Male breast cancer: an 11 year review of 66 patients

Male breast cancer: a Singapore perspective

INTRODUCTION

Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, representing <1% of all breast cancers. Treatment recommendations have been extrapolated from trial data of female breast cancer patients. This study aims to report our institutional experience of MBC across a 20 year period, analyse the survival outcome and prognosis of this group against female breast cancer patients treated at the same centre.

METHODS

Clinical, histopathological, treatment and survival data of male and female breast cancer patients treated between Jan 1999 and July 2019 at Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore were identified and analysed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven male patients were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years. Majority had invasive ductal carcinoma (86%) and presented at an early disease stage: 70.2% presented as Tis/T1/T2 and 49.1% had no axillary nodal involvement. 84.2% had a simple mastectomy with either a sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary clearance. The median follow up was 5.69 years for males and 5.83 years for females. The median survival was 11.86 years for males and 16.3 years for females. At 5 years, overall survival (OS) was 69.9% (52.3-82.1%) and disease free survival (DFS) was 62.9% (44.9-76.5%) for males compared with OS 83.8% (83.21-84.39%) and DFS 74.5% (73.91-75.09%) for females.

CONCLUSION

MBC remains understudied. Our institutional data indicates that good long term survival in South-East Asian patients can be achieved with treatment protocols that are similar to female breast cancer. More prospective studies are required.

Male Breast Cancer: Current Trends-a Tertiary Care Centre Experience

Male breast cancer is a rare tumour in all parts of the world. About 1% of all breast cancers occur in men. Occurrence of male breast cancer peaks at age 71 years. Familial cases usually have BRCA2 rather than BRCA1 mutations. Presentation is usually a lump or nipple inversion, but is often late, with more than 40% of individuals having stage III or IV disease. We retrospectively reviewed 25 male patients with breast cancer who came to the HCG Cancer Centre, Ahmedabad between 2014 and 2018, and their demographic details, tumor profile, and radiological, histopathological as well as luminal profile findings were studied. The average age at presentation and detection of male breast cancer was 61.08 years. Incidence of male ca. breast over these 4 years was 4.75/year which had a significant increase compared with our own data in the last 8 years (3/year). Male to female ratio for ca. breast was 1:61. One out of 25 (4%) patients had gynaecomastia. The most common histology was invasive ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified with none of the patients having lobular carcinoma. Majority of patients were ER/PR positive and HER-2 negative. Male breast cancer is having a rising incidence, which in our study is 1.56%. Males have relatively older age at presentation and stage-by-stage treatment remains the same. Males are more likely to be having prognostically favourable luminal subtypes. Male breast cancer in Indian population is currently experiencing an increasing trend. Improved awareness amongst patients and high index of suspicion by the clinicians along with accurate diagnostic techniques help detect the disease at an earlier stage culminating into prolonged overall and disease-free survival.

Radiotherapy and Male Breast Cancer: A Population-based Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

The local-regional management of female breast cancer has been extensively investigated worldwide. The optimal approach for males diagnosed with breast cancer is less clear. We have analyzed the treatment of male breast cancer using a population-based national registry to determine the impact of surgery and radiation therapy on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried to identify males with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who underwent primary surgical resection (radical mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, or segmental) for the years 1983 to 2002. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic data were culled and analyzed to determine the impact of radiation therapy (RT) following resection. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and significance was determined using the log-rank test (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model was performed to determine factors significant for overall (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 1337 patients met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 1 mo to 25 y). Most men underwent modified radical mastectomy (n=1062) with a minority undergoing segmental (n=113). About 329 men received postoperative external beam RT. The median rates of OS and CSS for all men were 10.5 years and not yet reached, respectively. The surgical procedure did not significantly associate with OS or CSS. By stage, RT was associated with improved OS for stage I (P=0.03). There was a trend for improved survival with stage II (P=0.21) and III (P=0.15). RT was not associated with improved CSS by stage. RT improved rates of OS and CSS in N2 patients without reaching statistical significance (P=0.10 and 0.22). On multivariate analysis, advancing age, stage and grade, and no postoperative RT predicted for worse OS. However, when controlled for those with known hormone receptor status (n=978), only the factors of advancing age, stage, grade, and hormone receptor negativity predicted for worse OS. Advancing age, stage, and grade were the only predictors of CSS irrespective of the cohort analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary surgical procedure did not ultimately influence OS or CSS in this population-based registry of males with breast cancer. A statistically nonsignificant improvement with postoperative RT was observed in men with lymph node involvement, larger tumor size, or higher stage. When controlled for age, stage, and grade in multivariate analysis, postoperative RT predicted for improved OS but not CSS. These data suggest a beneficial effect of RT in the postoperative setting. A prospective study is necessary to further elucidate appropriate treatment strategies for men with breast cancer.

Male Breast Cancer in India: Series from a Cancer Research Centre

Male breast cancer (MBC) is an uncommon malignancy. The scarcity of cases has reduced the focus of research in this area as compared with female breast cancer. The incidence of breast cancer in males is slowly rising and it becomes important to study the biology of this uncommon illness. Aim of the present work was to study the clinico-pathological behaviour of male breast cancer at a cancer research institute in India. 18 cases of MBC were identified out of 1752 cases of breast cancer registered during a 10 year period. Clinical parameters and histopathological data were analysed. MBC comprised of 1.03 % of total breast cancer cases. Median age of presentation was 60 years. Most of the patients presented to us in advanced stage. Aggressive pattern of disease was recognised with high node positivity, more perineural spread and lymphovascular invasion. Most of the cases were positive for hormone receptors. Breast cancer is seen at a relatively early age in Indian males. Disease is aggressive in nature with high hormone receptor positivity.

Male breast cancer: risk factors, biology, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship

BACKGROUND

The causes, optimal treatments, and medical/psychosocial sequelae of breast cancer in men are poorly understood.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the English language literature was conducted to identify studies relevant to male breast cancer between 1987 and 2012 and including at least 20 patients. Searches were carried out on PubMed using the title terms 'male breast cancer' or 'male breast carcinoma'.

RESULTS

Relevant published data regarding risk factors, biological characteristics, presentation and prognosis, appropriate evaluation and treatment, and survivorship issues in male breast cancer patients are presented. BRCA2 mutations, age, conditions that alter the estrogen/androgen ratio, and radiation are proven risk factors. Disease biology is distinct in men, but diagnostic approaches and treatments for men are generally extrapolated from those in women due to inadequate research in men. Survivorship issues in men may include sexual and hormonal side-effects of endocrine therapies as well as unique psychosocial impacts of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to address gaps in knowledge pertaining to care of male breast cancer patients and survivors.

Prognostic indicators in male breast carcinoma

Twenty-nine male breast cancers (MBC) were studied to determine the relationship between expression of several prognostic factors and clinical outcome. Immunohistochemistry employing a labeled streptavidin-biotin method was used to detect the presence of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR), cathepsin D (CD), c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and p53; results were visually semiquantitated. DNA ploidy was evaluated by image analysis (CAS 200) of 5 μm fixed embedded Feulgenstained tissue sections. For proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), nuclear immunostain was quantitated as percentage positive nuclear area (PPNA) by image cytometry (CAS 200). The frequency of expression was ER, 26/29 (89.7%); PR, 19/29 (65.5%); CD, 25/29 (86.2%); c-erbB-2, 5/29 (17.2%); EGFR, 4/29 (13.8%); and p53, 9/29 (31%). Twenty-one (72.4%) were aneuploid; the mean PPNA for PCNA was 37.87% (control 13%). Of 20 patients, 10 (50%) MBC had lymph node metastases; 6 (21%) had distant metastases to lung (1) and bone (5). Five of the patients died of MBC. Excluding the patients with only ductal carcinoma in situ, the 1-and 5-year survival rates were 90.5% and 56.3%, respectively. In this comprehensive study of a large number of available prognostic markers, their frequency (with the exception of higher ER and CD) and prognostic significance were similar to that in female breast carcinoma. Among clinical and standard pathologic unfavorable prognostic indicators, age ≥ 62 years was significant (p = .004). Trends toward reduced survival were associated with axillary lymph node metastases (p = .145), ER negativity (p = .058), PR negativity (p = .116), and aneuploid DNA content (p = .201).

A case of HER2-positive male breast cancer with lung metastases showing a good response to trastuzumab and paclitaxel treatment

We present a case of advanced HER2-positive male breast cancer, which showed a good response to a combined treatment of trastuzumab and paclitaxel. A 78-year-old man was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma (T4d N3 M1, stage IV). He had advanced breast cancer consisting of multiple tumors with skin involvement and redness over the entire left chest region. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest revealed a metastatic tumor in the left lung. Histologically, both the primary breast cancer and the metastatic lung tumor were identified as invasive ductal carcinoma that was estrogen receptor-negative (ER)(-) and progesterone receptor-negative (PgR)(-), with a HER2 score of 3+ (IHC). The patient received a combination chemotherapy using trastuzumab and paclitaxel. Two months later, a follow-up chest CT scan showed that the left lung tumor had disappeared, suggesting a good response to trastuzumab and paclitaxel. During trastuzumab treatment, no severe adverse events above grade 3 were observed. This is the first reported case of advanced HER2-positive male breast cancer in which a good response to trastuzumab and paclitaxel was demonstrated at both primary breast cancer and metastatic sites.

Prognostic factors in node-negative male breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Male breast cancer has traditionally been compared with female breast cancer, using the same staging system and prognostic indicators. A variety of histochemical and pathologic factors commonly used in node-negative female breast cancer were applied to 18 node-negative male breast cancers to assess their relevance to survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A slide review was performed for nuclear grade, lymphocytic infiltration, and lymphatic and vascular invasion. Flow cytometry was available on all the specimens. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess p53, estrogen receptors (ERs), cathepsin D, Ki-67, and c-erbB-2 (HER2/neu). A clinical correlation was performed based on chart reviews and phone interviews, recording demographics, treatment, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The average age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 34-85 years). There were 15 T1 lesions, 2 T2 lesions, and 1 T3 lesion. All patients had a modified radical mastectomy. None received radiation therapy. The mean follow-up was 73 months. Three patients died of their disease (17.6%), 2 patients died from unrelated reasons, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and the other 12 patients are alive with no evidence of disease. The actuarial 5-year survival was 83%. Estrogen receptor and HER2/neu overexpression were significantly more predominant in male breast cancer than in female breast cancer. Estrogen receptor positivity was present in 17 of 18 patients and HER2/neu overexpression in 10 of 18. A positive ER status and overexpression of cathepsin or p53 were correlated with a better survival, but only ER (P = 0.026) and p53 (P = 0.023) reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In this study, ER status was the only commonly used prognostic marker for female breast cancer found to be applicable in node-negative male breast cancer.

Male patients with diagnoses of both breast cancer and prostate cancer

Recently cancer susceptibility syndromes have been characterized that suggest possible genetic linkages between breast cancer and prostate cancer within families. Despite these connections, male breast cancer and prostate cancer in an individual man has rarely been reported. The clinical features of 10 patients with both of these cancers are described here. One hundred sixty-one patients with male breast cancer were seen at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital between 1977 and 2000. Of these, 10 were identified who also had prostate cancer. A retrospective review of records from these 10 patients was performed. Breast cancer preceded prostate cancer in eight of these men. The mean age of diagnosis of breast cancer was 65.7 years (range 47-72 years). Twenty percent had nodal involvement at diagnosis and two patients ultimately developed evidence of metastatic disease. The mean age of diagnosis of prostate cancer was 68.0 years (range 51-76 years) with a median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis of 6 ng/ml (range 1.8-47.5 ng/ml). Seven patients had a family history of female breast cancer in a first-degree relative, while one had a family history of prostate cancer. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years from initial cancer diagnosis, one patient had died of metastatic breast cancer and another had died of metastatic prostate cancer. The clinical features and course of the breast cancers diagnosed in this series do not appear significantly different from those described for the general population of male breast cancer patients. In addition, these men do not appear to develop prostate cancer at an earlier age or more aggressive stage than the general population.

Racial/ethnic differences in survival rates in a population-based series of men with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A rare occurrence, about 1500 men in the United States develop breast carcinoma each year. Little is known about survival patterns at the population level, particularly about racial/ethnic variation.

METHODS

Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we examined survival rates in 1979 men diagnosed with primary invasive breast carcinoma between 1973 and 1997. Race was defined as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other race/ethnicity (predominantly Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic). The two outcomes were all-cause and breast carcinoma- specific mortality. Survival curves were drawn using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression was used to estimate the risk of death with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. For both outcomes, the racial/ethnic survival curves differed significantly when the log rank test was used. Therefore, separate models were run for each racial/ethnic group. Covariates included age, stage, histology, surgery, radiation therapy, and year of diagnosis. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status were available for 616 men.

RESULTS

Survival rates differed significantly by race/ethnicity. Overall, 5-year survival rates were 66% for whites, 57% for blacks, and 75% for men of other race/ethnicity. Blacks presented with more advanced disease. By stage, whites and blacks had worse survival rates compared with men of other race/ethnicity. The effects of prognostic factors such as age, surgery type, and radiation were similar, but not always significant, for all groups. Diagnosis year and estrogen receptor status did not affect survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival following male breast carcinoma differed by race/ethnicity, whereas the prognostic factors associated with survival were similar.

Clinical relevance of biologic factors in male breast cancer

There is ample information on the clinical role of biologic factors in female breast cancer: urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), its receptor uPAR, its inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2, cathepsin D and pS2-protein. However such reports are missing or very rare for male breast cancer. We determined the cytosolic levels of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), cathepsin D, pS2-protein, uPA, uPAR, PAI-1 and PAI-2 of the primary tumour tissues from 40 male breast cancer patients. The tumour levels were compared with those of 180 matched females and 4114 historic females with breast cancer. In male breast tumours the level of PgR was higher, those of uPA, PAI-1, PAI-2 and cathepsin D lower. The tumour level of ER in men was similar to those in the matched and postmenopausal women, but much higher than those in the historic women. Male breast cancer seems to be biologically different from female breast cancer. Correlation of the eight cell biologic factors with disease outcome showed that PAI-1 (p = 0.03) was the only independent predictive factor for poor prognosis in male breast cancer.

Prognostic Variables in Male Breast Cancer

The prognostic role of ploidy status, S phase fraction, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and the expression of p53 and erbB-2 protein in male breast carcinoma (MBC) remains controversial. The primary objective of this study was to determine which of the common prognostic factors for female breast cancer predict prognosis in MBC. A secondary objective was to assess the impact of comorbid illnesses on survival. A retrospective review of demographic data, surgical treatment, pathological staging, adjuvant treatment and follow-up was completed for 16 patients with MBC (1 intraductal and 15 invasive). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was processed for ploidy, S phase fraction, and immunohistochemical detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors plus expression of p53 and erbB-2 protein. Six of 15 patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma are currently alive without evidence of disease and a median survival of 61 months. Nine patients died after a median survival of 52 months, with 6 patients having no evidence of recurrent breast cancer. Two of 3 deaths secondary to advanced breast cancer occurred in patients who initially presented with T4 lesions and were staged IIIB. Two of 15 tumors were erbB-2 positive, whereas only 1 tested weakly positive for p53 protein. We observed that MBCs express erbB-2 and p53 proteins infrequently. Neither ploidy status, S phase fraction, nor erbB-2/ p53 status provided any apparent improvement in establishing prognosis beyond routine pathological staging. Advanced TNM stage was associated with diminished survival. The majority of MBCs express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Survivals in MBC were reduced in association with comorbid medical conditions.

Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955-1996

BACKGROUND

A single-institution review of clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of male breast carcinoma was conducted.

METHODS

Data obtained by chart review of 229 cases were analyzed with respect to clinical presentation, treatment choice, significant prognostic factors, and survival. The patients were analyzed both as a single cohort and as four cohorts grouped according to decade of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Presentation occurred at a median age of 63 years, most often with a self-detected lump. Pathology consisted of subtypes similar to those of female breast carcinoma. The majority of tumors were larger than 2 cm in greatest dimension. Lymph node status, hormone receptors, and histologic and nuclear grade were underreported. Primary, adjuvant, and advanced disease treatment practices were reviewed over time. The 5-year disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and local control were 47%, 53%, and 91%, respectively. No difference in outcome by decade of diagnosis was observed. Negative lymph nodes and adjuvant hormone treatment predicted for better DFS and OS. Younger age and Stage 0 also predicted for better OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with data from female breast carcinoma patients, 5-year OS for this series was low; however, when these patients were separated by lymph node status, survival was similar for those with axillary lymph node metastases. Despite a change in standard primary surgical treatment and an increased use of chemotherapy and hormone therapy over the study period, no difference in outcome was observed among these males. In the absence of prospective, randomized clinical trials, collection of comprehensive data on the presentation and management of male breast carcinoma may help to optimize clinical care.

Chromosome banding analysis of gynecomastias and breast carcinomas in men

Male breast cancer is 100 times less frequent than its female counterpart and accounts for less than 1% of all cancers in men. Although men with breast cancer also often have gynecomastia, it is still unknown whether gynecomastia per se predisposes the male breast to malignant disease. We describe the cytogenetic analysis of three gynecomastias and four breast cancers in men. No chromosome abnormalities were detected in two cases of gynecomastia, with no other concomitant breast disease. The third gynecomastia sample, taken from a site where a breast carcinoma had previously been removed, had a t(2;11)(p24;p13) as the sole chromosome change; this is the first time that an abnormal karyotype has been described in gynecomastia. All four cancers had clonal chromosome abnormalities. Several cytogenetically unrelated clones were found in the breast tumor and in a metastasis from case 1. In the carcinoma of case 2, a single abnormal clone was found, characterized by loss of the Y chromosome, monosomy 17, and a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 18. In the carcinoma of case 3, a clone with loss of the Y chromosome as the sole change dominated, accompanied by the gain of an X chromosome in a subclone. In the lymph node metastasis examined from case 4, a single clone carrying trisomies for chromosomes 5 and 16 was detected. Our findings, especially when collated with data on the six karyotypically abnormal breast carcinomas in men described previously, indicate that gain of the X chromosome, gain of chromosome 5, loss of the Y chromosome, loss of chromosome 17, and del(18)(q21) are nonrandom abnormalities in male breast carcinomas.