes for each family history group were compared. Cosmesis and complications were recorded at each follow-up. Patients were treated between 1978 and 1995, and the median follow-up was 7.1 years.

RESULTS

Patients with a positive family history in a first- or second-degree relative each had an 8% incidence of local failure at 10 years, while the negative family history group demonstrated a 16% local failure rate (p = 0.33). Overall survival at 10 years for patients with a positive family history in a first- or second-degree relative was 100% and for those with a negative family history was 91% (p = 0.08). The negative family history group had a higher median age that may account for the difference in overall survival. Cause-specific survival (CSS) was 97%, 100%, and 99%, respectively, at 10 years (p = 0.25). There were no differences in the cosmetic results or complication rates between women with a positive or negative family history.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer is not associated with an adverse outcome for women treated with breast conservation therapy for DCIS. Local recurrence, cause-specific survival, overall survival, cosmesis, and complication rates were comparable to that of similarly treated women with negative family histories. Therefore, a positive family history is not a contraindication for breast conservation therapy in women with DCIS.

Ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for screening mammography

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) now represents 20% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers because of increased detection by screening mammography. Twenty year relative survival rates are 97%. Postsurgical and histological studies and recent molecular biological studies indicate that most cases of DCIS will progress to invasive carcinoma if not detected by mammography. Screening mammography studies support the need for annual versus less frequent screenings to detect DCIS before further progression.

Survival from contralateral breast cancer

First primary, or unilateral, breast cancer (UBC) cases diagnosed in 1960-89 at the Cancer Institute (WIA), Chennai, India were followed-up until December 31, 1994. Patients with UBC (n = 3163) and those who developed second cancer in the contralateral breast (CBC) after the initial breast cancer (n = 67 or 2.1% of UBC) were analysed. Compared to UBC patients, those who developed CBC were younger at the time of diagnosis of initial breast cancer and had higher frequency of breast cancer among the family members. The relative survival rate takes into account competing causes of death and was estimated as the ratio of observed survival rate to the expected survival rate. The cumulative relative survival from UBC at 5 and 10 years were 51% and 41%, respectively, and the corresponding rates for CBC were 47% and 30%; the survival difference seen between UBC and CBC patients was not statistically significant. The survival rates among younger, middle-aged and older women were significantly different from each other in UBC but not in CBC patients. Both UBC and CBC with early stage disease had a better survival compared to late stage disease. Survival advantage was also seen among both UBC and CBC patients with family history of breast cancer compared to those without. The multivariate analysis by the life table proportional hazards model showed that the age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. The study results should be interpreted in the light of small sample size of second cancers.

Routine contralateral breast biopsy: helpful or irrelevant? Experience in 871 patients, 1979-1993

OBJECTIVE

Is routine contralateral biopsy in the breast cancer patient justified, and by which parameters can the result be predicted in advance?

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Routine contralateral biopsy remains controversial, and with the possible exception of an invasive lobular primary, little used by most surgeons. Previous series are biased by small sample size, by interpreting lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) as a positive result, by selection on the basis of tumor type, and by the inclusion of patients with clinical or mammographic abnormalities.

METHODS

Among 1113 consecutive patients with breast cancer treated in the author's practice between 1979 and 1993 (excluding 77 patients who had a previous mastectomy, 131 who declined biopsy, and 34 with suspicious clinical or mammographic findings), 871 had a routine contralateral biopsy.

RESULTS

Invasive cancers were found in 1.6%, duct carcinoma in situ in 1.4%, LCIS in 3.2%, and atypical hyperplasia in 6.9% of all random biopsies. If LCIS was excluded as a positive result, invasive lobular carcinoma was not significantly more bilateral than invasive duct (5.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.32), nor were in situ tumors more bilateral than invasive (2.5% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.76). Tumor size, axillary node status, and young age were not predictive of a positive result. A positive biopsy result was significantly more frequent in patients older than 50 years of age (4% vs. 1%, p = 0.016), and with a first-degree family history of breast cancer (6.3% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The following conclusions can be made: 1. If LCIS was excluded as a positive biopsy result, invasive lobular was not significantly more bilateral than invasive duct cancer. 2. Family history and older age significantly predicted a positive biopsy, whereas young age, tumor size, and axillary node status did not. 3. Routine contralateral biopsy identified conditions (invasive cancer or duct carcinoma in situ) requiring immediate further management in 3.0% of patients, and markers of risk (LCIS or atypia) with the potential to influence future decisions in another 10.1%. 4. As a screening device applied in a high-risk population, with low cost and little morbidity, contralateral biopsy deserves wider consideration in an era of ever-earlier breast cancer diagnosis.

A population-based study of contralateral breast cancer following a first primary breast cancer (Washington, United States)

To evaluate predictors of contralateral breast cancer risk, we examined data from a nested case-control study of second primary cancers among a cohort of women in western Washington (United States) diagnosed with breast cancer during 1978 through 1990 and identified through a population-based cancer registry. Cases included all women in the cohort who subsequently developed contralateral breast cancer at least six months after the initial diagnosis, but prior to 1992 (n = 234). Controls were sampled randomly from the cohort, matched to cases on age, stage, and year of initial breast cancer diagnosis. Information on potential risk factors for second primary cancer was obtained through medical record abstractions and physician questionnaires. Women who were postmenopausal due to a bilateral oophorectomy (i.e., a surgical menopause) at initial breast cancer diagnosis had a reduction in contralateral breast cancer risk compared with premenopausal women (matched odds ratio [mOR] = 0.25, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 0.09-0.68), whereas no reduction in risk was noted among postmenopausal women who had had a natural menopause (mOR = 0.90, CI = 0.39-2.09). Among postmenopausal women, there was a suggestion of a lower risk associated with relatively high parity (2+). A family history of breast cancer was associated with an increased risk (mOR = 1.96, CI = 1.22-5.15) and varied little by menopausal status. Having an initial tumor with a lobular component (c.f. a ductal histology) was not related strongly to risk (mOR = 1.47, CI = 0.79-2.74). The results of the present and earlier studies argue that we have limited ability to predict the occurrence of a contralateral breast tumor. Better predictors will be required before diagnostic and preventive interventions can be targeted to subgroups of patients with unilateral breast cancer.

Absence of p53 germ-line mutations in bilateral breast cancer patients

The cause of Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a rare group syndrome of familial cancers, has recently been identified. Patients with this inherited condition are highly susceptible to specific neoplasms, including early-onset breast cancers. The available evidence links Li-Fraumeni syndrome to inherited mutations of the tumor suppressor gene p53. Moreover, somatically acquired p53 mutations and gene deletions are common feature in breast cancer of sporadic origin. These findings suggest that germline p53 mutations are important in familial and, possibly sporadic, breast tumors. We have therefore screened lymphocyte DNA from 19 unrelated bilateral cancer patients for germline p53 mutations in exons 5, 6, 7 and 8. We have however detected no germline mutations by means of the single-strand confirmation polymorphism technique in any of the lymphocyte DNAs examined and conclude that p53 mutations are not generally involved in bilateral breast cancer.

Bilateral breast cancer

Bilateral breast cancer has a cumulative incidence of 7% to 20% in patients with primary operable breast cancer, and the majority of these lesions are metachronous. A consensus on the management of the contralateral breast has been elusive. Much of the confusion arises from the fact that there exist marked differences of opinion regarding the impact of a second primary breast cancer on the overall prognosis. The risk of developing a contralateral breast cancer is influenced by the age of the patient, the presence of in situ disease, lobular histology of this new lesion, multicentricity, exposure to certain types of ionizing irradiation, and, possibly, family history of breast cancer. Management options include observation (clinical and mammographic surveillance), contralateral biopsy, and, rarely, prophylactic mastectomy. It is hoped that trials of breast cancer prevention, employing drugs such as tamoxifen, will identify agents capable of abrogating the risk of contralateral breast cancer and improve the ultimate outcome.

Factors influencing survival and prognosis in early breast carcinoma (T1N0M0-T1N1M0). Assessment of 644 patients with median follow-up of 18 years

That there is probably a significant proportion of "cured" patients, particularly in the T1N0 group, is an important observation when one considers the proper role of adjuvant therapy, especially for patients with stage I disease. Analysis of this series indicates that patients with T1N0 disease can be subdivided into different prognostic groups. Factors associated with an especially favorable prognosis in T1N0 cases are a primary tumor size of 1 cm or less; special tumor type such as tubular, medullary, papillary, or colloid carcinoma; and low-grade tumor. Relatively unfavorable tumor characteristics are size greater than 1.0 cm (especially the group 1.7 to 2.0 cm), the presence of lymphatic tumor emboli in the breast, blood vessel invasion, high-grade tumor or poor differentiation, and intense peritumoral lymphoplasmacytic reaction. The T1N0 patients whose tumors manifest the latter features may have longer disease-free survival as a result of adjuvant therapy. On the other hand, women in the T1N0 group with an especially favorable prognosis usually can be spared adjuvant therapy.

Bilateral breast carcinoma treated with definitive irradiation

From 1977 to 1987, 30 women were treated with definitive irradiation following breast-conserving surgery for bilateral carcinoma of the breast for a total of 60 treated breasts. Eleven women presented with concurrent bilateral carcinoma, and 19 women had sequential bilateral carcinoma. Pathologic axillary staging was performed in 51 of the 60 treated breasts. A total dose of greater than or equal to 6,000 cGy was delivered from breast tangential irradiation plus an electron or Iridium boost to 95% (57/60) of the treated breasts. A third field was used to treat the regional axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes bilaterally in three women (10%) and unilaterally in ten women (33%). Tangential fields were matched at midline in 17 patients, and in ten patients, the tangential fields overlapped by up to 3 cm on skin. In two patients, the tangential fields were matched to an internal mammary nodal field, and in one patient, tangential fields were matched to a mediastinal field given for postoperative radiotherapy for lung cancer. For the overall group of 30 patients, the 5-year actuarial NED survival following treatment of the first breast cancer was 79%, and the 5-year actuarial relapse-free survival was 72%. For the 60 treated breasts, the 5-year actuarial local failure rate was 6%. An analysis of complications and cosmesis showed results similar to previously reported results for unilateral breast cancer. These results show that definitive irradiation following breast-conserving surgery for patients with bilateral breast cancer can technically be delivered with low complication rates and with acceptable survival and local control rates. Definitive irradiation should be considered as an acceptable alternative treatment to bilateral mastectomy for appropriately selected patients with concurrent or sequential bilateral early stage carcinoma of the breast.

A genetic linkage study of familial breast-ovarian cancer

Linkage analysis was conducted in 17 families identified by the familial occurrence of breast and ovarian cancer using a series of 17 serologic and biochemical markers. Lod scores suggestive of linkage of breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility to the RH blood group locus on chromosome 1p were obtained. When the presence of fibrocystic disease of the breast in a first-degree relative of an affected family member was added as an indicator of susceptibility, the evidence for linkage increased. No evidence of linkage to GPT or ABO, both previously suggested to be linked to breast cancer susceptibility, was seen in this study.

Primary synchronous bilateral breast cancer: epidemiological approach

Twenty-eight (1.69%) cases of primary synchronous bilateral breast cancer (PSBC) out of 1,654 new cases were studied. PSBC compared with unilateral cases had a significantly higher (p less than 0.001) first degree family history of breast cancer; high frequency of subareolar location; no predominance of lobular and non-invasive types; no significantly different percentage of pathological stage I presentation. As there is no complete agreement on what constitutes a PSBC, studies should be carried out to formulate a more precise definition of this entity.

Estimating the age-at-onset function using life-table methods

In the analysis of dominantly inherited diseases, the age-at-onset function is often estimated from the observed age-at-onset distribution of cases. This estimate is confounded with the age distribution of the population from which the cases were sampled and is accurate only if there are no competing causes of death. In this paper, we present a straightforward method for calculating a more accurate age-at-onset function under etiologic heterogeneity. We use the life-table approach and survival analysis methods. This method is illustrated using data on first-degree relatives of probands from two sets of families with high cancer incidence: one with breast/ovarian cancer and the other with colon cancer. A comparison of the estimated age-at-onset function obtained by the two methods is presented. In both cases, colon cancer as well as breast/ovarian cancer, the estimates of onset probabilities based on proportion of cases, are consistently higher than those obtained by the life-table method. For breast/ovarian cancer, this difference is not as striking as it is in the case of colon cancer; nevertheless, the method using proportion of cases tends to give a lower estimate of the age-at-onset function (higher probability of being affected at lower age) than the life-table approach.